chinese crab apple flowers (haitang海棠) by 砚冰-Yanbing
styofa doing anything
wallacepolsom

blake kathryn
todays bird
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Stranger Things
No title available
Game of Thrones Daily

Janaina Medeiros

JVL

oozey mess

shark vs the universe

JBB: An Artblog!
No title available
🪼
$LAYYYTER
ojovivo
Show & Tell

Product Placement
Peter Solarz
seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Israel

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Finland

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye
seen from Japan

seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye
seen from Malaysia
seen from Saudi Arabia
@misandricsappho
chinese crab apple flowers (haitang海棠) by 砚冰-Yanbing
I'll try to keep this as brief as possible 🤐
Because of a rare genetic disorder that causes digestive enzymes to be activated prematurely in my pancreas, it had to be fully removed a few months ago due to it literally shrivelling up and dying. This has left me with brittle diabetes, nutrient absorption issues, and bowel issues that are all difficult to control. Now I've learnt that the pancreatectomy incision has caused a large hernia along the scar line. I'm on the urgent priority list for correction surgery, but I haven't been able to work much since my pancreatectomy due to the issues it's caused, and severe nerve pain. I'm 26 and single and having to look after myself, but I really need extra help as I wait for my next surgery. If you can spare any money at all, my paypal is [email protected] and if it's not possible, that's fine ♡ please consider reblogging this post!
new fav trend
Some dumb guy trying to make Sigourney Weaver seem more attractive for a movie:
A very smart man who definitely consulted a lesbian:
ahehehehe!! Weeeeeeeeee!!! ^w^ *holding your hand and skipping with you as we are hunted for sport*
Utah Macy’s really knows how to cater to their market.
Perfect for someone with three, perhaps weed smoking, girlfriends
@ radfems who sunk their identity into being a lesbian then immediately fell in love with a trans man: youre literally allowed to be bisexual, you dont have to go full fascist.
reblogging again cause I think I put that eloquently enough in the comments
Why are ‘trans men’ men tho?
because they identify as men. end of.
So self-identity is powerful enough to override material reality of your sex?
So that means that if I, an AFAB individual, identify as a trans woman, then I’m a bona fide trans woman?
porn obsessed grown adult men are harassing billie eilish for criticizing the porn industry and for talking about how young she was exposed to it and the effects it had on her body image and perception of sex. when she was first in the spotlight, porn obsessed men made deepfakes of her and oversexualized her as a minor, and now theyre harassing her for speaking out against it but this time theyre calling themselves "pro-sex work feminists"
Why I dont take anything a scrote talking about how “stacked” a minor is seriously at all
coombrains arent even sentient beings
radfems will see a licensed surgeon remove a glob of useless fat from the chest of a consenting adult resulting in thin, pale scar and call it mutilation
the purpose of breasts is the feed infants and you honestly think there’s nothing under the skin except fat? clearly biology class has failed you so here’s a free lesson:
Firstly, breasts are not useless and having them removed results in chronic pain for around 30-60% of women. This is not just the pain of recovery, this is damage that can be, and often is, permanent. It is quite risky and when it is done cosmetically as a reaction to living in an extremely sexist/homophobic society, that is a feminist issue.
But secondly, uteruses are absolutely not useless. They are extremely important to your health. There are so many negative side effects to having it removed because it is there for many reasons beyond growing babies. The fact that you seemingly don’t know this is just depressing. The way you see female anatomy as useless if it is not being used to reproduce is depressing.
You also seemingly think that plastic surgeons know best as if rich old men are paragons of morality who would never exploit anyone.
This is just more proof that TRAs see our bodies as useless if we don't have babies.
My breasts, my vagina, my uterus, my vulva, my hips and every other part of my body is useful and belongs on my body, regardless of what I do with my body. My body producing estrogen and progesterone help my skin, my moods, keeps my bones healthy and even keeps my cholesterol in check.
Gotta love how they will call us bioessentialist for saying "women don't have penises" and then will advocate women cut off/out body parts that aren't being used for babies actively because "what else would be the point?"
Bless him. I hope he’s well.
The timestamp shows that this has been going on for a while. Think, too, about how much longer lesbians were hearing this before gay men
It should make you shudder
@ radfems who sunk their identity into being a lesbian then immediately fell in love with a trans man: youre literally allowed to be bisexual, you dont have to go full fascist.
