My Final Project - Gonzalez
No title available

Product Placement

Kaledo Art
we're not kids anymore.

tannertan36
Today's Document
NASA

roma★
Three Goblin Art
Sweet Seals For You, Always

#extradirty
Stranger Things
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

★
KIROKAZE
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
No title available

pixel skylines
todays bird
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
seen from China

seen from Belarus
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@ncgonzalez-blog
My Final Project - Gonzalez
Resurrecting Hassan (Dir. Carlo Guillermo Proto 2016) was an interesting film experience which for me was also helpful in understanding many different perspectives on the concept of death and the afterlife, as well as life itself.
Denis, Peggy, and Lauviah all had very similar perspectives, given they are all a part of the same family and are all blind. They all had the same perspective when it came to the death of their son and brother Hassan, who could see. They had all believed he was not fully gone. They also all lived their lives very similarly. However despite all of these similar ideas in their heads, they all thought very differently about their own actions and decisions in their personal lives. None of them seemed completely happy in their lives and found different things to have faith in in order to feel fulfilled. Peggy chose Phillou, Lauviah chose singing, and Denis chose the resurrection of his son.
During the discussion with the director of the Documentary after it was over, I was reminded of The Case of the Inappropriate Alarm Clock, because people asked questions about what the director chose to show us in the documentary to get across what he wanted us to see. I thought of how the room in the reading was rearranged or how the photo of the skull was “faked” and how in a way, many documentaries are “faked” because the person directing wants to get a point across or make the viewers feel something specific and so they choose to show us certain things that happen or leave others out. Unlike the film Another Year (Dir. Shengze Zhu 2016), when there were no cuts, there were cuts and certain scenes where the ending or beginning was meant to leave the viewer with a specific idea of what was happening or what to feel.
Final Project Proposal
1) What is your working title?
What Do You Want to Be When You Grow Up?
2) What do you intend to make? Be concrete; don’t just list vague ideas you’re interested in exploring, but describe what you will actually produce. Big words are not helpful unless they help me to visualize what you are making.
I want to make a video, about myself and how I have struggled (especially recently) with knowing what I want to do when I am older. I’m not sure if I will have a voice-over or just use the sounds from life, but their definitely won't be music. I want to convey a message of self-reflection and thoughtfulness. There will not be any resolution at the end of the video because I don’t know what I want to be when I graduate or even what I want to major in here.
3) Discuss tone, style, techniques – anything that gives a fuller picture of the formal qualities of the work you intend to make. How will the formal qualities of your work be appropriate to the subject matter?
I will show myself and what I do in my daily life, I want to kind of create something cinematic and almost dreamlike. I want to include footage observing what others do while at work. I will have some scenes where there a fast cuts and some that are longer, scenes that I’m in and scenes that I’m not in, it probably won’t be a short video.
4) What kind of experience are you trying to create for your audience?
Something that will relax the viewer but also make them understand how I’m feeling. I want them to think about what they saw after they leave.
5) What are your personal goals for this project? How will you know if you succeeded?
I just want to be happy with how it turns out, I really don’t want to have any ideas that I end up not being able to do. I will know if I succeeded if I watch the final cut of my video and I feel satisfied, and then watch it again as if I have not seen it before and feel what I want the audience to feel.
6) Create a schedule with weekly deadlines. Keep in mind you will be presenting works-in-progress for feedback on 12/5, so you need to be “almost done” by then.
By 11/9: Proposal Done
By 11/14 Storyboard Done (and start filming)
By/During Thanksgiving Break: Filming
By 11/28: Editing
By 12/5: Almost done editing
By 12/12: Final Project Done
My experience watching Another Year was really extraordinary. Before the film was played, listening to Shengze Zhu explain what was going to happen/what was going on in her film, I was already interested. From the initial shock of seeing the one room that this family of 6 shared, to getting used to the family dynamic and feeling like I knew the family, I was engaged. I was able to share their humor, despite not being able to understand what they were saying without subtitles. I could feel the stress of the mother when she talked about having to take care of everyone all day, and when the grandmother had a stroke and the implications this would have on the father’s ability to work for the family. I felt sad when no one wold speak to the grandmother, or really give her much support, especially helping her move after the stroke. I could feel Qin’s frustrations as she complained about her mother wanting her to get a job. I could understand that although I was not seeing everything that went on in this family’s life, I could make inferences as to how long certain things had been going on, such as Qin complaining about the old chopstick both in January and then late in the year, and the running joke about how salty Hongwei’s food always was. I could see Kangyi and Manzi and Qin growing, and I saw how much each of their lives were changing throughout the course of the year. Even though I only saw parts of 13 of these dinners, I felt like I grew a larger understanding of culture of families in China and really what typical dinners looked like. I haven’t stopped thinking about the film since I watched it.
