i cant do anything about it i just love theseus so much
RMH

ellievsbear

No title available
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
almost home

oozey mess
🪼
One Nice Bug Per Day

#extradirty
wallacepolsom
Misplaced Lens Cap
Xuebing Du
No title available

No title available
taylor price
todays bird
h
$LAYYYTER
No title available

Product Placement

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Indonesia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Italy

seen from Malaysia

seen from Russia
seen from Ireland

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Singapore
seen from United Kingdom
@mostcuriousmythicist
i cant do anything about it i just love theseus so much
In Bacchylides’s Odes of Dythyrambs, he sings about Theseus when he first entered Athens whom is said to followed by two other companions.
The herald says that only two men accompany him, and that he has a sword slung over his bright shoulders .. and two polished javelins in his hands, and a well-made Laconian hat on his head with its fire-red hair.
Bacchylides, Dythyrambs 18.45-50
It’s never said who exactly these people are but I discovered that there are a few good candidates based off other traditions.
Theseus is described as having two comrades (verse 46). It seems probable that the allusion is to Peirithous and Phorbas, whom some vase-paintings associate with Theseus in the act of carrying off the Amazon Antiope. There is also a vase which gives him two companions in his encounter with Sinis and with Procrustes’.
Jebb, Richard Claverhouse, Bacchylides: The poems and fragments page 232-233
This is mostly speculation but it’s fun to think of Pirithous as having been with Theseus from the beginning even if he’s usually on his own st this time. Oh and also Phorbas too…even if no one knows who he is 🥲
Theseus helping to tame Cerberus with Heracles
Then, stroking the monster’s (Cerberus) sullen necks, he (Hercules) binds him with chains of adamant. Forgetful of himself, the watchful guardian of the dusky realm droops his ears, trembling and willing to be led, owns his master, and with muzzle lowered follows after, beating both his sides with snaky tail. But when he came to the Taenarian borders, and the strange gleam of unknown light smote on his eyes, though conquered he regained his courage and in frenzy shook his ponderous chains. Almost he bore his conqueror away, back dragging him, forward bent, and forced him to give ground. Then even to my (Theseus) aid Alcides looked, and with our twofold strength we drew the dog along, mad with rage and attempting fruitless war, and brought him out to earth.
Seneca, Hercules Furens 807–823.
In Rhodes there is the Dogfish, or thresher shark. And even if you must die for it, if they won't sell it to you take it by force. The Syracusans call it fat dog. Once you have got it, submit patiently thereafter to whatever doom is decreed for you."…In fact, I imagine, says Lynceus, when Theseus grew up to be so handsome, he yielded his favours because Tlepolemus gave him this fish.
Athenaeus, The Deipnosophists 7.44
Ariadne: umm Theseus. Have you ever paid for a meal on your own? 🤨
Theseus: well not with money no. 🙂
tbh i've never been very interested in theseus-related myths
until just now when i read this lacuna'd-to-hell fragment about that disastrous time theseus and his bff pirithous went to the underworld to kidnap persephone. it hits those thebaid/apollonius' argonautica beats for me like "aw look at you about to eagerly do something Super Wrong And Stupid without realizing you're sooooo fucked"
(with bonus meleager who is already dead and having a nice underworld chat with theseus)
"But come tell [me this] from the beginning: [why] have you come [all this way to Hades? And why has Pirithous] your trusty comrade come with you? [. . .] What need had you to [come here a]live?" [Theseus the son of Aegeus spoke] first and answered him, [ ]ing at the shepherd of the peoples: "[Noble Mel]eager, son of the wise Oineus, I will tell you exactly. [Pirithous has been greatly misled by] the grim goddess Erinys: [he has come to seek] illustrious Persephone, saying that Zeus whose sport is the thunderbolt [has given approval, and according to the go]ds' customs, to contract for her as his wife. For they too are said to woo their glorious sisters, and make love to them out of sight of their dear [parents. So] he is eager to contract a marriage from among the blessed ones – his own sister from the same father; for he [claims] he is closer kin than great Hades to Persephone, the daughter of lovely-haired Demeter. For he says he is her brother, of one father, while Hades is her dear uncle. It was for that he said he was going down to the misty dark." [So he spoke,] and Oineus' son shuddered on hearing what he said, and addressed him in answer with soothing words: "[Theseus,] counsellor of the warrior Athe[nians,] was not prudent [Hippo]dameia the wife of great-spirited Pirithous?..."
