"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
$LAYYYTER

pixel skylines
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸

Kaledo Art

Product Placement
YOU ARE THE REASON
Today's Document
trying on a metaphor
cherry valley forever

#extradirty
todays bird
Xuebing Du
Sade Olutola
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Cosmic Funnies

Andulka
Sweet Seals For You, Always
occasionally subtle
dirt enthusiast

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Vietnam
seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Mexico
@museumstudious
My good friend Amy, who is a trans historian and museum pro has compiled a list of trans museums studies resources on her website!
Check out 'Not Your Average Cistory' here!
Night at the museum, Nicolas Krief
I just informed my boyfriend how terrible the pay is in the museum industry and he is SHOOK.
Being weird together in museums is a love language
Archivist here, about the Reagan Library. YES he was awful. But these are historical records that expose just how bad he was. This is also part of a profession/administration in an uphill fight to preserve as much of the crazy evidence that comes out of the current administration for history and future generations. Lastly, the people who work there may not have recovered financially from the govt shutdown & panicking about jobs, homes, etc So yes, Fuck Reagan but please keep that in mind
Youâre right. Fuck Reagan, but preserve evidence of his cruelty, crimes, homophobia, and bigotry.
I canât stress enough how shitty Reagan was and the amount of horrible consequences his policies have had. And I absolutely get wanting to burn down his legacy (especially when what most people see looks like a monument to him) and when it is literally surrounded by fire. I get it.Â
Losing a monument to him is one thing, losing the archives is a whole different animal. Losing this means losing the voices of those who were directly affected by what was happening. Who reached out/pleaded for help or intervention and that maybe didnât make it. It means losing so much of the hard evidence of what he did. Not the effects of what he did, those scars are all around us, but of the very real decisions he made and consequences he chose to ignore or decided were completely acceptable (or even the point). There are millions of pages, artifacts, and materials. Even working on them since he died the staff wouldnât have had time to digitize them. The vast majority would be gone.Â
The human factor is also important. A lot of labor goes into archival collections. A lot of emotional labor goes into collections as well. Keeping the papers and records of anything, but especially of a person or administration, means dealing with the good, the bad, and the ugly. Getting those materials organized and ready for researchers means going through sensitive materials. Every archivist I have ever met has cried at work because of something that has come across our desks. In the last two months alone I have dealt with boxes of materials on hate crimes, school bullying, the Ground Zero Task Force files for the NY state senator that represented lower Manhattan, meaning notes and updates on all the devastating details. I work on a much much smaller and, generally considered, more positive collection. Archivists deal with amazing things but it can also get real dark.Â
There is also the front of house museum, facilities, and service staff also in this boat. Anyone who has worked any kind of position like this knows it can be rough. Especially if you work at a place dedicated to someone like Reagan. Their feelings about Reagan aside, they have to deal with the general public and a public that probably has strong feelings about Reagan. Now add the stress of possibly losing your job due to it literally burning to the ground and, depending on where staff live in comparison, their homes might also be at risk or already gone.Â
So to sum up, FUCK REAGAN I hope he spends eternity living the experiences of every person he harmed but with full knowledge that he is the one directly responsible for it, but also my thoughts are with the staff.Â
Musings of a Museum Science Grad Student.
#18.The best practices of museums today, are trying to make up for the best practices of 50 years ago.
There's really no such thing as the 'voiceless'. There are only the deliberately silenced, or the preferably unheard.
Arundhati Roy
Good morning,
museums should repatriate artifacts belonging to living cultures and display reproductions instead
Good afternoon,
no one is entitled to the sacred art, tools, or costumes of another culture (save members of the culture itself) and nonsacred reproductions will serve just as well for the purposes of education and appreciation
Good evening,
having museums full of reproductions would be even cooler than having museums full of sacred artifacts because when modern craftspeople are able to replicate those artifacts, itâs usually because they still make the same items the same way today
this means that you could have description tags emphasizing that such-and-such item has been made by these people in almost the same way for hundreds of years
having museums full of beautiful reproductions takes the emphasis off of Things and places it on the People who make them, which is really as it should be
All art seized by colonialists should be returned to the people and cultures they belong to.
Museums are NOT more important than people.
In my art history class weâre discussing museums and repatriation and I am so fucking angry
Just wait until I have some free time, Iâll post my favorite whiny bitch responses from European museums.
First, a fun fact: âIt is noted in the report that some 90% of African cultural heritage currently exists outside of the continent and is displayed in major Western museums.â So keep that in mind when reading these.
Letâs get this party started, shall we?
