This is my THIRD time coming back to Tumbler and it's never been by choice. Gender: both of the classics 🚻, TME ☆ Age: old (as in, I am over 18) ☆ White ☆ Romantic partner ♥️ of my beloved Holly (@top1jesterquestfangirl) ☆ I LOVE BIRDS. PLEASE SHOW ME SOME BIRDS. ☆ Nothing else to see here. Shoo. Bye. Get off my Tumbler.
This blog is officially raising funds for Yesmin, a friend of @ayooshsthings / @ayooshs-stuff (a verified blogger).
Yesmin is a 27 year old, a mother of two, and cannot afford food for her family.
If you have the means to do so, PLEASE set up a recurring/weekly donation for Yesmin. I know that everyone needs help, and it's hard to spread it so thin, but we all know there's no price on human life and dignity. So, please, even $5 a week can make a difference.
If we start at that pace, and keep it going, we can create a surge of support for someone who deeply needs it. #TidalWave4Yesmin will be the tag I use to update you on the fundraiser, as well as Yesmin's situation.
I am raising funds for Yesmin, a 27 year old mother from Gaza and a victim of the ongoing genocide. Here are her own words:
Since GFM frequently terminates campaigns, here are some Ch^ffed [Ch]/P^yP^l [Pa] campaigns to donate to:
Lama and Mohammed. Lama suffers from intense eczema. [Ch]
Nesma. Her 6 year old sister is dependent on her, and is currently suffering from intestinal worms. [Pa]
Fidaa. A mother to two young children, one of whom is a one-year-old boy. [Ch, Pa]
Filtering List
If you're a mutual with a trigger or squick, please let me know, and I shall update the list.
Bugs - images of them (includes insects, arachnids, and bug-like creatures)
Eyestrain
🩸🥩 - blood and gore. Realistic.
Heyo. My online name is Mia. I'm an adult. I'm bi-gender and gender-fluid, and use both he/him and she/her pronouns. If you send me a picture of a pigeon, you will win my heart forever (Old Man On Tumbler heart ×1 can be sold at the black market for goods and services).
Coloring text helps me read easier. If you have trouble reading something due to the text, please ask me.
My incomplete tag directory is as follows:
A
Ableism
Actions Upon Boyfriend - hey, so you know your boyfriend? Yeah, we turned him into a Tumbler tag.
ADHD
Agnesstory - a scientist, a statue, and a misplaced memory walk into a story (written by @/possessable here on Tunglr dot com)
Allie C - Thelemick magickian Aleister Crowley
Amazing Digital - not a fandom tag, but a joke tag (ie, "reblogs this amazing digital post")
America
Anecdotes
Antiblackness
Aroace
Aromantic
Art Tag - info for drawing
Artwork - art that I want to save (work in progress)
Asexual
Autism
AYBF - my "OTP"
B
Bisexual
Bitternposting
Black Hair - for when it's the focus of a post
Blood
Box God Brian - best friend numero uno (alphabetically, that is)
Bunny
C
Comminfo - info for commissions
Cubeposting - sweet little Kyubey
D
Dead Note - the animanga about Light Yagami
Doohickey
Doorposting - these are pictures of dogs!
Dreams People Have Had
E
Endorsed
Evil Secretary - my best friend/girlfriend, Holly (top1jesterquestfangirl here on Tumbler!)
F
Fake Dashboard
Famous Post
Fatphobia
Fat Positivity
G
Gamerade - video game making info
Gay - specifically concerning gay men (lesbians have their own tag)
Grugposting
H
Hashtag Mylung
Hannibal Phase
Hetjoshi - rich and juicy M/F posts
Hornyposting - coloured text, used erotically~
Houseposting - the beautiful House of Leaves
Humour Storage - funny stuff for a rainy day
I
Imperialism
Intersex
Intersexism
J
Jang Aesthetic - aesthetic related to the Jang, the satirical teenaged caste of Tanith Lee's "Don't Bite The Sun."
Javertposting
K
Killerposting - The Killer. Watch out, Wendy Williams!
