radfems: the defining trait of a lesbian is not liking dick
me, examining the hundreds-to-thousands of sex toy shops owned and operated by lesbians, selling strap-ons, marketed towards lesbians: huh. Interesting
@andrewhussiespisskink why is it so important that all categories of women be willing to fuck someone with a penis? How is a penis like a dildo when there is no dude attached to the dildo?
Ok so you admit that men are useless then? Or are you saying men are nothing but walking dildos? Why bother with the frail emotions and rageful demands who will use your body to masturbate into when you can get a dildo for under a $20?
“As far as the history of this polarized relationship between Man and Nature and Man and Woman goes, we have to reconsider the holocaust of women in the course of the European witch hunt, an event which took place in those same centuries which are hailed as the beginning of the modern, enlightened era. After this orgy of violence against women which continued until the era of Enlightenment, the end of the eighteenth century, came a new yearning for the ‘feminine’, the romantic and sentimental identification of women in eighteenth century literature and art. It seems that real living, strong and independent women had first to be physically destroyed and subdued before the men of the new bourgeois class could create a new romantic ideal of womanhood. An ideal in which the frail, submissive sentimental woman, one dependent on the man as ‘breadwinner and protector’, woman as the epitome of the world of feelings rather than of reason, plays the main role. As Sheila Rowbotham remarks, throughout the nineteenth century and even until today this romantic ideal of womanhood has been the ‘desired space’ for men’s longings and still largely determines the man-woman relationship. This ideal of womanhood was the necessary complement to the strong, enterprising, bourgeois white man who began to conquer and colonize the world for the sake of capital accumulation. Moreover, this cult of the frail, sentimental woman, who supposedly represents ‘nature’ vis-a-vis ‘rational man’, is largely based on fantasy, on symbolic constructions. And men began to project their desire on to these female fantasy figures, rather than on to real flesh and bone.”
— Maria Mies, White Man’s Dilemma: His Search for What He Has Destroyed in Ecofeminism with Vandana Shiva (1993)
Just saw a guy on here post about wanting emotional and mental stability in a woman and then immediately followed it with a reblogged porn gif of a woman getting punch in the face….. this is why I fucking hate men
I love how men expect to be able to mistreat and abuse women and then have women be totally fine after it like we’re just supposed to walk it off and if we don’t then they’ll be like “I always end up with the mentally ill girls”. Wrong. You traumatized women and they become ill after meeting you.
imagine unironically saying that pornography isn’t a public health and safety crisis or a crisis of morality with a straight face…when articles like this have to be written
my hot topic cashier had big buttons that said “ask me about my fursona” and “submissive” on his lanyard but no name tag because thats just too personal i guess
“Frequently Asked Questions About Prostitution. Q. Can’t prostitution be made medically safer with regulations? A. Sometimes more safe is still not safe enough. Unless prostituted women are sterilized they can expect to get pregnant and must have repeated abortions. Neither the option of sterilization nor submission to repeated abortions is acceptable, and humans have not yet figured out a 100% effective method of containing the spread of deadly STDs. I’m much more concerned about preventing rape, battery, burnings. etc. than I am in wondering how to patch women up after men torture them. When doctors, police, priests, NATO soldiers and refugee working men use their position of power to prey upon vulnerable and traumatized populations, as many prostituted people have reported, regulating prostitution is really about men organizing to provide other men easy access to disease-free bodies and not about the welfare of women’s health and well being.”
Based on the first two statements, what does being “trans” mean?
George Cecil Ives, a contemporary of Oscar Wilde, created the first homosexual rights group.
4. All sexualities are valid. Coercing people to have sex with people they don’t want to (like guilting them or saying they suck if they don’t) is rape and contributes to rape culture . Stop disrespecting Lesbian’s sexual and romantic boundaries and encouraging conversion therapy. Sex with other people is not a human right and Lesbians are oppressing nobody by not fucking or dating trans women.
5. Misogyny is hatred of the female sex. The sex that produces ova, menstruates, and can bear offspring if they are impregnated through heterosexual intercouse. Trans women deal with their own issues, but they are not the victims of FGM, femicide, forced pregnancy, lack of access to abortions, menstrual huts and stigma associated with periods, which is what counts as misogyny.
6. Prioritizing the female sex before and above all else is the exact opposite of misogyny. Caring about women born female does not mean thinking trans women or female people who do not identify as women should die. That is a reach. Are you going around telling Prostate and Breast cancer organizations to include all cancers as well? Are you going to support groups for people with drug addictions if you don’t have a drug addiction yourself? Do you see how wanting into a group focused on issues you do not have is illogical?