âContrary to the sanctified treatment of objects in these museums, there have been cases in Africa where artworks have temporarily left the museum to be used in rituals.â
Europeans, clutching their pearls: But it is Art, it cannot be soiled by the hands of the masses who created it!!
Then I read a big long paragraph from a French museum director that in summary reads: Hey everyone, letâs start from scratch and pretend colonialism never happened. That good? Does that work for everyone? Awesome.Â
ââŚcultural objects from the area which is now Iraq are being used to promote BP [Oil], which supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq.â
So yâall just gonna an oil company sponsor an exhibit of dubiously obtained Iraqi artifacts? Cool, cool, no colonialist undertones there.
â[D]irector of the British Museum Hartwig Fischer said that while the museumâs trustees were open to all forms of cooperation, âthe collections have to be preserved as whole.ââ
You mean, all those collections donated from wealthy individuals who pillaged the entire world? If you really believe this Iâve got a simple solution for you: return the entire damn collection.
âUnlike Nazi-looted art, what was taken in the former colonies are not recognized as criminally obtained under international law.â
Hi yeah what the actual fuck
Then thereâs the Parthenon Marbles, and if you donât know, itâs a whole big Thing with a near comical backstory. But this post is long enough as is, and I donât want to bore you. In short: Britain has bunch of the carvings and statues that were left in the Greek Parthenon, and Greece wants them back. Here are some choice bits from the British Museumâs current official stance on the marbles:
âArchaeologists worldwide are agreed that the surviving sculptures could never be re-attached to the structure.â
That is??? Not the issue??? No one is suggesting this???
âacting with the full knowledge and permission of the Ottoman authoritiesâ
Really? You sure about that? Because it seems like no one else agrees with you on that. Also, even if there was clear permission, saying âThe empire that conquered Greece told us we could take themâ doesnât exactly strengthen your case.
âthe Greek authorities have now removed all the architectural sculptures from the Parthenon to the Acropolis Museum. They have thus completed a process begun by Lord Elgin 200 years agoâ
Are⌠are you suggesting that Greece only wants to preserve its heritage because you wanted to first? Seriously? Iâd be damn careful about touting yourself as paragons of historical preservation, Britain.
âThe Museum is a unique resource for the world: the breadth and depth of its collection allows the worldâs public to re-examine cultural identities and explore the connections between them.â
And how did your collection get so big, might I ask? Oh, you donât know? Because youâre not willing to do the research on how most of these artifacts were acquired? Fascinating.
âThis display does not alter the Trusteesâ view that the sculptures are part of everyoneâs shared heritage and transcend cultural boundaries.â
Guys Iâm dying they sound like an entitled white boy in an intro to philosophy class
By the way, this document that is less than 1,000 words mentions that the public can view the them âfree of chargeâ no less than 3 times.
Fun times.
Sources: (x) (x) (x) (x)
I actually was given a C minus in this class in my undergrad for calling out museums for being whiney about repatriation. My professor HATED me and we would get into heated arguments about how stolen artifacts needed to be returned. God those were the daysâŚ.lol FYI this professor Dr.Wilson got mad one day and told me to go back to Mexico and asked me if I was legal. I know this angerâŚlolÂ
Greeceâs Acropolis museum is literally a huge fuck you to the British Museum. The New Acropolis Museum opened in 2007. It looks amazing
Since you canât dig anywhere in Greece (especially right by the Acropolis) without hitting ruins or artifacts, they built a glass floor so that visitors can see the ruins below the building.
A huge part of the design for the new building was to emphasize that Greece is ready and capable of caring for the Elgin Marbles (a huge defense the British Museum will give is that colonized countries donât have the resources to care for the artifacts properly). So they went out of their way to make this as clear as possible.
The top floor of the building is entirely devoted to the metopes and friezes around the Parthenon. Like, so devoted that they even oriented the top floor to align with the actual Parthenon
So if you walk around the floor, everything is oriented as if you were walking around the actual Parthenon.
So the two ends of the floor are dedicated to the two pediments. And they were very particular with how theyâre displayed.
Wow there sure are a lot of things missing.
They left space for where the Elgin Marbles should be. All of the pieces are labelled. For all of the missing pieces, there is a sign saying that that piece is in the British Museum. Itâs pretty hard to miss when entire sections are not there.
