$LAYYYTER

⁂

★
🪼

pixel skylines
YOU ARE THE REASON
almost home
No title available
Sweet Seals For You, Always
h
i don't do bad sauce passes
One Nice Bug Per Day
Monterey Bay Aquarium
hello vonnie
sheepfilms

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

blake kathryn

if i look back, i am lost
Today's Document
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from Hong Kong SAR China

seen from United States

seen from Brunei
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Spain
seen from Canada

seen from Lebanon

seen from United States
@mothrealms
The fact that men are credited with advancing civilization, rather than condemned for critically stunting its advancement after they forbade half of humanity from contributing, is an excellent example of an androcentric analysis.
someone said we had more fun in childhood because we didnt have any past memories to linger on and it has stuck with me ever since
“Fuck your gender”
New York City Dyke March, June, 1995, via lesbianherstoryarchives /ig
[ID: a black and white photo of a large crowd of people at eye-level. One person is beaming at the camera and is holding their shirt open so their chest is visible to the camera. Their nipples are censored and there is a sign on their stomach that says "Fuck your gender". The person directly to the left of the first person is looking at them and laughing. End ID]
it's insane to me that this woman is literally saying 'fuck your gender' and y'all are STILL they/theming her. a woman is beaming at the camera. her nipples are censored because men's nipples don't get censored. she is saying 'fuck your oppressive and patriarchal stereotypes that you push on lesbians' and you are they/theming her. you are all the misogynists this is directed at.
Self Portrait Series, Photo by Melissa Shook, 1973
Sorry again for the late post ! Today, after talking about my favourite poet (Renée Vivien), I'm gonna talk about on of my favourite filmmaker ;
Chantal Akerman !
Chantal Akerman was a Belgian filmmaker who was born in Belgium in 1950 and died in Paris in 2015.
She has had an absolutely insane influence on cinema, most recently when her film "Jeanne Dielman, 23 quai du commerce, 1080 Bruxelles", was named best film of all time (which honestly is very fair, this movie is a damn masterpiece).
She was a lesbian, though she didn't talk about it much and didn't want to be reduced to a "lesbian filmmaker". She was married to Sonia Wieder-Atherton, a cellist. Female homosexuality is a recurring theme in her movies - with sometimes long and explicit sex scenes between women, not at all created for the male gaze.
Chantal Akerman comes from a Polish Jewish family. Her grandparents and her mother, Natalia, were deported to Auschwitz, and only her mother returned. Her relationship with Judaism has had a profound influence on her cinema.
She studied briefly at the Institut National Supérieur des Arts du Spectacle in Paris, before going to New York, meeting some other filmmakers, and making some short movies, movies and documentaries. But her huge international success came in 1975, with Jeanne Dielman.
"I was tossing and turning in bed, worried. And suddenly, in a single minute, I saw the whole of Jeanne Dielman..."
I'm going to try and keep it professional when I talk about Jeanne Dielman, but it's going to be hard, because I LOVE this film.
It's a three-hour film that follows three days in the life of a widowed housewife, Jeanne Dielman, who lives with her son, spends her time doing household chores and prostitutes herself to survive. The film is shot in the illusion of real time: if Jeanne spends 30 minutes cleaning her living room, you'll be watching her do it for 30 minutes. (Obviously none of the scenes are that long and there are ellipses but that's to illustrate my point). It's revolutionary. A poignant film about the condition of housewives, alienation, the way we make sure we're busy all the time so we don't have to think about life or death. The tension escalates little by little until the deeply disturbing end of the film, when everything comes crashing down. A masterpiece. Everyone should watch it. It's long but it's worth it! (Plus the main actress is incredible, both as an actress and as a person).
This film was a huge success, and she continued to make others, with recurring themes of the status of women, mother-daughter relationships, lesbianism, death, mental health, alienation, boredom, the need for freedom, solitude, the passage of time, inner suffocation...
More generally, women are at the heart of his work. Women, their inner lives, their identity as women, their experiences...
Chantal was also a great feminist. She defended women's rights in her words, her actions and her films, and was keen to put women in the spotlight. She even surrounded herself almost exclusively with women to create her films.
Suffering from manic-depressive psychological disorders and deeply affected by the death of her mother Natalia a year and a half earlier, she decided to end her life at the age of 65 on 5 October 2015 in Paris.
She is buried in Père-Lachaise cemetery.
She is remembered today as an extraordinary filmmaker and a true innovator. Her films, long, emotionally chanllenging, psychologically and philosophically profound, are quite simply splendid. Check her work!!!
Chantal had a unique and magnificent style, and many more people should watch her films and documentaries.
Protesting the high school dress code that banned slacks for girls, Brooklyn c.1940
via reddit
Women fought for EVERYTHING we have today, if you think feminism hasn’t helped you in any way remember you’re ALLOWED to wear pants in public
Also reminder that men did not give women any of the rights we have today. Men withheld all of our freedoms and rights until we made a big enough stink about it
i do genuinely think I Am A Transwoman. I Am In The Closet. I Am Not Coming Out. should be like. required reading for anyone trying to make claims about gender politics.
somehow this tumblr post is spreading around radfem tumblr so that’s fun
Yes, this should be required reading. The author of this essay shows infinite empathy for his fellow males as complex human beings yet show nothing but hostility and naked contempt for females who he sees as nothing but the vessels of feminine caricature. Manhood is complex emotion, tender feelings, and raw humanity while womanhood is prom dresses, smooth legs, Tinkerbell costumes, and sleepovers. And women are supposedly guilty of greedily monopolizing these jewels of femininity. Of course, all men have access to smooth legs and sleepovers if they want. But that would entail challenging the patriarchy. It would entail being angry at the dominant, hypermasculine men who brutally enforce masculine stereotypes and dole out harsh consequences to males who fail to conform. But men rarely have the courage to challenge other men. They are in love with and are worshipful of the dominant males who brutalize them. Just like the author is in love with and protective of the reputations of the men who brutalized him. Just like the man who is bullied and disempowered at work by other men and then goes home to abuse his wife, who he sees as stealing power from him with disobedience- Transwomen are bullied by other males for being effeminate and then turn their rage onto women and accuse us of hoarding femininity from them with our bodies. An irrational but very predictable response to the male condition. For the abused woman, there is no level of acquiesence, placating and servitude that will satisfy her disempowered husband. She will be plundered and eventually, her very existence will be seen as an irritable provocation to her abusive husband. Just like there is no amount of acceptance, validation, and sharing with transwomen that will soothe their irritability or quell their desire.Yes, this essay is required reading. Perfectly shows the lengths the male will go to avoid themselves and other men.
California’s first woman structural engineer, Ruth Gordon Schnapp, 1970s
instead of calling the pride and prejudice heteros lesbian coded you should read actual books with lesbian leads. instead of calling hozier lesbian coded you should listen to actual songs by lesbian artists. lesbian creators deserve more than solely lesbian audiences. do you actually respect lesbians or are you just ally coded 🤨🤨🤨
the absolute lack of self-awareness
Britney Spears