So, @ng-sideblog can't be tagged and the messaging system is not showing when it's not a group blog.
Did I finally piss someone off that much?
Peter Solarz
KIROKAZE
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

JBB: An Artblog!
taylor price
AnasAbdin

pixel skylines

⁂
DEAR READER
will byers stan first human second
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

blake kathryn

Discoholic 🪩
NASA
d e v o n
art blog(derogatory)
trying on a metaphor
Sade Olutola
we're not kids anymore.
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Canada
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Thailand
seen from France

seen from Netherlands

seen from Germany

seen from Singapore

seen from Türkiye

seen from Indonesia

seen from Germany

seen from Slovenia
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Japan
seen from Malaysia
@ng-sideblog
So, @ng-sideblog can't be tagged and the messaging system is not showing when it's not a group blog.
Did I finally piss someone off that much?
Since the left wants to redistribute wealth, then let's start with the wealth of every politician that became rich as a result of being elected to office. Then we can redistribute the wealth of every crony that got rich because of that politician-- Hunter I am looking at you.
The only people who should have no personal property are politicians
I'd agree to re-distribuiting celebrity wealth too.
We'll start with all the liberal celebrities.
i am so fucking tired
When the state apologizes, concedes your values and false narrative even when it shouldnt, but you still want the state to be your enemy, even though youre part of the state. Kathy Hochul. Literally nothing makes them happy. Appeasing them upsets them more. Imagine how theyll react when Trump unpardon's Susan B Anthony. Trump pardons the arrest of a leftist in rememberance, and leftists call it rape.
If he recanted, the left would argue he is against women having the right to vote.
KAFKA TRAP
Susan B. Anthony was a Republican civil rights leader, she was racist yes, she actually did want the state to admit it was wrong to not let women vote, by pardoning her it is an admission the state was wrong, the only reason it isn’t being celebrated is because Trump did it.
This is just horrid. And yes it’s because it’s trump
One idiot said that a pardon counts as considering someone guilty.
I don’t remember the logical contortions he had to go through to get to that.
I’m so fucking tired.
Whenever you ask a communist, or any leftist for that matter, where they see themselves "after the revolution," their answers vary from party leadership, to some sort of propaganda influencer, to forcibly re-educating the political dissenters their regime decided not to execute. Even in their ideal world, their ultimate desire is for even more power and control. Despite their ideology offering the illusion that they abhor central authority, they all dream of a world where they are empowered above all else. To them, the revolution is eternal. Even when they have everything they could have ever wanted, it is still not enough.
White people love pulling that “Africans had slaves TOO!!!” And “slavery is still legal in Africa!!!1!1!” Card as if they have any fucking idea what they’re talking about
They are right though. In other countries they still have slavery
African!!!!! Slavery!!!!! Isn’t!!!!!! Slavery!!!!!! Read a damn book!!!!!
So when an African enslaves any race it’s not slavery to you and therefore acceptable?
Yet it’s Slavery when any other race does it?
I’ll copy and paste it for you too you dense ass eggshell colored bitch!!!!
Alright here’s a history lesson you won’t learn in school:
Most African economies were barter economies, or trade based economies. Because of this, being “paid” for labor is hard, because it’s much easier to make one large trade than lots of smaller trades. Therefore, rather than making many smaller trades to pay people for their labor, they would just make one large trade that would allow them to “own” the person for their labor, because (again) it was easier. That’s where the idea of “slavery” in other countries comes from.
This type of “slavery” is completely different because in 99% of situations, these “slaves” were treated exactly the same as everyone else, they still had all or most of their rights, and they were likely to be free again in their lifetime. It was never malicious, it was just the easiest way for trade-based economies to function. This is still common in trade-based economies because that’s what fucking works.
Bonus fact: over the course of about 1,000 years, only about 10,000 slaves were traded throughout all of North Africa and the Mediterranean. Europeans traded 12 million+ African slaves in 1/10 of that time.
You can’t equate what barter economies do in any way to European slavery because white people built their entire economies around keeping black people on the bottom. Africans were starved, whipped, raped, and worked to death. Sick slaves on ships were thrown overboard, still in chains. Slave ships were so unsanitary that they could be smelled from miles away. They were given no rights and had no way of earning freedom. They were viewed as animals. They were branded by their owners. After slavery was outlawed, the Spanish and the Portuguese continued to conduct “slave raids” where they would show up on the central west coast and invade villages, stealing people away from their homes and shipping them to the Americas. Tell me again how the two are in any way similar