Kinship - my "relatable" tag
Kittislam - kitty cats partaking in Islam. Self-explanatory tag. :}
Kitty
L
LCB - Limbus Company
Lesbian
LGBT
Liberal Seinfeld
Lobcorp - LOBOTOMY CORPORATION YIPPEEEEEE
Look Outside
Long Live LGBTQ! - stereotypical Mafia goons and bosses being very queer-affirmative
LoR - Library of Ruina
M
Marvelous Steampunk Posts
Mia Save Point - important info
Mia Storage - like Save Point, but not as urgent
Medical Info
Minecraft
Moby Dick
Monk Enclosure
Mutual Fridge Magnet - when my moot makes (or ends up on) a big-note post. I'm so proud of you, mutuals.
N
NDDP - Notre Dame De Paris
Nonbinary
No Note Post
Nope 2022
No OP Post
No Secretary Zone - block tag for posts my GF would not like to see
Normalpersonposting
O
OCD
Old Mii On Tumbler - my makeshift Tomodachi Island (Google Slides and transparent PNGs)
OSDDID
Other People's Thought Cabinets - Digital Nomad (Success): You think you can guess what this tag means
Other Types Of Birds - birds which, while WONDERFUL, are not pigeons
P
Palestine
Parenting
People Tag
Playlist Stories
Pigeon Religion - stuff featuring pigeons :D
Poems
Poison
Polls
Polyamory
Posts I Would Make If I Was On Tumbler - your premium, subscription-free Mia content
Posts To Show Mom
Q
Quails!!!
R
Racism
Remembersposting
Rene Magritte :D
Role Models
S
Seagulls
Sea Herring Sex Post - you'd be surprised at how often sex and fish interse(x)t
Sex Chain - those emoji-laden paragraphs
Shirts That Go Hard
Sinners Tag - I LOVE YOU SINNERS 2025!!!!!!!!!!
Squid Squad - my best friends :D
Spiderverse
Star War
Suntzuposting
Swifthate
T
The Labyrinth
Thelemick-Manager - 2024posting
The Matrix
The Sinister Potion!
Trans
Transfem
Transmasc
Transmisogynoir
Transmisogyny
[tumblr]
[tumblr] drinks
TW Markiplier - if you don't want to see his face, or the atrocious things I say about him.
U
V
Vampire Show - Interview With The
W
War And Hell On Planet Sandwich
Who Gives A Shit - Rene Descartes mentioned
Wizardposting
Wonderlab
X
Y
Z
Zby Tag - for my last-but-not-least best friend, Zby. (He is not on Tumbler.)
kind of funny that people think ideologies are tested for evolutionary fitness, like secular liberalism or whatever will die because liberals don't have as many children as religious folk. ideological reproduction happens through the culture, not only literal reproduction from parent to child. there's also the living experience of being born in a religious family, which is often its own permanent inoculation into atheism.
hindutva watch maintains an archive of hate crimes, hindutva legislation as well links and mirrors to relevant articles on the key issues, the ideology and structure of the sangh parivar. i rec exploring the website and starting with their reporters guide to hindu nationalism.
hindu supremacist: hinduism is amazing! muslims have always been allowed to celebrate hindu festivals!!! muslims are the intolerants who decided themselves to stop being involved.
hard hindu nationalist: yeah now we have banned them cause they're all rapists stealing and converting our girls
The thing about American "leftist" comedians is that they aren't actually leftist, they are the Imperial Court Jesters. They stand on a stage, point directly at the blood-soaked gears of the war machine, make a little tee-hee noise, and the crowd erupts. Not because they are critiquing the machine, but because the laughter is a pressure release valve for the people inside it. Take the video of that stand-up asking the defense contractor if she helped Trump bomb those 160 Iranian school girls, and everyone laughing, including the contractor herself. That laughter is ritual absolution. The contractor laughs because she knows she will never face a tribunal. The audience laughs because they get to feel "self-aware" without having to actually stop anything. The joke doesn't condemn the contractor; it humanizes her, turns her into a lovable scamp who just happens to have a job graphing the velocity of shrapnel through children's bodies. By making it a punchline, the comedian sanitizes the atrocity. The blood is scrubbed off the stage. The audience gets to say "wow, we are so edgy for talking about it" while the person who builds the bombs gets to chuckle and order another drink. It is not satire, it is a team-building exercise for the empire.