i know theseus wasn't super keen on the whole "kidnapping an actual spoken-for major goddess for an incestuous marriage to a mortal" thing but the boohooing is extra rich when you know theseus' got ten year old helen imprisoned at home so that HE can have his own semidivine incestuous marriage (no he won't). heehee you boys are sooooo fucked
god i love dumbass hubristic doomed-to-fail-from-the-start ventures in greek mythology. chef's kiss
The fragment makes me a bit curious into the evolution of this myth.
In the fragment, Theseus claims that Pirithous was misled by the furies into thinking Zeus approved of match between him and Persephone. No mention of this being part of a pact to marry a daughter of Zeus or anything about Helen. The epic is usually dated to the 7th or 6th century bc, so it’s pretty, so I wonder when exactly those other elements were included.
Chat, what source says that Icarius exposed Penelope as an infant only for her to get rescued by ducks? I’ve seen it spread around but I haven’t even seen that story on Wikipedia.
it's quite obscure in truth, and the only place I recall seeing it is in the Scholia to Pindar:
“It is said that she was first called Arnaia and was thrown into the sea by her parents, and then carried to shore by some birds called penelopes. And in this way she was recovered by her parents and named Penelope, by the same name as the birds, and when she grew up she had two names for the rest of her life.”
I prefer to go with Eustathius of Thessalonica's account of the penelops myth, which is in mentioned in his Commentary on the Odyssey, as it feels more in accordance with what we get of Icarius in all else:
So much for that. Didymos says that Penelope was first called Amirace/Ameirace or Arnacia, but when Nauplius threw her into the sea to exact vengeance for his son Palamedes, she was saved by ducks (pēnelopes), the nominative singular of which is pēnelops, and accordingly she was renamed in this way.
So Nauplius tries to kill Odysseus’s wife when she was a baby… to avenge his son who nearly got Odysseus’s child killed… huh
Time traveler shenanigans, the ducks saved the world from a massive loophole
Maybe he planned to go back in time to kill Penelope, that way she would never give birth to Telemachus, and therefore Palamedes would never be involved in a baby yeeting incident that Odysseus would try to get revenge for.
Truly Nauplius’s master planning goes beyond our feeble mortal minds.
Well it took a while but J Holts Theseus comic has finally gotten to Dionysus.
…I’m very curious as to how the comics going to address the “incident” on Naxos.
Jason: sorry to hear that Thetis left you.
Peleus: yeah it looks like everyone else knows that me and Thetis are divorced now. At least the worst part is over now, right?
Jason: Oh Peleus….it gets much, much worse. 🥲
The marriage of Theseus and Helen in Attic Vase Art
The tale does not reflect well on Theseus, not so much because he abducted Helen, but because the abduction caused an enemy invasion of his country…It is not hard to see why the original tale should have become unfitting for Theseus' later incarnation as an Athenian statesman, and was given less and less prominence…One significant exception to the comparative neglect of the story in later Athens is on a fifth-century vase on which his liaison with Helen is at last sanctioned by law and the gods: young and handsome, he marries a splendidly dressed Helen, with her mother, the brothers who had once invaded Attica to retrieve her, and his divine father, Poseidon (amongst others) in attendance.
Theseus, Tragedy, and the Athenian Empire by Sophie Mills, page 8.
Athenians writing a fix it fic where Theseus gets successfully marry Helen in a consensual manner with her family totally down with it. Oh and the gods decide to attend it cause why not.
E. fr. 964 (ap. DK 59a. 33) is attributed to a speech of Theseus from an unknown play. ἐγὼ δὲ παρὰ σοφοῦ τινος μαθὼν ] εἰς φροντίδ ̓ ἀεὶ συμφορὰς ἐβαλλόμην | φυγάς τ ̓ ἐμαυτῷ προστιθεὶς πάτρας ἐμῆς ¦ θανάτους ἀώρους καὶ κακῶν ἄλλας ὁδούς ¦ ἵν ̓ εἴ τι πάσχοιμ ̓ ὧν ἐδόξαζον φρενί | μή μοι νεώρες προσπεσὸν μᾶλλον δάκοι (‘I learnt from some wise man always to lay difficulties in my mind, setting before myself exile from my homeland and untimely deaths and other routes to evil, so that if I were to suffer anything of what I expected, nothing new would fall on me and sting me."). Such a speech of calm acceptance would be appropriate for Theseus as he prepares to meet the Minotaur. It is also reminiscent of S. OC 562 f.
Theseus, Tragedy, and the Athenian Empire by Sophie Mills, pg 253 note 104.
I know this was probably intentional because Theseus in ancient Greek plays is seen more as a narrative representative (of Athens, of a king, of a patriarch, whatever) than as a person in many scenes, but it's still curious to imagine a teenager on his way to a potentially horrible death (being devoured by a monster) saying that. I don't know who he's supposed to be talking to, but I'm imagining that person's reaction… why on earth is this boy calmly saying "yeah, maybe I'll suffer, but so what? I'm already expecting it! If I suffer, it won't affect me because I've already prepared myself. But if things go well, then it will be even better!"????
