some foxes

No title available
Xuebing Du
almost home
Cosimo Galluzzi
trying on a metaphor

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Today's Document

pixel skylines
cherry valley forever
d e v o n

Andulka

Kaledo Art

shark vs the universe
AnasAbdin
Three Goblin Art
Cosmic Funnies
will byers stan first human second
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Misplaced Lens Cap
$LAYYYTER
seen from Chile

seen from Thailand
seen from Iraq

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Canada

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
@mintandmorecolor
some foxes
I made an X-Files version of Clue and you will all be pleased to know that “A Perfectly Reasonable Scientific Explanation” is an option, but has so far never been the correct solution to the X-File.
Seven Things the Movies Forgot About Hermione
In the original books, Hermione was a clever, kick-ass character made highly relatable by her imperfections. The movies erased most of her flaws, making her a better ‘role model for girls’, but a far less interesting person: a typical weakly written strong woman. So here are a few things we should remember about Hermione:
1. She is an outsider. Just like Harry, she is often clueless about the unspoken rules of wizarding society, but unlike Harry she has no illustrious parentage and pretty green eyes to compensate for it. This goes beyond the blatant racism she is shown for her muggle-born status, and means that assimilation is a constant conscious struggle for her.
2. She has bad social skills. She is a good friend, but not always good company. Hermione isn’t called a know-it-all just because smart girls tend to be bullied, she is a know-it-all. She can sometimes ‘manage’ people when she tries, but when she doesn’t pay attention she is often blunt and tactless. She alternates between showing off her knowledge and assuming everybody knows what she knows, and she talks a lot about things only she is interested in. Remember how she introduces herself to Harry – it is far more awkward than cute, and she doesn’t outgrow it entirely. I know that opinionated women are often put down for opening their mouths, but Hermione is a more interesting character for having moments where she is genuinely grating and arrogant.
3. She is authoritarian. She has a worrying authoritarian streak, repeatedly choosing the rules over her friends in the first few books, such as the time when she lets Harry’s new Firebolt be confiscated. She was still unwilling to disobey an instruction in a textbook in book six, when she had already organised resistance against Umbridge and broken into the Department of Mysteries. This of course means that every time she chooses to break a rule is emphatically more awesome. When she perceives herself to be in a position of authority, she expects the same obedience from other people. She often makes decisions for people, speaks over them. Sometimes this is a positive trait, her friends often ask her to do their homework for them, and the planning she does for DA actually pays off. But she often assumes – that Harry’s broomstick is cursed, that house-elves want freedom, that Trelawney is a fraud. One of the most interesting aspects of her character development is outgrowing this to learn to break rules and actually listen to people.
4. She has a habit of obsessively focusing on things. Again, sometimes this is productive, such as when she takes off to the library for hours and comes back with a solution, but sometimes it is silly like her crush on Lockhart or harmful like the entire S.P.E.W. fiasco. Combined with her monologues, her hit-and-miss social skills and her adherence to rules, I am surprised the internet isn’t flooded with headcanons that put her somewhere on the autistic spectrum.
5. She is not pretty. I know that casting couldn’t predict Emma Watson growing up to be model-gorgeous, but I remember watching 11-year-old Hermione and already thinking she looks far too polished. It’s not that book Hermione is ugly, it’s just that she puts no effort into her looks. The point of the ball room scene is that she proves to herself that she is capable of presenting traditionally feminine and attractive if she tries really-really hard, not that she has always been beautiful without trying. Her unprettiness was actually one of the factors that made her so relatable, and while I didn’t expect the movies to actively make her ugly, they could have just at least chosen less flattering clothes and put slightly less product in her hair.
6. She has fears. She is extremely brave, but she is still human, and there are moments when she loses control. She panics when the Devil’s Snare attacks her, and Ron has to snap her out of it. She shows visible fear when faced with hippogriffs, with centaurs, with Grawp, and one time she fails to defeat a boggart. She is afraid of flying, and as a result she isn’t simply uninterested in quidditch, she actively sucks at it, but still gets onto a hippogriff, a thestral and a dragon. She is all right at Defense and duelling, but despite all her work lacks Harry’s raw talent. This doesn’t make her weak – a perfectly brave person is much less motivational than a person who is terrified but does her best.
7. She has a near-pathological fear of failure. This is partly due to her outsider status, partly her personality, but she is a nervous wreck and an overachiever. One of the first things she says is that she knows all textbooks by heart and hopes it will be enough. This isn’t mere intellectual curiosity, this is sheer fucking terror. She isn’t that smart merely because she’s gifted, but because she relentlessly overworks herself. In the third books she uses time-travel to get to all of her classes, and she spends most of the book looking half-dead with exhaustion. She is often described as frazzled or otherwise nervous, and for god’s sake, her boggart is a failed test! Again, she starts to grow out of this around book five, but it still remains a part of who she is. In the case of movie Hermione, her fear gets minimised into a generic smart-girl personality.
