h
sheepfilms

No title available
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
NASA

if i look back, i am lost
YOU ARE THE REASON
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
𓃗
ojovivo

tannertan36
★

Origami Around
occasionally subtle
noise dept.

roma★

Kiana Khansmith
Mike Driver

izzy's playlists!

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from China

seen from South Africa

seen from North Macedonia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Japan

seen from United States

seen from Philippines
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia
seen from Morocco
seen from South Korea

seen from Malaysia

seen from Norway

seen from Côte d’Ivoire
seen from Canada
seen from Bangladesh
@musicgeek1999
I think about this Frankie Boyle quote more than I should.
source
And this is exactly why the heartbeat bill is a load of horseshit, and late-term abortions need to be legal.
I know 3 women who have been through similar situations, but because OH and WV have archaic abortion laws, they were forced to carry either to term, or until the child near killed them. One of them had a tubal pregnancy, and still wasnt allowed go abort. She literally had to wait until her tubes basically exploded and the docs took one of her ovaries, half of her fallopian tubes, and she wound up hospitalized for a month.
Anti-abortion is anti-women.
Having a uterus in Kentucky causes you to realize that many people view you as an incubator and nothing more. I’ve come to realize that more and more as I’ve gotten older.
And these fuckwits have the nerve to call themselves pro-life.
Fucking bullshit asshole pieces of literal garbage.
There are so many difficult feelings about this particular scenario. I understand how devastating it can be to find out that your pre born baby might have a disability, or a condition that shortens their life span. But to shorten their life span even further by having that child’s life ended. Is wrong. Your baby is alive now. From the beginning at conception. Your baby is a person, human and alive. Ending that life earlier does not save anyone from some pain. There is also the moral concern of ending a life early just because it’s life span is going to be shortened, does not justify murder. And saying it does gives permission for any family who might have a child with a disability to kill them because they have a disability. This is a prejudice against those with disabilities. And it is wrong and evil. One my most favorite pro-life Doctor’s said this:
The worst part about terminating a pregnancy, or abortion, or ending a human’s life (it is all the same, no matter what you call it) Is that the process is an extremely painful procedure. When you have an abortion you are subjecting your child to be burned by acid until they die. Or have their limbs be torn apart until they bleed to death. There is no analgesics, or pain killers for your preborn child. Even if their brain isn’t fully developed, or underdeveloped or barely developed. They will feel that pain. And science says that our nerve endings are more sensitive at that point than any other point in our life. It is better for a baby to live for a few short hours out of the womb. Wrapped in the arms of those who love that baby. Than for it to be torn apart and burned by acid within the womb. Abortion is evil. It is racist, prejudiced and evil. I’m sorry if you received news that devastated your expectations. But please, do not subject your baby to the torture of abortion.
You would want a fetus born WITHOUT A BRAIN to suffer horrendously in its few hours of life rather than like…a quick and painless abortion?
You would want that MOTHER to have to watch the fetus of the child she WANTED, without a brain, suffering and in pain for those long, horrifically painful hours, to have it die in her arms?
You think that’s less painful and less traumatic than an abortion at 4 months?
Fuck you. I can’t even fucking believe that you would read about this tragedy and think “Well, she should have carried this barely living corpse of a fetus to term and then watched its mangled half-formed brainless body struggle to breathe for a few hours before dying painfully. That’s the morally correct thing to force on a person who lost a desperately wanted pregnancy.”
Fuck.
You.
Did you not even read what I wrote? Are you so arrogant that you know nothing of how abortion works? Abortion literally has the baby torn into pieces, or burned to death by acid! There is no painkillers for the baby. The baby feels everything. A child without a brain can still feel pain. Even within the womb. How is that better than a peaceful death in the mother’s arms? And fetus means baby. If they continued with their pregnancy. They would have had their baby for another 15 weeks. But instead they subjected an innocent baby to be tortured to death. And doctors are wrong all the time about what your baby can or cannot do. I have known many kids who were not expected to make it and they did. And they live happy lives. I know kids and people with only a half of a brain, or an underdeveloped brain. But you don’t kill them because their lives might be shorter than yours. If you did, you should be arrested for crimes against those with a disability. Love does not murder innocent life. Love does not subject your baby to a torturous death by abortion. Maybe it makes life a little bit easier for you. But life isn’t easy and love isn’t easy. It hard and takes effort, but it makes you a better person for it.
You don’t get to judge this woman for what she went through. It is horrendous, immoral, heartless and fucking sick for you to try.
Abortion happens differently at different stages. And regardless- YOU deciding that dying in agony in the arms of a sobbing, traumatized, heartbroken woman forced to carry a corpse to term is more “peaceful” than abortion is just…I can’t.