I can't even tell if this is more funny or more disturbing lol
Also, some context: this fragment is attributed by MIlls to a lost play about Theseus, but I don't know the possible authorship because I can only read the parts of the book available online for free, and unfortunately, the page I need to understand the context isn't one of them. I got the impression that she thinks it's likely to be a fragment of Sophocles, but I'm not sure.
The Roman writer Cicero, in his Tusculan Disputations (written in 45BC) attributes this quote to Euripides actually:
Therefore, this ruminating beforehand upon future evils which you see at a distance, makes their approach more tolerable; and on this account, what Euripides makes Theseus say, is much commended. You will give me leave to translate them, as is usual with me -
“I treasured up what some learned sage did tell, and on my future misery did dwell; I thought of bitter death, of being drove far from my home by exile, and I strove with every evil to possess my mind, that, when they came, I the less care might find.”
Cicero, Tuscalan Disputations. 3.29
The translation I have reads a little differently in that it seems to imply that Theseus was told by some wise sage about his miserable future including being exiled and murdered. So becasue of that he learns to mentally prepare himself for it, that way he doesn’t feel anything when it actually happens.
But this one line is so fascinating to me because it’s probably one of the most in-depth looks into Theseus’s inner personality and thoughts. He imagines all the worst possible things that could happen to him so that he’ll be almost completely unattached emotionally.
But bedside that, I’m curious at what point of Theseus’s life he is supposed to say that. Depending on whether this takes place before or after events like losing Ariadne and Aegeus, it could almost serve as a reason by Theseus for remaining emotionally unattached so as to avoid any future heartbreak.
Theseus, Ariadne, and the young tributes defeat a more animalistic Minotaur in a 7th century BCE representation
[…] In the seventh century we find a clear, albeit unusual, representation on a Tenian-Boiotian relief pithos of about 650 B.C. now in Basel (BS 617). Here the Minotaur has the reverse of his usual form, with the body of a bull and the head (unfortunately missing, but there is long hair) of a man; there are also traces of a horn. Since he has no hands, he naturally holds no weapon; Theseus for his part approaches the monster with a stone in his raised hand, and he is followed by three women and two men in the same position with raised stones. All appear to be holding on to a thread with their other hand; it runs horizon- tally across the four figures on the upper band of the scene, then drops down to Theseus and the remaining (female) figure on the lower band. This last figure, though directly behind Theseus, seems to be in the same attitude as the others, but possibly she is nonetheless Ariadne. Alternatively, the last figure in the sequence (far left on the upper band) might be so interpreted, with Ariadne here guarding the entrance or holding the end of the thread. In any event, aside from the maverick Minotaur we have also an early illustration of the (logical enough) idea that the other young men and women were sent into the Labyrinth at the same time as Theseus, and aided in the fight. […]
Early Greek Myth: A Guide to Literary and Artistic sources by Timothy Gantz, pg 266.
In the visual arts, the thread already appears in the earliest known representation of the encounter between Theseus and the Minotaur, on the neck of a Cycladic relief pithos of ca. 650 b.c. in Basel (Fig. 4). Here Theseus and five companions, two boys and three girls, confront a monster that is part quadruped, part human. Theseus and his companions hold rocks in one raised hand and a thread in the other hand. Like mountaineers on a sheer ice wall, whose means of survival is the rope linking them together, the Athenian boys and girls cling to the thread, which will ensure their escape from the Labyrinth if they defeat the monster with their stones. The representation on the pithos indicates that, in the 7th century, the Minotaur was already to be found in the dark and disorienting Labyrinth, from which there was to be no escape, and that Ariadne’s thread was the key to survival in the maze.
Bild, Mythos, and Ritual Choral Dance in Theseus’s Cretan Adventure on the François Vase by Guy Hedreen, pg 495.
Theseus and the Athenian children in the Labyrinth. Cycladic relief pithos, ca. 650 b.c. Basel, Antikenmuseum und Sammlung Ludwig, BS 617 (Kä 601). Photo courtesy Antikenmuseum Basel und Sammlung Ludwig. Photo A. F. Voegelin.
