Female Logic

[rapistswillbeshot]

"…No matter how many Americans are murdered every year, and no matter how many times we say we ‘could just kill that guy,’ we don’t talk of ‘murder culture.’ We talk of ‘gun culture.’ Accordingly, when we talk about rape, we should rage not against ‘rape culture’ but against ‘dick culture.’

When...

[more-female-logic]

"The inordinate pride men feel in owning and wielding their dicks. The idiotic contests they hold to see whose dick is more powerful, can shoot off harder, go farther"

This literally has never happened.

[faerie-gardens]

All of these “women against feminism” and “against feminism pro human rights” blogs are making me want to blow my fucking brains out.

FEMINISM DOES NOT MEAN YOU HATE MEN. FEMINISM IS LITERALLY SUPPORTING EQUAL RIGHTS BETWEEN THE GENDERS.

[more-female-logic]

But women already have equal rights. So what's feminism's point again? Female supremacy

[thatfembitch]

sometimes i just sit down at laugh at the fact that some people actually believe that sexism against males exists.

[more-female-logic]

Sexism against women: Someone honked a horn when I was walking around outside

Sexism against men: drafted into a war and killed

[scratchdoc]

I would say I’m a Mens’ Rights Activist, and I noticed that our men with two X chromosomes don’t seem to have all of their rights.

[more-female-logic]

Isn't that because someone with two X chromosomes is a woman, not a man?

[disposablelimbs-deactivated2017]

I’ve noticed lately a lot of people who identify as feminists are standing up for the song blurred lines, claiming, “It’s not offensive” etc.

Here’s the thing, if you like it and are not offended by it, well fine, I’m not going to sit here and tell you what music to listen to and what not to...

[more-female-logic]

By that logic, I could say photos of hands are offensive to me. Thus someone walking around without gloves on is triggering me and erasing my experiences

Female logic

[evennifitkillsme-blog]

It’s getting late for me

[more-female-logic]

How would a man's masculinity be dependent on a woman's femininity.. in say, a gay relationship?

Good luck explaining that

[tatorstot]

ok so for english class i made a documentary about how most women are negatively portrayed in media…what should i call it?

definition of beautiful

no brains, just bodies

unrealistic expectations

help???

[more-female-logic]

My Delusional English Project

[roqueofspades]

okay so I am very very angry over this Martin Freeman rape joke thing.

There’s a very specific feeling that you get when you find out that a celebrity you love is a horrible person. Now, this isn’t nearly as bad as that time with Jimmy Page, but I won’t even go there for the moment. Anyway, there...

[more-female-logic]

"Because murder isn’t really that much of an issue"

lol. just lol.

"And it’s ridiculously common: one in every four women in the United States will be sexually assaulted in her lifetime."

[Citation Needed]

[aimchatroom]

ugh

[more-female-logic]

That's silly, a whore charges for her service.

The correct term would be slut.

[beyonceprivilege-deactivated201]

[beyonceprivilege-deactivated201]

[chopped for length]

1) "What does it being unpublished have to do with its validity? Really grasping at straws now." Translation: I’m claiming it as valid even though I haven’t seen it, and think that accusing you of grasping at straws for asking me about my sources will actually work to make you look silly instead of making me look pathetic and desperate. 2) “Once someone makes an accusation, there’s two outcomes; true and false. If it’s not true, then it is, by default, false.” Have I told you how cute your efforts are? It is possible to not have anything conclusive either way. You’d need to PROVE something true in order for it to not be false, and you need to PROVE something false in order for it to not be true. “I can’t tell” is neither. 3) “since we don’t have cameras following everyone around all the time, there’s no way to prove that it really didn’t happen.” Yes, that’s how crimes are investigated. With video evidence and nothing else ever. So if someone says, “Hey my neighbor robbed me, I know it was him because I saw his face clearly, and he broke my door down at such and such time when he thought I wasn’t home”, and it turns out the neighbor was out the country, the door is not broken, and the accuser was actually at work as verified by their coworkers at the time, then how is that NOT proving the claim false? 4) “It’s the accuser’s job to prove that the crime happened. If the evidence isn’t there (which for a violent crime, such as a rape, will obviously be there) then the crime simply did not happen.” Getting even cuter! Innocent until proven guilty is the standard for court, not tumblr. Finding someone legally not guilty doesn’t mean they never actually did anything. A verdict doesn’t change facts. 5) “Nice “hypothetical” situation that doesn’t actually happen in reality.” It’s funny because the person you tried to claim as a source, Fairstein? Accused of coercing several men into falsely confessing to rape. Their convictions were overturned (and before you try to get clever, a rape HAD occurred… they just weren’t the ones guilty of it). Wipe that sweat off your brow son, I can see you really tried. Failed, but tried. 6) “"but estimates on the rate of underreporting are actually based on research" [Citation Needed]. Someone says they were raped, put themselves at risk for developing HIV, hepatitis, and various other diseases and doesn’t go to the police, but would happily 3admit to some flawed, unproven survey. “ A citation was given within the text. Sorry, I don’t take your opinion seriously on “flawed” and “unproven” when you think not pressing charges stops a rape from ever having occurred and will cite sources you can’t even find. You clearly don’t understand STIs (hint: they don’t go away just because you got them through rape and actually reported that rape, and it is actually possible to see a doctor and lie about unprotected sex or something).