On another note, I feel as though I can relate parts of this film to Ways of Seeing by John Berger. He mentioned how different works which are shown on TV are automatically changed by the environment the TV is in. It is surrounded by the things in the house that TV is in, it has entered the context of the people watching’s lives. Whenever the TV was visible. I thought about how I could watch TV with whoever was watching it in the room, and how strange it was to be able to share a cartoon experience with these children, but I was experiencing it in a different way, because I don’t understand Chinese and couldn't really follow what was happening. A moment that really struck me was when Hongwei and Qin were watching TV while eating takeout, and the TV wasn’t visible, but I knew the kind of show they were watching because they talked about whoever was on the screen being a good singer or not. When the girl on the TV started singing Alicia Keys, I was taken aback, because I thought again how this form of art, a song written and sung by an American woman was translated into this environment, on this Chinese singing show, that I was watching this father and daughter watching.
Overall, I definitely enjoyed the film and found it to be genuinely very interesting. I kind of wish I could see a follow up on how this family is doing now, but I also feel that the point of the film was just to show another year, and that while things are changing constantly, they also stay the same.
Pink and Present
1.) A Birthday Card
2.) Flowers by the Chapel
3.) Shower Shoes on the Rug
4.) A Heavily Used Hairbrush
5.)Post-its atop of Study Materials
6.) Non-Traditional Clout Goggles
7.) Paper Clips out of a Plastic Tube
The whole point of using copying as an innovative strategy is to change it in some way to make it better. If someone copies someone’s idea, writing, invention, style, or anything without changing it at all, they are only engaging in the first basic element or creativity, and are therefore not creative. Without the two aspects of transformations and combinations there is no intelligence or imagination reflected in the work.
Plagiarizing to me is when someone uses another’s ideas wanting to play them off as their own. Accidental plagiarism is way too easy to commit. Even if something is cited incorrectly it can constitute as plagiarism and in my opinion it’s a little hard to hold that against someone because you know there was no mal-intent.
When someone copies the way someone else dresses or does their hair, or their style in general, it is considered a form of “flattery”, but it really is just annoying. When someone has their own style it reflects a certain pride of being themselves and their own unique individual. When someone copies them it takes that away from them. There is no mal-intent in this action either, but there are negative consequences to the person being copied. When someone cites a quotation incorrectly there is both no mal-intent and no negative consequences to the original speaker because people can see that the person tried to give them credit.
When someone really intends to plagiarize, they want to pass off the ideas as their own, and leave out an original source. In this case, there is both mal-intent and negative consequences to the owner of that intellectual property because anyone reading the paper is lead to believe that these ideas came from someone whom they really didn’t, and the person who really is intelligent and imaginative doesn’t get the recognition.
Overall the concept of copying is generally pretty black and white, but plagiarism has a lot of grey area.
What one can do to maintain their academic integrity really is quite simple. Make sure at the References page at the end of a paper or project that literally everything you got any idea from is cited, and within the paper, make sure every quote is cited correctly. Use an introductory phrase with the original idea owner and then end it with (citation). If an idea is your own, you don’t have to cite it.
Questions surrounding a photo’s authenticity have certainly changed from 1917 to 2017.
In the past and today, people often believe(d) doctored photos. In the earlier stages of this phenomenon, when a photo was revealed to be “fake” this revelation made the news. For example, the fairies and the little girls, and the missiles in Iraq.