I admit I liked this idea more than the idea of Theseus being the only one to physically do anything, with the tributes usually being in another part of the labyrinth and Ariadne not being in the labyrinth at all. I like the idea of Ariadne and the tributes being there, actively helping to kill the Minotaur. Maybe because I love teamwork in stories lol. It also makes it seem less like a victory for Theseus against a monster and more like an Athenian victory against the Cretan's oppression. The potential for Ariadne to have been there at the Minotaur's death and, in fact, to be actively collaborating in it is intriguing as well. Although, to be frank, I prefer the usual depiction of the bipedal Minotaur rather than the quadrupedal Minotaur. Anyway, the fact that this source is so old (7th century BCE) makes me wonder how much this myth has changed over the years…
Ariadne: Do you really love me?
Theseus: In this life and in almost all my other lives
Hippolytus: Do you really regret it?
Theseus: There isn't a day that goes by that I don't do it.
Helen:...
Theseus:...
Helen: I'm waiting for my apology
Theseus: To be honest, my only regret is the leg pain I got from being among the rocks.
Wherefore some writers, thinking to correct this heaviest accusation against him (Theseus), say that he did not carry off Helen himself, but that when Idas and Lynceus had carried her off, he received her in charge and watched over her and would not surrender her to the Dioscuri when they demanded her; or, if you will believe it, that her own father, Tyndareüs, entrusted her to Theseus, for fear of Enarsphorus, the son of Hippocoön, who sought to take Helen by force while she was yet a child.
Plutarch, Life of Theseus. 31.1
Dionysus the judge and abductor of Helen of Troy
]seek ] ] –self j]udgment, Hermes leaves and they [the chorus?] say something to the audience about the begetting of sons, and they mock and scoff at Dionysus when he shows up. And he, after immovable Tyranny from Hera, Bravery in war from Athena, and Aphrodite arrived, she (promised) to make him very beautiful and lovely, he judges Aphrodite the winner. After this, he sails to Sparta, leads Helen away, and goes up to Ida. After a little while, he hears that the Greeks are sacking the countryside and are looking for Alexander. He hides Helen in a basket as quickly as possible, changes himself into a ram, and waits for developments. Alexander arrives and, after he tracks them down, arranges for them to be led to the ships to be handed over to the Greeks. When Helen hesitates, he pities her and takes her as his wife, but he sends Dionysus away to be given up. The satyrs follow and comfort him and deny that they will betray him. In the drama, Pericles is mocked very persuasively through emphasis for bringing the war upon the Athenians.
A lengthy fragment summarizing the plot of Dionysalexandros, comedy play by Cratinus. In this retelling, it is Dionysus instead of Paris who is the judge of the contest and took Helen away. Later when Paris encountered the god and Helen, Helen was reluctant to returned (for whatever reasons), and so he picked her up out of compassion and pity, unknowingly started the war. The last sentence stated the play was meant to be a mock toward the Athenian politician Pericles.
I guess Theseus and Dionysus truly had the same taste in women ay?
Oh Electra they'll never make me hate you. Not that i truly hate any character from the house or Atreus. What many people do often is jumping into defence mode for Clytemnestra whereas her actions speak of a layered personality that her actions influenced negatively her children.
Yes she lost a daughter, but Electra and Orestes also lost a sister. Grief became pain, anger twisting the knife of tragedy to this family. Clytemnestra became a mother isolated from her children, closed to her own revenge that caused her own kids to despise her, especially Electra, forced to marry a servant, becoming one by her own mother's hands. The kind of betrayal coming from your parents is a pain deep residing in the soul.
The family's story is one complex one as many of the families in Greek myths. What many however ignore often are how a mother's actions changed her family for the worse instead of being caring and kind.
gothic literature character apologists are such a strange breed of person… like imagine being confronted with a piece of literature that forces you to contend with the fact that horrible, awful people can be victims and suffer too, and you go “but consider this: they’re victims, and they suffer, therefore the author was blaming them for things they didn’t do when they described them commit unforgivable crimes” god it must feel great having cotton for brains huh