reblogging again cause I think I put that eloquently enough in the comments
Why are ‘trans men’ men tho?
It’s crazy how the women’s march was allowed to last one single year as a womens march. 2016 was all “pussy grabs back” and pussy hats and reproductive rights and then there was an immediate backlash about so called “white feminists” and how the womens march wasn’t ~intersectional enough~ and then in 2017 I was working in the city centre close to the main street where all the womens march stuff was happening so I thought I’d check it out after work and it was essentially all trans flags and fucking furries. No pussy hats in sight, a few posters about how feminism is for ~everyone~, but that’s basically it on the feminism front. The backlash to feminism after the 2016 womens marches was so severe. It showed lots of women had actually started to gain class consciousness and everybody panicked bc suddenly the rise in popularity of feminism was starting to seem like a credible threat to the status quo rather than a fad that mostly existed on tumblr and H&M slogan tees
This is literally disgusting I don’t care how many men and women out there think this is cute or romantic. It is NEITHER. He is showing off his power and the imbalance between their relationship, I don’t care how consensual she says it is a woman should have the PAIN FREE RIGHT to take off any ring she wants.
Their relationship is also so glamorised by the media and seen by the masses. What does this fucking tell our young girls??? That is okay if a man does this to you it’s fine it shows your commitment and devotion even if it brings you pain
Fuck this shit can we stop acting like they are couple of the century
Yo this ring is literally magnetic, it comes apart easily. Machine Gun Kelly is just an idiot edgelord. Please look further into shit before spreading false information. MGK is still gross for saying that shit, but it doesn't change the ring's actual design. "Thorn" is basically a design line for Stephen Webster.
(x)
the above image says it all.
the actual designer has confirmed that yes, “thorns” have been used in designs for many, many years. the designer ALSO confirms that it can hurt, if it’s taken off a certain way.
it’s 100% possible that the same thing can be said of ALL the “thorn” rings webster offers. maybe all of them hurt if not taken off the right way.
but it’s not exactly misinformation though, because it’s very clear that by his own admittance, this ring was chosen for it’s ABILITY TO HURT HER. meaning that she will most likely be purposely removing the ring as a whole instead of it’s magnetized parts, leading her to experience the sting of the “thorn” as it rakes across her knuckles.
he’s expecting her to remove it in the most painful way possible even though she could remove it pain free using the magnets. that’s the point. that she’s “choosing” to hurt herself for “love” to remind her of him.
it’s a BDSM relationship. did yall forget that?
i don’t have the money for a real webster obvs, but even my moms avon ripoff magnetized thorn style rings do the same. if they are not taken off in two parts, they’ll shred your knuckles depending on how often you’re removing it off your finger incorrectly, and how much force you’re using to do so.
this is very clearly a man admitting that he likes his partner in pain. i don’t give a fuck if it’s a magnetized ring. from everything that we have already seen and read and literally HEARD these two say, i am 100% sure that the ring is not being taken off in a way that would be pain free, especially since THE DESIGNER was quoted as saying: “after all, there is a fine line between pleasure and pain” — that is an admittance that the goal of this particular ring was purposely made to dance between that fine line (which, by the way, is not actually a fine line to radical feminists) which is why this is being called abusive despite its inclusion of magnets.
Nicole Simpson knew someday her husband would kill her. She’d told many people, including her sister, Denise, that he’d kill her and get away with it. In fact, you can take a battered woman’s knowledge of her abuser’s capacity to inflict harm and evade consequences to the bank.
But five days before Nicole Simpson was murdered, she knew, for sure, she would die. How? Why? Something had happened: a confrontation, a threatening phone call, an unwanted visit, an aggressive act from Simpson directed at her. She told no one, because, after seventeen years of torment, she knew there was no one to tell. The police virtually everywhere ignore assault against women by their male intimates, so that any husband can be a brutal cop with tacit state protection; in Los Angeles, the police visited Nicole Simpson’s abuser at home as fans.
Remember the video showing Simpson, after the ballet recital, with the Brown family—introduced by the defense to show Simpson’s pleasant demeanor. Hours later, Nicole Simpson was dead. In the video, she is as far from Simpson, physically, as she can manage. He does not nod or gesture to her. He kisses her mother, embraces and kisses her sister, and bear-hugs her father. They all reciprocate. She must have been the loneliest woman in the world. What would Nicole Simpson have had to do to be safe? Go underground, change her appearance and identity, get cash without leaving a trail, take her children and run—all within days of her call to the shelter. She would have had to end all communication with family and friends, without explanation, for years, as well as leave her home and everything familiar.
