Rose-ringed parakeet
Photo by: @soumitra_basak_wildlife
NASA

⁂
wallacepolsom

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

★
Jules of Nature
occasionally subtle
trying on a metaphor
EXPECTATIONS
Noah Kahan
sheepfilms
Keni
No title available
official daine visual archive
ojovivo

shark vs the universe
𓃗
Not today Justin
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
KIROKAZE

seen from Canada
seen from Malaysia
seen from Netherlands
seen from Türkiye

seen from Mexico
seen from Japan

seen from South Africa

seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from Singapore

seen from Italy
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from South Korea
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from United States
@parrotparadiseparty
Rose-ringed parakeet
Photo by: @soumitra_basak_wildlife
Australian King Parrot (Alisterus scapularis), family Psittaculidae, order Psittaciformes, Lamington National Park, QLD, Australia
photograph by Andrew Hunt
Plum-headed Parakeet (Psittacula cyanocephala), male, family Psittaculidae, order Psittaciformes, India
photograph by Nitin Jain
A Stanley Parakeet, One of 42 Plates in Edward Lear’s Illustrations of the Family of Psittacidae, or Parrots. Biodiversity Heritage Library/CC BY 2.0
Before Edward Lear Was a Limerick Genius, He Was a Teenage Parrot-Painting Prodigy - by Cara Giaimo | Atlas Obscura - Stories | 4th/12/2017
The Beloved Children's Poet Spent his Own Youth “at the West End / Painting the Best End / of Some Vast Parrots / as Red as New Carrots.”
Edward Lear was a man unafraid of his own imagination. In his best-known nonsense poems & limericks, he wrote of things the world has never seen: green-headed Jumblies; toeless Pobbles; oceanic romances between birds and cats.
But before he began bringing these impossibilities to life, he had a different focus: he drew parrots. When young, he was employed as an ornithological illustrator, and he spent years learning to draw birds, favoring live models in an era when most worked from taxidermy. Before he turned 20, he’d published Illustrations of the Family of Psittacidae, or Parrots, a critical success, and the 1st monograph produced in England to focus on a single family of birds.
A Pair of Kohl’s Parakeets, as Drawn by Lear. University of Wisconsin Digital Library for the Decorative Arts and Material Culture/Public Domain
Lear was born in London in 1812. One of the youngest of a gaggle of kids - he always said he was the 20th of 21, although some contest this exact number - he was raised mostly by his oldest sister, Ann. According to biographer Peter Levi, it was Ann who taught Lear to draw, and the 2 siblings spent many hours meticulously copying flowers, birds & butterflies from textbooks & magazines.
Early on in Lear’s childhood, his father went into debt, and his family fell on hard times. When he turned 15, he decided to put his talents to work professionally, and began taking commissions for everything from decorative fans to “morbid disease drawings for hospitals,” as he later wrote a friend. In this way, he explained, he managed to make enough money “for bread & cheese.”
But when he found the time to choose his own subjects, he often made his way to London’s Zoological Gardens. A relatively new experiment by the city’s Zoological Society, the Gardens were dedicated to scientific study, and were filled with creatures imported from all corners of the British Empire. While many artists of the time relied on taxidermied specimens—which, after all, were better at staying still—Lear preferred drawing live animals, and was known to occasionally enter their cages, so as to get a better look.
A Hooded Parakeet, Drawn From Life. University of Wisconsin Digital Library for the Decorative Arts and Material Culture/Public Domain
Although the Gardens were closed to the public, Lear somehow wrangled an invitation to go inside & sketch. (Some sources say that the Zoological Society President, Edward Smith-Stanley, chanced upon him drawing & was so impressed that he signed a permission slip. Others say the young artist simply managed to pull some strings.)
Lear liked all kinds of animals, & tried his hand at drawing many, from kangaroos to weasels to platypuses. Although mammals provided a welcome challenge, he found himself especially adept at birds. The zoo aviaries were still being built, & he quickly gained admission to the temporary parrot quarters on Bruton Street, home to everything from a green macaw to a black-masked Mascarene. “Parrots are my favourites,” he would write later, “and I can do them with greater facility than any other class of animal.”
Perhaps for this reason, in between commissions, Lear decided to undertake a larger project: he would, he decided, create a set of prints devoted entirely to parrots. This was a unique idea, as most natural history books at the time took a geographical focus rather than a taxonomic one, as with John James Audubon’s The Birds of America. Lear managed to gather 125 subscribers—including the then-Queen Consort, Adelaide, to whom he eventually dedicated the book—and set to work.