Dorian Gray being a victim of grooming and abuse doesn’t magically negate how violent and misogynistic he is the Frankenstein Creature being alone and rejected by all doesn’t magically negate how violent and misogynistic he is Erik Phantom being pelted with ableist abuse and despondency since birth doesn’t magically negate how violent and misogynistic he is Edward Hyde struggling with self harm and suicidal thoughts doesn’t magically negate how violent and misogynistic he is . I’m starting to get the feeling you guys just don’t like women
This is exactly how I feel when people rewrite the Minotaur to be this perfect victim who did nothing wrong and Theseus was super evil for killing him
He ate children. Regardless of anything else, Theseus was entirely justified in killing a literal child-eating cannibal monster. People can make up headcanons about him only being that way bc he was locked away in a labyrinth (there’s zero indication that he was uncomfortable with the childkilling)— but just portray his death as a mercy atp, then. He dies to end his suffering, and the suffering he causes. It isn’t fair because the world’s unfair, but removing the monstrousness from the monster undermines the entire story.
In Greek mythology, I don't think it can be overstated how much collateral damage Theseus caused, damage that extended well into the Trojan War:
The war itself was caused because Tyndareus, King of Sparta, needed a successor after his two sons, Castor and Pollux, died, so Helen's husband would be the successor... But since she was actually the daughter of Zeus her suitors included many of the most powerful princes in Greece, leading to the oath that would create the Greek coalition just to allow the choice without causing a war. But how did people know Helen was Zeus' daughter? Because that's why Theseus kidnapped her as a child, he wanted to marry a daughter of Zeus and decided it was easier to raise one from childhood (how HE found out is a mystery, but considering both he and Castor and Pollux were among the Argonauts he may have heard from them).
Late in the war the friggin' AMAZONS show up to help Troy. Why would the Amazons care? Because Theseus' first wife (or second depending if you count Ariadne) was their queen, that he kidnapped, and they were still holding a grudge and were going to take it out on the Athenian contingent led by his sons.
Speaking of the Amazons, they give a REALLY hard time to the Greeks and almost win before Achilles kills their queen. This can also be blamed on Theseus' kidnapping of their old queen, as the Amazons did of course mount a rescue operation but were defeated by the Athenians. Quite a few years had passed, long enough for them to revise their fighting methods and come up with something that could beat the full force of Greece.
Finally, Circe: in The Odyssey she turns Odysseus' men into pigs for no apparent reason and has to be subdued with divine help, but back when the Argonauts showed up she was much friendlier. This cannot be blamed ENTIRELY on Theseus, as Jason shares the blame... As they messed with her two nieces, Ariadne and Medea. And while Ariadne got herself a better husband in Dyonisus and Medea made Jason PAY, knowing that her nieces had been betrayed like that by two Greek men would have soured her disposition against them (and we don't know if Theseus abandoned Ariadne on purpose or it was a genuine accident, but YOU go and tell that to Circe. Plus, it's possible Theseus and his idiotic friend Pirithous messed with Circe's nymphs while she was purifying and lecturing Medea and Jason).
@babyrdie, @mostcuriousmythicist, @fostydosty
Are there factual sources that tie Theseus to the Trojan War, aside from sometimes having kidnapped child Helen? I know there is a lot of contradictory material to sort through and the Trojan War generation is very much not my area of expertise.
Well when it comes to what ancient sources say, here’s what they have to say about Theseus’s indirect involvement in the Trojan war.
The kidnapping of Helen is certainly the most tangible one. This led to Aethra being enslaved by Sparta and also led to her grandsons, Demophon and Acamas coming to her rescue.
This actually is pretty significant since some sources like Dictys Trojan chronicle, Tzetzes, and Malalas Chronography, claim that Aethra had persuaded Helen to elope with Paris. So this could be a case of how Theseus’s actions indirectly caused the Trojan war.
As for claims like “Theseus revealing the secret of Helen’s birth,” “The Amazons attacking the Greeks because of Theseus abducting Hippolyta,” and “Circe hating men because of Theseus ditching Ariadne,” well there’s no known source I’m aware of that mentions this. Not in Homer, Hesiod, the Athenian tragedies, or Ovid. Nothing.
Therefore it’s hard to really argue anymore about something that’s not there.
To be clear, there’s nothing wrong with having these as your own interpretations or headcanons. In fact this actually could be interesting stuff to write about. Just as long as your not passing it off as the part of the actual mythology of Ancient Greece.