It’s morally deficient to look at someone who has laid out their deepest trauma for you and for you to say such horrendous things about them, to say that they should have carried a dead and dying pregnancy for longer because YOU think it is better. You think THAT is loving? It’s awful.
Just so as everyone knows, what @manip-loki said up there is a lie. Abortion doesn’t involve tearing the fetus to pieces or burning it to death by acid and the only reason that people like this tell you that is so they can try to emotionally manipulate you into agreeing with them.
1 - A fetus without a brain cannot feel pain
You heard me. The cannot feel pain. You have to have a brain in order to feel pain because the brain is how we interpret nerve signals. Without it, there’s no functioning central nervous system to interpret those pain signals. The nerves are there, but there’s nothing for them to report home to. Hence, no pain.
2 - Abortion doesn’t involve tearing a fetus apart
What they’re referring to here is the way that a dilation and evacuation abortion is performed, only they’re describing it in as disgusting a way as possible to make you react.
In reality, what happens in a dilation and evacuation abortion is that the very first thing a doctor does is to use a small tool to remove whatever internal organs the fetus has developed. The fetus dies instantly and without pain. And keep in mind, we’re talking about a procedure that’s only performed on fetuses that are already non-viable and can’t continue to live anyway.
The part that anti-choicers never want to tell you is that they’d like to see this fetus develop to the point where it might be able to feel pain and discomfort and then see it born and live for how many ever hours it can, even though it could suffer terribly for that time, for the sake of their twisted sense of morality.
3 - Abortion doesn’t involve burning a fetus to death with acid
That’s straight up fiction and it’s bullshit to boot. What they’re talking about is a rarely used form of late term abortion called saline amniocentesis, which you can read about on wikipedia as ‘instillation abortion’. It doesn’t burn the fetus at all. It involves injecting a saline solution (that’s fucking salt, btw) or some other compounds into the amniotic sac where it irritates the tissues of the uterus and provokes contractions.
I think the origin of this lie is that salt (NaCl), when mixed with water (H2O), creates tiny amounts of NaOH (sodium hydroxide, a base) and HCL (hydrochloric acid) in addition to creating a dissolved solution of salt water. It creates acid and base in very small amounts due to the way that the salt continually interacts with the water, most of it saying dissolved in solution but the occasional salt molecule breaking apart to form an acid and a base with the water, only for the acid and base to interact with each other and turn right back into salt and water.
Here’s where it gets really shitty, in my opinion. The pain caused by saline amniocentesis? It’s felt by the person carrying the fetus because inducing uterine contractions is anywhere from really uncomfortable to up to ‘hella painful’ and this lie completely ignores it. The fetus doesn’t feel that pain because the salt or other compound isn’t doing anything to damage the fetus during the process.
4 - Fetus doesn’t mean baby
A baby is an infant human who has been born. A fetus is a stage of fetal development, prior to being born.
5 - Forcing a parent to carry a non-viable fetus to term is cruel and inhumane
Not only does it place the parent at undue risk, it’s basically forcing someone to live with the torturous knowledge that their child isn’t going to be born and isn’t going to grow up.
Let me translate that for you.
They’re saying that pregnant people shouldn’t be allowed to grieve unless they’re grieving properly. Remember, the arguments that anti-choicers like @manip-loki are raising essentially argue that if you abort a fetus you’re evil and should suffer but if you carry that non-viable fetus to term and suffer through weeks of knowing your child will never grow up then you’ll get a cookie for being a good parent who ‘grieved correctly’.
6 - No, doctors are not wrong all the time about a fetus
When a child is born without large portions of the brain, that’s a rare condition known as anencephaly. Children with anencephaly never develop a mind, are unaware of their surroundings, and cannot feel pain. Basically, they can breathe and react to some really primitive stimuli and that’s it.
People who have only half a brain are people who have undergone a medical procedure called a hemispherectomy, in which one of their hemispheres is removed, usually to help deal with a condition that causes severe seizures or other issues that result in a greatly diminished quality of life. It doesn’t have anything to do with a fetus and I don’t even think you can perform a hemispherectomy on a fetus.
If nothing else, consider this:
If anti-choicers had any leg to stand on they wouldn’t have to lie so egregiously about the nature of abortion in order to try to win their arguments. Stay skeptical, make people prove their assertions, don’t take their bullshit at face value.
Thank you for that breakdown.
I honestly couldn’t even begin.
☝️☝️☝️
insp
I think the weirdest part of that post is the suggestion that RTD didn’t do dark content. Like, that’s a backhanded as hell defence, and not a very accurate one. Waters of Mars and Silence in the Library are etched into my brain and always will be for their darkness I saw as a child, and I’ll always treasure them for it.
I think because a lot of his stories are all over the place in terms of tone, that much of the darkness of the RTD era is often overlooked. People remember the Master dancing to the Scissor Sisters, but don’t notice that his wife is hiding her bruised face.