A Small Swindern’s Parakeet Shows Off its Plumage. University of Wisconsin Digital Library for the Decorative Arts and Material Culture/Public Domain
Lear’s models inspired at least one bit of verse. In December of 1830, he ended a letter to a friend with an account of a parrot-filled day that had left him rather peckish:
As this poem suggests, the job was rather demanding. Although Lear worked in many different media—his papers are full of ink, graphite, and watercolor sketches—the 42 works that make up Illustrations of the Family of Psittacidae are lithographs, at the time a fairly new style of art, and one that required many detailed steps in order to produce a proper print. It apparently took Lear a little while to figure it all out: one early draft of a purple-naped lory is captioned “my first lithographic failure.”
Lear Eventually Got the Black-Capped Lory Right. University of Wisconsin Digital Library for the Decorative Arts and Material Culture/Public Domain
Eventually, though, he boiled the process down to a science. 1st, Levi writes, “A young zookeeper would hold the bird while Lear measured it in various directions.” Then he would make a few pencil drawings of the parrot, in different poses, doing his best to ignore the curious public (although sometimes he drew them, too).
Next, he would choose his favorite drawing, & make 2 different versions: one in black & white, which he then copied directly onto the limestone printing slab, & one in watercolor, which he sent to a team of professional colorists so that they could replicate his work exactly.
A Particularly Colorful Stanley Parakeet. Wisconsin University Digital Library for the Decorative Arts & Material Culture/Public Domain
Lear put out his lithographs in small batches. They were a hit from the beginning: after the release of the 1st 2 plates, he was inducted into the Linnaean Society, an honor he eventually celebrated on the title page of the book.
He also drew several favorable comparisons to Audubon, the premiere ornithological illustrator of the time. Critics called Lear’s birds “equal [to Audubon’s]… for grace of design, perspective, or anatomical accuracy” as well as “infinitely superior in softness.” (Audubon, who may or may not have agreed, did deign to buy a copy of the young upstart’s book.)
One of Lear's Most Critically Acclaimed Works, this Red & Yellow Macaw Appears to be Slyly Showing Off. Wisconsin University Digital Library for the Decorative Arts & Material Culture/Public Domain
His sudden renown also granted him access to yet more parrots. “He went bird-chasing,” writes Levi, listing trips to aviaries, collectors, & commercial bird-dealers. He worked with stuffed specimens when no live ones were available, & labored over a sick bird’s strangely angled feathers. During a visit to the Irish ornithologist N.A. Vigors, he covered a draft with carefully mixed blotches of green, blue & gray before finally coloring in a grey-cheeked parakeet.
By 1831, he and Ann had moved houses to be closer to the Zoo; the next year, he put out what would be his final batch of parrot lithographs, drew up a table of contents, and encouraged his subscribers to bind them into a complete book. He was 19 years old.
Although he started out expecting to produce 14 sets of illustrations, depicting about 50 species, he ended up stopping just short, at 42 prints total. In a letter to one of his subscribers, he cited 2 things that made him quit: 1st, he was building his brand but not his billfold, & 2nd, he didn’t want to make the same mistakes as his father. “To pay colourer & printer monthly I am obstinately prepossessed,” he explained, “[and] I had rather be at the bottom of the River Thames than be one week in debt.”
This Model, a Roseate Parakeet, Temporarily Grew Curved Feathers. “After the Bird Moulted They Resumed Their Original Form,” Lear Wrote in his Notes. Wisconsin University Digital Library for the Decorative Arts & Material Culture/Public Domain
And so he returned to commissions. The naturalist John Gould, a fan & patron, bought all the unsold copies of the parrot prints, and hired Lear to help with several monographs. Stanley, the president of the Zoological Society, paid Lear to sketch his entire at-home menagerie.
Baudin’s Cockatoo, a Strange Bird Even by Lear’s Standards. Wisconsin University Digital Library for the Decorative Arts & Material Culture/Public Domain
By 1837, when he was 25, Lear had moved on from scientific illustration altogether, & had begun traveling around Europe painting landscapes. 9 years after that, he published his 1st collection of limericks, A Book of Nonsense, which would shape the rest of his career. (He eventually gave up fine art, blaming his worsening eyesight.) But he never forgot his 1st avian love, which would show up repeatedly in his poems, fighting over cherries, dispensing wise advice, & doing pretty much everything but sitting still.