Then there is the YouTuber talking about Transformers, casually dropping the "Iraq war aesthetic" like it's a color palette. Desert punk. Military core. A vibe. This is what happens when your country hasn't had a war on its own soil in living memory; the violence becomes media, a backdrop for childhood toys. The explosions are no longer the sound of mothers screaming; they are cool action sequences. They are digesting the visual debris of massacre as a nostalgic fashion choice, scraping the trauma off and compressing it into a genre for their retro-futurist fantasies. The apocalypse becomes a mood board.
And finally, the girl recounting celebrity love triangles from her childhood, flippantly mentioning how the U.S. was "busy with the Iraq war or whatever." Or whatever. That single phrase is the thesis statement of American innocence. Over a million dead, a region destabilized for a century, an endless river of grief; and for her, it was the commercial break between pop culture segments. It didn't raise her rent. It didn't stop her Wi-Fi. The violence is geo-locked to brown skin and distant deserts, just background noise like a refrigerator humming. She has the luxury of forgetting because the machine doesn't eat her children, it eats yours.
Americans don't hate the machine; they love the output. They hate the mess of it. So they turn it into jokes, into aesthetic, into "whatever." Because if they stopped laughing, if they stopped scrolling, if they actually looked at the 4K drone footage of the aftermath instead of the cool explosion CGI in their movies, they would have to realize that the lithium in their phones, the gas in their tanks, and the comfort of their suburban cul-de-sacs are all greased with the fat of foreign children. And they can't handle that. So they laugh. They turn it into a vibe. They call it "the Iraq war or whatever." You can't deconstruct the master's house with the master's jokes, especially when the punchline is the corpses holding up the floorboards.
me when i get one (1) note on tumblr dot com from my beloved mutuals: they lovme❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🙏🙏🙏😭😭❤️❤️😁😁😁😁😁✨️✨️☝️☝️☝️☝️😁😁👅👅👅👅👅👅👅💜💜💜💗❤️🩹❤️🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥🫂🫂🫂🫂i love them 😁😁😁❤️❤️❤️❤️💜💜💜 f ried n
under the dictatorship of alberto fujimori, USAID funded peru's "family planning" program, which was used to sterilize 300,000 indigenous women, often through deception or in exchange for basic necessities such as food or medical care
A system of incentives and sanctions reinforced the policy: healthcare providers received cash or in-kind payments for each sterilized woman, while promotions, demotions, and the allocation of medical equipment were tied to the fulfillment of sterilization targets and quotas. The program was also implemented through mass campaigns. DEMUS reported large-scale operations aimed at recruiting women for tubal ligation, including so-called “ligation festivals,” which promoted sterilization as a path to happiness and often offered food or money as incentives.
Deceptive practices were widespread. Many women were misinformed about the nature of the procedure or told it was minor. In other cases, they were offered debt forgiveness related to childbirth or abortion in exchange for agreeing to be sterilized. Within a broader context of poverty and exclusion, sterilization often became a transactional means of accessing healthcare or food, services the state was already obligated to provide.
source
not coincidentally, US president george h.w. bush's administration was very pleased with the mass privatization fujimori's regime was implementing
the twitter user who made the original anonymized people of the global south tweet is still active on bluesky, and is a liberal zionist who is currently mad at spain and italy for intervening on the behalf of hamas for accompanying the flotilla lmao.
a lot of discourse about poor working conditions is basically reliant on xenophobic instincts, what are we a bunch of asians forever and ever. if your country has an underclass, they're being exploited to prop up all the work thats dirty, dangerous or dull.
The Rampur Development Authority has ordered the demolition of 38 buildings at Mohammad Ali Jauhar University over alleged approval violatio
The Rampur Development Authority (RDA) has ordered the demolition of 38 out of 40 buildings at Mohammad Ali Jauhar University in Uttar Pradesh's Rampur, alleging that they were constructed without the required approvals from the competent authority, drawing criticism over the alleged selective targeting of the institution and its potential impact on students.