But let me tell you something, kiddo: Sometimes it’s the rapists who admit to raping but not being charged! Can you believe it? (Lisak 2002. The study is easy to find but I’ll let you look it up based just on this info to see if you can. But not to worry, lazybones, here’s another source: http://sapac.umich.edu/article/196). 7) “Of course you can’t charge someone, but you can take a claim, be unable to prove it, and then.. wow, would you look at that, it becomes a false accusation! “ Sweetheart, please. Your flawed logic has already been rejected, and trying to get out of admitting it by screaming about “hypothetical that would never happen” when it um, has, doesn’t actually distract from that. 8) “Your 8% myth is brought on by the fact that unless the police are given a recanted statement, it doesn’t actually get marked as “false”.” Nope. Read the source, stop embarrassing yourself. 9) “ Even though logical (See: Kanin) people would realize that a claim is either true or false, and if the claim isn’t marked as true, then it’s false.” Sure, something is either true or false. But if you cannot prove it as true, then you don’t get to claim it as false without proving it is. If we’re going by your logic, why can’t we flip it around? Can’t prove it’s false, then it’s absolutely true. Ah right, flipping it would be incovenient for you which is why you’d rather not. 10) “Why would someone not give proof of a rape if it actually happened?” You realize it’s up to the police to investigate and not the victim to prove it, right? I like how you ignored my link on the victim who was charged with a false accusation only for it to be discovered that she didn’t lie and that there was a serial rapist who was forcing his victims to get rid of the evidence. It’s almost like that “assuming false because not enough evidence to prove it as true” idea is pretty shitty and can be used against victims… 11) “Considering your little rape analogy is assuming that officers don’t take rape victims seriously, gonna need a big [Citation Needed] for that.” Try the Kanin study, beautiful. Really, you should read it, since you’re so in love with citing it and all. But hey, I like making you look foolish, so here are a few: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/10407493/Rape-victims-not-being-taken-seriously-as-prosecutions-fall-to-five-year-low.html (Nope, don’t even try to claim it’s because there’s a drop in rape rates. Read the article closely and you’ll see why that doesn’t explain it fully ;) ) http://hamptonroads.com/2013/08/victims-ordeal-prompts-sex-assault-policy-shift-norfolk http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/06/why_cops_don_t_believe_rape_victims_and_how_brain_science_can_solve_the.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/6652613/Rape-victims-not-believed-if-they-come-from-wrong-area-warns-report.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/9134799/Sexual-assault-survey-80-of-women-dont-report-rape-or-sexual-assault-survey-claims.html So, let me see what we have so far: 1) You admitting you don’t know your own source. 2) You dodging the debunking of one of your own sources. 3) You making it very clear you haven’t read the one source you can actually access. 4) You asking for proof and then obviously not reading it. When asked to support an assertion about it, you failed to do so. 5) You making it clear you don’t understand that an inconclusive result is just that. 6) You being outed as a massive hypocrite. 7) You ignoring my question as to why attacking rape victims on tumblr is so important and why you keep trying to act like someone talking anonymously on tumblr is trying to get someone falsely charged with rape.

Oh look, more strawmans! Again with the unpublished = false? Where is that even coming from? Take another shot at it.

