user killalllesbians comes under your post to lecture you on empathy.
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
𓃗

PR's Tumblrdome
macklin celebrini has autism

Andulka
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
The Stonewall Inn
EXPECTATIONS
Sade Olutola
No title available
$LAYYYTER

Love Begins
Stranger Things
Cosmic Funnies
Show & Tell
NASA

pixel skylines
Xuebing Du
RMH
Mike Driver
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Finland

seen from United States

seen from Puerto Rico
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore
seen from Uruguay
seen from Italy
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Netherlands

seen from China

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany

seen from Germany

seen from United States
@veritablevent
user killalllesbians comes under your post to lecture you on empathy.
it literally doesn’t matter in the grand scheme of things it’s not like radfem optics will ever be good on here but I’m so pissed about how we are apparently being blamed for cockslinger harassing us. I was sent unsolicited nudes and rape threats and reported and blocked sooo many of those bots for around a year now just to be told it’s my fault lol???? I feel genuine sympathy for anyone those bots target regardless of their views but it stings a bit knowing that solidarity only goes one way.
kind of obsessed with the way all of the context has to be stripped off for tras to effectively hate on rowling. "assaulted a trans woman by taking an upskirt photo" and it's a man at a public event where filming is agreed upon beforehand exposing himself by not taking into consideration the length of his skirt as he raises his leg. there was no crawling into the bathroom to secretly record the female penis the man in question bragged about. he was exposing himself indecently, and she simply didn't stop recording.
sometimes i feel like the only sane person left in the world.
kind of obsessed with the way all of the context has to be stripped off for tras to effectively hate on rowling. "assaulted a trans woman by taking an upskirt photo" and it's a man at a public event where filming is agreed upon beforehand exposing himself by not taking into consideration the length of his skirt as he raises his leg. there was no crawling into the bathroom to secretly record the female penis the man in question bragged about. he was exposing himself indecently, and she simply didn't stop recording.
it's genuinely crazy how this is as ethical as the situation could have been, and yet they are portraying her as the predator. if she'd filmed him without his knowledge or consent, that would have been bad. if she'd reached down or repositioned her camera to get a better angle at his underwear, that would have been bad. if he was a regular person living his regular person life as she filmed him, that would have been bad. but she didn't. he is a public person, he was at a public event, he was showing himself to people sitting in front of him and listening to him. posting the photo still isn't in good taste, but neither is acting as that man did. is he not a predator for exposing himself? why?
kind of obsessed with the way all of the context has to be stripped off for tras to hate on rowling. "assaulted a trans woman by taking an upskirt photo" and it's a man at a public event where filming is agreed upon beforehand exposing himself by not taking into consideration the length of his skirt as he raises his leg. there was no crawling into the bathroom to secretly record the female penis the man in question bragged about. he was exposing himself indecently, and she simply didn't stop recording.
every time i read those dramatic posts about another evil jkr has done and i go "oh no. that's horrible. if true, this will make me hate her", and then i look it up and... yeah no. she's once again being normal enough. this isn't a case of a drunk girl at a party whose boobs are falling out of her dress getting photographed secretly and then exposed online by creep. it's a man at an event he knew he would be filmed at choosing not to wear safety shorts under his ridiculously tiny belt-skirt and not covering himself up as his sits. come on. have some common sense. female children at the playground are expected to be more conscious of their underwear than this adult man.
kind of obsessed with the way all of the context has to be stripped off for tras to effectively hate on rowling. "assaulted a trans woman by taking an upskirt photo" and it's a man at a public event where filming is agreed upon beforehand exposing himself by not taking into consideration the length of his skirt as he raises his leg. there was no crawling into the bathroom to secretly record the female penis the man in question bragged about. he was exposing himself indecently, and she simply didn't stop recording.
a woman can wear an "indecent" dress and get so harassed by the public for it that she sees no choice but to end her own life, and a man can be a pedophile whose victim kills herself because of the abuse she's suffered from him and still get forty job offers the moment he considers coming back to public activities. ah but sure. women aren't targeted purely out of misogyny anymore. we've gone past that.
a male idol can talk about jerking off to porn and it be a silly funny moment which doesn't impact his career whatsoever, while a female idol holding a mildly feminist book in public will have her cds burned. cool. cool.
a woman can wear an "indecent" dress and get so harassed by the public for it that she sees no choice but to end her own life, and a man can be a pedophile whose victim kills herself because of the abuse she's suffered from him and still get forty job offers the moment he considers coming back to public activities. ah but sure. women aren't targeted purely out of misogyny anymore. we've gone past that.