The university, run by the Mohammad Ali Jauhar Trust chaired by jailed former Uttar Pradesh minister and senior Samajwadi Party leader Azam Khan, has been given 15 days to remove the allegedly unauthorised structures, failing which the authorities will carry out the demolition.
The demolition order was issued on Wednesday by Rampur District Magistrate and RDA Vice-Chairperson Ajay Kumar Dwivedi under Section 27 of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973.
According to the RDA, a scrutiny of official records found that only the university's medical college building and one academic block had valid building approvals. The remaining 38 buildings, covering a total built-up area of 82,309 square metres, were allegedly constructed without permission from the competent authority.
District Magistrate Ajay Kumar Dwivedi said, "The buildings of Jauhar University were constructed in Gram Singhan Kheda, which falls under the jurisdiction of the Rampur Development Authority (RDA).
Officials said the buildings stand on land where their present use is not permitted under the applicable land-use regulations and that the violations cannot be regularised under existing law, making demolition the only legally permissible course of action.
The order followed notices issued on June 28 and 29 to the secretary of the Mohammad Ali Jauhar Trust and the university registrar after a complaint was received.
The respondents submitted a joint written reply on July 8, and representatives of the university appeared before the authority on Wednesday to present their case.
The university argued that the land was outside the jurisdiction of the Rampur Development Authority when the buildings were constructed.
However, the RDA rejected the contention, holding that approval from the competent authority was mandatory under the Zila Panchayat Act and other applicable laws even before the area came under the authority's jurisdiction.
The order also cited Supreme Court judgments on unauthorised constructions, observing that such violations warrant strict enforcement of the law.
Meanwhile, the District Magistrate directed officials to ensure that the demolition process does not adversely affect students enrolled at the university.
The Regional Higher Education Officer and the District Inspector of Schools have been asked to set up counselling camps on the campus to guide students and help safeguard their academic interests.
Mukrim Rawl, a fourth-year B.A. LL.B. student of Mohammad Ali Jauhar University, appealed to the authorities to halt the proposed demolition, expressing deep concern over its impact on thousands of students pursuing their education at the institution.
(...)
hi! just wondering about the “you will not call me desi or a person of colour” thing? finalgirlianthe also has it n i was wondering what it means? i mean, i do find poc terminology irritating, but i didn’t know if there was more to it. oke thanks bye
I find it very dehumanizing and awkward to be called a poc on this website. The desi thing is because I reject the category, it groups together all south asians under a hindustani term that signals mostly north indian and upper caste hindu culture as unifying. The term quite literally means "of the nation" in opposition to foreigner (videshi) or of othered nations (pardeshi) which has particular implications about citizenship and belonging deployed inside india in particular that I am politically opposed to since 2019.
I feel like temporary immigrants and diaspora have very divergent interests in and relationships to the homeland and it results in ugly friction due to the fact that we are grouped together and supposed to culturally rub along or something. Some of it is the narcissism of small differences for sure. Some of it is that temporary immigrants are too busy maintaining their visa status and tend to have contempt for solipcism about identity.
Please put on your N95s. The same ones used for covid will filter particulate pollution. I lived in a city with yearly winter pollution levels like this and its a serious carcinogenic and respiratory disease risk. If you can pay for it, you might as well get an indoor air filter to sleep in because the cause is systemic.