Again.. it’s innocent until proven guilty. I don’t have to do anything to prove that I’m not guilty, if you’re the one making the claim, it’s your job to prove it’s validity. Are you aware of what reasonable doubt it is? Considering the natural state of all humans is neutral, unbiased, and innocent, you’re still taking the “guilty until proven innocent” stance over and over again. Is this what they teach in community college or something?

Lol, oh boy! If something is good enough for a court of law, it’s not good enough for tumblr, ooooookay! So what you’re saying is that I could go around telling people that I could fly, but instead of proving that I couldn’t fly, I go around saying “Well prove that I can’t fly!”. I honestly believe I’m being trolled and baited now.

Your entire argument is hinged on, even in the face of completely infallible evidence proving something didn’t happen “well umm you weren’t there to see it first hand so it could have still happened!”

Congratulations, I managed to get through half of that before I realizing I was actually trolled. Well done.

Oh look, more articles referencing claimed rapes, rather than actual fact. So by looking at these statistics, I can come to the conclusion that the higher amount of claimed “rapes” (likely due to women lying about rape) is the reason for less cases sent to trial. Wow, it’s almost as if you’re making this too easy on me. 17000 “rapes”, 5400 go to trial, so 68% of rapes are false at minimum? Wow, guess I’ll start using that instead of 41%. Thank you.

Wait a second, -I- don’t understand inconclusive results? You do realize that within an accusation of anything, it’s either true or false, correct? There is no inconclusive. If I claim I crashed my car into a tree to get some insurance money, but don’t provide evidence, what happens? Oh yea, I get sent to jail for insurance fraud. But thanks to female privilege and gynosympathy, women are afforded the privilege of claiming someone raped them, providing zero evidence, and getting zero punishment as a result.

"No longer classifying sexual assault cases as "unfounded." Sexual assault reports will be considered valid, unless proven otherwise."

So women are now given the privilege of not being charged with a false accusation unless they recant it, hey, isn’t that exactly what I said? Thanks for proving me right, again. :)

edit: What was I thinking attempting to debate someone who posts gems like these? http://fuckingrapeculture.tumblr.com/post/64388814288/closely-related-to-denial-is-the-minimization-of http://fuckingrapeculture.tumblr.com/post/62212393054/damn-prejudice-against-white-colonizers-their

Aren’t you a little out of your element? Maybe you should stick to whining about white people and leave the rape accusations to people who understand what they’re talking about

hey! i was thinking about you last night while i was working. mainly because i went upstairs to take a shit and was checking my tumblr while on the toilet and i saw you were, like, still talking on my post and it made me laugh because i went through the notes and you had literally zero supporters

i understand that you enjoy being, like, the sole voice of dissent. like i get it, you’re home life is mediocre your ex girlfriend was always disappointed that you couldnt satisfy here w/ your smegma covered microdick, the dudes on reddit only give you three upvotes, your parents wanted a child who was somewhat exceptional but instead they got you. so you come on tumblr and hope to be that voice of dissent in order to get some goddamn attention & that’s cool seriously just do it on your own damn posts so i dont have to see the notifications

anyway what i really want is an answer to chica’s question. why are you so concerned about me (an anonymous and unnamed person) getting some non-named literally hypothetical person accused of a “false” rape charge?

i came up with an answer for you! because you’re trying to redefine rape and get people to be on /your/ side of the non-facts. i legit just watched you get ripped to shreds and you’re still trying to spew your misinformation and i was like “why is he doing this? he should know by now no one is taking him seriously” but I get it now. because you want to be able to redefine rape and justify it to others (and yourself) when you finally do commit this crime. emphasis on this. 

what other reason could you have for doing this. you’re not defending anyone… but yourself. there’s no man involved in this discussion… but yourself. you haven’t even made any solid points about the validity of your claims… hm… it’s all so suspicious…… who are you defending…………? and you keep skirting the question………………………………….. 

are you familiar with the term “schrodinger’s rapist”

if i knew you in real life and this was a discussion you and i had at a bar i would be calling my boyfriend and telling him to meet me right outside the door with a bottle of mace because you are clearly a very dangerous person 

so don’t get me wrong i’m not accusing you of rape. i’m just letting you know that any women with any sense of self-preservation should be weary of you and your……. logic 