“you dense ass eggshell colored bitch!!!!“
Actually I am more of a Creamy Olive but I surmise that that was meant to be an insult, cunt.
“Alright here’s a history lesson you won’t learn in school:”
No, I learned it unlike American Schools we have competent curriculum’s here.
“That’s where the idea of “slavery” in other countries comes from.”
Again, no Slavery comes from the Cradle of Civilization itself Mesopotamia.
Slavery, unlike today, was very prevalent and popular in ancient cultures and is very evident in the Mesopotamian society. The civilization which was known for its advancements in all the fields of livelihood was actually a primitive somewhat semi barbarian civilization.Slavery existed and loomed large all across Mesopotamia. Here are details.
In ancient times, crimes such as assaulting one’s elder brother or mother were punished by subjecting to slavery. Thus, slaves were mostly obtained from war captives and criminals. Slaves were made to wear skirts made of cloth that were tied along their waist, extending up to their knees and as long as the owner so desired.
It is widely believed that slavery came into being as a major institution with the development of agriculture, sometime around 10000BC. In ancient Mesopotamia as agriculture required labour, slavery was seen as a profitable way of exploiting war captives, warriors and civilians.
In ancient Mesopotamia Slavery was used to pay off debt and as chattel.
This Slavery has existed for tens of thousands of years far before Modern Europeans took African Slaves, but before Europeans took slaves the Arabs took slaves from Europe, Asia and Africa this was the Barbary Slave Trade it lasted Longer than the Atlantic Slave Trade and Still continues to this day, where is your outrage?
Europeans Ended Slavery in the West yet you are still whining.
“Bonus fact: over the course of about 1,000 years, only about 10,000 slaves were traded throughout all of North Africa and the Mediterranean. Europeans traded 12 million+ African slaves in 1/10 of that time.”
Bonus Fact: The Barbary Slave Trade Enslaved 1.25 million Europeans [these numbers do not include the European people which were enslaved by Morocco and by other raiders and traders of the Mediterranean Sea coast which is estimated 4x higher] 700 Americans were also made slaves, along with millions of Asians, Africans and Middle Easterners, the Time frame of this is for Europeans from 1450 - 1812 that is 362 Years, the Arab/Muslim/Barbary Slave Trade continues to this day with an estimated 30 million still in slavery in the Middle East and Africa.
Where is your Outrage?
You are Outraged that Europeans Enslaved Africans because you Harbour a racial Hatred towards Europeans, you are Racist.
Chattel Slavery in-case you didn’t know was introduced when a Black Man won life ownership over his Slaves in the US his name was “Antonio the negro“ or Anthony Johnson as he changed his name to,
He was brought to the colony in 1621. At this time, English and Colonial law did not define racial slavery; the census calls him not a slave but a “servant.” Later, Antonio changed his name to Anthony Johnson, married an African American servant named Mary, and they had four children. Mary and Anthony also became free, and he soon owned land and cattle and even indentured servants of his own.
n 1651 he owned 250 acres (100 ha), and the services of five indentured servants (four white and one black). In 1653, John Casor, a black indentured servant whose contract Johnson appeared to have bought in the early 1640s, approached Captain Goldsmith, claiming his indenture had expired seven years earlier and that he was being held illegally by Johnson. A neighbour, Robert Parker, intervened and persuaded Johnson to free Casor.
Parker offered Casor work, and he signed a term of indenture to the planter. Johnson sued Parker in the Northampton Court in 1654 for the return of Casor. The court initially found in favour of Parker, but Johnson appealed. In 1655, the court reversed its ruling. Finding that Anthony Johnson still “owned” John Casor, the court ordered that he be returned with the court dues paid by Robert Parker.
his was the first instance of a judicial determination in the Thirteen Colonies holding that a person who had committed no crime could be held in servitude for life.
Before this instance Chattel Slavery was not practiced in North America, the type of Slavery Practiced was the barter or servant Slavery you mention, people could earn their Freedom and be Acknowledged as Free Englishmen and could own Land and Slaves of their own.
Good Day.
If you think slavery is acceptable purely because of their skin colour, you are disgusting and racist.
Yeah you’re right I am racist and I hate all white people thanks for noticing
So you’re racist as well as ignorant. No surprise there
Slavery still exists in Africa. Today.
And the slaves that were sold to the Americas were not the barter economy bullshit you’re selling. They were Africans sold by Africans. That doesn’t absolve the Americas, both north and south, from their responsibility, but this narrative that white folk were mainly getting slaves by raiding is simply inaccurate. The slaves were already there, sacked up and awaiting purchase.
