The Zoe Slander file
What follows was initially written in response to an attack piece on Reddit, for Reddit. But it ran over the space allowed, so I just posted it here, those coming here from Reddit, should scroll to “ PART TWO” to avoid re-reading what Reddit did have room for.
Andrew Johnston here, late to my own (Reddit) party. In all honesty I was hoping not to attend, but as this garbage appears to creep up the search engines even without me casting my pearls to the swine it seems I would be remiss not to make an appearance. The problem with internet forums in general is that those with the least to offer, logically enough, have the most time to do so. Having read this whole silly thread I think "Reddit" just might be the ultimate case in point.
Granted until I found my person and breeding program being slandered here, I’d not occasion to visit, so I don’t know if there might be higher levels of reason and discourse displayed elsewhere within. But if anyone can hide behind a false identity, make up whatever BS they want, and find a bunch of morons with nothing better to do then respond…….. well really how different can it be on any given topic ?
My first instinct was not to grace it with my presence.
So I didn’t, for about four months, curious as to how it would play without rebuttal, I even refrained from sending any supporters. So before I set about tearing new cyberholes, let me first tip my hat to that slim minority here that doesn't simply lurk in cyberspace reading random dog rants waiting to cheer, jeer, and make clear what they don’t know like so many village idiots the world over magically finding comfort in one another’s company virtue of www.
Let me thank the few that thought to question “nw posters” bald face lies; TheKearney, meaniereddit, derrickito1, Brougham Faithful. Those who called bullsh!t where they smelt it, pointed out the absurdity of some of the claims. Without you folks this thread would be little more then clueless cyber lynch mob, with no interest in the other side of the story, or inclination to question even an accuser hiding their own identity ?!
And let me give the short version of the other side of the story, in case the readers here have better things to do, then the writers. The "NW poster" (Nathan), Rafe, and likely several of the chime ins are actually all the same team. And that team is orchestrated by a woman named Zoe Song, she is the "partner" of Nathan friend of Rafe and author behind multiple false identities supporting this organized and rather professional bit of slander.
And this supposedly selfless effort at helping others avoid “nw poster”s “mistake” in buying a dog, is really about to trying to extort money from yours truly.
She's even gone so far as to create a fake website
www.olympicdogs.biz
Using photos stolen from my own, including one of me, linking to my youtube station, and my picassaweb album, and then misrepresenting my priorities and program in a crude and blatantly illegal bit of….. pretending to be me. She also likes to pop up on various dog forums, never as herself, pretending to seek advice on whether or not to buy a dog from me, and then drop a link to drive traffic to the fake website.
Not to be confused with my actual website, which you can see below bears the same image of me.
www.olympicdogs.net
But if she's left a credit card trail, yours truly, will be suing her a$$ when we get past the proxy domain used to register the slander site.
Allow me to quote Zoe Song from her own Yelp review below, because it was my rebuttal to it, that rather clearly inspired the hair brain text on the fake website… I think you’ll agree.
The yelp review/rebuttal can be found in it’s entirety at the address below
https://biz.yelp.com/r2r/RBbbiOJjTrkgbKKehvvFyg
"Hooch went to lay down and mistakenly I had tied his leash to the stroller and walked away for a second. Another dog had approached him from behind and as Hooch went to jump and attack the other dog, he dragged the stroller 30 feet with a child strapped inside."
Yea, that’s the level of self righteousness i’m dealing with here. This is her shining example of how dangerous her dog was……I felt obliged to point out the idiocy of tying one's toddler/stroller to any dog, much less a 140lb. untrained dog, in a public park, with other dogs. And so in my yelp rebuttal I did just that.
So here's the deal. I breed big, capable, dominant, protective dogs. There is no misrepresentation of that on my website ( nor will one hear it from my mouth). Said website being far and away more educational and informative then most, it contains whole essays such as.
http://www.olympicdogs.net/post/559498302/choosing-a-breeder
http://www.olympicdogs.net/post/559505819/choosing-a-breed
Not to mention a 1 to 10 scoring of the four breeds I work with on a variety of relevant considerations, including DOG AGGRESSION.....