"You proved me wrong, so I’d tell my boyfriend to try and assault you"

Grade A female logic right there. I mean I’ll be honest, the only reason I doubted you was because I was thinking “Who would rape a fat, ugly, white woman?”

well i am far from ugly (i’m pretty fucking hot) , i’m a fairly average weight, and i’m definitely not white so does that mean since there’s no premise to your doubt i can completely disregard it? yes. yes it does. 

i don’t even want to go into your whole “no one would rape an ugly woman” argument since all it reveals to me is you have no idea what rape even is and also that you’re just trying to antagonize me which, of course, is the entire premise of this here blog that you are running.

remember how i said you constantly invalidate your arguments? i don’t even have to lift a finger, you do all the heavy lifting for me. 

also i would tell my bf to meet me at the door so he could walk me to my car & i would need mace to protect myself in case someone tried to attack me? ever seen a movie? ever seen a woman clutching her keys between her knuckles? holding her hands in her purse on her pepper spray? walking in the dark on edge? is she being confrontational? i suggest you get yourself a female friend and have a nice heart to heart with her because you literally have no clue about anything and that is probably why you’re behaving this way

but not that that matters since apparently harassing women (in your opinion) isn’t any reason for them to be hostile. pro tip: if a woman feels threatened by you and makes it very clear she doesn’t want you around her yet you still continue to provoke her don’t be surprised if she retaliates.

and you’re still skirting the last question i’m actually going to go ahead and say: don’t respond to me until you riddle me that. anything you have to say after this post that does not relate to the question posed by both the woman before me and me will be ignored. ^.^

[more-female-logic]

The Schrodinger’s rapist bit? Yea! I believe in that.. in a different way. Schrodinger’s Negro: Avoiding all 18-24 y/o black people.

When you approach me, I will begin to evaluate the possibility you will do me harm. That possibility is never 0%. For some white people, particularly white people who have been victims of violent assaults, any level of risk is unacceptable. Those white people do not want to be approached, no matter how nice you are or how much you’d like to strike up a conversation. Okay? That’s their right. Don’t get pissy about it. White people are under no obligation to be nice to you.

[nomyg0d]

I need feminism because I’m tired of putting up with catcalls from dirty, older men It doesn’t even matter if they’re attractive guys my age I’ll snap at anyone who makes me feel uncomfortable and talks to me like their personal sex toy

[more-female-logic]

"Someone was whistling while I was out walking on the street, I was so close to being raped!"

[thetechnicolortrenchcoat-deacti]

Woman’s nudes are leaked: Wow what a dumb bitch she shouldn’t have sent them in the fist place

Man’s nudes are leaked: Wow his girlfriend must be such a bitch what a betrayal

[more-female-logic]

Women commenting on woman's nudes being leaked: Slut! Whore! Skank!

Women commenting on a man's nudes being leaked: OMG what a hotty!

[lyydia-blog]

I googled bartender and I didn't see anything?

images of male bartenders:

images for female bartenders:

spot the differences

[more-female-logic]

Male bartender: Gets a job because he understands what he's doing and knows how to make drinks correctly. Time needed: 3 months of OTJ

Female bartender: Gets a job because she has big tits. Time needed: Puberty

Female privilege

[beyonceprivilege-deactivated201]

[beyonceprivilege-deactivated201]

[chopped for length]

Is that what you’re still harping on? The fact that the McDowell USAF study is unpublished? What does it being unpublished have to do with its validity? Really grasping at straws now.

What’s too prove? Once someone makes an accusation, there’s two outcomes; true and false. If it’s not true, then it is, by default, false. This isn’t really high end logical thinking skills, but for some reason you’re still struggling to understand it.

By your wonderful Female Logic®, since we don’t have cameras following everyone around all the time, there’s no way to prove that it really didn’t happen. Thankfully we live in a society where “guilty until proven innocent” isn’t an actual thing. It’s the accuser’s job to prove that the crime happened. If the evidence isn’t there (which for a violent crime, such as a rape, will obviously be there) then the crime simply did not happen.

"by your logic a man falsely confessing to rape is absolutely guilty" Nice "hypothetical" situation that doesn’t actually happen in reality. Why would someone falsely confess to something that they didn’t do?