Yeah kid, you’re making shit up. And a fucking racist too. Go fuck yourself bloody you piece of shit
Well, at the very least she admitted she’s racist and didn’t pull the whole ‘I can’t be racist because I’m black’ bullshit. Small mercy, low bar, I suppose.
OP is selfish, ignorant and a sack of garbage. She cares more about blaming white people than caring about ongoing slavery today. She doesn’t care about slavery, she cares about blaming white people.
The absolute irony being that white people actually abolished slavery while several African and Middle Eastern nations have just happily continued the practice.
@twerkcircus is another Tumblr racist. What else is new when it comes to this site?
I love these threads where OP deactivated so they can’t block anyone.
Lolol
That number about slaves from north Africa and the Med is so wrong it hurts. The bulk of the Ottoman army was made up of jannisaries which were christian children stolen from their homes, forcibly converted to Islam, and made to fight for the empire. Also conveniently ignores the slaves they had rowing their galleys both merchant and war, worked to death or near death but hey if you were lucky enough to be in one of the war ones that sank you were still chained to your bench, gotta pray for capture there. Oh and they are 100% buying and selling black Africans in Libya today for less than the going rate was in the US, not adjusted for inflation, you know like 200 bucks. But ya know whippo are still the big problem some how.
Gotta wonder if the OP was them just begging to get a smackdown or not
Imagine unironically saying “slavery is good when it’s not being perpetuated by white people” and not thinking you come off as a massive fucking racist.
Its okay when OTHER PoC do it! Whitey cant take in slaves!!! But the others can!
Im glad twerk deactivated
The level of cognitive dissociation here was absolutely astonishing. I’m genuinely shocked about how deluded someone can be without realizing they are either insane or bordering insanity.
Imagine saying slavery is cool cause “they were nice and let the slaves still be people” like boy that sounds a lot like those white slave owners who were ‘nice’ to their slaves and ‘treated them like people’ but they were still fucking slaves so…
No, no, no. You just don’t get it.
They were progressive slave owners
https://medium.com/@jewsforjustice0317/linda-sarsours-acts-of-hate-against-jews-a-running-list-b22628335bdb
Here is a collective list of the many times Linda Sarsour engaged in antisemitism.
Since Linda Sarsour is getting attention again, here's a primer of her antisemitic remarks and proof that this isn't merely about Israel and that this is no Islamophobic smear campaign.
For the life of me I will never understand why Ben and Jerry have had a single thing to do with her. Biden and Harris apologizing for disavowing her because of her antisemitism makes a sick sort of sense though.
The thing I find ironic about the whole Orc Controversy is that it is one mostly fabricated by disgruntled malcontents who want to try and take over a fandom space for themselves without any respect or care for who founded the community or even if they're accusing people of things that are true.
Most of the people who buy into the whole "Orcs are a racist caricature of black people" thing are likely those who have never read Lord of the Rings or even played any edition of D&D prior to 5e. The Orcs in Tolkien's books are a reflection of the way people can lose themselves to violence and savagery in times of war and devastation. Anyone who says that they are meant to be a racist metaphor misses not only the point of what is being commented on, but also Tolkien's writing style.
Tolkien had a great distaste for metaphor and analogy. Its why all those theories about what the One Ring represents miss the forest for the trees. The One Ring doesn't represent Money, or Influence, or even Nuclear Weapons. It is designed to be used as a commentary on temptation and the fallen nature of humanity without representing any one kind of temptation or vice. That's why very person is tempted by the Ring in a different way. Similarly, the Orcs are not meant to represent any one country, ethnic group, or race. They are a twisted reflection of all Humanity at its most savage and cruel.
This is also pretty much how they've been portrayed in D&D up until now. The concept of Good Orcs is one that goes against what they were originally designed to represent and has only become prevelant in recent years. Tolkien and Gary Gygax aren't racist because the original creation is not even a racial commentary to begin with. Those who claim otherwise tend to project their own feelings, ideals, (and if we're being honest here sometimes even sexual fetishes) onto fictional creatures that were never designed to be reflections of these personal feelings in the first place. If D&D and Lord of the Rings were truly racist works, the different fantasy races contained in them would be constantly at each others' throats instead of working together to survive, and this would be portrayed as a good thing with a "superior" race as the victor.