7. There are as many genders as there are people because it is your personality and relationship to what society arbitrarily dictates is “feminine” and “masculine”. There are however only two SEXES, which refers to chromosomes /primary and secondary sex characteristics/ what gamete you produce. The only options are male and female, no one produces a gamete other than sperm or ova and no one has both sets of equipment to functionally produce both (the concept of a hermaphrodite). Less than 2% of the human population is born with chromosome abnormality or a disorder in sexual development and we call these people intersex. They do not disprove that the rest of the population is either male or female, just like babies born missing a hand doesn’t disprove that humans are generally born with two hands.
At least you’re not wishing death on people who disagree with you, which is nice.
Only what Google has to provide because I just searched “first gay rights protest” and results for the first movement showed up.
This is actually from the Digital Ttransgender Archive: https://www.digitaltransgenderarchive.net/files/1544bp405
Either way, him and Oscar Wilde (both English poets) worked to end the oppression of homosexuals as early as 1892
If OP wants to be more specific and refer to the LGBT community in its most recent conception or in the West, there is an entire Wikipedia page about movements in the US prior to Stonewall (which we all know is the implication of saying trans women started the movement). All kinds of gay and trans people have participated and been the faces and voices of the movement, so isolating a minority in the group as the originators doesn’t make sense. It’s US-centric and anachronistic.
“Trans-Exclusionary-Radical-Feminist,” when you think about it, is a VERY kind term. To be called a TERF is for the person to admit that they still consider you a feminist.
But what kind of feminist excludes so many women from their movement? If you hate so many women for what they are, you really don’t deserve to be called any kind of feminist, radical or otherwise.
The kind of women who knows women are raped because of their vaginas
The kind of women who knows female child are drowned because they are born females
The kind of women who acknowledges that female child being thrown in dumpsters isn’t about identity
The kid of of women who acknowledge ghat Brazil pays for TW auguries but abortions is still illegal
The kind of women who acknowledge that majority of Restavaks in Haiti are female
The kind of women who knows women were not allowed to vote because they are female
THE KIND OF WOMEN WHO KNOWS TRANSWOMEN WERE ALWAYS ALLOWED GO VOTE
The Kind of women who knows that many Islamic countries award ownership of children to the husband because they beleive the sperm is more important than the egg
The kind of women who knows activist in Saudi Arabia face death penalties for wanting to drive
The kind of women who is concerned where Iranian women re put in jail for not wearing the Hijab
The kind of women who is absolutely horrified that lesbians are getting publicly caned for having sex
The kind of women who is concern that there is no Domestic Abuse laws in Haiti
The kind of women who is is angry that women are being inprisoned for miscarriages
The kind of women who acknowledge rape was a weapon of war
The kind of women demanding where Transwomen were when women couldn’t vote, couldn’t own House, property, a credit card.
Kind of women wondering where the fuck transWomen were when black women were being made to be mounted and rape to create chattel and slaves.
THE KIND OF WOMEN WHO DOESNT BELEIVE ITS HER JOB TO CATER TO THE MALE SEX NO MATTER HOW THEY IDENTIFY
The amount of hatred I have for western liberals. The amount hatred I feel in how western feminist have literally allowed males to steer the plight women’s oppression to the point where males being happy about female rage is acceptable in feminist circle because you liberal westerners don’t actually give a single fuck about the female sex….
AND IM SUPPOSED TO GIVE A FUCK ABOUT MALES? Who feel like women?
Petition to refer to “transwomen” as males/men because that’s what they are and no amount or denial or adherence to a gender thetan cult will ever change that.
Trans"women" have always been males. They’re men and boys and no matter how much they stomp their feet, the whole world recognizes them as males.
They’ll never ever be women. Just men playing make believe until they die.
So die fucking mad about it you pestilent smeglords.
Female reproductive anatomy is stigmatized and we celebrate it, but congrats on not being “obsessed” with making women feel proud about their bodies & further stigmatizing it, I guess??
trans ppl: its so hard to date when youre trans :// oppression
also trans ppl: im going to purposefully call myself the wrong sexuality and seek out partners i know are inherently not attracted to my sex because i want to try and fulfill some validation fantasy more than i actually want find partners that could make good partners for me in the long term
remember when terfs were shocked I was happy women’s colleges started accepting trans women and that shitty music festival in Michigan finally stopped?
If it was so shitty, why did you lot want to go so badly?
Rather than make your own, you destroyed someone else’s’ festival. That isn’t anything to be proud of; it’s the adult equivalent of kicking someone’s sandcastle because it’s nicer than yours.
