Algernon Bertram Freeman-Mitford, Baron Redesdale (1837-1916), The AttacheÌ at Peking (1900)
No title available
tumblr dot com

tannertan36

PR's Tumblrdome

izzy's playlists!
The Bright Sessions
đ

Jimmy Eat World
Doug Jones

shark vs the universe
taylor price
Cosimo Galluzzi

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ
ojovivo
d e v o n

romaâ
Today's Document
YOU ARE THE REASON
Sweet Seals For You, Always

bliss lane
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Ukraine
seen from Honduras
seen from Brazil

seen from Thailand

seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Armenia

seen from India
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Algeria

seen from United States
@only-women-bleeed
Algernon Bertram Freeman-Mitford, Baron Redesdale (1837-1916), The AttacheÌ at Peking (1900)
Natalja Gontsjarova (1881-1962)
via soup.io
(found a bigger, yellower version of âBathing Women Iâ, 1938, by Yuki Ogura. I havenât been to the spa in a very long time and this picture puts me at ease)
Vera ChytilovĂĄ Â Daisies, 1966
vintage everyday: Mask Series with Saul Steinberg Photographed by Inge Morath, 1959-1962
Rosa Naynon, Vaudeville bird act, 1907, J. Willis Sayre Photographs
Light Witch
Jules Didier (1831 - 1914), SociĂ©tĂ© Protectrice des Animaux (Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals), oil on canvas, Sothebyâs
Karl Brjullov, The Last Day of Pompeii (detail), 1830-1833
The premise of the film project is simple: a woman is asked to read an excerpt from a personally elected body of literature. (x)
Itâs called âHysterical Literature,â and I have never seen a better example of questioning why it is that educated women (whether self or otherwise) always seem to be showcased as having no interest in sex. They all choose interesting books, and they all get off, and itâs fabulous.
Itâs also brought forth a lot of comments (on youtube and otherwise) and WHY WOULD SOMEONE DO THIS. ITâS SO DIRTY, and I feel thatâs part of the point: Why is this considered so scandalous? Itâs just sex. In fact, we donât even SEE the sex, so the only thing that could be making people uncomfortable while watching it seems to be watching a woman enjoying getting sexual pleasure.
And maybe some of those people just arenât into voyeurism and thatâs cool. But Iâm betting a lot of them just donât like to consider that maybe they think women having sexual pleasure is weird and that they think that you canât have sexual pleasure as a woman and also have other facets and appreciation for âfiner things.â
What Iâm saying is, this whole series gives me a lot of thoughts.
Always reblog because Hysterical Literature is the sexiest thing Iâve seen in a long while.Â
Pretty sure Iâll wanna watch this later soooo
I think some reasons for why the people who probably do watch porn are made so uncomfortable by Hysterical Literature are a little more involved, since thereâs definitely a decent market for porn in which women masturbate solo. Itâs not JUST that each woman is experiencing sexual pleasure, itâs the combination of a bunch of aspects that are specific to this series:
each woman is without a partner, so sheâs not servicing anyone;
sheâs without a partner, so her attention is focused inward â this is completely about her enjoyment only;
sheâs without a partner, but she does have a vibrator and her own body, so she isnât dependent on any other human for her orgasm;
sheâs reading a selection of her own aloud with some serious dedication, demonstrating that there are things she finds just as interesting as sex;
we donât get any of the visuals or the melodrama or the POV that are usually considered to be the point of porn, so we canât be titillated by her body (or her partnerâs body/actions, or her reactions to her partnerâs body/actions) â we donât get to see whatâs causing her pleasure, we only see how it makes her feel.
The whole production is actually super-dismissive of mainstream (straight) porn and its primary audience (dudes), in that itâs not particularly staged for the viewerâs pleasure (thereâs no pretense that there isnât a viewer â itâs just not about them) unless the viewer happens to be a person who gets off on the idea of women having some fantastic selfish orgasms, even when the viewer is in no way invited to imagine themselves participating. :D
FANTASTIC.
I love this simply because I sorta just love seeing people feeling this good. Specially the fourth one, I just stare at her beaming and thinking âhey, it looks like this is awesome, so happy for you!â
Iâve only seen a bit of these videos (the fourth gif is Stoya, a porn star, who reads the most beautiful excerpt about love) but Iâll add that what I also think makes critics so uncomfortable with this project is that for the first minute or so you are just listening to the woman read while showing no arousal. It is forcing the viewer into a (slight but still) personal connection before any sex comes into play. You are hearing a woman speak the words she wants and you the viewer are not receiving any reward for this, even if you do enjoy voyeurism.Â
I really love this idea of empowerment. The idea that, âI am going to say something, and I am going to feel something, and you might enjoy bothâbut I am doing this for myself and my own enjoyment.â
Iâve only watched the black womanâs video where she reads from Toni Morrison and it was awesome. I love this too cause as a âsmart womanâ I am constantly desexualized by my peers. Yay
took a moment to watch the one with Sole. I have no additional coments, just that I still have a smile on my face.
Hysterical Literature always merits a reblog.
weâve been here since the dawn of time
and weâre not going anywhere. Â get used to us.
forever reblogging
Printemps aprĂšs printemps, je me suis assise devant mon miroir. Maintenant, je me lasse de tresser des bourgeons de prunier dans mes cheveux. Jâai passĂ© une autre annĂ©e sans toi, frissonant Ă chaque lettre. Jâai pleurĂ© jusquâĂ lâautomne, mes pensĂ©es allaient au Sud Ă tes cĂŽtĂ©s. MĂȘme les portes du Paradis me sont plus proches que toi dĂ©sormais.
Li Qingzhao
Poetry is the way I fuck you when youâre gone.
Nicola Cayless, Literary Sexts (via dirtyberd)