Expanding on that, you can’t just walk into a courtroom and say “Hey, I did XYZ crime, throw me in jail” http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_11 “Determining the Factual Basis for a Plea. Before entering judgment on a guilty plea, the court must determine that there is a factual basis for the plea.”

"but estimates on the rate of underreporting are actually based on research" [Citation Needed]. Someone says they were raped, put themselves at risk for developing HIV, hepatitis, and various other diseases and doesn’t go to the police, but would happily admit to some flawed, unproven survey. Try again.

"You cannot charge someone without evidence " Hey look! You’re finally catching on! Of course you can’t charge someone, but you can take a claim, be unable to prove it, and then.. wow, would you look at that, it becomes a false accusation! Your 8% myth is brought on by the fact that unless the police are given a recanted statement, it doesn’t actually get marked as "false". Even though logical (See: Kanin) people would realize that a claim is either true or false, and if the claim isn’t marked as true, then it’s false.

Though.. by your logic on your other blog http://fuckingrapeculture.tumblr.com/post/69183482654/a-couple-of-years-ago-id-gotten-drunk-at-this-party I can’t even tell if you’re just trolling me nonstop with your ad nauseum of “WELLLL you can’t prove that they DIDN’T rape!!!”

And on your hypothetical “piss in shoes” comparison. Why would I discontinue an investigation if it actually happened? Why would someone not give proof of a rape if it actually happened? Oh.. yea.. Female logic. “because the officers aren’t taking him seriously” Considering your little rape analogy is assuming that officers don’t take rape victims seriously, gonna need a big [Citation Needed] for that.

X says Y raped them, X refuses to give any information other than statement, investigation dies. X falsely reports a rape, doesn’t count as a false report due to not being recanted, or by your logic, Y didn’t prove he didn’t rape.

2/10, apply yourself

1) "What does it being unpublished have to do with its validity? Really grasping at straws now." Translation: I’m claiming it as valid even though I haven’t seen it, and think that accusing you of grasping at straws for asking me about my sources will actually work to make you look silly instead of making me look pathetic and desperate. 2) “Once someone makes an accusation, there’s two outcomes; true and false. If it’s not true, then it is, by default, false.” Have I told you how cute your efforts are? It is possible to not have anything conclusive either way. You’d need to PROVE something true in order for it to not be false, and you need to PROVE something false in order for it to not be true. “I can’t tell” is neither. 3) “since we don’t have cameras following everyone around all the time, there’s no way to prove that it really didn’t happen.” Yes, that’s how crimes are investigated. With video evidence and nothing else ever. So if someone says, “Hey my neighbor robbed me, I know it was him because I saw his face clearly, and he broke my door down at such and such time when he thought I wasn’t home”, and it turns out the neighbor was out the country, the door is not broken, and the accuser was actually at work as verified by their coworkers at the time, then how is that NOT proving the claim false? 4) “It’s the accuser’s job to prove that the crime happened. If the evidence isn’t there (which for a violent crime, such as a rape, will obviously be there) then the crime simply did not happen.” Getting even cuter! Innocent until proven guilty is the standard for court, not tumblr. Finding someone legally not guilty doesn’t mean they never actually did anything. A verdict doesn’t change facts. 5) “Nice “hypothetical” situation that doesn’t actually happen in reality.” It’s funny because the person you tried to claim as a source, Fairstein? Accused of coercing several men into falsely confessing to rape. Their convictions were overturned (and before you try to get clever, a rape HAD occurred… they just weren’t the ones guilty of it). Wipe that sweat off your brow son, I can see you really tried. Failed, but tried. 6) “"but estimates on the rate of underreporting are actually based on research" [Citation Needed]. Someone says they were raped, put themselves at risk for developing HIV, hepatitis, and various other diseases and doesn’t go to the police, but would happily admit to some flawed, unproven survey. “ A citation was given within the text. Sorry, I don’t take your opinion seriously on “flawed” and “unproven” when you think not pressing charges stops a rape from ever having occurred and will cite sources you can’t even find. You clearly don’t understand STIs (hint: they don’t go away just because you got them through rape and actually reported that rape, and it is actually possible to see a doctor and lie about unprotected sex or something).