Fischer’s Lovebirds (Agapornis fischeri), family Psittaculidae, order Psittaciformes, Tanzania
photograph by Charles Gangas
Red-tailed Black Cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus banksii), family Cacatuidae, order Psittaciformes, Australia
photograph by Deepak Karra
Red-fan Parrot aka Hawk-headed Parrot (Deroptyus accipitrinus), family Psittacidae, order Psittaciformes, Brazil
photos: Claudia Brasiliero, Richard Garrigues, Luciano Bernardes
I work as an animal keeper and a big part of my job is prepping diets and feeding animals and the number of times per week that I say or think 'eat a tasty ___!' is. well. its a lot.
So have you ever considered though...
Gang-Gang Cockatoo (Callocephalon fimbriatum), male, EAT A TASTY FRUIT!!!, family Cacatuidae, order Psittaciformes, SE Australia
photograph by Ruben Montero
Eastern Ground Parrot (Pezoporus w. wallicus), BIG STEPPY!!!, family Psittaculidae, Jervis Bay, NSW, Australia
photograph by Subhranil Das
Kiwi2 - by Myra & Matt
Pale-headed Rosella (Platycercus adscitus), family Psittaculidae, order Psittaciformes, Australia
photograph by Jan Wegener
Peach-faced Lovebird and Galah
42° 56′ 43.43″ S, 171° 33′ 56.44″ E
Purple-crowned lorikeet (Glossopsitta porphyrocephala).
Monitoring the noises within ecosystems reveals their health—allowing researchers to monitor changes in biodiversity, detect threats, and me
Costa Rica Is Saving Forest Ecosystems by Listening to Them - by Geraldine Castro | WIRED - SCIENCE | 25th/02/2025
Monitoring Noises in Eco-Systems Reveals Their Health, Allowing Researchers to Monitor Bio-Diversity Changes, Detect Threats & Asess the Effectiveness of Conservation Strategies.
Photograph: Charlie Fayers/Getty Images
Monica Retamosa was in the middle of changing the batteries of a tape recorder when she heard a bellbird for the first time. Standing on a forest floor, she looked up into the trees, scanning for the source of its metallic and powerful sound, searching for the bird for half an hour to no avail. The bellbird sings from the treetops where it is visible to its peers but invisible to those below. Still, Retamosa smiled: She cares for ecosystems in Costa Rica’s AmistOsa Biological Corridor by listening to them.
In nature, living things use sound for almost everything. They make calls to attract mates, communicate identities, warn of dangers, guide the way, and help in hunting or defense. For decades, researchers have tracked species with recorders in hand, and still do, though increasingly are using remote recording devices too. The study of the sounds organisms make is known as bioacoustics. Retamosa has been doing this work for 10 years. Using bio-acoustic recordings, studies have shown that some birds shout loudly to make themselves heard in cities and that sea turtle hatchlings communicate from the nest to coordinate their hatching. And when bioacoustics is combined with other sounds—those made by humans, as well as the natural sounds of the landscape, such as the crashing of waves in the sea—it is possible to interpret deeper ecological meaning. It becomes possible to monitor changes in biodiversity, detect threats, and measure the effectiveness of conservation strategies. This wider analysis of sound is known as eco-acoustics—and it is exactly the work underway here in Costa Rica.
A three-wattled bellbird (Procnias tricarunculatus) in Costa Rica. Photograph: Juan Carlos Vindas/Getty Images
The development of automated recordings revolutionized bioacoustics and ecoacoustics. Now, research groups can hang sensors that record snippets of the day for months at a time without interfering with wildlife. Retamosa likes this strategy because it’s non-invasive to animals, makes it easier to have ears in large areas and hard-to-reach places, and occasionally helps discover mysterious species.
Although she prefers to monitor ecosystems from a distance, Retamosa still has to go deep into the forest to set up recorders. Visits to the field are fascinating, but never a Sunday stroll. She has hiked miles through mud and branches, along with her colleagues Jimmy Barrantes and Randall Jiménez. They have gone up and down endless slopes. Once, she fell and fractured her ribs. But the work doesn’t end with the installation: they have to go back to change batteries and memory cards. In other countries, they use solar panels and the internet to receive real-time data; in the dark, humid rainforests of Costa Rica, it’s still done by hand.
Acoustic-monitoring fieldwork in Costa Rica. Photograph: Courtesy of Jimmy Barrantes & Randall Jiménez.
That’s what Retamosa was doing when she heard the bellbird. That recording forms part of a project to track the movement and distribution of these birds, which migrate between different altitudes in the region. Their presence could be a functional indicator of the state of the AmistOsa Biological Corridor, which connects La Amistad International Park, on the border with Panama, with other reserves in southern Costa Rica.
