I write mostly for fun so I might post new stuff everyday or once a month -we will never know- plus I don't have the faintest idea what to post so this blog will be a feverish mix of random things.
My main blog is @ph4os in which I talk about religion, witchcraft and other various nonsense.
Feel free to use the question box or to text me at any time!
You can also find me on wattpad: @-phaos
and Ao3: @ kl30s
More about me • my IG
Thanks for being here, hope you have a wonderful day!!!
When there are harmful and offensive depictions of POC, POC are fully allowed to be angry and criticise it. Anyone against this is racist.
When there are harmful and offensive depictions of women, women are fully allowed to be angry and criticise it. Anyone against this is a misogynist.
When there are harmful and offensive depictions of queer people, the LGBTQ+ community is fully allowed to be angry and criticise it. Anyone against this is a queerphobe.
When there are harmful and offensive depictions of disabled people, disabled individuals are fully allowed to be angry and criticise it. Anyone against this is an ableist.
So how come when there are harmful and offensive depictions of rape and sa, victims aren't allowed to be angry and criticise it? How come anyone against this isn't a fucking asshole? How come we victims hear tonnes of "it just isn't made for you!!", "it's just fiction!!" and "fiction doesn’t affect reality!!!"? How come we get called fascists and nazis and puritans and conservatives?
Link to the petition to stop the "Haunting Adeline" movie
"Haunting Adeline" getting a movie is sick. And everyone's that's happy about that, doesn't even know what's like to be a woman.
Luckily I didn't have such an experience not nearly likely what happens in this book,
but I was 13 when a 18 years old good looking dude tried to pursue me.
I was 13 when he asked my middle school bully to give him my phone number, as "a joke".
I was 13 when he asked me to be his girlfriend, after 3 days of our first encounter. I said no.
I was 13 when I felt so scared of him that I forced myself self to remain his "friend".
I was 14 when I encountered him on the bus, after the summer. He was 19. He was in his last year of high-school, I had just started my first year.
I was 14 when he started stalking me, memorizing when and where I took the bus, where my school was.
I was 14 when he started to be everywhere, anytime, always.
I was 14 when he started to touch me on the bus. The bus was always packed with students, most of us always rode back home standing and, somehow, he was always standing behind me. His hand always brushing my back, my ass.
I was 14 when he tried to put his hand in between my legs, on the bus.
I was finally 15 when he sent my middle school bully to threaten me. He said that he was going to work far away, but this didn't meant I'll ever be free from him.
I'm 22 now, and every summer he comes back in our little town. He even has a girlfriend now.
I'm 22 now, and his hand somehow still tries to fin a way to touch me in the crowd. He can't do that anymore.
But he's still here, he still tries, and I can't say nothing against him, cause I "don't have proofs".
So, no, I'm not excited for this film. I don't care if the main character is attractive. My stalker is conventionally attractive too, but I didn't find it funny when his hands touched me "casually", when he tried to rape me. I didn't giggle, I wasn't in love, I'll never be.
No, I don't find this book a masterpiece. I find it sick and twisted.
We live in a society where not even women supports other women. I, as a woman, would never write a book romanticizing some other woman's trauma. If it's a trauma there's must be a reason, and no one should call it romantic, nobody should sexualize it. And if someone can't comprehend what I'm saying, then they shouldn't express their opinion on that matter.
Last month, I made a post (which I later removed) in which I talked about a bad experience with a teacher during an exam. For those who do not know how the university works in Italy:
the exams (at least in certain faculties) are mostly oral,
the grades range from 18 to 30L,
you can refuse a grade you do not like and take the exam again in a different date.
As I said in the deleted post, I refused a """bad""" grade in my ancient history exams + the teacher's been awful during the exams. He's been insulting us students, telling we are no good, not meant to be archeologist, that we need to be competitive otherwise we wouldn't go anywhere in life.