Hermione is awesome, but the more perfect she is the less she has to do with us, smart unpretty girls looking for someone to relate to. Or just people in general, looking for someone to relate to. Let the movies keep their superhuman super-clever Hermione who stares danger in the face but is upset that her hair looks bad from behind. I want book Hermione, a girl with flaws, a woman with issues who has to work and learn in order to overcome her inadequacies and become the good friend and great witch she is.
S/o to this officer
Salute a real nigga.
Shoutout to officers who still know what “protect and serve” means.
French Bulldog argues bedtime
I AM TOO FILTHY TO WATCH SOMETHING AS PURE AS THIS
now THIS is good content if i’ve ever seen it
Because there seems to be a lot of confusion on the subject.
A while back I was asked by someone who has read this site for about 2 years why I do not post any works by the Philadelphia Mural Arts Program any more. I chose to keep the reasons for this private, as I did not want to start any kind of trouble. However, I feel this is something that crosses some sort of line.
Pictured here is the much publicized new project from the Mural Arts Program. I don’t know the official name of it, nor do I care to learn it. What it is, however, is an expansive public art project along Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor. This stretch of railway is legendary amongst graffiti writers from both Philadelphia and elsewhere over the span of decades. Names from the past such as ESPO, REVS, NEKST from the past, and current heavy-hitters such as GANE, TEXAS, Derm, Bard, SZ, and many others are feature along this stretch. This particular stretch I took pictures of covers up huge rollers from Drama and TIBET, as well as a fill-in from SKREW. It is a pivotal stretch of outstanding graffiti, which regardless of one’s view on it, is a part of this city’s history and culture. Almost overnight, Mural Arts Program erased decades of history with this project, which frankly doesn’t look that great to my set of eyes. I’m not here to debate whether this is art or not, I’m just gonna call it what it is: an organized buff job of graffiti history.
Ultimately, this is why I take issue with Mural Arts Program: I find much of what is done here to be hypocritical. While working tirelessly to gain acceptance from the street art and graffiti community, Mural Arts Program does things behind the scenes to undercut it. Most graffiti writers, believe it or not, leave the murals alone, and write on other walls in the city. In many ways, this will be treated and looked at as a diss, which means it will likely be written on.
Like it or hate it, that’s up to you and what you personally feel as appropriate. I believe that this is artists disrespecting other artists, and reflects a bigger issue of a city-sponsored entity playing “art god” and buffing graffiti through shady back-handed ways.
Interesting commentary from the always interesting
loladelphia
Losing art to make art- painful
A while back I was asked by someone who has read this site for about 2 years why I do not post any works by the Philadelphia Mural Arts Program any more. I chose to keep the reasons for this private, as I did not want to start any kind of trouble. However, I feel this is something that crosses some sort of line.
Pictured here is the much publicized new project from the Mural Arts Program. I don’t know the official name of it, nor do I care to learn it. What it is, however, is an expansive public art project along Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor. This stretch of railway is legendary amongst graffiti writers from both Philadelphia and elsewhere over the span of decades. Names from the past such as ESPO, REVS, NEKST from the past, and current heavy-hitters such as GANE, TEXAS, Derm, Bard, SZ, and many others are feature along this stretch. This particular stretch I took pictures of covers up huge rollers from Drama and TIBET, as well as a fill-in from SKREW. It is a pivotal stretch of outstanding graffiti, which regardless of one’s view on it, is a part of this city’s history and culture. Almost overnight, Mural Arts Program erased decades of history with this project, which frankly doesn’t look that great to my set of eyes. I’m not here to debate whether this is art or not, I’m just gonna call it what it is: an organized buff job of graffiti history.
Ultimately, this is why I take issue with Mural Arts Program: I find much of what is done here to be hypocritical. While working tirelessly to gain acceptance from the street art and graffiti community, Mural Arts Program does things behind the scenes to undercut it. Most graffiti writers, believe it or not, leave the murals alone, and write on other walls in the city. In many ways, this will be treated and looked at as a diss, which means it will likely be written on.
Like it or hate it, that’s up to you and what you personally feel as appropriate. I believe that this is artists disrespecting other artists, and reflects a bigger issue of a city-sponsored entity playing “art god” and buffing graffiti through shady back-handed ways.
Interesting commentary from the always interesting
loladelphia
Losing art to make art- painful
Yellow, yellow. Blue, blue.
http://www.nps.gov/jame/historyculture/what-happened-to-the-three-ships.htm