tell me about homosocial pilot culture tho
At the mo I’m very interested in how early twentieth century air forces constructed their own cultures, because other military service branches all have centuries if not millennia of precedent: the class hierarchy of the Royal Navy, for example, not only dictated (and to an extent still continues to dictate) how ships ran and battle worked, but also established behaviours, traditions, and social norms that carry on to the present. Most air forces are all barely a century old, if that, and flying quickly became a very separate occupation from land- or sea-based soldiering (it’s a profoundly different kind of combat, often involves working from an established ‘home base’ behind the far more uncomfortable front line, etc.).
My theory is that most air forces were established in cultures beginning to overhaul their imperial class systems, and consequently military aviation built itself upon a sort of perceived chivalric egalitarianism. Class did heavily influence air force cultures - most of the people who could fly planes pre-war were upper-class, so they were often the first to sign up and got first dibs on shaping their squadrons - but the lack of class requirements/precedent to enlist as a pilot meant that a lot of working- and middle-class men ended up as included members of squadrons that were starting to look like aristocratic boys’ clubs. As such, a lot of gendered behaviour in these pretty much all-male spaces took its cue from essentially early twentieth century Etonian-or-equivalent wankers. Read: very homosocial, often encouraging strong same-sex bonds, emphasis on athleticism, etc.
I’ll use the Lafayette Escadrille as an example, they gurgled softly: elite flying squadron founded by Harvard and Yale grads, who were the first Americans to volunteer, disproportionate amount of Ivy Leaguers, this is why they got a lot of media attention and why their legacy developed as it has (and why not-obviously-American non-upper-class pilots like Lufbery and Bert Hall were often entirely ignored/completely reinvented in this image in the American press and history books; in the US Air Service, working-class Rickenbacker conformed to this culture, so it was different). In the press, these guys were portrayed as ‘pure’ (sexually and like, also literally not covered in mud) chivalrous elites with an emphasis on ‘the profound bond of the sky’ that they shared even with enemy aviators, who were consistently portrayed more sympathetically than enemy ground forces. The press, esp the pre-1917 American press, were fucking killing it with this Clean Masculine Romantic Hero For A Modern Age Knights Of The Sky shit. Obviously this was not what combat was like but the Escadrille guys did absolutely read their coverage and were certainly influenced by it, even if they thought it was hilarious and got a kick out of making shit up for reporters. Read any World War I-era newspaper in a country with an air force, though, and you will get this similar image of the Male Pilot emerging, the most obvious/international example being von Richtofen.
So that is popular construction of air force culture, if you will (popular constructions and stereotypes are important even though they’re inaccurate! The people they are about know about them). Then in practice, you get my other Crazy Theory that because air force men fight alone in combat and are physically removed from the people they kill, they depend more upon physical intimacy with their comrades on the ground to manage trauma.
World War I-era masculine culture is markedly different from World War II as it is (Paul Fussell writes in detail about why; essentially World War II-era is much more macho and no-homo bro across the board for a variety of reasons not least the Great Depression hard times austerity suck it up yo/traumatised WWI vets trying to reclaim their masculinity dads). If you look at photos of any military group in World War I, you’re far more likely to see men with arms around each other’s necks and waists, hands on thighs, sitting in each other’s laps, a lot of physical relationships that today (in part thanks to WWII masculinity eyyyy) would look fairly gay. In most air forces, this gets exaggerated thanks to a lot of downtime, an imposed ‘boys’ club’ culture, and (sounds weird but hear me out) highest exposure to women, children, and civilian life, which both reasserts personal senses of masculinity and creates a very present mental divide between real people and fighting comrades. Using the Escadrille/the 94th Aero Squadron as examples again because that’s what I’ve read most of, pilots use romantic language to refer to one another in their letters and mention holding hands in their memoirs, there’s footage of Thenault and Lufbery (who were different ranks so this is interesting to me) strolling around with arms around each other’s waists, Thaw and Prince and a few years later Rickenbacker and another pilot standing around chatting with their arms linked, the American pilots quickly adopting la bise, Jimmy Hall talking pretty explicitly about the ‘flying bond’ he feels with the friend he joined the Escadrille with (though Jimmy Hall ran away to the Caribbean with another pilot for several decades wahey so take that with a grain of salt).
in conclusion obviously the first onscreen same-sex kiss was WWI pilots ‘homosocial’ more like homo as fuck