But okay. You’ve colonized spaces that were created to provide females with an education (because they were denied access to higher education — which trans women never were, fyi) and destroyed a festival.
You know what we have? And that you can’t borrow, colonize or destroy?
Our history, our legacies, and — most importantly — the knowledge that in fifty years, you lot will be looked at like lobotomies, and we will still be here:
Because it was in my fucking backyard in Michigan. You all came into West Michigan, I didn’t come to you. I’m a woman sweetie, I’m not upset, I’m stoked there’s not a bunch of shitty people coming into my home state that never gave anything back to West Michigan. I have family members who don’t have access to clean drinking water just miles away from your ex shitty festival was, that you claim gives so much back to the community. Fuck you and every other person who comes into Michigan to enjoy how beautiful it is without giving anything back. You being anti trans is only one of my issues, leaving my home state trashed is about at the same level
So even though it’s been established that you’re a willful liar and that photo has nothing to do with Michfest, I have to ask, how was a private gathering of woman out in the woods impacting you in any way?
The first thing I see when I go to your blog @chelseapoe is you spreading your ass open and other bdsm stuff. You are the LAST person to understand why women would want to gather at a festival with other women born female and share and talk about our experiences pertaining to such.
Lesbians should “critically examine” their attraction to vaginas but questioning straight men on why they get off on beating their girlfriends is too far???
The idea that millions of sperm are on an Olympian race to reach the egg is yet another male fantasy of human reproduction
Before science was able to shed light on human reproduction, most people thought new life arose through spontaneous generation from non-living matter. That changed a smidgen in the middle of the 17th century, when natural philosophers were able (barely) to see the female ovum, or egg, with the naked eye. They theorised that all life was spawned at the moment of divine creation; one person existed inside the other within a woman’s eggs, like Russian nesting dolls. This view of reproduction, called preformation, suited the ruling class well. ‘By putting lineages inside each other,’ notes the Portuguese developmental biologist and writer Clara Pinto-Correia in The Ovary of Eve (1997), ‘preformation could function as a “politically correct” antidemocratic doctrine, implicitly legitimising the dynastic system – and of course, the leading natural philosophers of the Scientific Revolution certainly were not servants.’
One might think that, as science progressed, it would crush the Russian-doll theory through its lucid biological lens. But that’s not precisely what occurred – instead, when the microscope finally enabled researchers to see not just eggs but sperm, the preformation theory morphed into a new, even more patriarchal political conceit: now, held philosophers and some students of reproduction, the egg was merely a passive receptacle waiting for vigorous sperm to arrive to trigger development. And sperm? The head of each contained a tiny preformed human being – a homunculus, to be exact. The Dutch mathematician and physicist Nicolaas Hartsoeker, inventor of the screw-barrel microscope, drew his image of the homunculus when sperm became visible for the first time in 1695. He did not actually see a homunculus in the sperm head, Hartsoeker conceded at the time, but he convinced himself that it was there.
More powerful microscopes eventually relegated the homunculus to the dustbin of history – but in some ways not much has changed. Most notably, the legacy of the homunculus survives in the stubbornly persistent notion of the egg as a passive participant in fertilisation, awaiting the active sperm to swim through a hailstorm of challenges to perpetuate life. It’s understandable – though unfortunate – that a lay public might adopt these erroneous, sexist paradigms and metaphors. But biologists and physicians are guilty as well.
It was in the relatively recent year of 1991, long after much of the real science had been set in stone, that the American anthropologist Emily Martin, now at New York University, described what she called a ‘scientific fairy tale’ – a picture of egg and sperm that suggests that ‘female biological processes are less worthy than their male counter-parts’ and that ‘women are less worthy than men’. The ovary, for instance, is depicted with a limited stock of starter eggs depleted over a lifetime whereas the testes are said to produce new sperm throughout life. Human egg production is commonly described as ‘wasteful’ because, from 300,000 egg starter cells present at puberty, only 400 mature eggs will ever be released; yet that adjective is rarely used to describe a man’s lifetime production of more than 2 trillion sperm. Whether in the popular or scientific press, human mating is commonly portrayed as a gigantic marathon swimming event in which the fastest, fittest sperm wins the prize of fertilising the egg. If this narrative was just a prejudicial holdover from our sexist past – an offensive male fantasy based on incorrect science – that would be bad enough, but continued buy-in to biased information impedes crucial fertility treatments for men and women alike.
MOVED TO: MUSCLEV2 @musclev - Tumblr Blog | Tumgag
2087
turnnoffyourmind
kaledo-art
jacobvanloon
andulkaphoto
prguitarman
gummygunk
stormborns
areudirty