Another common arguement I've seen is "well all the characters in Lord of the Rings are white. So doesn't that mean Orcs are supposed to represent some 'other' race?" The flaw with this line of reasoning is that in Lord of the Rings all Orcs are corrupted elves and humans. They can't represent black people because literally ANYONE can get turned into an Orc regardless of race. The original Orcs of Lord of the Rings have more in common with things like vampires, mutants, and zombies, than they do with racist caricatures such as Blackface. There's also the issue that LotR is meant to take place in Northern Europe during the Age of Myths. Expecting to see black people in pre-History England and Sweden is ridiculous. Meanwhile, in D&D black people and other racial minorities have always been playable. You just play a fucking Human. Again, there is no racial metaphor because the Orcs aren't meant to represent human races. They are a completely different species.
All of this being said, you are not obligated to play as an evil Orc in D&D or portray that as the norm in your campaigns. Most modern fantasy is inspired by Tolkien in only the most surface level details such as conventionally used fantasy races and the tropes often associated with them. Themes like the scarring nature of evil, the importance of natural conservation, and the tragedy in how things are lost to the flow of time are often not commented in other fantasy works, despite these themes being more crucial to Tolkien's stories than any of the surface level details. If you want to do something different with Orcs, or any fantasy race for that matter, go ahead! You aren't obligated to stick with the norm and your creativity shouldn't be limited by the way "things are supposed to work". It is your creation after all.
It should also be noted that Tolkien and Gygax weren't perfect, nobody is. Tolkien found himself conflicted over the fact that all his Orcs were evil since it conflicted with his Catholic beliefs on Free Will and redemption, and while he tried many different ways of reconciling his beliefs with what he made he was never able to do so. Meanwhile, Gygax's style of creating and running campaigns would be considered the hallmarks of a bad DM today. In the older days of D&D it was an unspoken rule that the DM and the players were in conflict with one another, an influence from it's war game roots. It was expected of the DM to throw unfair bullshit at their players and for the players to respond in kind by taking advantage of every weakness in the DM's armor. This kind of design philosophy has fallen out of favor with time and most people nowadays probably wouldn't find much interest or fun in Mr. Gygax's campaigns. I myself am one of them.
The thing is though, is that you don't need to shit on these men, or any creators really, in order to do something new within a genre. It's incredibly disrespectful to use someone's work as inspiration and then cancel them so you don't have to give them credit for their work. Without these men, modern fantasy as we know it could not exist. Enjoying the fruits of their labor while spitting on their names reeks of hypocrisy and ungratitude.
TLDR: The Orcs are Racist Stereotypes Controversy is one caused by a mixture of ignorance and petty self-righteousness. It's also pretty scummy of people to insult dead men and their legacies based on rumors without evidence, while also having the gall to use things inspired by what said dead men made.
Sounds like the pussy needs to be regulated.
Every woman who says stupid shit like the twit in OP absolutely should have all the current gun laws on the books applied to her vagina.
GOOD. LUCK. BITCH.
people who say folx are beyond cringe and belong to the streets
Communism is the ideology whose adherents are wrong every single time about every single thing and interact only with their own smug posturing and their own bloodthirst, but nobody’s actually allowed to notice that, and you must be a bad person if you notice that, and the only reasonable thing is to keep taking the things Communists say at face value no matter how many times they have been proven liars, bullshitters, and idiots
because they will not stop and will not be made to stop
social power is burning us from both ends and we cannot form the intent to put the fire out
The major flaw with Communism is that it’s a Utopian world view. And Utopias are, by definition, impossible. They all require some form of a perfect world to exist before they can even be tried.
The issue with communists is that they presume that the world can be perfect if everyone just TRIED and it’s your fault that it’s not.
it’s a utopian world view in the same way “people shouldn’t have to go to doctors, they should be able to wish themselves better!” is utopian
it’s like you’re understating things when you say the ideology is “too utopian”. that makes it seem like they’re big dreamers.
Communism is about ignoring every factor that goes into why people make decisions, why and how they gain or use resources, and how people arrive at plans fo action. Just ignores every single thing that makes those things difficult in the real world. Asserts them away with a sneer, and when anyone points out “hey resources exist in the real world” or “not everyone will agree with you one hundred percent of the time” they just sneer at that and gloat about how they’ll get to kill the naysayers.