With this abuser’s wealth and power, he would have had her hunted down; a dream team of lawyers would have taken her children from her. She would have been the villain—reckless, a slut, reviled for stealing the children of a hero. If his abuse of her is of no consequence now that she’s been murdered, how irrelevant would it have been as she, resourceless, tried to make a court and the public understand that she needed to run for her life?
Nicole Simpson knew she couldn’t prevail, and she didn’t try. Instead of running, she did what the therapists said: be firm, draw a line. So she drew the sort of line they meant: he could come to the recital but not sit with her or go to dinner with her family—a line that was no defense against death. Believing he would kill her, she did what most battered women do: kept up the appearance of normality. There was no equal justice for her, no self-defense she felt entitled to. Society had already left her to die.
On the same day the police who beat Rodney G. King were acquitted in Simi Valley, a white husband who had raped, beaten, and tortured his wife, also white, was acquitted of marital rape in South Carolina. He had kept her tied to a bed for hours, her mouth gagged with adhesive tape. He videotaped a half hour of her ordeal, during which he cut her breasts with a knife. The jury, which saw the videotape, had eight women on it. Asked why they acquitted, they said he needed help. They looked right through the victim— afraid to recognize any part of themselves, shamed by her violation. There were no riots afterward.
The governing reality for women of all races is that there is no escape from male violence, because it is inside and outside, intimate and predatory.
While race-hate has been expressed through forced segregation, woman-hate is expressed through forced closeness, which makes punishment swift, easy, and sure. In private, women often empathize with one another, across race and class, because their experiences with men are so much the same. But in public, including on juries, women rarely dare. For this reason, no matter how many women are battered—no matter how many football stadiums battered women could fill on any given day—each one is alone.
Surrounded by family, friends, and a community of affluent acquaintances, Nicole Simpson was alone. Having turned to police, prosecutors, victims aid, therapists, and a women’s shelter, she was still alone. Ronald L. Goldman may have been the only person in seventeen years with the courage to try to intervene physically in an attack on her; and he’s dead, killed by the same hand that killed her, an expensively gloved, extra-large hand.
Though the legal system has mostly consoled and protected batterers, when a woman is being beaten, it’s the batterer who has to be stopped; as Malcolm X used to say, “by any means necessary”—a principle women, all women, had better learn. A woman has a right to her own bed, a home she can’t be thrown out of, and for her body not to be ransacked and broken into. She has a right to safe refuge, to expect her family and friends to stop the batterer— by law or force—before she’s dead. She has a constitutional right to a gun and a legal right to kill if she believes she’s going to be killed. And a batterer’s repeated assaults should lawfully be taken as intent to kill.
Everybody’s against wife abuse, but who’s prepared to stop it?
Andrea Dworkin, In Memory of Nicole Brown Simpson
Trans teens bored thoughts:
A common argument I see amongst transphobes is that “if you hate your body that much you need therapy not to transition-“ etc etc..
To be clear, I don’t necessarily hate my body. It does it’s job and does it the best it can..however there are parts of it that I feel a strong disconnect to, and that disconnect to those parts causes me genuine distress and discomfort. They’re not meant to be there. I don’t want them.
I want to medically transition because I love my body, And I want to be able to see it, and think “yes that’s me.”
I deserve the body I see in my mind.
This isn’t how I’d describe my dysphoria..but that’s for another post
this requires the same response though. those body parts shouldn't be causing you extreme distress and discomfort. they are meant to be there. if you look at parts of your body and think of them as not part of you, that needs therapy
Did I not say to not be a transphobe on this post? Shut the fuck up. Shut. Up. I won’t even dignify your stupid ass argument with a serious response. Shut up. You don’t understand and it’s not my job to educate you. Shut up. Transitioning is a valid god damned form of dealing with dysphoria so shut up.
You invited a discussion, writing an argument to your “terf” intellectual opponent against their views of dysphoria, and then grew pissy when they responded in turn. Telling your opinion to “shut the fuck up” when you opened the conversation in the first place doesn’t put you in a good light.