Yesterday I tried again to take the exam and the professor, not only gave me an even lower grade, also had the courage to threaten me by saying "either you keep this grade or you keep giving the exam back to the bitter end, the grade will never change. You'll regret refusing the grade I gave you the first time" (I obviously had to accept the grade, as it was my last exam). He also told me that, among us students, we must be competitive, hinder each other, put our careers first (and among other things he also made misogynistic comments about the fact that me and other girls had nails polish) + he kept repeating "how you think you can become an archeologist? Why you're even here!"
What amazes me is that, a few months ago, a man literally committed suicide INSIDE the campus because of academic pressure. I was there, casually passing by, shortly after he had jumped out of the building, while the few present called the ambulance. I haven't slept for a week, I still have nightmares. And you, a (failed) professor, have the courage to tell me that I have to ruin my mental health for uni?
Like, he doesn't have a wife (never even had a girlfriend), he doesn't have children, he boasts that he never had any emotional interest in anyone, that he always put family and friends last. Why the fuck do you think you can give advice on how to be in the world? And most importantly, who in their right mind would listen to him?
How can he feel fulfilled in life if he doesn't even have a fucking pet waiting for him when he comes home?
I cried, I admit. Not because of the grade itself, not because I ruined my average one step away from graduation. I cried because of nervousness, I cried because, once again, a man who knows nothing about how the world really is, felt compelled to tell me who I am.
And it's always MEN (not women) who make these nonsensical speeches. And always TO women. (He had no business telling me and the other girls that archaeology is a "man job" and that we wouldn't be respected if we wear nails polish, not even gel extensions)
Why the fuck should I turn my back on my friends on purpose? Why should I also turn my family away for a shitty job? I could understand the talk about love interest that "distracts" from studies/are not "necessary" (aromantic/demiromantic people exists and of course I support them) but you can't judge who chooses to share their life with another person.
If you're really so proud of yourself and your life, why do you feel the need to insult those with a different (and probably even healthier) lifestyle? Are you a fucking university professor, fuck, don't you doubt that by saying certain things, sooner or later, some report will come to the university and you will be removed from your professorship?
I don't even have fucking words to express my fucking self.
Holy Gods.
Guys just... really, you're not your grades, not even your job. You are yourself, the love you give to others, your kindness. If you feel like shit, if you put your studies/work even before yourself, if you feel crushed by academic pressure, please, seek help. Go to a therapist. Do something. But, please, PLEASE, for the Gods sake, don't do nothing stupid.
Life is not worth a grade or a job interview.
Keep living, everything will be ok.
You are not what a 70 years old sweaty grumpy man shouts you in your face.
How, defending the rights of trans women, makes me homophobic and "anti-women"? You're homophobe and misogynist if you support a woman taking pictures under other people's skirts, if you support a woman who deliberately spreads hate. Admit it, and avoid posing as a paladin of justice on your blog. You're not progressive, you're homophobic and you're misogynistic.
And if, speaking against a person who spreads hatred against our trans sisters, makes me in some strange way homophobic and misogynistic, then I'm happy to be.
And yes, I'm "obsessed," I'm obsessed with doing the right kind of propaganda, pointing the finger at anyone who says or does something wrong, not giving a damn who they are. That means being progressive and feminist. The fact that R*wling is a woman does not allow her to say and do whatever she wants. She is the first to not be truly feminist and her being a woman does not bind me in any way to her and to having to defend her.
Just to be clear: a misogynist comment could have been "she became famous because she opened the legs for someone important," too bad that we poor "obsessed" are calling her out because she's literally a shitty person. Let's wake up and start dot the i's and cross the t's, and making ourselves respected. As women, as true activists and as supporters (and part) of the LGBTQ+ community, we are not angry enough.
I'll explain and firstly I will say that both me and my partner are LGBTQ+ so careful with yourself.
"How, defending the rights of trans women, makes me homophobic and "anti-women"?" you defend an ideology that believes that same-sex attraction is transphobic, that is homophobic by default, and that pays no attention to threats against women, and is perfectly happy to harass and attack women, threaten women (and I was there in the flesh when the transgender mob marched into Trafalgar Square asking through a speaker for women to be raped and killed if they disagreed with them), and occupy all spaces and concepts previously reserved to women until women are even more invisible.
