History. Art. Culture. The Written Word. Comedy. Curiosities. Nature and The Sciences. Anything Else That Holds My Attention. Combinations Thereof. And The Occasional Disjointed Personal Post. ((Hodge-Podge)) Welcome Bid. "Queen of the Cultured Wilds. Empress of the Empty Space between Words. Grand Duchess with Dominion over Damasks" - shilohta "The best mystery I've ever discovered" - R a n d e h
In my ravenous search for some unheinous thing with which to play my vast and ancient music library, I've discovered beautiful FOSS creatures feasting upon the corpse of WinAmp
And what this means is I can now play music with an interface made up of pixel art old enough to rent a car
Also i highly recommend getting a gaggle of friends together and scrolling through the piles and piles of archived winamp skins together. Peak experience.
Please have a moment of silence for the people who were killed instead of freed when news of emancipation finally reached the furthest corners of the american south.
have another moment for the ledgers, catalogs, and records that were burned and the homes that were destroyed to hide the presence of very much alive and still enslaved people on dozens of plantations and homesteads across the south for decades after emancipation.
and have a third moment for those who were hunted and killed while fleeing the south to find safety across the border, overseas, in the north and to the west.
black people. light a candle, write a note to those who have passed telling them what you have achieved in spite of the racist and intolerant conditions of this world, feel the warmth of the flame under your hand, say a prayer of rememberance if you are religious, place the note under the candle, and then blow it out.
if you have children, sit them down and tell them anything you know about the life of oldest black person you've ever met. it doesn't have to be your own family. tell them what you know about what life was like for us in the days, years, decades after emancipation. if you don't know much, look it up and learn about it together.
This is Juneteenth.
white people CAN interact with this post. share it, spread it.
â°ïž Atlas de la flora alpine 4. GenĂšve, Georg & Co., 1899.
Original source
Image description: Illustration of two tubular blue alpine flowers, identified as Gentiana Froelichii, or Froehlichâs Gentian. Each flower is elongated and closed with delicate petals, attached to green slender stems growing from a cluster of narrow, pointed leaves. Visible roots extend downward, showing the plantâs structure. The illustration is detailed and botanical, set against a plain beige background with the page number 335 in the top right corner. The text below names the plant and notes its habitat in high-altitude eastern Alps, flowering from August to September.
A virulent form of misogyny has become the single most important force holding together the American right.
Helen Lewis at The Atlantic:
Douglas Wilson has a modest proposal to improve American life: He wants to repeal the Nineteenth Amendment, which gave women the vote. In his ideal system, âwe would do it in our politics the same way we do it in our church structure,â he told me recently. âAnd that is, we vote by household.â
Wilson is a co-founder of the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches, based in Moscow, Idaho. Over the past five decades, he has built a small empire there, dedicated to disseminating his theocratic vision for the United States: a publishing house, a school, a liberal-arts college, and a video-streaming service. His denomination, which has about 170 affiliated churches, counts Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth as a member, and Wilson was invited to lead a prayer service at the Pentagon in February. So when the pastor casually suggests disenfranchising half of America, people listen.
[...]
Wilson believes that women should ânot ordinarilyâ hold political office, and should never serve in combat roles in the military. Husbands should have dominion over misbehaving wivesâ weight, spending habits, and choice of television programs. His uncompromising vision for America was once considered marginal, the conservative writer Karen Swallow Prior told me. Since his elevation by Hegseth, however, âno one can credibly say that Doug Wilson is fringe anymore.â
Wilson is a prominent voice in what is sometimes called âmasculinismâ: a movement to fight back against the advances of feminism and reassert the primacy of men. His version is religious, influenced by the notion of male âheadshipâ of the family and Saint Paulâs belief that godly women should âbe quiet.â There are also plenty of secular masculinists, as well as nominally Muslim ones, such as the streamer Sneako, the self-proclaimed pimp Andrew Tate, and the podcaster Myron Gaines. Woman-bashing plays well on social media and sells lots of ads for crypto, sports betting, and supplements. You can make good money telling men that theyâre the truly oppressed sex.
