
pixel skylines

Andulka
EXPECTATIONS
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

oozey mess
KIROKAZE

gracie abrams

@theartofmadeline
Cosimo Galluzzi

Kiana Khansmith
No title available

bliss lane
Today's Document
h

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
YOU ARE THE REASON
Cosmic Funnies

ellievsbear

izzy's playlists!
seen from United States

seen from Indonesia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Pakistan

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from France

seen from Japan
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Indonesia
seen from Venezuela
seen from United States

seen from Colombia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil
@osbxrns
A collage zine I made in 2021 about my cat, all the text is cut out from copies of his old vet and shelter paperwork
michelle zauner of japanese breakfast by tonje thilesen
restaunt menu:
meal............$400.00
Global problems need global solutions. But what you do personally can shift what’s seen as ‘normal’.
Clearly, in terms of global greenhouse gas emissions, a single person’s contribution is basically irrelevant (much like a single vote in an election). But my research, first in my masters and now as part of my PhD, has found that doing something bold like giving up flying can have a wider knock-on effect by influencing others and shifting what’s viewed as “normal”.
In a survey I conducted, half of the respondents who knew someone who has given up flying because of climate change said they fly less because of this example. That alone seemed pretty impressive to me. …
I interviewed some of those who had been influenced by a “non-flyer”. They explained that the bold and unusual position to give up flying had: conveyed the seriousness of climate change and flying’s contribution to it; crystallised the link between values and actions; and even reduced feelings of isolation that flying less was a valid and sensible response to climate change. …
The debate about personal vs. collective action will continue. My research supports the arguments that this is a false dichotomy: individual action is part of the collective.
Portrait of Lady Sunderland (detail) 1786. Joshua Reynolds
aleksandra waliszewska
FOOD IN MOVIES
TAMPOPO (1985) dir. Juzo Itami
Jusepe de Ribera, Saint Joseph (ca. 1635)
I think the famous Ludwig Mies van der Rohe phrase “Less is More” finds here, backwards, its perfect application: the painting is all about Joseph’s ecstatic contemplation of the Highest; only those little white almond blossoms distract our attention from his captivated eyes, but, at the same time, they immediately remind us of the real centre of the painting through the same use of colours.
P.S. Happy new year!
With Christmas, Truly, this Near…
Jusepe de Ribera (1591 - 1562)
Graham Durward
1. Incense and Light
2. Incense: Silver Light
3. Lay Claim to 0
Flavor of Happiness (2008) ‘しあわせのかおり’ dir. Mitsuhiro Mihara
Details from Cupid (Amor), c.1630 - Johann Liss
By Czech writer Karel Čapek, inventor of the term ‘robot’ as well!
IVANOFF SERGE (detail)
Mihály von Zichy, Romantic Encounter, 1864.
goldenmoon tarot by Elizabeth Aralia