I hate rgu fan's refusal to accept the idea that the show is racist. anthy is a south-asian coded racialized character who unfortunately plays into a lot of stereotypes associated with south asians. the only reason we know she is south asian is because of the bindi on her forehead. akio as the representative of the patriarchy is south asian and plays into the "brown rapist" stereotype. the only reason anthy and akio were racialized was to Other them. to say that the show is a thoughtful depiction of racism and colonialism is to give the show far more credit than it deserves. to say that race is a blind spot in the show is doing much the same. that's not to say that any analysis of utena through the lense of race is worthless, it actually adds to the show's critique of the structures of oppression. especially since racism is kind of inseparable to them. but that analysis can go hand in hand with acknowledging the show's inherent racism. a lot of south asians, including me identify with anthy as a character and they have given a lot of excellent meta that enriches the show but i don't want anyone to use that fact as a card to deny her orientalized depiction.
to add to this, a lot of rgu fans who try to analyse the show through a racial lense will impose western ideas of race onto the characters, this feels like ignorance of the very idea that racism can exist beyond the white/poc dichotomy and it's racism within itself. every character in the show is japanese in a japanese setting, anthy and akio are racialized due to being the only south asians in a majorly japanese setting. any analysis of utena that doesn't take this fact into account is worthless.
I really don’t want to open this can of worms because Tumblr hath no fury like people called out on their political performativeness but it is literally driving me up the wall to watch people react to Serkis’ ‘keep Tolkien white’ commentary by insisting twice as hard that Tolkien would descend down to earth and dropkick the entire Republican party to hell or whatever, just because they want to ensure that a piece of media they enjoy isn’t seen as being morally impure. Case in point: I have seen at least five instances of Tolkien’s ‘I hate apartheid’ valedictorian address being used as a ‘counter’ to Serkis being racist, including by actual news outlets.
Except it’s only ever the ‘I hate apartheid’ line that’s shared, and not the actual quote in its full context. Because here it is:
If we consider what Merton College and what the Oxford School of English owes to the Antipodes, to the Southern Hemisphere, especially to scholars born in Australia and New Zealand, it may well be felt that it is only just that one of them should now ascend an Oxford chair of English. Indeed it may be thought that justice has been delayed since 1925. There are of course other lands under the Southern Cross. I was born in one; though I do not claim to be the most learned of those who have come hither from the far end of the Dark Continent. But I have the hatred of apartheid in my bones; and most of all I detest the segregation or separation of Language and Literature. I do not care which of them you think White.
Which is to say. This isn’t exactly the antiracist quote of the century, to say the least. This is a white South Africa born man and a white Australian shaking hands and going ‘omg we relate’ and expressing what is a very, very mild ‘segregation is not great’ opinion in order to convey his thoughts on an academic subject, ie the confluence of language and literature. Using race to make a point about his own subject of interest, in his own interest, which is, amusingly enough, what a lot of ostensibly well meaning progressive seem to be doing.
I also think that some of the general surprise around ‘what do you mean large swathes of the Tolkien fandom are incredibly conservative!?’ in lib/left Tolkien fandom is the result of a tendency in said parts of the fandom to transpose one’s own progressiveness onto Tolkien and turn a blind eye to things like, say, the Shire being a very specifically mid-century British racist construct that is very, very clear in its politics, often going so far as to insist it’s anarchist or an ideal society or whatever the fuck… and then getting really Pikachu-meme ‘but they’re misreading it’ every single time a conservative explains exactly what it is about the legendarium that they really love, and get surprised when someone uses the Shire being a racist construct to do more racism. It is 2026 let us do away with ‘I don’t see colour’ interpretations of media, I beg. Nobody is cancelling you for enjoying a book that is not kind to race. Most of the books I love are not kind to race.
I genuinely don’t have the energy to go deeper into it now because I and others have been beating this drum for ages but like man. Man. I’m not surprised by Serkis’ comment. I don’t really give a shit about what Andy Serkis says and does because if I was the kind of person who gave a fuck about Andy ‘I felt like an ethnic minority on the Black Panther set’ ‘I somehow interpreted Animal Farm in the most ridiculous way possible’ Serkis’ opinions on anything, let alone race, my life would be much sadder. I think the adaptation will be an enshittified money-grab, and I will probably embrace cannibalism when McDonalds inevitably starts giving out little Gollums with every Happy Meal. Again.
