the entire basis of the kink is that these men know, as everyone does, that lesbians do not like dick and are not attracted to males. that is why they get off on the idea of raping a lesbian straight. they know she is not attracted to them, because they are male, they know she does not like penis, because she is a lesbian.
a woman who identifies as a man having sex on a lesbian woman, could not have this same visual impact in pornography, and men with dykebreaking kinks would not find it stimulating. a man who identifies as a woman and retains male genitalia however, could achieve the same exact effect, and men with dykebreaking fetishes could find it stimulating. this is because they find arousal in the idea of a lesbians sexual boundaries being violated by a man, and the idea that after experiencing heterosexual sex, a lesbian will be turned straight. the reason that a woman who identifies as a man does not arouse the same sexual response from men with dykebreaking kinks is because they, like everyone, are aware that lesbians are not sexually attracted to internal identities, and having sex with someone female does not violate her sexual boundaries, nor does it have the imagined or real power to turn her straight. they are not aroused by a lesbian being raped by an internal man gender identity, they are aroused by a lesbian being raped by a penis.
imagine all of the pornography contained within every dykebreaking forum and subreddit all over the internet. now imagine that every single adult video actor playing the role of the male sexually aggressive "dykebreaker", identified as a woman, and used she/her pronouns. do you think that it would suddenly transform the contents of the pornography from dykebreaking porn, to lesbian porn? would men with dykebreaking kinks suddenly find it unappealing? no. they would like it just the same. because they are rape fetishists who know there are zero circumstances under which a lesbian would have consensual sex with a male.
now imagine if an exact recreation of all of the pornography contained within every dykebreaking forum and subreddit all over the internet was made, but with a woman who identifies as a man taking the place of the male porn actor in the role of the sexually aggressive "dykebreaker", and then after the sexual encounter, the woman who identifies as a man told the lesbian woman, "actually, I identify as a man, and use he/him pronouns, you're straight now". would it have the same impact? would the men with dykebreaking kinks enjoy it? no, they would not, because they, like everyone, knows that that doesn't violate the lesbians sexual orientation, because lesbians are attracted to women. they are rape fetishists, and they would not be aroused because they know that lesbians can be attracted to women, regardless of identity.
the basis of the kink is something we all know, but many deny; lesbians are not under any circumstances able to be sexually attracted to male or penises. your assertion that lesbians can like penis, and your dislike for dykebreaking porn are at odds with one another. if you dislike dykebreaking porn because it is a rape kink, you need to understand that lesbians fundamentally cannot be attracted to males. otherwise, to you, the kink would be totally morally acceptable as long as the dykebreakers told the lesbian woman about their she/her pronouns and womanly gender identity, at which point the lesbian woman could suddenly induce sexual attraction to him, and have consensual sex.
also that's not what bioessentialism is. also you are stupid and homophobic