But let me tell you something, kiddo: Sometimes it’s the rapists who admit to raping but not being charged! Can you believe it? (Lisak 2002. The study is easy to find but I’ll let you look it up based just on this info to see if you can. But not to worry, lazybones, here’s another source: http://sapac.umich.edu/article/196). 7) “Of course you can’t charge someone, but you can take a claim, be unable to prove it, and then.. wow, would you look at that, it becomes a false accusation! “ Sweetheart, please. Your flawed logic has already been rejected, and trying to get out of admitting it by screaming about “hypothetical that would never happen” when it um, has, doesn’t actually distract from that. 8) “Your 8% myth is brought on by the fact that unless the police are given a recanted statement, it doesn’t actually get marked as “false”.” Nope. Read the source, stop embarrassing yourself. 9) “ Even though logical (See: Kanin) people would realize that a claim is either true or false, and if the claim isn’t marked as true, then it’s false.” Sure, something is either true or false. But if you cannot prove it as true, then you don’t get to claim it as false without proving it is. If we’re going by your logic, why can’t we flip it around? Can’t prove it’s false, then it’s absolutely true. Ah right, flipping it would be incovenient for you which is why you’d rather not. 10) “Why would someone not give proof of a rape if it actually happened?” You realize it’s up to the police to investigate and not the victim to prove it, right? I like how you ignored my link on the victim who was charged with a false accusation only for it to be discovered that she didn’t lie and that there was a serial rapist who was forcing his victims to get rid of the evidence. It’s almost like that “assuming false because not enough evidence to prove it as true” idea is pretty shitty and can be used against victims… 11) “Considering your little rape analogy is assuming that officers don’t take rape victims seriously, gonna need a big [Citation Needed] for that.” Try the Kanin study, beautiful. Really, you should read it, since you’re so in love with citing it and all. But hey, I like making you look foolish, so here are a few: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/10407493/Rape-victims-not-being-taken-seriously-as-prosecutions-fall-to-five-year-low.html (Nope, don’t even try to claim it’s because there’s a drop in rape rates. Read the article closely and you’ll see why that doesn’t explain it fully ;) ) http://hamptonroads.com/2013/08/victims-ordeal-prompts-sex-assault-policy-shift-norfolk http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/06/why_cops_don_t_believe_rape_victims_and_how_brain_science_can_solve_the.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/6652613/Rape-victims-not-believed-if-they-come-from-wrong-area-warns-report.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/9134799/Sexual-assault-survey-80-of-women-dont-report-rape-or-sexual-assault-survey-claims.html So, let me see what we have so far: 1) You admitting you don’t know your own source. 2) You dodging the debunking of one of your own sources. 3) You making it very clear you haven’t read the one source you can actually access. 4) You asking for proof and then obviously not reading it. When asked to support an assertion about it, you failed to do so. 5) You making it clear you don’t understand that an inconclusive result is just that. 6) You being outed as a massive hypocrite. 7) You ignoring my question as to why attacking rape victims on tumblr is so important and why you keep trying to act like someone talking anonymously on tumblr is trying to get someone falsely charged with rape.

Oh look, more strawmans! Again with the unpublished = false? Where is that even coming from? Take another shot at it.

Again.. it’s innocent until proven guilty. I don’t have to do anything to prove that I’m not guilty, if you’re the one making the claim, it’s your job to prove it’s validity. Are you aware of what reasonable doubt it is? Considering the natural state of all humans is neutral, unbiased, and innocent, you’re still taking the “guilty until proven innocent” stance over and over again. Is this what they teach in community college or something?

Lol, oh boy! If something is good enough for a court of law, it’s not good enough for tumblr, ooooookay! So what you’re saying is that I could go around telling people that I could fly, but instead of proving that I couldn’t fly, I go around saying “Well prove that I can’t fly!”. I honestly believe I’m being trolled and baited now.

Your entire argument is hinged on, even in the face of completely infallible evidence proving something didn’t happen “well umm you weren’t there to see it first hand so it could have still happened!”

Congratulations, I managed to get through half of that before I realizing I was actually trolled. Well done.

Oh look, more articles referencing claimed rapes, rather than actual fact. So by looking at these statistics, I can come to the conclusion that the higher amount of claimed “rapes” (likely due to women lying about rape) is the reason for less cases sent to trial. Wow, it’s almost as if you’re making this too easy on me. 17000 “rapes”, 5400 go to trial, so 68% of rapes are false at minimum? Wow, guess I’ll start using that instead of 41%. Thank you.