What I am surprised and disappointed by is how the liberal-left reaction to this shit is to always and forever just either pretend it doesn’t exist in the text, or is the result of a complete misreading. So seldom is the response ‘fuck me, this book has some real wild thoughts on race, let’s see how we can engage creatively with that in an adaptation’. Which has never happened. In fact, all your thoughts on Amazon and lore faithfulness and other adaption criticism or applause aside, TROP, the only Tolkien interpretation that has directly engaged with race has thus far done so very, very badly, and only on a surface level. Why?
Because the loudest parts of liberal Tolkien fandom is not interested in exploring race as it exists in the text, to explore it progressively, to engage creatively with the structural conservatism present within the very construction of Middle Earth. They’re interested in concessions that change very little: you can have your brown elves, as long as we don’t have to think about the implications of foundational aspects of our beloved world, which we relate to greatly and do not wish to think about why we relate to it beyond our own experience of encountering the text.
No, it’s always either an insistence that the Racists are Wrong because the Text is Pure, or a slight, grudging concession that Tolkien had ‘a few racist elements’ but ‘nothing like the racism of today’. Of course it’s nothing like the racism of today. Tolkien isn’t writing in 2026. It was the racism of yesterday, and it is very clearly written into the text. Tolkien is not your mildly problematic grandpa. Tolkien was an Oxford don with an enormous, wide-ranging cultural impact, and refusing to acknowledge that is the misreading, not the pointing out of or engagement with structural racism within the text.
There's also a version of this where people cite Tolkien's 1938 letter to the German publisher, ie the one where he refuses to confirm he's of "Aryan" descent and basically tells them to fuck off, as the other canonical "proof text" that Tolkien Was Not Racist, and it does the same flattening as the valedictorian quote. It's a great letter, very ‘get thee gone from my gate’ but it is also a letter about refusing a specific, legally coded Nazi racial category, not a statement about the internal racial logic of his own fiction.
Nobody is saying Tolkien was a fascist white supremacist Nazi. Hell, Tolkien’s own thoughts on military atrocity in general is pretty clear in the depictions of the escalating kinslayings. But people love to conflate "hated actual fascism, said so on the record and is very evident in his fiction" with "therefore the legendarium contains no racialised hierarchy," as though those two things have to rise or fall together, when they don't. You can be sincerely, personally opposed to Nazi race science and apartheid violence and still write a mythology where moral and aesthetic worth consistently map onto a Northern-European somatic ideal. Because the racialisation Tolkien both inherited and passed on wasn't Nazi race science, it was the broader Edwardian/interwar philological raciology he was actually swimming in, hell, drowning in, considering the Oxford environment. And I find it so, so frustrating how fandom keeps failing to make this distinction: structural racialisation and personal bigotry are not the same axis, and refusing to be measured on one doesn't clear you on the other.
The Southrons/Easterlings material is obviously the part most quoted when it comes to Tolkien’s ‘problematic elements’ except it's imo super telling how rarely it actually gets quoted compared to how often it gets vaguely waved at (except Charles E Mills. I love you Charles E Mills). Anyway “Black men like half-trolls," swarthy, slant-eyed, riding out of the south and east to serve Sauron… it’s the same mapping of good-north/evil-south-and-east you get in a dozen other early-twentieth-century adventure texts. And this imo actually undermines the "it's just medievalism, calm down" defense, because medievalism is a selectively retrospective construction of which past you're claiming and which one you're othering, not some sort of static, neutral historical styling.
Tolkien's medievalism is specifically Northern European heroic-elegiac medievalism, the "Northernness" he talks about loving as a kid, and that aesthetic preference is not extractable from the racial hierarchy it produces on the page. You cannot keep the aesthetic and disclaim the politics because as in all art, the aesthetic is the politics, that's what "structural" means as opposed to "incidental”, and I just wish that many extremely clever people who understand this in a contemporary sense would allow themselves to feel uncomfortable and look at it in a beloved text.