That entire floor is just to show that they all belong together. The pediments need to be back together. Get your shit together British Museum
You missed my favorite part of the museum:
They have separate room devoted to these statues, with a spotlight shining on the empty spot where the sixth one is supposed to be. It was the saltiest museum I have ever been to, and I was living. My favorite part was when the tour guide pleaded to us to write to the British Museum and ask them to return the artifacts, and an older man from India muttered under his breath, âHa! Good luck with that.â
That aside, itâs also one of the most beautiful museums I have ever been in. The architecture is stunning. If you ever get a chance, absolutely go to it.
For those who donât know the story behind why all these Greek statues are in Britain, buckle up for a wild ride.
The Parthenon has a storied history, obviously, as it is was an incredible temple in a major Mediterranean port. It had started to show wear and tear over the years, and different people had attempted at various points to âsaveâ it, or at least save the carvings. Most of the time, these attempts did more harm than good.
Then along comes Thomas Bruce, a Scottish nobleman more commonly know as Lord Elgin. Between 1799-1803 he acts as British ambassador to the Ottoman empire, which controlled the entire region that is now Greece. He gets really interested in the old works of the classical civilizations and asks the Sultan of the Ottoman empire if he can undertake an extensive study and recording of the art at the Acropolis in Athens. Not only does the Sultan say yes, his agreement states that Elgin can âtake away any pieces of stone with old inscriptions or figures thereon.â It is agreed by all parties who are not the British Museum that the Sultan was referring only to the various pieces that were scattered across the ground, but not anything still standing.
Elgin interpreted this wording to mean, âTake anything you want. Go absolutely hog wild.â So he did. He sawed many of the marble carvings off the building to make them easier to transport, which did damage to both the carvings and structure of the building itself. Hereâs my favorite part: one of the ships he was using to transport the marbles sank. When Elgin found out, he sent a letter to local authorities asking them to retrieve the cargo, which he referred to as âstones of no interest to anyone but myself.â
He took literal metric tons of artwork, which he wanted to use to decorate his home back in Britain. Except he poured so much money into this project that he went into debt and had to sell the marbles. Parliament bought them (which was not a popular decision at the time) and put them in a public museum. Then in 1832 Greece won its independence from the Ottoman Empire, and the marbles have been a point of contention in Greek-British relations ever since.
Hereâs another quote from the British Museum displaying an astonishing degree of ethnocentrism!
âThe public display of the sculptures from spring 1807 encouraged Hellenists in their love of ancient Greece while, at the same time, it inspired the Philhellene movement in its sympathy for the inhabitants of modern Greece and their struggle for independence.â
The most recent volley in this fight was Britain saying, âwell, we canât give you the marbles, your museum is too dinky to display them in their full splendor.â In response, Greece built the above museum.
As many people mentioned in the comments, Black Panther was fantastic in that it brought the issue of museums and repatriation into the public view. Now with more voices joining in, hopefully change can happen more quickly.
You left out the part where the document giving Elgin permission to take them may or may not be a forgery, also!
This was a part of this I was not familiar with! And wow! I looked into it, and there is decent evidence that the agreement from the Sultan was faked! This story just keeps getting better and better!
Went to the Aboriginal artifact exhibit in Chicago. And itâs interesting. How many blankets and masks and totem poles say âunknown sourceâ, because every five seconds my mom would stop and point to something and say. âPaulineâs grandmother made that,â or, âThat belongs to Mikeâs family, I should call himâ because. Itâs all stolen
âThese artifacts were excavated by archaeologists from a burial site in the 1970âs. The remains were returned for reintermentâ Okay cool, cool cool. So you just, like. Dug up the grave of a respected family member, stripped them naked, mailed their body back to their family and kept everything they were lovingly put to rest in. Like a graverobbing bastard
Reminds me of the time when of the elders from my hometown started touching a totem pole in the Museum of Anthropology out at UBC and got yelled at by the staff, only to tell him that the pole had been stolen off of the front of her bighouse when she was ten years old.
Museum collectors did the equivalent of kidnapping a family member when they were away fishing.
one of the most annoying things about royal weddings is all the middle class liberals who come out with their tepid takes about how they âdonât mind the royals, actuallyâ as if a liberal having no problem with unearned wealth and privilege is some massive shockerÂ
Innit. Especially now these two are âsocially consciousâ, the mc liberals can really give that royal arse a good tonguing. The Queen knows what sheâs doing, sheâs adapting the monarchy to the times. They could go on for another 50 years like this.
The royal family existing is profitable for the UK as a whole, because it basically funds half the tourism industry. Theyâre obnoxious, but getting rid of them would actively harm the working class in many of the places most hostile to the working class. Get off your bloody high horse.Â
actually socialising their wealth would benefit the working class directly and weâd get even more tourists when the palaces are fully open to the public, like in the other countries that have done the sensible thing and gotten rid of their monarchies.
