07/25/2026

tannertan36
No title available
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr

Love Begins
Interview Vampire Daily
đȘŒ
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
Mike Driver
Sweet Seals For You, Always
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
The Stonewall Inn
Doug Jones
Keni
macklin celebrini has autism

oozey mess

PR's Tumblrdome
almost home
Color Me Curious
$LAYYYTER

seen from Germany
seen from Honduras

seen from Ukraine
seen from Sweden
seen from Brazil

seen from Ecuador

seen from United States
seen from Singapore

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Argentina
seen from Iraq

seen from Bangladesh

seen from France
seen from United States

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from Brazil

seen from Colombia

seen from Brazil

seen from Canada

seen from United States
@hexagon-club
07/25/2026
07/31/2026
not to keep posting about this but i donât think a lot of people realize that forcing women to be in a perpetual state of defensiveness, so much so that it is internalized and wired into our brains from the time weâre born, is actual brain damage and directly mirrors the internal wiring of trauma survivors whose nervous systems are constantly on alert and ready to defend even when they donât need to be. when youâre living in a state of perpetual defensiveness you become neurotic, hypervigilant, obsessive, anxious, depressed, overreactive, self-conscious, afraid. all of the things that have been historically categorized as feminine traits and behaviors. your true internal needs become masked by this compulsion to always be performing to satisfy externally enforced expectations, and you lose your sense of self and create this situation where what you want/need is directly at odds with what you express (or donât express) to others. which then is what gives birth to the idea that women never know what they want, women are mysterious and hard to understand, women are always contradicting themselves, women are never clear. itâs like well..yeah because women are repeatedly traumatized both psychologically and physically from the day theyâre born and only those who are fortunate enough to encounter sisterhood or wise maternal guidance or individually break free from ideology are able to live authentically. and even then it takes so much work to resist because you still have to operate within a culture that doesnât have a place for liberated women.
11/05/2025
The Garbage Ape is a folkloric figure made up by the cats to explain where garbage comes from. Joe Stork brings babies, the Sandman puts rheum in your eye, the Garbage Ape puts garbage cans on the sidewalk. Heathcliff cares about garbage because heâs a cat that eats out of the trash as made explicit in other comics. For trash day the Garbage Ape puts the garbage cans on the sidewalk and then the garbage men come to empty them. The only difference is that the garbage men are real. The cats donât know the actual reason for either the appearance or the disappearance of their snacks so they made up the Garbage Ape to balance it out. Thereâs nothing confusing whatsoever about this comic or about the concept of Garbage Apelings.
âHer life was not easy. Not by any measure.
(...) She was treed by lions more times than anyone could count. She was involved in a serious fight with her neice the Nhlanguleni Female, escaping with scratches beneath her eye that could easily have cost her half her vision. She endured all of it and returned, each time, to patrol her territory, to hunt, to try again.â
In memory of the Mashaba Female leopard (2008â2025) Taken in Londolozi Game Reserve, South Africa Photographed by Anthony Goldman
DO NOT DOWNLOAD TUMBLR it will install a virus on your device called tumblr
You guys are always like "being crushed by 10,000 tons of rock probably feels good as hell" or "being torn to pieces by hunting dogs would low key fix me" and I feel like those things would actually be unpleasant.
How about "Drinking an ice cold strawberry milkshake probably feels good as hell". Do you guys like that one.
Hope this moid gets everything that is coming to him
Itâs a game to these men. Thatâs what the freedom to take the costume off grants you. They are choosing to roleplay these situations secure in the knowledge that they can step away at any time.
And for many men these discussions about the impact of sexual harassment or rape are thought experiments at best and masturbation fodder at worst.
Maybe he is just a random troll, but he still got this woman to disclose times in which she was sexually victimised by men. She got upset, she recalled traumatic events in her life, while he doesnât care and tells her how he sexualises her experiences because he cannot fathom that he could ever be the victim in these scenarios. Because this isnât real for him. Whether he is âtrollingâ or not.
Even many men who donât sexualise it, still treat discussions about rape and harassment as theoretical. You might as well be discussing what if the moon was made of cheese. They donât care because itâs hypothetical to them.
And if it is a satire account as someone said in the comments, is the other user part of it? Cause if not, then what exactly is the satire? You are mocking a woman talking about how she was raped.
#oh my god did gallagher just discover the term dank this is so exciting #does he know it's a weed thing?? there's no way right
Of course Peter Gallagher knows that "dank" is a weed thing. He also knows that "in heat" is a sex thing and that when aliens "probe" someone it's in the anus.
These are words, not things. Heathcliff is a comic about symbols.
You're never going to get a comic where an alien actually probes someone any more than you're going to get a comic where the Man-Eating Giant eats a man. You're just going to get a dozen comics where aliens like the word "probe".