Jackson's trilogy didn't invent racialisation in Tolkien, hell I think he even softened some of it because the Scouring is straight up impossible to adapt without it being very clear about its politics, but his adaptation does go quite some way make the existing racism legible… casting, costuming, choreography and cinematography does the same racialised sorting the text does, and does it visually: Uruk-hai as a kind of grunting brutalised, brutalistic mass, Haradrim on oliphaunts as a fairly straightforward Orientalist boogeyman, and the Fellowship itself photographed like a Pre-Raphaelite fantasy lmfao. Serkis isn't introducing a new interpretive layer with his commentary, hell Serkis was in all those Jackson films as well! Serkis is being very clear about what aspects of the legendarium matter to him, and that aspect happens to be the whiteness of it all. And I genuinely cannot understand why the huge ‘scandal’ around his comment is not that someone said the quiet part, but that saying it out loud is what became the scandal, taken as some kind of transgression against Tolkien and all his readers with Good Politics™️, rather than the quarter-century of adaptations, readings, and analysis of the text that wordlessly encoded the racism and got called faithful and dedicated for it.
I didn’t want to go to author is dead territory but. Fandom discourse keeps reaching for authorial intent as the arbiter of textual meaning in exactly the way most of these same people would reject in any other context. Everyone is a massive New Critic the second the author in question is someone they love. But Tolkien doesn’t need to have consciously intended a racial hierarchy or a white nationalist mythology for the text to functionally produce one, for it to be so loved by conservatives and ethnonationalists who come fifty years after his time.
Intent is not even a contested position in literary theory, it's just the very basic understanding that "text has ideology independent of authorial intent". The insistence on relitigating Tolkien's personal feelings as though that settles the structural question is wild to me, and I find it so extremely unproductive how liberal fandom reaches for this constantly, repeatedly chanting Tolkien’s few vaguely liberal statements that read far less liberally in context. But I guess the alternative, ie reading the actual construction of race in the legendarium on its own terms, requires giving up the fantasy that the thing you love is politically inert. And it’s just so sad man. Like I fucking love the legendarium, and I think insisting on its moral purity is the worst thing you can do to it.
I think my entire argument can be summed up in a few questions. Why do conservatives keep saying "I love Tolkien" completely unashamedly, in a way they don’t realy say about most other ‘canonical’ twentieth-century texts, while we on the left have to perform a whole apologetic dance before we say it? What is it that they embrace about the text, that we have to occlude in order to express an unproblematic ‘love’? Why do we have to disavow parts of a text to claim we love it? Who are we performing to? What are we losing in focusing so hard on this performance?
This is why the Serkis-style comment, or the Rings of Power casting discourse, ends up being the deepest engagement we collectively get in fandom terms. Because both "sides" of that fight are actually shallow in the same way, just from opposite ends. The right-wing backlash to diverse casting is, repulsively, responding to something absolutely present in the text: a defensive crouch around a racial aesthetic it identifies as being under threat. The liberal-left response, the "just add brown elves" gesture, claims the problem to be one of representation and casting rather than structure, which is precisely why the racial elements of The Rings of Power satisfies no one and changes nothing.
You can put actors of colour in Númenor and Harfoot villages and yet the underlying moral framework of who is coded as inherently noble and who as inherently monstrous, whose skin colour the textual narrative uses as a standin for corruption, stays completely untouched. Again, see my TROP link above, with the jihadi-coding of the villains. Because that framework isn't located in the casting of an adaptation, it's located in the construction of Arda itself and physiognomy-as-morality at the level of the prose itself, constantly present throughout the text. Casting a Black actor as an elf doesn't do anything to the fact that "evil race coded as racially other" is still sitting right there in the Southrons and the orcs, unadapted, undiscussed, doing exactly the same work it always did, and this work takes on a new look in post-2001 adaptations.
So what you get is two adaptations of the same tiresome insanemaking discourse rather than two different arguments: the right defends the racial aesthetic as the substance of their love, and the liberal mainstream defends the fantasy that representation-level tweaks constitute engagement with race. And so, nobody actually produces the adaptation that takes seriously what nonwhite Tolkien scholars have been saying for decades, which is that you'd have to touch the orc/Southron/Valar/Valinor/blondeness architecture itself to ever productively have this conversation. Not diversify who plays the good guys, but interrogate why "evil" in this legendarium has a face and a hair colour and points compass east.