Yes, Boerboels, Kangals, Dogos all score high, only breed in the mix that doesn’t is the Dane, which is one reason it’s in the mix. So, misrepresenting anything on that score. And anyone that has done any reading on dog selling websites will likely find mine refreshingly lacking in spin, hype, and all manner of the typical marketing BS in general.
To the assertion that I am breeding dogs that are dangerous to children or inappropriate for families: Given the majority of the folks buying dogs from me for well over a decade probably are families, one would have untold numbers of tragedies unfolding right ?
Yet "Rafe" himself, who stays much closer to the truth, even admits (when pressed on why he choose to buy a dog from me in the first place)
“I found every reference to Andrew's dogs I could online and saw only good things by people with direct experiences of the dogs.”
Which, considering the numbers produced, and the inevitable flops, is rather remarkable. Mind you, to this day there is not a single testimonial on my website... so whatever he found was just people talking about their dogs, on their own, of their own volition.
The truth is in well over a decade of breeding big, protective dogs. Dogs that are supposed to have what it takes to protect one's family from threats, including humans, I've never..... till this crew..... had anyone claim that any dog I sold was a danger to the children in it's own family..... not once.
A threat to other children playing too rough with the dog's children, yea I've had that. But never the children of it's own family. A threat to other dogs, yes often, a certain amount of dog aggression is almost a given, needs to be managed, it's to be expected. If you just want a dog park dog, I'm not your guy, and I don’t pretend to be. A danger to other humans posing a threat, yes, I hear about my dogs standing those down on occasion; not to mention other dangerous dogs, coyotes, wolves, cougars, bears…
You know what I've also not heard yet, in all these years ?
" Hey Andrew there was threat X to my kid, and your dog ran away"
I Can't say it hasn't happened, I can honestly say I've never had it get back to me, not once.
Bottom line, we breed towards a tricky balance. If you want a dog that has the backbone, the nerve, the physical capability to stand down a man, a cougar, a wolf, you are going to get serious dominant innately aggressive dogs, balls is balls at the basest level. And that's what people come to me for, a dog that might actually step up and defend them if needed. We breed for confident, stable, smart, and brave.
But anyone that's been out here, or even watched our videos, will know all my dogs can be trusted around children !! I have quite a few myself, people bring theirs out all the time, we don't have issues with that. Allow me to quote “Rafe” again, when pressed by a reddit poster on why he chose to buy a dog from me.
“ the overall experience of Andrew's Kennel was of seeing a bunch of very happy, healthy seeming dogs mixing well and responding well too his kids. He had his 4 year old out playing with these very large dogs in seemingly total comfort that was big selling point for us.”
And as I've said on the website, if you do research you'll find that people who actually know the breeds well, Kangals, Boerboels, Dogos, and of course Danes, those folks will tell you that every one of those breeds is in fact naturally good with children! And no, that doesn't magically negate in crossing breed lines!
So, to the asinine assertions from the purebred fanatics haunting the far flung corners of reddit, asshats, and fear mongers, with no actual experience with serious dogs or crossing breed lines:
Shut the f%&k up ! You sound so silly. As if Dogs were as simple as Mendel's peas and strange or Oil or water concoctions are to be expected. There is nothing quite so obvious to person with real experience of a subject than people without it. More eloquence on the topic can be found at the link below.
http://www.olympicdogs.net/post/559582539/defending-the-cross
As can the remainder of this rebuttal, will be posted in it’s entirety on my website. As I appear to have bumped up against a space limit for comments and don’t know a better away around that. If you’re coming from Reddit, you’ll want to scroll to
“Part two” so as not read this first bit again.