But this isnât just a movement of grifters exploiting a quirk of the algorithm. In the past decade, one of the New Rightâs major challenges has been to retrofit a consistent ideology onto the electoral power of Donald Trump. Masculinism has been a great gift, because factions with different views on, say, protectionism or Israel or Big Tech can all agree on the overreach of feminism and the need for a return to traditional gender roles. Far from being a fringe belief system, masculinism has become the single most important force uniting the American right, bringing together an unlikely constellation of pastors, posters, senators, preachers, influencers, podcasters, and fanboys.
The MAGA movement is often framed as a reaction to the first Black president, and to a growing Latino population. But the multiracial appeal of the manosphere and Trumpâs 2024 inroads with young minority men point in a different direction. âPeople ask me what the New Right is furious about,â the author Laura Field, whose book, Furious Minds, describes the intellectual underpinnings of Trumpism, told me. âAnd I think a good shorthand for that is theyâre furious about their own loss of status in society over the last few years and the elites who made that happen, and I think that the pithiest short version of that is that itâs the women. Itâs the women who took their status.â
Wilsonâs approach to public life clearly has an element of what professional wrestlers call kayfabeâthe winking, performative trollishness that now characterizes the online right. He wants feminists like me to get angry with his most outlandish proposals, making ourselves look like scolds or Chicken Littles in the process. But Wilson and a growing number of powerful allies are sincere in these beliefs, and would want to enact them if given the chance.
One of masculinismâs central claims is that no one is talking about men. So true! Menâs issues are not being discussed in Senator Josh Hawleyâs 2023 book, Manhood: The Masculine Virtues America Needs. They arenât being discussed in Tucker Carlsonâs documentary The End of Men. They arenât being discussed in the panoply of Christian books available on Amazon with titles such as Man for the Job, Masculine Christianity, and Itâs Good to Be a Man, or in their secular counterparts, such as Why Women Deserve Less. They arenât being talked about on social-media feeds (which can be highly segregated by sex) or on some of Americaâs most popular independent podcasts, such as Modern Wisdom, Huberman Lab, and The Diary of a CEO.
For decades, each feminist advance in American public life has prompted an equally strong backlash. The first wave of womenâs-rights activists won suffrage for women, against ferocious and sometimes violent opposition. After the second wave secured Title IX and other legal victories against sex discrimination, Phyllis Schlafly successfully fought back against the full ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment. By the identity-obsessed 2010s, the full weight of corporate America had swung behind glib slogans such as âThe future is female.â This commercial blitzkrieg inevitably convinced some people that womenâs advancement had come at menâs expense. A refrain I kept hearing over the past few years was that boys were being made to feel ashamed of themselves, as if they were stained by some kind of original sin. These years have seen a counterreaction, with the total abandonment of the #MeToo movement, conservative gloating over the fall of Roe v. Wade, and the return of straightforwardly sexist put-downsââQuiet, piggyââto public life.
Like most popular movements, masculinism has many entry points, and both defensible and alarming forms. At one end of the spectrum are legitimate concerns about male loneliness, the declining share of men in higher education, stagnant wages for non-college-educated men, and the deadening effects of day-trading, gaming, and porn. At the other end of masculinism are a misogynist vocabulary about AWFULs and the longhouse (terms that weâll come back to) and a political agenda close to that in The Handmaidâs Tale, whereby women are denied the right to work, vote, and control their own bodies.
On the internet, masculinism is presented as a rebellionâa transgressive middle finger to the liberal establishment, expressed in all the words a corporate HR department would order you not to say. In the past few years, leaked group chats have shown Young Republicans and college conservatives using sexism, infused with racism, as a bonding mechanism. âIf your pilot is a she and she looks ten shades darker than someone from Sicily, just end it there. Scream the no no word,â read a message in a Telegram thread used by the leaders of Young Republican chapters in New York, Kansas, Arizona, and Vermont. (Several members of the chat were women.) Richard Hanania, who describes himself as a former white nationalist, calls this kind of in-group signaling âthe Based Ritual,â a way for younger MAGA enthusiasts to prove their bona fides to one another.