In 2016/2017 just under 2,000,000 people visited âroyal propertiesâ. Meanwhile in 2015/2016, 7,000,000 people visited the British Museum alone. In 2015 nothing related to the monarchy came close to the top 10 most visited attractions in the UK. The âmonarcy bring money inâ is a myth, in 2016 Flamingo Land was visited more than any palace.
The âroyal familyâ cost about ÂŁ350,000,000 a year, which is an unjustifiable amount of money considering that since 2010, people using food banks has jumped from 41,000 to 1,200,000.
Reblogging for the last.
I mean, the overwhelming majority of the artifacts in the British Museum were stolen from other countries. What no one wants to admit is that you cannot disentangle the British culture industry from its histories of class and imperialism.
Locking your wheelchair lift and requiring disabled people to find an employee to unlock AND OPERATE it is a direct violation of the ADA.
âThe [ADA] Standards require âunassistedâ entry and exit from lifts (§410.1). Situations in which platform lifts are locked and require users to request or retrieve a key for operation will not satisfy this requirement for independent operation.â
âAttendant operation, although recognized by the ASME A18.1 Standard, is expressly prohibited by the ADA Standards. Platform lifts must provide âunassisted entry and exit from the liftâ (§410.1).â
(Source)
Smells like a lawsuit waiting to happenâŚ
This is not great, but itâs likely because people are fucking stupid and will screw around with it if itâs not locked up.
[ID: @gavrielabrahams âItâs probably because people were peeing in it.â]
You think people were peeing. In an open wheelchair lift. In the middle of a museum. With public toilets around the corner.
I think not.
But even if people had been peeing in it or otherwise misusing the lift⌠It. Doesnât. Matter. Itâs not just ânot great.â Itâs ILLEGAL. It is just as illegal to lock off a wheelchair lift as it is to not provide one to begin with.Â
The correct response to people peeing in an elevator is never to lock the elevator. It is to provide a toilet. If you think the correct response to any problem is to violate the civil rights of an entire group of people by denying them access, YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM.
Disability rights are civil rights.
You want to know exactly how this went down? Let me tell you a tale.
I was visiting the museum with friends. They went on around the corner while I finished looking at the previous exhibit. I then followed them around the corner only to find I couldnât get up to the exhibit because the museum AS PART OF THEIR POLICY had illegally locked the lift. My friends didnât know the lift was locked (why would the lift be locked?) and had no idea that I couldnât get to them.
Now I, the disabled person, am forced to travel halfway around the building to the front desk to find someone to unlock the lift for me, wait for them to finish what theyâre doing, and then travel all the way back to the lift. This was bad enough in a wheelchair. Who else uses lifts? Oh yes. People who struggle to walk. Can you imagine, as a person who struggles to walk, being forced to walk halfway around a building, and then back again, just to access an exhibit? You wouldnât do it. Youâd skip the exhibit. Youâve just been completely denied access.
So finally the museum employee unlocks the lift and then operates it (because yes, theyâve made it so I canât operate it myself, which is also illegal). I finally get to the top probably ten minutes later, only to find that my friends have finished looking at the exhibit and are heading down again, wondering what has happened to me.Â
After Iâve gone to all the trouble to get up there, fuck it if Iâm not going to look at the damn exhibit. So I look at it, then head back to the lift to go back down, only to find theyâve locked the lift with me at the top and gone back to the front desk.
If one of my friends hadnât stayed up there with me, Iâd probably still be up there. As it was, my friend had to go down the stairs, back around to the front, find an employee, and get them to come back and let me down. Leaving me sitting up there. Alone. For another five minutes.
Now imagine if I had gone to the the museum by myself. Or what if there had been an emergency? You think if there was a fire some museum employee who couldnât be assed to leave the damn lift unlocked until I had come back down would really have run back into the building to unlock the lift so I could get down? I think not.
Locking an accessibility feature is never the right solution. It is denying access to an entire class of people. Which is ILLEGAL and a CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATION.
Disability law is civil rights law.
Exactly.
Also, anything designed with the assumption that a disabled person will always have a companion is a violation.
Unassisted access means just that.
WHAT MUSEUM? fucking shame on management this is absolutely unacceptable. I endorse a good public shaming on Twitter in cases like this.
weird how they call it âthe british museumâ yet practically none of the items on display are british or have any justifiable reason to be in britain
weird how they call it âthe british museumâ yet practically none of the items on display are british or have any justifiable reason to be in britain