There are many women who react very emotionally strongly when men share some retarded chimp ass standard they have for dating, like her being a virgin/having low body count, her being younger than they are, her not talking to other men, her basically doing nothing but sucking him off all day and licking his boots and perfecting the art of constant ass kissing.
And a lot of women respond to these men's standards with the misogyny charge. And there's some truth in it, a lot of these mate guarding esque standards are misogynistic to some degree, even if the men don't consciously view it that way.
But I don't care. I don't give a single flying fuck what these men want. They can want whatever they want to want, as long as it doesn't involve me personally, it's not my problem. They can dream and cry and have aneurysms about it all day long for all I care, as long as their misogyny exists only in dating standards, there's not even any tangible harm I could theoretically care about. They're free to do whatever the fuck they want within the limits of the law.
So why do so many women react so strongly to these things?
Because it attacks their mating prospects. That's it. That's all there is to it. These women feel like the men are degrading their value on the dating market, and since they care about the dating market, they feel like if a lot of men really did have these standards, their prospects of finding a good man they'd actually want would be lower because the number of men who'd want them would be lower.
I think that this is one of the reasons why most gender content is so unbearably emotionally charged and retarded: most people drag their romantic/sexual grievances into it and become incapable of talking about tangible harm, pragmatic policy changes or what actually inevitably physically affects women.
romaincrisis
tangentwithtanner
jbbartram-illu
dededos