If anyone wants to advise as to the proper to way to post a rebuttal without being subject to the character limitations imposed in “comments,” how to cross post to Rafe’s little hit piece, or tell me WTF a Tl;dr: is please do.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PART TWO Reddit pilgrims continue below.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
To the assertion that we are breeding unhealthy dogs:
Our crosses come with a five year replacement warranty for ANY GENETIC ISSUE. I challenge anyone to find a better warranty. Have we ever produced dogs with health issues...? Of course, nobody producing as many dogs hasn't. But it's relatively rare and we stand behind our warranty. Which it should be noted, is not the same for purebreds... precisely because they do have more problems. I breed both, so I KNOW.
To the assertion that what we do is reckless, thoughtless, or the random play of a "backyard" breeder:
If you don’t recognize thought when you read it, I can’t help you. But perhaps you’ll acknowledge that the efforts I have made traveling to; S. Africa, Turkey, Argentina, and crisscrossing this country in pursuit of the best examples of the purebreds I choose to use are not what one associates with “backyard breeders”. I have been whittling down from my own breedings for over a decade, best to best. By no criteria, excepting that of a dimwit that thinks purebreds are of quality by virtue of being purebreds, can what I do be dismissed as such.
To a couple of the crazier and more offensive lies/accusations, most of which I won't dignify with response; such as
using a bb gun to brake up a dog fight:..... how silly and ineffective would that be ?
2. To the lie that I beat my favorite dog into submission due to his “man aggression issues" Wow. how completely full of sh!t are you ? My favorite, Oz, is about perfect on the issue of man aggression. Which is to say, he's not really aggressive at all. He likes people and hundreds of people that have been out and met him can testify to it.
But he is protective and territorial, and he's absolutely not going to be backed down, or beaten. Not by me, or anyone else. This we know, he's been "tested" He's got that kind of backbone. It's rare, we respect it, we cherish it, we admire it. Beating it out of him, would be the last thing we would ever want to do. I probably shouldn’t dignify these lies with rebuttal.
I would ask those of you who thoughtlessly join in and condemn people and events you really know not about to consider what damage you might do. Ask yourselves before you attack someone who is not even present, whose side of the story you’ve not heard, whose livelihood might be effected. Ask yourselves do you really know enough about the facts to play judge, jury, lynch mob ?
Ask yourself would you hurl those insults so freely if you were looking them in the eye, if you were within arms reach ? I rather doubt it. What if that person was less able or inclined to defend themselves in print or elsewhere then I…. would you be more or less right then ?
And let me leave you with some things to consider regarding the ZoeSlander team.
1. Both guys are claiming to have put down male dogs for excessive aggression… “ONLY AFTER TRYING EVERYTHING”....yet both guys admit those dogs were put down IN-TACT that is with BALLS.
2. Both are claiming to have searched for rescues far and wide, to no avail. But neither guy asked me to take their dog back, ( if I remember correctly one wasn't willing to bring it back unless he got his money back ) And we take dogs back, no questions asked, on policy. So that I can decide if a dog is fit to be re-homed or not. So that if a dog needs to be put down, and they very, very, rarely do… I do it. I know it happened. I know it was done humanely.
3. Both guys did try to get money back, before and after claiming to have put their dogs down.
4. Neither guy has, to date, shown proof of euthanasia, and I do wonder if there demise itself isn't a lie also.
5. They are friends, in fact one brought the other, and for all I know one might be the roommate with the autistic child that got nipped cause it didn’t know how to behave.
6. Rafe admitted, on reddit, that he had his previous dog put down also. Guess why ? It had torn both of it’s ACL’s and it bit him.
What a coincidence !
How unlikely is that ? Maybe it's cause he he tried to get both dogs to climb trees with him as part of his "parkour" instruction. Maybe they tear ACL's that way, or bump their heads when then they fall out of the trees, who knows ? Here’s what I know about Rafe, I sent him away to two other breeders, cause after some 70 fucking emails, making plain he was an instant internet expert of the highest order I didn’t really want to deal with him. Ultimately he proved more likable in person and I relented and sold him a strange little runt of a dog because, although he was sure he wanted to buy a dog from me….based on his extensive research, he wanted a smaller dog then is the norm for us, so it might climb trees and do whatever other silly shit one wants a “parkour” dog to do.
