Advertising on Insecurities: Fair & Lovely vs. Dark is Beautiful
The pervasive thought that fairer or whiter skin is more appealing or beautiful stem back to the Aryan invasion of India, which happen in the first and second centuries BC. This incredibly long history of desire to be fairer and prejudice against darker skin has been maintained for centuries due to the caste system and British control of India. Creating a product to change one’s natural appearance is an incredibly difficult and complex issue. On one hand, if this is something that an individual feels like they want to do in order to make themselves feel better, they should do it. On the other (and more important) hand, marketing products that change user’s appearance in a way that makes the individual feel bad about their natural features is shameful and should not be so prevalent in the global society today. The skin whitening industry in India is massive. Of the entire skin care industry that was a billion dollars in 2014, about half of the industry was focused on skin whitening and lighteners ($454 million). That is an incredibly high portion of the industry that is focused on changing one’s skin color. Advertising on other insecurities that are propagating the root issue of appearance is prevalent in every country in the world, not just India.
Targeting Insecurities Examples in America
Skims and Spanx - the Kardashian/Jenner family represent the obsession in the U.S. with having impossible human measurements (small waist but larger other areas) and flawless features (attained with plastic surgery and fillers). Not to mention pervasive photo shopping and presence on social media. The skims and spanx product depends on women wanting to appear skinnier or slimmer in their clothes. While this is a more tame example of wanting to change physical features, this product is still marketed in a way that plays on insecurities and seems to provide a “solution” for acquiring a flat tummy or desirable curves. While I have purchased a pair of spanx, I can honestly say that it is a temporarily fix on a ever present body image issue.Â
FitTea - this brand of tea is advertised mainly through social media influencers and is often posted by women in men with their chiseled abs showing alongside some (probably false) claim by the influencer that they drink the tea multiple times a day and it was really the thing that sparked their weight loss or figure maintaining. In reality, it has been shown that these influencers do not actually drink fit tea and that those who do drink fit tea suffer from a lot of really harmful side effects. The biggest voice against Fit Tea was actress Jameela Jamil who called out the fit tea industry and brought to light the scandal of marketing a product toward insecurities of the consumer.
A Good Example of Body Positivity Advertising
To close this post about the dangers of advertising on insecurities and the ethically shameful consequences of pushing a certain standard of beauty, I want to introduce a brand that I believe is doing the right thing. Megababe is a beauty brand that offers products from deodorant to their renowned product “thigh rescue” that is an anti-chafe balm that is catered to women and men whose thighs rub together when they run or walk. The founder of Megababe, Katie Sturino, has made strides as a founder but also as an advocate for inclusive sizing and speaking out about negative self talk. Katie has a large following on social media and uses her influence to call out companies who are using predatory body-insecurity advertising tactics alongside clothing companies who do not provide inclusive sizing with her hashtag #makemysize. While not every company has to cater to a cause, advertising should not be predatory.Â