Among Gen Zers, Douglas Wilsonâs intellectual heir is Nick Fuentes, who leads a loose collection of trolls known as Groypers. A self-professed Christian nationalist, anti-Semite, and virgin, Fuentes has built a fan base in part by deploying vividly misogynistic language. âOur No. 1 political enemy is women, because women constrain everything, every conversation, every manâeverything,â Fuentes said on a livestream earlier this year. He added: âJust like Hitler imprisoned Gypsies, Jews, Communistsâall of his political rivalsâwe have to do the same thing with women.â He suggested that they be sent to âbreeding gulags. The good ones will be liberated. The bad ones will toil in the mines forever.â
Fuentesâs rhetoric shows how this gendered view of the world can easily be interlaced with other prejudices. Gay men? Effeminate, uninterested in sports, therefore unmanly. Jews? Clever rather than athletic; also unmanly. University lecturers? Pencil-necked postmodernists; also unmanly. Trans people? Inevitably degenerate. Muslims? An invasion force of rapists. Black men? Thugs from whom white women should be protected (if only they would submit to patriarchy). Almost every facet of contemporary online rightism can be refracted through the prism of gender. Multiple people affiliated with the Heritage Foundation, perhaps the most influential MAGA policy organization, cut ties with the group after its president refused to condemn Fuentesâs anti-Semitism last year. But his view that women belong in forced-breeding camps has produced no such fuss.
[...]
How popular are masculinist ideas? Last year, research by Kingâs College London and Ipsos found that Gen Z men in 30 nations were far more likely than male Baby Boomers to say that the fight for womenâs equality had gone so far that men were now disadvantaged. They were also more than twice as likely to say that a father who stayed home with his children was âless of a man.â Meanwhile, 83 percent of Republican men younger than 50 think society is too feminized, according to a survey by the conservative Manhattan Institute. Intriguingly, this survey did not replicate the usual trope of working-class men revolting against snooty female elites: It found that âcollege-educated Republicans are more likely than their non-college counterparts to endorse the view that society has become too feminine.â
The most recent presidential election, pitting Trump against Kamala Harris, was a gift to masculinists. After all, the movementâs villains include female bosses, feminists, and women who donât bear childrenâand Harris was the embodiment of all three. The male podcasters who got behind Trump in 2024 now host outright misogynists: Consider the career of the Christian debater Andrew Wilson, who in January appeared on arguably the most popular podcast in America, The Joe Rogan Experienceâthe manosphere-influencer equivalent of singing the national anthem at the Super Bowl.
[...]
In fact, the challenge of falling birth rates is so well-known that many countries have implemented pronatalist policies in response: Singapore offers $11,000 âbaby bonuses,â while Hungary exempts mothers of three or more children from income taxes. So far, though, none of the carrots has worked. The actually unspeakable bit is whether womenâs access to education and the job market should be restricted, in the name of producing more babies and saving civilization. I wish people like Rachel Wilson would just come out and say that they favor this, so we can have a proper argument about it.
Instead they deploy a classic masculinist tactic: Tiptoe up to the edge of a policy that would poll as well as mandatory Ebola, then pirouette away at the last minute. Joel Webbon, a hard-right pastor based in Austin who has built a large social-media following by opposing feminism and the âLGBT Mafia,â is one of those prepared to say openly that he would like to restrict womenâs participation in public life. âI know a lot of people, and Iâm obviously not going to name them, but a lot of people and names that you would recognize are much further to the right than they are willing to publicly say,â he told me. However, he did not mind their bait-and-switch style, because the left has used it for decades. A small group of people argued that âlove is loveâ to pass gay marriage, âand then, you know, itâs like:Â Oh, actually, Drag Queen Story Hour.â Masculinists were only turning leftiesâ own strategy against them.