And let me Quote Zoe herself again from the the only place she used her own identity.
“Not including Hooch's intolerance to other dogs. At first it would be one dog Hooch would bark and want to attack. So I would say oh Hooch you just don't like poodles. Then like a faucet turned on, it was ALL DOGS, Hooch wanted to kill them all.”
Ohhh Yea….…… Hooch probably didn’t have anything against poodles, per se.
That would be a silly projection of race based dog prejudice…. to infer that. And I rather doubt “the faucet” was that sudden. But I’m sure that what Hooch was displaying was the first, and consequently most important, example of a level of dog aggression the owner did not approve of. So the owner’s responsibility there, to everyone, including Hooch, the poodle and it’s owner, is to come down on that behavior like a ton of bricks and let THE DOG KNOW, it’s not acceptable.
Or the lesson Hooch will get is that it is okay, and in this case there’s no telling how many other bone headed inferences the owner made, “Hooch doesn’t like this kind of dog or Hooch doesn’t like dogs on these days”…. before she got it, if ever. So by the time you do start to come down on him for going after let’s say….. a collie….. he’s just fucking confused…… he’s thinking “this crazy bitch must really like collies, cause she never had a problem before” :)
People…. I deal with the public, in all their madness, in all their stupidity. I sell them dogs. When it works out, which is far and away the vast majority of the time, they praise me. If it doesn't they demonize me. It is what it is, everybody it seems has strong opinions about anything having anything to do with mans best friend. Yet every individual’s anecdotal experience is just that.
But customer service is really not my thing. I’ve done many things in life and none involved customer service. Even when I was and actor in L.A. I wasn’t a waiter, which defies laws of physics. And though I believe in treating everyone with respect, as a default setting in life, customers or strangers, I have never been inclined to take shit from anyone. And I don’t, so you come chippy, customer or not, I’m gonna tell you to get fucked. There will always be conflicts with me, always have been, that’s just the way it is. And there will always be people who have strong feelings towards me, both good and bad as a result. That too is the ways it’s always been. Used to be you didn’t want to piss of a gangster, then it became a lawyer, now perhaps it’s and I.T. professional :) But I’ve pissed someone from most walks of life, and I’m still here, standing tall, living large, and too old a dog for new tricks.
I can’t say to what degree these haters are motivated by trying to leverage money out of me or to what degree they just got their feelings hurt, because I don’t have time to try and teach common sense. Buying a dog from me does not make us friends for life, unless we actually happen to become that. Buying a dog from me does not mean I will hold your hand or train that dog. I will stand behind my warranty. If I like you and you treat me with respect I will and have gone beyond what’s implied with the warranty. If you rub me wrong, don’t expect me to do more then I’m obligated to.
I've spent more time on this now then I intended, and I probably should have put my side out sooner, if I was going to at all... but I have no intention of wasting my time debating people with nothing better to do on reddit, so I’ve tried to cover it as best as I can, so as to forget it.
But as Zoe Song and the Nathan Schroeder have seen fit to post my home address and contact information of their fake website I think at the very least I should do the same. In the event anyone out there wants to give them a taste of their own medicine in the form of anonymous fake reviews ( you might have to review some other stuff prior not to have your review discounted ) or maybe pay them a visit at home and let them know what you think of dog killers. or maybe contact Zoe’s employer, she does I.T. release for Costco of all places, a very righteous company, one of the best, I think they should be able to find better help don’t you ?
Nathan’s
Ballard Boxing and Barbell
http://www.yelp.com/biz/ballard-barbell-and-boxing-club-seattle
Home address is
Zoe Song 12714 Dayton Avenue N Seattle, WA 98133
See me drop the mic Olympicdog out !