seeing people fangirl over two happily married actresses alluding to the potential of starring in a wlw movie together makes me feel a little insane, because you know that nobody would take those same comments/jokes lightly if they were about a man. it's just another variation of "i kissed a girl and i liked it (i hope my boyfriend don't mind it)". there's no jealousy from their male partner to navigate here, because neither woman is a human with autonomous desires. wanting to fuck your female costar is funny and silly and hashtag for the gays. wanting to fuck your male costar would be grounds for a media scandal.
it's an actress play on "my boyfriend doesn't mind me exploring my sexuality with women because it turns him on".
When you said happily married actresses I immediately assumed married to each other 💀
see, that i would be rooting for. instead there are two straight men lurking in the background of all the internet fangirling like two shadow monsters only my lesbian self can see. it's scary out there.
seeing people fangirl over two happily married actresses alluding to the potential of starring in a wlw movie together makes me feel a little insane, because you know that nobody would take those same comments/jokes lightly if they were about a man. it's just another variation of "i kissed a girl and i liked it (i hope my boyfriend don't mind it)". there's no jealousy from their male partner to navigate here, because neither woman is a human with autonomous desires. wanting to fuck your female costar is funny and silly and hashtag for the gays. wanting to fuck your male costar would be grounds for a media scandal.
it's an actress play on "my boyfriend doesn't mind me exploring my sexuality with women because it turns him on".
seeing people fangirl over two happily married actresses alluding to the potential of starring in a wlw movie together makes me feel a little insane, because you know that nobody would take those same comments/jokes lightly if they were about a man. it's just another variation of "i kissed a girl and i liked it (i hope my boyfriend don't mind it)". there's no jealousy from their male partner to navigate here, because neither woman is a human with autonomous desires. wanting to fuck your female costar is funny and silly and hashtag for the gays. wanting to fuck your male costar would be grounds for a media scandal.
If you can recognize that misogyny is destructive enough to drive people to transition away from womanhood, why does the radfem movement overall have so little empathy for the people who chose this solution to their distress? These people are regularly mocked, derided, stereotyped as universally sexually predatory and called slurs like tranny within radfem communities and pushback is minimal. If radical feminists want to critique the culture that has made people feel as if body modification was the only solution to misogyny, we should critique it, instead of constantly deriding the victims. The ftm trans community has faced more sexual assault than *any* other demographic. Honestly, who are you to tell them to just keep plugging away at ineffectual cognitive behavioral therapy until their trauma goes away, that caving to their dysphoria and living as a man is a display of antifeminist weakness? They *as a group* do not deserve to be the scapegoat for everything you perceive to have driven them to make the choices they’ve made.
how is it that feminists are always at fault. there are plenty of detransitioner feminists on here who talk about their experiences with trans identification as well as gender dysphoria, and there are plenty of feminists in general who do not condone the vitriol and the hatred towards trans-identifying women, and yet you come here to me with your generalizations about the community with the intention of... what? telling me to shut up because my criticism of the movement may make some women feel bad? is that how we do feminism? by pretending like any way of coping with oppression, regardless of how bad for the individual and the community, is automatically feminist? what is the point of your message, anon? if it is to say that women should be kinder to women, then yes, i agree. obviously. slurs thrown around at women is not something i tolerate or promote. but if it is to tell me and other feminists to just shut it, then you might want to do some soul-searching on why you are sending this kind of ask to me rather than somebody actively harassing trans-identifying women.
i could also take an example of a campaign which has been going on for months with messages like this one
to make some generic point about trans-identifying females, but i haven't and i won't, because it's unreasonable to act as though all trans-identifying females are like this. some are, yes, and that's something to analyze and criticize, but definitely not all and likely not a majority. yet when it comes to feminists, you don't even have to bring up an example. you can just say "feminists are all big meanies" and that's good enough proof already. how convenient.
If you can recognize that misogyny is destructive enough to drive people to transition away from womanhood, why does the radfem movement overall have so little empathy for the people who chose this solution to their distress? These people are regularly mocked, derided, stereotyped as universally sexually predatory and called slurs like tranny within radfem communities and pushback is minimal. If radical feminists want to critique the culture that has made people feel as if body modification was the only solution to misogyny, we should critique it, instead of constantly deriding the victims. The ftm trans community has faced more sexual assault than *any* other demographic. Honestly, who are you to tell them to just keep plugging away at ineffectual cognitive behavioral therapy until their trauma goes away, that caving to their dysphoria and living as a man is a display of antifeminist weakness? They *as a group* do not deserve to be the scapegoat for everything you perceive to have driven them to make the choices they’ve made.