Heathcliff wears the ham helmet because it's the helmet you wear when you eat a ham. You can tell it's that helmet because it says "ham" on it. The helmet's function is determined not by its form but by its label.
summer = beach = sand = desert = mummy and thus there is the Summer Mummy. Because of symbolic associations that do not otherwise cohere.
Robots don't wear clothes but the mere act of labeling them "nude" makes them nude. And once a painting is a nude painting there has to be a fig leaf because a "nude" without a "figleaf" is "indecent".
A "ham" is a ham even when it's a car. A yam can be a ham can be a car because "yam" sounds like "ham". Symbols have overtaken things.
Jimmy is Heathcliff's attempt to manipulate these symbols.
popularity = billboards, popularity = charity fundraising, popularity = influencers. But standing underneath the word "influencer" has failed to make Jimmy popular. Why is this?
#oh my god did gallagher just discover the term dank this is so exciting #does he know it's a weed thing?? there's no way right
Of course Peter Gallagher knows that "dank" is a weed thing. He also knows that "in heat" is a sex thing and that when aliens "probe" someone it's in the anus.
These are words, not things. Heathcliff is a comic about symbols.
You're never going to get a comic where an alien actually probes someone any more than you're going to get a comic where the Man-Eating Giant eats a man. You're just going to get a dozen comics where aliens like the word "probe".
Heathcliff wears the ham helmet because it's the helmet you wear when you eat a ham. You can tell it's that helmet because it says "ham" on it. The helmet's function is determined not by its form but by its label.
summer = beach = sand = desert = mummy and thus there is the Summer Mummy. Because of symbolic associations that do not otherwise cohere.
Robots don't wear clothes but the mere act of labeling them "nude" makes them nude. And once a painting is a nude painting there has to be a fig leaf because a "nude" without a "figleaf" is "indecent".
A "ham" is a ham even when it's a car. A yam can be a ham can be a car because "yam" sounds like "ham". Symbols have overtaken things.
Posted on the noticeboard outside my uni lab.
The cognitive dissonance men need for this!
A Common Theme, from Gentlemen: âItâs obvious girls & women get attacked all the time, they should constantly be on their guard in public, guys get women way too drunk on purpose as âa moveâ, donât ever let a woman walk alone at night- but I personally donât know any predatory men whatsoever.â
Itâs not dissonance. Men actively benefit from a society where women are in constant fear of sexual harassment/rape. They prefer the way we are socialized because of it. And they prefer the bar being so low for ~nice guys~ to be the bare minimum of decent human beings. This type of society is more important than the safety of individual women in their life.
âMen actively benefit from a society where women are in constant fear âŠâ
A significant portion of "transfems" are nothing more than just women-hating incels.
The thought process that goes behind believing a demographic that statistically does the least amount of harm is actually evil and deserves to be killed, while simultaneously holding nowhere near the same level of vitriol towards the demographic that actually murders and assaults "transfems" (which is OTHER MALES, mind you) should raise some brows, even amongst TRAs.
Also, notice how in many of these posts it isn't just "transmascs" but "tme" people in general, which includes "cis" women, y'know, the group these trans identified men claim to be the same as and share "kinship" with. They believe themselves to be superior to females because they are "trans" (aka MEN) while simultaneously claiming to be female. This is nothing new; males have been claiming that females are inferior for centuries, this is just the same thing in a different font.
I donât understand why they hate the trans mascs so much. Like I know itâs misogyny but I donât know the reason they claim to have such beef with their supposed âbrothersâ
sorry to add more examples but they actually REALLY hate trans mascs. They hate them beyond belief. this isn't even all of what i have seen, i randomly selected a few screenshots in the folder that i've been saving for a few weeks.
So the reason that they hate them is misogyny obviously, but also consider that these are the "afabs" that are closest and most accessible to them, the ones who bear the brunt of their abuse. It's like asking why amish men especially mistreat amish women. And I think what we need to be aware of is that ftms/transmascs deserve empathy and understanding in this situation. It simply won't work to attack or to ridicule their beliefs and identity, when they're already facing harassment from their own community. From everything we know about religions and cult dynamics, that will only entrench them further in their beliefs that feminists are the enemy.
I would suggest that radfems treat transmascs with respect and empathy. Or failing that, leave them alone. They have a huge mental and social block when it comes to speaking with "suppressive persons" aka radfems... I know it's frustrating to watch, but this situation is growing unsustainable for many of them, so it's likely that many of them will reach these conclusions on their own, in their own way and in their own time. The best thing we can do is provide acceptance, solidarity, and support when they get there.
i will always have an endless amount of love and empathy for transmascs because i've been exactly where they are. i left the community before the tme/tma shit started but the violence aimed at trans men by trans women has always existed.
it was this violence that i could never fully agree with. i realized that they treat transmascs the same way they treat radfems. i realized that, despite their insistence to the contrary, we were still women to them. swapping the terms they used (from "transmasc" to "terf") revealed an identical rhetoric of hate.