[...]
The Phyllis Schlafly of today is the writer Helen Andrews, with whom I am sometimes confused by liberals with Helen blindness. In a viral 2025 essay for Compact magazine called âThe Great Feminization,â Andrews asked whether greater female participation in the workforce was âa threat to civilization.â (Honestly, women can be so overwrought.)
She was building on an influential thesis on the right known as âthe longhouse,â which argues that modern, feminized society resembles the communal living halls of the past, which were dominated by âden mothersâ who ruled by passive aggression, offense-taking, and ostracizing their enemiesâall classically feminine modes of behavior. The most famous outlining of the longhouse thesis came from a writer calling himself L0m3z in the religious magazine First Things. He declined to cite any specific historical examples and added that one could not really define the longhouse, anyway, because âits definition must remain elastic, lest it lose its power to lampoon the vast constellation of social forces it reviles.â How convenient! Instead, the longhouse was âa metonym for the disequilibrium afflicting the contemporary social imaginary.â Let me shock you: L0m3z was eventually outed as a humanities academic.
Andrews took this thesis further, arguing that âeverything you think of as âwokenessâ is simply an epiphenomenon of demographic feminization.â To translate that into English, the claim is that women donât settle arguments like characters in a Guy Ritchie film, with fisticuffs outside the smoking shed and no hard feelings two hours later. Instead, Andrews writes, they âcovertly undermine or ostracize their enemies.â Therefore, âall cancellations are feminine.â Again, a quick glance at the history books presents a few challenges: The backstabbing in the Roman Senate was both literal and figurative, and the Vatican has always been a nest of scheming cardinals. And who pressured ABC to take Jimmy Kimmel off the air after Charlie Kirkâs assassination? Brendan Carr, who is Trumpâs Federal Communications Commission chairâand the possessor of a Y chromosome.
[...]
On the right, creeping feminization has become an all-purpose explanation for many recent events: Women pity the underdog, pander to self-proclaimed victims, and care about hurt feelings more than the truthâall of which are exploited by undocumented immigrants and violent criminals. In this analysis, Renee Goodâthe woman shot by an immigration-enforcement officer in Minneapolisâwas killed because sheâd adopted left-wing values. âAn AWFUL (Affluent White Female Urban Liberal) is dead after running her car into an ICE agent who opened fire on her,â the right-wing pundit Erick Erickson posted immediately after her death. Women are childlike, naive, immature; they simply do not understand the real world.
Many MAGA figures have identified the surfeit of feminine empathy as a political issue. The first episode of Douglas Wilsonâs Man Rampant podcast was called âThe Sin of Empathy.â The Canadian marketing professor Gad Saad issues regular condemnations of âsuicidal empathyâ between posts complaining that women âno longer wear any real clothes and instead are always in athleisure.â
This disdain for empathy often leads to the conclusion that womenâs political participation is a problem, because the little ladies will insist on voting for the wrong candidates and policies. âThe 1920s were the last decade in American history during which one could be genuinely optimistic about politics,â Peter Thiel, an early advocate for Trump in Silicon Valley, wrote in a 2009 essay for a Cato Institute journal. âSince 1920, the vast increase in welfare beneficiaries and the extension of the franchise to womenâtwo constituencies that are notoriously tough for libertariansâhave rendered the notion of âcapitalist democracyâ into an oxymoron.â In this view, the gender split in American politicsâ55 percent of men but only 46 percent of women voted for Trump in 2024âis not merely a reflection of differing priorities but a problem to be solved.