when they get in power, any time one of those issues becomes relevant, the only way they know how to deal with it is killing whoever brought it up because Communism is so spectacularly nonfunctional it utterly fails on contact with anything.
Communists aren’t utopian big-dreamers with their hearts in the right place. Their big utopian dream is “The world would be so much better if everyone just did what I told them to do, and I didn’t have to think about the reasons why something I don’t want might happen!”
it’s the kind of philosophy that a child would come up with before they developed theory of mind. But Communists are inherently entitled to status and power, and you’re not allowed to notice these things. Their power does not diminish, no matter how many times they expend it.
> and when anyone points out “hey resources exist in the real world” or “not everyone will agree with you one hundred percent of the time” they just sneer at that and gloat about how they’ll get to kill the naysayers.
Or just ignore the objections. Or say they’ll compel people by force. Which is what capitalism supposedly does.
If you are pulling up Snopes then boy do you live in an alternate universe.
when was there such a thing as the objective universally accepted FACTS like that book from fuckin Ed Edd ‘n Eddy show?
When and where did this exist? Never O’Clock in Fantasyland?
“Nobody knows what to believe, but we never lie. We are the Good Guy Squad! We are immune to any kind of bias :)”
It’s ironic he says this when Trump is perhaps the most lied-about president in recent memory. He didn’t make his detractors do anything.
And ironic that he’s talking about objective facts when he’s clearly wrong and making crap up to justify the beliefs he already has.
And ironic that he claims Trump is gaslighting, while he’s using the abuser tactic of blaming the opposition for your side’s mistakes.
...How...is...Trump gaslighting?
I really do think that the whole sense of "any interaction with children is predatory" is what enables predators to win over kids so easily.
When you're young and no one ever shows you healthy intergenerational interactions outside of close family and/or authority figures (and kids are most often taught to simply obey and not question adults of [perceived] authority), any time someone in that position gives you positive attention becomes almost heroic. And it certainly becomes intoxicating, especially for ~weird~ kids with 'uncommon' interests, or kids who just simply don't get regularly indulged by adults in their lives.
Yes, we have to be aware of and mindful of how people who would prey on kids use being nice, or just listening, to kids. However, if kids don't know that they *can* challenge adults, or that there *are* ways adults can interact with and educate them that aren't simply rooted in authority, they'll have a harder time recognizing that an adult *isn't* behaving the right way.
Simply treating a child as if they're a being in your community, and a being with inherent worth, isn't predatory. That's just what being part of the world is.
Why else do you think they say it takes a village to raise a child?
Tl;dr: the less we isolate children from positive, meaningful, age appropriate interactions with adults outside their immediate family unit the harder it is for predators to convince children that their attentions are healthy or permissible. AND the harder it becomes for those predators to isolate children from people who would intervene on their behalf.
what a champion of civil rights
He said that more than thirty years ago. Have you never said something stupid in the past then corrected the behavior?
HAS HE???
And if he was a conservative, and didn’t have a big fat Democrat next to his name, would you be suddenly concerned with “personal growth”?
If he was a conservative then I probably would vote for him. If he was a conservative and still committed to doing good I would vote for him. But he’s not a conservative he’s a democrat so let’s not distort reality, shall we? And furthermore, since he has enough star power on his own and a track record of success that spans decades, I don’t see how any “big fat democrat” next to his name is relevant. That’s often not the case. Also in case you didn’t know using fat in that context is a slur, and offensive. It’s 2020 get with it, honey.
LOL WHAT??
So if Joe Biden - who can’t remember what he’s talking about or who he’s talking to half the time - was conservative, you’d vote for him?
>he’s got a good record of doing good
>You used fat as a slur
What the fuck are you talking about? Is there an adult I can speak to??
You literally refuted nothing I said and just posted two poorly chosen memes.
So maybe you’d like to structure some sort of argument around your misplaced anger.
Anyone can add memes doesn’t mean you have a degree in political science darling.
Dude, it’s like you’re literally too stupid to follow the conversation.
I asked you some very simple questions and somehow you got confused and thought I was talking about a literal obese democrat because you lack the ability to read. “IF JOE BIDEN DIDNT HAVE A BIG FAT “DEMOCRAT” NEXT TO HIS NAME”. HES A DEMOCRAT. I LITERALLY SAID THAT. It’s COMMON KNOWLEDGE. Yet somehow you again tried to imply I was “distorting reality” by saying he wasn’t??