The biological corridor was shaped by the passage of wildlife that emerged following the 1990 Forestry Law, which protected wilderness areas and encouraged reforestation on farms through payments for environmental services. In 2010, it was officially mapped. Today it runs through indigenous territories and crosses the country’s largest wetland. Across the Costa Rica there are now 53 corridors, covering 38 percent of its territory.
The project data will help the committee in charge of Costa Rica’s biodiversity and natural resources make decisions. “The idea is to make a monitoring protocol, linking the government, the communities, and us as academia, providing support for analysis and interpretation,” Retamosa says.
A Limón giant glass frog in the rain in Braulio Carillo National Park in Costa Rica. Photograph: Christopher Jimenez Nature Photo/Getty Images
Recorders hung in the wild capture many terabytes of data, so listening to every recording is not feasible. With an eye toward making it a cost-efficient strategy, researchers have developed acoustic indices: mathematical formulas to interpret ecosystem traits from the recorded sounds. “They can reflect the acoustic energy of a place, activity, or frequency diversity,” Retamosa explains. When she started in this field, there were only eight acoustic indices. Now there are more than 80.
The discipline is advancing so rapidly that the scope of these indices is currently being debated. In some of her early research, Retamosa found that certain acoustic measurements show variations between tropical and temperate regions. One of the best known, acoustic complexity—the degree of variation and intricate structure of bioacoustic sound—has been used as a descriptor of bird diversity in temperate environments. However, in tropical areas, different investigations have shown that it does not reflect species diversity, but rather the level of acoustic activity; that is, instead of indicating the presence of multiple species, it seems to show the intense vocalization of one or a few birds.
Careful analysis of these indices can be used to reveal the health of the forest. In a report with Jimmy Barrantes, Retamosa outlines that measuring acoustic entropy—the variation of sound intensity across time and audio frequencies—and acoustic diversity helped them to classify the state of disturbance of some sites, while those of acoustic activity and energy did not. “You can use the indices for a first exploration of the site, to do studies over time, looking for specific changes associated with human disturbances and work with key species,” she explains.
Listening for the Impacts of Tourism
Every region has its own environmental concerns. In Costa Rica, tourism has grown dramatically: between 1984 and 1989, international arrivals increased 37 percent, from 273,900 to 375,900 visitors. But since 1990, the pace has skyrocketed: last year the country received 2.6 million tourists. This boom poses sustainability challenges. To address them, the International Institute for Conservation and Wildlife Management team analyzes sounds inside and outside protected areas. One of its tools is an index that measures the ratio between biological sounds and human-made noises.
The acoustic quality of the landscape must be monitored to conserve the country’s ecotourism. Photograph: Jordan Siemens/Getty Images
In recent years, automated acoustic detection, using artificial intelligence and machine learning, has revolutionized species identification. Previously, advanced programming skills were required to use AI, but with the advent of accessible interface models, it’s becoming more popular. Exoacoustics is increasingly focused on developing more accurate models for classifying sounds.
And it’s becoming possible to pick out individual species in the soundscape using these tools. In a study of farms conducted as part of the Bosque Vivo project, run by Costa Rica’s National Forest Financing Fund, the research team found that Hylopezus perspicillatus, a bird species sensitive to landscape disturbance, was only present in the control sites of Corcovado National Park and in the forests of the best-conserved farms.
In Guanacaste, Retamosa is also working on a long-term monitoring protocol to evaluate how ecosystems and biodiversity are responding to climate variability. In other countries, similar projects are recording sound baselines in sites with minimal human intervention that, in the future, could be compared with up-to-date recordings to detect changes. Although storing all these records is costly, Retamosa believes that they’ll form an invaluable historical archive, which one day can be returned to when technology allows further analysis.
This story originally appeared on WIRED en Español and has been translated from Spanish.