But if the talk about this goes on as it does, and continues between Tolkien the Pure versus Tolkien the Misread, there will never be anyone willing to make that adaptation, and we’ll go on forever in a sisyphean climb, where both the reactionary embrace and the progressive denial are just two versions of refusing to read the same damn book. Basically, I think we on the left etc need to stop treating "is Tolkien racist" as a yes/no gate you have to clear before you're allowed to enjoy the books, and stop acting like enjoying problematic media makes you a fascist. We need to start treating the racialised architecture within Tolkien’s world as the actual object of study, same way you'd read imperial romance or Forster or Kipling or Haggard, without needing to acquit or convict the author first.
Which means we have to name the conservatism specifically rather than gesturing at "some outdated attitudes," trace where it comes from historically (the philological Northernness Tolkien grew up steeped in, not some special personal failing that reflects badly on you), and then ask what an adaptation would look like which dramatised that rather than smoothing over it or weaponising it. We have to let go of the idea that critical engagement is disloyalty, and let go of the idea that loving something requires defending its honour. We need to get the resilience needed to engage with the idea that a work can be both formative and ideologically compromised at the same time.
We don’t need to resolve that tension into either adoring hagiography or totalising cancellation. If we do, we're going to keep getting “keep the Shire white” Serkis soundbites and “hooray we cast a brown elf in our we-invented-elf-jihadis show!” news cycles standing in for a conversation that hasn't actually started yet, and ngl buddies I have to say I personally will be biting people the next time I see yet another rendition of the same damn response-reaction cycle start again because everyone, both the conservatives and the left, wants the things they love to be a reflection of themselves, and will twist themselves into pretzels to ensure that remains the case.
After I suspected a climate connection to tooth decay, I conducted systematic saliva pH testing across my patient population and documented
agricultural workers in punjab who have to labor in 45°C (113°F) plus heat are losing their teeth as their bodies prioritise cooling through respiration and minimise saliva production.
idk i would personally rather give up access to certain products seasonally or locally than have people enslaved to give me the ability to have any product any place any time. i think i can go without tomatoes in january.
i wish buy local or seasonal meant something to do with ethics but tbh most agriculture in the us is also farmed by immigrant seasonal labor in conditions that with the growing weaponisation of ICE raids by farmowners is much like the kafala system. the part of the supply chain where tomatoes get shipped from florida or southern california are like the least enslaved human labour parts of it.
In a study published July 2023 in Nature, researchers at the University of Nottingham Rights Lab and the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University calculated the risk of forced labor across all aspects of the U.S. food supply, excluding seafood. They found that most forced labor risks came from animal-based proteins, processed fruits and vegetables, and discretionary foods – products such as sweeteners, coffee, wine, and beer. They also found that 62 percent of forced labor risk came from production or processing that occurs on US soil. The study notes that characteristics such as poverty, language barriers, and uncertain immigration status could render individuals at higher risk for forced labor in the US.
The elimination of forced labour (Sustainable Development Goal 8.7) is a priority for the sustainability of food systems. Using data on prod
and basically avoid chocolate. almost all chocolate involves slave labor, including the chocolate that advertised itself as slavery free.
like many people have said this better than me but no it IS odd that we've come to think of potatoes as so quintessentially european that their presence in historical fantasy where they're anachronistic doesn't jar. and yes people are trying to have the trappings of post-colonial europe without engaging w the icky colonialism part and yes people are neglecting to imagine what a european cuisine without potatoes would be like.
im fully in favour of 'let people have fun w their fantasy world' but is considering how the potatoes got there in the absence of colonialism not a fun exercise? maybe every year the dragon riders go on a great transatlantic potato pilgrimage
if you put potatoes in your medieval european style fantasy world people will by and large not find it jarring and accept it as a normal fantasy trope
if you put, say, black people in your medieval european style fantasy world a whole demographic of people will get very angry and accuse you of breaking their immersion
this is in spite of the fact that black people were a lot more common in medieval europe than potatoes.
Check Pinned For Yesmin's Fundraiser @oldmanontumbler - Tumblr Blog | Tumgag