Then you said “I’d vote for Biden if he was conservative and still had a good record of doing good” - implying you think he has one now. Spoiler alert, he doesn’t.
And then you’re trying to critique my MEMES?
If you can’t fucking keep up with simple sentences, I think it would be a good idea to ask your handler to buy you some of those “see spot run” books and this time, really read the words - don’t just look at the pictures.
Look here you poorly educated bottom feeder, he does have a track record of good. I guranteee my English is better than yours as all you can come up with is as hominem attacks. But also because you’re a dumb fuck. Of course he’s a democrat you stupid inbred fuck, it’s on the ticket. Your verbiage is elementary at best. If it’s common knowledge why are you restating it? Fuck your memes, I don’t need a picture to eviscerate someone who probably went to public school. You stupid fuck. I was varsity debate in high school and college, dumb cunt.
Yeah yeah little guy lmao, you couldn’t string two coherent thoughts together if I put a fucking gun to your head.
You can’t read, so you got completely confused about what’s being said here, answered a bunch of questions that nobody asked, and now you’re making assertions you clearly haven’t researched - I just BET you were “on the debate team”, as the dipshit they kept around because your mommy paid them to.
“Eviscerate”
I propose a new subtype of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Biden Cope Syndrome. When people do logical contortions to defend Gramps.
I'm starting up get tired of saying, "I don't believe in the nonbinary." Not because it isn't true, but because the word "believe" in there makes it seem like an opinion rather than that the stupid concept just isn't real.
You’re right and you should say it.
The dude with the song was the 3rd guy shot. Why does it look awfully clean for a recent severe gsw?
He literally did stop your boy. Your boy fucked around and found out.
Should’ve shot him again
Should’ve shot him again because he was absolutely planning on killing Rittenhouse.
Seems like a good way to catch an attempted murder charge by announcing he intended on mag dumping someone on the ground.
Why the fuck would you say anything about that incident? They filed charges, and this guy just torpedoed the prosecution's case that this shooting wasn't in self-defense. Hell, if they can get this entered as evidence, getting a grand jury to indict is going to be really hard.
Aww man Hominis got sacked
RIP sometimes the only man with any god damn sense on this site.
Still got his backup and art blog going. Honestly I was wondering how long it was going to be until he got sniped.
Can we stop comparing everything to nazism. Trump isn’t a nazi. Conservatives aren’t nazis. People who disagree with you aren’t fucking nazis. Nazis are the human beings, who during WW2 sent members of my family to concentration camps and were apart of the nationalist socialist party. Who carried out hitlers orders.
Nazis exist today. That’s true. But if we water down or start accusing everyone of being a nazi, people are gonna start forgetting what a real nazi looks like.
Most of you have never had the misfortune of meeting a neonazi and, by christ, does it show.
We compare Trump and conservatives to Nazis because they align themselves with Nazi ideals and values. They may not have been the ones carting off your family in goosestep during WWII, but give them a chance and they will do so to you without fanfare or guilt. Neonazis are a thing and the more we deny that the more room they have to breathe.
LOL who’s “denying” that Neonazis are a thing? The first sentence of the second paragraph of OP’s post is literally “Nazis exist today”, you pulphead.
>muh trump and the conservatives (read: anyone who’s not a far left extremist) will cart you all away!!
It’s “muh right wing death squads” all over again
@iamcon-fu-sion
Lol, are you sure about that?
Did you forget that you were the brain dead moron comparing conservatives to Nazis and how if given the chance they’d do the same as the Nazis of WWII did with sending people to concentration camps? You don’t get say that others are crying about Nazis when you spout this paranoid bullshit. Get help.
Backpedalling hard enough to leave skidmarks.
>We compare Trump and conservatives to Nazis because they align themselves with Nazi ideals and values.
NPC detected.
>They may not have been the ones carting off your family in goosestep during WWII, but give them a chance and they will do so to you without fanfare or guilt.
Well, I'm sure convinced by that complete hypothetical.
Say, you support gun control?
I still wanna know why Nazi’s are considered the end all be all evil.
The racism? The body count? The Death camps? I swear anything the Nazi’s did that could be considered evil, the Commies did bigger and better, as in 10 times the body count just for example.
Fuck em both, but I’ve been wondering why the Commies aren’t considered evil for doing the same shit the Nazi’s did.
Probably because America fought with the Commies against the Nazis.
We compare Trump and conservatives to Nazis because they align themselves with Nazi ideals and values.
Which are those “aligned” values? The ones which SJWs either never care to point out (apart from vagueposting) or straight up conjure out of thin air?