Today, we all know that most photos that appear in fashion magazines are made to make the models look thinner or a place appear more beautiful. It’s less talked about how in tabloids such as In Touch, photos are often real, but taken way out of context. This tabloid cover takes photos from many different events that occurred, but they have put them all together and made the caption highly sensational and they portray a severely warped version of reality to appeal to readers who like the dramatics. When it comes to certain news sources we have to worry less about whether or not the photo is “real” but more if the caption is true. Not to say that these images are not photoshopped, it’s just more of the caption that poses the threat. The photo of “Kim Kardashian” from the back showing that her dress apparently didn't fit isn't even her, but the captions and pairing with other photos that are her change the viewers perspective.
Beginning, Nadia Gonzalez, 2017
This project shows the emotions and uncertainty people have entering new relationships, and the questions they ask in their head when they care a lot about the way someone else perceives them.
These questions are juxtaposed onto pictures of someone I’ve been with for a long period of time. The questions people ask themselves at the beginning of a relationship don’t reflect the comfort levels they have in a long-term relationship.
The emotions depicted in these photos are all genuine and candid. I took photos of his eyes because I think that people in general express a lot of emotion through their eyes, and the feeling that shows through their eyes is the hardest to hide. People often hide the array of emotions they have when they start talking to someone who makes them feel a certain way. However, the more time one spends looking at another’s eyes, the more clearly the emotions are seen.
My project is about the way people can make us feel. It is a photo series of the eyes of one specific person in candid moments. I believe that someone’s eyes can tell us a lot about how they are feeling, and when you’re with someone who has the ability to change the way you feel easily, it can be a lot more obvious. In Sol Worth’s “Picture’s Can’t Say Ain’t”, he says that pictures cannot be true or false. I believe that pictures can convey some sort of truth. When you photograph someone for the purpose of capturing their true emotion, hopefully the emotion that the audience sees in the photo is true to what the subject’s emotion at the time was. In that case, the photo conveys truth, because the claim you are making to that subject’s emotion is being made in the picture. However, there are different ways to edit a photo or frame it with specific captions that can alter the truth that the photo conveys. If someone is crying in a photo and they obviously look very sad, but the caption said that the subject was crying tears of joy, it may make the viewer take a second look, because people believe what they see, but what they read also has a lot of influence and power over what those same people believe. I will try to be as truthful as possible in the captions of my images. In this photo, the subject is in a relaxed and tranquil state. I wonder what I would think if I weren't there at the time the photo was taken.
I chose the video "Their World Is Not Our World" by Susannah Sayler and Edward Morris. They are two Americans born two years apart. The video is 23 minutes long, and is apparently a work in progress. In the video, the narrator who is male, goes on a trip to Oostvaardersplassen, where the woman he accompanies wants to take photos and explore the land. The general public are not allowed to enter the park, they're only allowed to look at it from the outside. The male narrator says that he only really goes on the trip to be with the woman photographer, and that he just wanted to spend time with her. However, based on his narration he learned a lot in the process. He speaks of the "re-creation" of extinct animals to be placed in the park, and the park's creation and the surrounding community as a sort of idealistic and utopian place. He speaks of the animals as if they have maintained their innocence in a world where humans have not. For example, when he explains the concept of the "nazi cow" he says what they're really called, and then their nickname, and then proceeds to comment on the nickname saying "as if it was their fault what happened". he explains how the nazis wanted to make a hunting grounds with only purebred indigenous animals that a certain man (i forgot his name) could kill off for sport. The juxtaposition of these innocent and unknowing animals next to the kind of person that wants to kill others both because they believe they don't belong on the earth, but also for fun. The quote "Their world is not our world" comes about when the narrator is expressing the obvious differences between animals and humans, if you can say that humans are not animals. I believe that quote to be true. We as humans can never truly know what goes on in those animals' heads because they don't speak our languages. In a way, the fact that we don't share the same "world" means that we have no right to destroy theirs. we live by the same means but have no mutual understanding of one another. The rule forbidding the public to enter the park is also artistic in a way he mentions that the photographer said, a "don't touch the art kind of thing" but I feel like there should be another reason. The land in and of itself is not untouched, because those animals were human made, and the community of houses on the water is man made as well, but preventing humans without permits to enter the park is kind of a tribute to the means