how is it that feminists are always at fault. there are plenty of detransitioner feminists on here who talk about their experiences with trans identification as well as gender dysphoria, and there are plenty of feminists in general who do not condone the vitriol and the hatred towards trans-identifying women, and yet you come here to me with your generalizations about the community with the intention of... what? telling me to shut up because my criticism of the movement may make some women feel bad? is that how we do feminism? by pretending like any way of coping with oppression, regardless of how bad for the individual and the community, is automatically feminist? what is the point of your message, anon? if it is to say that women should be kinder to women, then yes, i agree. obviously. slurs thrown around at women is not something i tolerate or promote. but if it is to tell me and other feminists to just shut it, then you might want to do some soul-searching on why you are sending this kind of ask to me rather than somebody actively harassing trans-identifying women.
very funny seeing russian athletes and artists gradually allowed back into competitions while russia is still killing ukrainian athletes and artists just as actively as it did at the beginning of the full-scale invasion (if not more). must be so nice to get to tap out of the news about dead ukrainians the moment they get exhausting to you. must be so freeing.
petition to have catcallers explode like the victims in the ready or not movie.
ideal interaction with a catcaller:
petition to have catcallers explode like the victims in the ready or not movie.
https://www.tumblr.com/veritablevent/796401709880688640?source=share
But I've also met many many straight and bisexual women that rarely think or talk about men, that are still called "dick worshippers" or "men obsessed" for simply being a straight or bisexual woman.
not sure how shutting down commentary on the struggles lesbians specifically face with "but some lesbians are misogynistic" is productive. i don't endorse calling any women any misogynistic names. i'd hope that this is obvious enough from my blog not to warrant separate commentary every single time i talk about lesbian-specific experiences with discrimination.
i'm also a little tired of people acting as though those calling bi/straight women those names are the majority, among lesbians and in general. most of the world celebrates and promotes women loving men. call out misogyny when you see it, but let's not act like having a chronically online user say something like that (misogynistic and mean-spirited) is the same as being harassed on the street for going out together with your girlfriend. both are bad, but if your reaction to me talking about the latter is to bring up how bad the former is, you might want to reflect on that.
you truly cannot say anything about lesbophobia without getting dogpiled by peoole who 1. see all criticism of lesbophobia as some form of bigotry, and 2. use the very few misogynistic lesbians that exist as a gotcha to silence conversation surrounding the unique oppression we face.
why do lesbians have to provide 500 disclaimers about how supportive we are of other women, how much we love other women, how we aren't talking about all straight/bi women, how much women of other sexualities suffer, how we arent like those nasty misogynistic dykes—which, by the way, disclaimers that are never reciprocated or required of other women—to be granted the right to discuss our oppression?
why must we always make space for non-lesbian women in conversations about lesbophobia? why must we prove our solidarity with non-lesbian women by downplaying the oppression we face to center their experiences in our conversations? and why are non-lesbians across the board never held to the same standard?
it's lesbophobia, plain and simple. the dual oppression of homophobia (homos are mean and exclusionary and hate everyone who isn't them), and misogyny (women must be all-inclusive, people-pleasing, and submissive) exclusively faced by lesbians. which is why having these discussions is necessary in the first place.
and derailing these discussions with other conversations, no matter how important those conversations are, directly contributes to lesbophobia by policing conversations about our oppression. the ultimate goal is to silence us, by making it so difficult for us to speak on lesbian issues that we give up on it altogether. and no, your intent doesn't matter when the result still harms us.
time and time again, we see that any acknowledgement of our oppression incites a knee-jerk defensiveness in non-lesbians, which is an argument we were never meant to win. nobody listens when we speak, or understands what we're saying, or empathizes with our struggles. we are expected to let everyone else determine the validity of our claims, and to listen when those people tell us we're wrong—and why they are more oppressed than we could ever be—and how we are the true oppressors over them.
this attitude being so normalized in the most pro-female feminist movement of the modern era shows how widespread lesbophobia is, and proves why lesbians deserve our own branch of feminism to discuss lesbian issues.
the plight of the lesbian must never be acknowledged, lest the plight of everyone else be forgotten.