and then i experienced the horror of knowing that i played right into their hand. that i was not only agreeing with their misogyny, but i was actively praising and promoting it. i played a part in normalizing the rhetoric that has hurt my fellow women so badly.
i think this realization keeps a lot of people trapped in the community. acknowledging reality means acknowledging the hurt you've caused yourself and others. it means swallowing your pride and accepting that you fell to manipulation and propaganda.
"i would never be stupid enough to join a cult," says everybody on earth.
bomb that kills all tmas
They hate transmascs and wlw more than any other group of people because we have what they never will:
A female body and the ability to date female lesbians.
They canât stand the fact that weâre able to live the life and date the women that they fetishize but will never have access to.
Theyâre insanely, irrationally jealous. Thatâs why they lash out, talk shit, call us names. And itâs also what makes them physically dangerous to transmasc people.
I should probably update my bio. I have been 32 for a few years at this point.
some people have boundaries that are rooted in confusing, offensive, or disagreeable beliefs. and the thing is, no matter how much you disagree with those core beliefs, as long as the boundary is a *personal* one, it still needs to be respected.
for example: i'm bi. when i was dating, i knew many gay and straight people who did not want to date bi people. that boundary is fine and i respect it. it has happened before they told me they don't want to date bisexuals because we're promiscuous and unfaithful. is that gross and offensive? sure. i don't respect that belief one bit. but i respect the boundary and never tried to force anything.
you can challenge those beliefs, but you cannot challenge personal boundaries. and if it's clear that you're only challenging someone's beliefs to push their boundaries, don't be surprised when they lash out at you.
on a related note, i've seen an uptick in people debating this about some topics relating to women's bodily autonomy (when do they ever stop, really). so i'm tapping this post as reminder of my stance on the matter.
whether a woman aborts a disabled fetus because she personally can't care for a disabled child, or if she disgustingly sees disabled people as inferior, that has no bearing on whether on the morality of the abortion itself.
whether a woman chooses not to date/sleep with people from any marginalized race, belief system, gender, class, physical or mental ability, etc., it can be due to "acceptable" reasons of past experiences or incompatibility, or due to "unacceptable" bigotry (extremely loaded arguments of acceptibility btw), again, it doesn't matter for that choice itself.
the answer "women need to use their genitals to make X choice for X reason" isn't to say "women need to use their genitals to make Y choice for Y reason". the obsession with women's reproductive systems and romantic/sexual relationships as progressive praxis is disgusting.
if u only learn one thing from my washed up blog, learn this. one of the many things both the left and right can agree on is that womenâs social, physical and sexual boundaries are to be held in contempt. unfettered sexual access to women is the nucleus of male supremacy.
women who say no to sex with any kind of male for any reason or no reason commit an injustice. to the right, our injustice is against civilization itself, because our failure to comply means they will find it harder to propagate the next generation of slaves and slave masters at our expense. to the left, our injustice is against the oppressed, the marginalized males who want to reap this particular spoil of patriarchy but cannot due to their diminished value in the patriarchal pecking order.
the right will be honest. they will tell you that their solution is to simply erode and eliminate your ability to enforce your boundaries. that your ability to say no is a glitch in the system that has been left unpatched for far too long. the left will lie. they too agree with the rightâs solution, and they too agree that your boundaries are an inconvenient glitch in the system. but the left will use progressive language to obfuscate this belief. to the left, the erosion of your boundaries is necessary for the marginalized males of this world to achieve some semblance of their denied birthright.
come to think of it, both the left and right believe your ability to say no can be an act of oppression; some of the most high status, western white men, are losing their minds over birth rates, saying women are oppressing the human race itself by saying no. they both believe that your ability to say no is an ethical and moral failing. to the left, to say yes is justice, to say no is bigotry. to the right, to say yes is justice, to say no is catastropheâon par with human extinction.
all males are politically incentivized to view your ability to say no as an injustice, and they are socially and culturally compelled to correct and overcome this injustice. they correct or overcome this injustice with rape. the more sophisticated male supremacists will push for a psychological strengthening of patriarchy. a world where youâll never say no at all, because you are a good comrade, or a good wife, and there will be no rape to speak of and no boundaries to think of because you will always say yes. that is true liberation for both the marginalized males, and for the higher status males who have marginalized them. you were never really supposed to say no in the first place. itâs inconvenient. they want to claw back this power.
donât let them. keep committing the injustice. it is important that this injustice is ours to commit. embrace the failure of ethics, embrace the criminality, and smile when they attempt to wear down your ability to uphold your fortress. donât allow anyone to take your spine. if sex is a need, then let them die, and tiktok dance on the gotdamn corpse.