of the park's creation. I watched the end and the beginning of the video, im not sure how much of it I missed during the video but there was one quote that struck me toward the middle or end which was "the other type of hunters that came were the news cameras". This makes me feel a type of way because it shows how humans not only ruin nature by tearing it up and poaching, but also with invasive methods involved in documentation. To me, one can never truly feel the atmosphere of a place through a video; this reminds me of the concept of images from Ways of Seeing, and how the images which are distributed into different homes change their meaning. Even as I am sitting and watching the video about Oostvaardersplassen, my perception of the place is changed by the point the video is making, the soundtrack, the voiceover, the images and the order in which they're presented to me, these things all affect my idea of what that park is and what it is there for. When the narrator mentions the news cameras, it is after a period of silence in which there are video clips of the specially bred horses galloping around, and people taking video or photo or just watching. He then proceeds to speak of the death that begins occurring, and it is almost hard to listen because of the graphic clips that accompany his speech. Animals in the process of dying, animals lying dead on the ground or in the water, animals rotting, and flies picking at their decaying flesh. It's almost disturbing-- but we know as humans that this sort of thing is happening because of our interference in the natural world, it just doesn't become as real to some people until they see it. This video makes me look at certain things in a different light now, especially about the world of animals and what they think about that's deeper than what they're going to eat or how they're going to reproduce. I hope that they do have that deeper thinking, but I suppose I'll never know.
Response 4
In my opinion, the two men share the same goal in conveying a sense of honesty throughout their works, and they feel as though photos serve as evidence for events or situations which exist. The controversy they were caught up in displayed a sense of intended honesty, but what actually happened was not. However, I don’t believe they very well convey a sense of honesty at all if they are moving things around to fit the picture they want. In completely honest terms, one is objective. But if someone goes to take a picture knowing what they want their audience to see and it isn’t the scene as it is, it is in a way dishonest to everyone but they photographer. The photographer is the only one who actually understands the true setting of the photo. I’m also not sure that any of it really matters, because the photographer/artist is still going to do whatever they want regardless of other people’s opinions because art in itself is selfish. People make art for themselves. If it conveys a larger meaning to other people it is because the artist wanted it to. I don’t feel like you (generally) can come up with a definition of art because no one has to accept your definition if they don’t want to. In a way, art itself is dishonest because it can be dishonest to others. People can perceive meaning where others don't. An artist can try too hard to convey something and end up embellishing and “lying” to themselves. In simplest terms, it doesn’t matter what photos are used in any circumstance or what their captions say because anyone can manipulate the “message/meaning”.
I chose this screenshot from the movie Fast Times at Ridgemont High because I believe it supports the male gaze. Throughout the movie females are consistently as unintelligent, and in what I remember to be every single scene that depicted girl friends talking to each other, they were talking about sex or the boys in their school or that they knew. No matter what, they were talking about boys. More of an internal part of the plot also showed how much the movie itself supports the male gaze is this screen cap of a scene in which one of the main male characters is fantasizing about a girl he knows. This screenshot shows the inside of a man’s fantasies and has this young girl exposed and with a provocative expression on her face. Aspects of this girl’s casual action of getting out of a pool are highly exaggerated in a sexual way.
Response 2
In Scherezade Garcia’s lecture, she emphasized her fascination with ideas from colonization, history and politics, she also talked about how in her artwork she likes to allude to the emotional and physical aspects of making art. It mostly seemed important to her to talk about immigration and the struggles of immigrants, and how she is fascinated with contradictions in artwork. She sees beauty and tragedy both at once in things, and enjoys juxtaposing contradicting concepts in her art. Her piece of the pink life vest with 2 faces on it showed the contradiction of faces who are angelic and arrogant. She also uses the color pink effectively in her artwork to force people to engage in the beauty and seriousness rather than fragility. It was a serious business for her to create all those other life savers for the people in Sabana De La Mar. She wanted to help the community while spreading a message at the same time. She sees the life vests as objects of freedom and protection. The concept of contradiction is what intrigues me most about Garcia’s works