I reckon RTD is a darker writer than Moffat, in part because of the tonal whiplash, and because a lot of the darkness in his stories is never openly acknowleged in the text itself. I mean, Dr/Rose had some hella dark moments to it, and most of fandom thinks of it as non-stop happy fluffy funtimes.And then there’s Ten, who lacks Eleven’s painful self-awareness and so it doesn’t tend to get foregrounded in the same way when he does something questionable or outright bad.
There’s more to darkness than the stuff Moffat writes. And I think Moffat’s writing is generally a lot more optimistic about things.
RTD was always ultimately cynical about about things, whereas Moffat was always more optimistic.
In RTD’s Who, people are all a little bit selfish, dumb and easy to trick. They’re willing to fall for cyberman invasions because they want to believe in (and monetize!) the ghosts of their relatives or because they want fancy new earpod technology. They’re easily placated by the futuristic drugs of “Gridlock” or the macabre reality TV of “Bad Wolf”. They’re willing to elect the Master into the office of Prime Minister in series three. In “Midnight” (which is probably the best and most exemplary thing he wrote for Who), everyone is easily manipulated to distrust the Doctor and each other because of fear and pettiness and are saved because of the rare moment of self-sacrifice.
More specifically, the companion’s family lives are always in a state of disarray. Rose’s mother badgers her and her boyfriend takes her for granted. Martha’s parents are a warring divorced couple who can’t be in the same room with each other. And Donna’s mother is verbally abusive.
And the cynicism extends to the storytelling. It’s why he always goes for the sad ending. There’s Rose and the Doctor in “Doomsday”. Donna losing her memories in “Journey’s End”. And, of course, there’s all of Children of Earth.
Moffat, meanwhile, is the man who wrote “Everybody lives.” In Moffat’s Who, everyone is basically good. In his stories, the antagonists are inhuman monsters, not villains. And villains, when they do appear, exist to be redeemed, like Missy in series 10 or Kazran Sardick in “A Christmas Carol” (as well as a couple of unfortunate historical examples in Richard Nixon and Winston Churchill). And monsters often get humanized too, like with the Paternoster Gang. In Moffat’s Who, a religious order bent on the Doctor’s destruction try to create the perfect assassin to kill him and he marries her. (Hell, both of the first two series of Moffat’s run end in weddings of a sort. The traditional sign of a comedy.)
We see the masses less in Moffat’s Who, but they seem to be kind when we do. Everyone in Leadworth is perfectly pleasant. The people of Kate Stewart’s UNIT are uniformly competent and trying their best. Goodness is seen as a core feature of people. And while we don’t see as many parent child relationships, we see several marriages, and they’re always functioning and positive on average.
And, of course, the endings are always hopeful. To borrow from Star Trek, there’s no such thing as the no-win scenario. The universe gets rebooted. The Time War gets reversed. Clara and Bill get Space Girlfriends.
And I’m not advocating for one over the other here really, though I obviously have my preference. Both can lead to great storytelling. I love “The Waters of Mars” AND “The Day of the Doctor”. I’m just saying, if we’re talking dark vs. light, it’s pretty clear which is which.
As a RTD fan, I mostly agree.
I don’t have a train of thought I have seven trains on 4 tracks that narrowly avoid each other when the paths cross and all the conductors are screaming
[15/?] (insp.)
pls tell me im not the only one
In which Petrenko is all of us
Conservatives: These millennials and Gen Z’s are lazy and wasting their time eating tide pods. Get up and do something good for society for once
Millennials and Gen Z: *constructs protests and walk-outs for stricter gun laws*
Conservatives: YOU’RE NOT ALLOWED TO DO THAT
2018 is the year of genZ kids Not Fucking Around™
@theimtiredproject
Watch: Kristen Bell opens up about the mental health double standard and how she manages her own struggle.
Follow @this-is-life-actually
Hit reblog on this so hard
But like why is there still this concept that males don’t like cute mushy romantic shit and being emotionally taken care of? Just the other day I was cuddling with my boyfriend and after admiring him for awhile I told him, “Your eyes are so beautiful, they look like mini oceans” and I swear to god I heard him squeak in embarrassment and saw his cheeks actually begin to blush. Sometimes he likes being the little spoon and although I’m half his size I’m always happy to play jet pack. If he’s having a bad day he knows he can lay his head on my shoulder and just bawl his eyes out and I won’t think any less of him. Guys have emotional needs and want to feel loved and taken care of too yanno.
Reblogging this twice because it’s so goddamn important. Guys should not be allergic to emotions. And anyone else–if a guy expresses emotions to you, if he cries or blushes or does anything traditionally associated with “feminine” emotions, don’t you dare patronize or ridicule him.
Every single person on this planet is entitled to have and express their emotions. No one gets to tell another person how or where or when to express them. No one gets to tell another person not to express them.
Emotional policing is fucked up, it’s a symptom of the male-centered world we live in, and it needs to stop.
CUTE, BLUSHY NOT-STONE-COLD MEN ARE THE BEST MOST ADORABLE THINGS IT TAKES STRENGTH TO SHOW EMOTIONS
BLUSHY BOYS ARE ADORABLE THANK YOU AND GOODBYE
We, as women, need to let me know it is not unacceptable for them to have feelings and to vocalize emotions, we have our part in this. Toxic men won’t help them normalise it, we need to.
I think this is the perfect example of their friendship