At the same time that people like Wilson are saying out loud that they want to repeal the Nineteenth Amendment, the suggestion that anyone seriously wants to end female suffrage is often dismissed by mainstream conservatives as lib hysteria. After all, changing the Constitution would require the assent of three-quarters of the 50 states. âIâll be concerned about the 19th thing the day a single stateâjust one out of 38âpasses a repeal,â Inez Stepman, a former fellow at the Claremont Institute, posted in March. Liberals were âhumorlessly chasing fumes of jokes and bar chatter, and dishonestly using it to silence real policy and cultural debate.â Personally, I would feel better about this line of argument had I not sat opposite the conservative intellectual Jordan Peterson in 2018 while he sneered at my suggestion that Trump-appointed justices would overturn Roe v. Wade. Or if the Trump administration had not taken the issue of birthright citizenship all the way to the Supreme Court. Or if Pete Hegseth had not already blocked the promotion of female (and Black) military officers, and frequently expressed his opposition to women serving in combat.
Masculinism is now approaching its imperial-overreach phase, like the Roman empire that many of its leaders so admire. For some of its most ardent adherents, if someone on the left is doing anything, regardless of their sex, itâs feminized and bad. Meanwhile, when Trump sends out a bitchy Truth Social post about a petty grievance, that is a display of manly vigor. Tucker Carlsonâs perfectly buoyant coiffure? Ruggedâbutch, even. Ben Shapiroâs heartwarming enjoyment of musical theater? In the best tradition of the Vikings or Spartans, probably. This reductive view of the worldâwomen things bad, men things goodâis the mirror image of the worst excesses of 2010s Tumblr feminism, when introverted teenage girls posted hashtags like #KillAllMen and drank from mugs that read MALE TEARS.
In March, the anti-DEI activist Christopher Rufo had to fend off a horde of anonymous right-wing posters claiming, apparently seriously, that white men âare very easily the most oppressed group in history.â When he described this view as âbrain damagedâ and invoked a little-known American phenomenon called slavery, he was besieged with complaints.
For me, this episode gets to the core of MAGA masculinism. Which of its faces is the real oneâthe conservative think-tankers seeking to undo antidiscrimination laws, or the soap opera of influencers railing against âsmall-breasted biddiesâ and AWFULs, wallowing in self-pity, and labeling everything they dislike as feminine?
But of course, the sober thinkers and the shock troops feed off each other. Sometimes, as with Wilson, they coexist in a single person. This is a movement with real policy goals: the rollback of no-fault divorce. Tax breaks to reward male breadwinners and female homemakers. An end to anything with a whiff of DEI, even leadership programs for women in the military, like one cut by Hegseth. A return to the workplace culture of the 1970s, where sexual harassment was normalized. An open preference for male employees in hiring, promotion, and pay awardsâin other words, affirmative action for men.
Yet masculinism also functions as a perpetual-motion machine of grievance, an inarticulate howl of anguish at the status quoâwhatever that currently is. Masculinism is both serious and silly, sometimes camp and sometimes chilling, an attention-grabbing performance and a genuine proposition. No wonder it has become the cornerstone of Trumpism.
This Atlantic article takes an important yet disturbing undercurrent uniting disparate far-right factions: anti-women hatred under the cloak of "masculinism.â
The U.S. Department of Education will announce its plans to move special education services and civil rights out of the agency, according to The Washington Post. The move â expected to be announced Tuesday â is a part of the Trump administrationâs larger plan to dismantle the federal Education Department.
Under this plan, the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, which oversees the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), will move to the Department of Health and Human Services, while the Office for Civil Rights will move to the Justice Department.
The Postâs cited three anonymous officials who were briefed on the plan. There has been no official statement from department spokespeople or U.S. Department of Education Secretary Linda McMahon.
The Education Department was created by Congress and cannot be closed without congressional approval â which has not happened. Rather than closing the department altogether, the Trump administration has begun moving operations and staff to other federal agencies, including the Labor Department. This is a part of the Trump administrationâs promise to close the department and âreturn education to the states.â
The un-American and evil Trump Regimeâs US Department of Educationâs issuance of plans to move special education and civil rights offices out that department and into others is an attack on American values and proper education.
blakekathryn
prguitarman
janainaart
vaporwave
turnnoffyourmind
stormborns
dededos