Wait a second, -I- don’t understand inconclusive results? You do realize that within an accusation of anything, it’s either true or false, correct? There is no inconclusive. If I claim I crashed my car into a tree to get some insurance money, but don’t provide evidence, what happens? Oh yea, I get sent to jail for insurance fraud. But thanks to female privilege and gynosympathy, women are afforded the privilege of claiming someone raped them, providing zero evidence, and getting zero punishment as a result.

"No longer classifying sexual assault cases as "unfounded." Sexual assault reports will be considered valid, unless proven otherwise."

So women are now given the privilege of not being charged with a false accusation unless they recant it, hey, isn’t that exactly what I said? Thanks for proving me right, again. :)

edit: What was I thinking attempting to debate someone who posts gems like these? http://fuckingrapeculture.tumblr.com/post/64388814288/closely-related-to-denial-is-the-minimization-of http://fuckingrapeculture.tumblr.com/post/62212393054/damn-prejudice-against-white-colonizers-their

Aren’t you a little out of your element? Maybe you should stick to whining about white people and leave the rape accusations to people who understand what they’re talking about

hey! i was thinking about you last night while i was working. mainly because i went upstairs to take a shit and was checking my tumblr while on the toilet and i saw you were, like, still talking on my post and it made me laugh because i went through the notes and you had literally zero supporters

i understand that you enjoy being, like, the sole voice of dissent. like i get it, you’re home life is mediocre your ex girlfriend was always disappointed that you couldnt satisfy here w/ your smegma covered microdick, the dudes on reddit only give you three upvotes, your parents wanted a child who was somewhat exceptional but instead they got you. so you come on tumblr and hope to be that voice of dissent in order to get some goddamn attention & that’s cool seriously just do it on your own damn posts so i dont have to see the notifications

anyway what i really want is an answer to chica’s question. why are you so concerned about me (an anonymous and unnamed person) getting some non-named literally hypothetical person accused of a “false” rape charge?

i came up with an answer for you! because you’re trying to redefine rape and get people to be on /your/ side of the non-facts. i legit just watched you get ripped to shreds and you’re still trying to spew your misinformation and i was like “why is he doing this? he should know by now no one is taking him seriously” but I get it now. because you want to be able to redefine rape and justify it to others (and yourself) when you finally do commit this crime. emphasis on this. 

what other reason could you have for doing this. you’re not defending anyone… but yourself. there’s no man involved in this discussion… but yourself. you haven’t even made any solid points about the validity of your claims… hm… it’s all so suspicious…… who are you defending…………? and you keep skirting the question………………………………….. 

are you familiar with the term “schrodinger’s rapist”

if i knew you in real life and this was a discussion you and i had at a bar i would be calling my boyfriend and telling him to meet me right outside the door with a bottle of mace because you are clearly a very dangerous person 

so don’t get me wrong i’m not accusing you of rape. i’m just letting you know that any women with any sense of self-preservation should be weary of you and your……. logic 

[more-female-logic]

"You proved me wrong, so I'd tell my boyfriend to try and assault you"

Grade A female logic right there. I mean I'll be honest, the only reason I doubted you was because I was thinking "Who would rape a fat, ugly, white woman?"

[wearegeth]

The fact that this female boxer just said, on TV, that women boxers shouldn’t fight male boxers even if they’re physically matched near perfect because men are “built stronger” pisses me off.

[more-female-logic]

The only time a woman will be "physically matched" to a man is if a man is an AIDS patient or has some other muscle wasting disease.

[ivyxaur]

so yeah this actual fedora guy is trying to argue with me on facebook trigger warnings galore that this guy uses cisnormative language and shames mental illness and he’s sexist

not blocking out his name because he’s a cunt

[more-female-logic]

Do you really have a mental illness though? Can we see the doctor's note acknowledging the diagnosis? Because it seems to me like there's a lot of people here who looked up a symptom on WebMD and self-diagnosed themselves for sympathy

[ghostinthetacobell-deactivated2]

Guys start watching a show aimed for girls and they’re celebrated for “defying gender roles” Girls start watching a show aimed for boys and it gets CANCELLED.

[more-female-logic]

1,000 men watch a show: doesn't get cancelled

5 women watch a show: gets cancelled

Gee, I wonder why