"You're homophobe and misogynist if you support a woman taking pictures under other people's skirts, if you support a woman who deliberately spreads hate" JK Rowling doesn't spread hate, JK Rowling didn't take an underskirt photo, one cannot be misogynist against a MALE, and calling me homophobic and misogynistic is rich, absurd, ridiculous, funny and entirely expected of your mob.
"Admit it, and avoid posing as a paladin of justice on your blog. You're not progressive, you're homophobic and you're misogynistic." I will not take any lessons of morality from people who happily support and make excuses in favour of a criminal mob that enjoys fantasizing with raping anyone who rejects them, with murdering, who enjoys making women feel unsafe, who is hugely composed by pedophiles and people with a criminal record of sexual offences and domestic violence (like Stacie-Marie Laughton, Isla Bryson, Stephen Ireland, Karen White, Ciara Watkin, or Lea Rose Cheng), and who supports the sexual sterilisation and castration of children, which, as I would know given I'm one of the psychologists who does research and writes scientific reports for institutions in the UK, does not actually improve their mental health but leads to a significant long-term decline, increase of suicidal thoughts and increase of numerous health problems they lacked prior to these treatments. Even my partner, a female trans man, is heavily opposed to gender ideologists and those mobs and those people, and has suffered hatred from within the same mob you belong to for that, and for being a huge fan of JK Rowling. And he works for the NHS so again, both of us are quite aware of the actual effects of the treatments gender ideologists are happy to push without concern.
"And if, speaking against a person who spreads hatred against our trans sisters, makes me in some strange way homophobic and misogynistic, then I'm happy to be." JK Rowling has been one of the greatest protectors and defenders of women, children and LGBTQ+ people, including trans people. It's only ignorants like you who have consistently tried to prove otherwise (and largely failed, as seen by how the tide is slowly but surely turning).
"And yes, I'm "obsessed," I'm obsessed with doing the right kind of propaganda, pointing the finger at anyone who says or does something wrong, not giving a damn who they are." Look at yourself in the mirror.
"That means being progressive and feminist." Dude you follow Nazi propaganda techniques don't make me laugh.
"The fact that R*wling is a woman does not allow her to say and do whatever she wants. She is the first to not be truly feminist and her being a woman does not bind me in any way to her and to having to defend her." Things you don't know: what feminism is, what misogyny is, what homophobia is, what sexism is, what JK Rowling does...
"Let's wake up and start dot the i's and cross the t's, and making ourselves respected. As women, as true activists and as supporters (and part) of the LGBTQ+ community, we are not angry enough." Again start with yourself. I'm angry enough. I'm fighting. My partner is fighting. Is shits like you who know shit, think you know it all, and are doing all harm and no good. And we're the ones who then have to treat the victims of your negligence.
Again you prove the kind of shit you are. You're arguing with a person with two careers, a PhD and who works as a psychologist with trans people, and loves trans people and is in a relationship with them. Your ignorance, your far-right behaviour, your refusal to learn, your embracing of Nazi like ideology and your sheer stupidity are going to cost you massively. You're the one who will end up shutting up, I guarantee. Not me. Women won't wheesht. You're not on my side, you're not on the side of gay people and you're not on the side of trans people. You're on the side of a mob and you'll pay enormously for it. And worst of all? you don't want to do any better and you don't give a fuck. My dear, you're just revealing your true colours and thank god for that.
And if Terf means: person who defends, protects and takes care of women, children, gays, lesbians, bisexuals and normal trans people, then yes I am. Because someone has to protect them against monsters like you, who do everything to ruin their lives. I might be a terf, but you're a monster who hates and preys on women, kids, and vulnerable LGBTQ+ people.
So you, a psychologist, are telling me, a cisgender bisexual woman, that my fears are unmotivated?
You are telling me that what R*wilg posts on her socials is completely normal and not, in any way, dangerous fort trans people and for women?
Take a look yourself then and try to defend these statements too:
Promoting detransition
Invalidating trans women experiences
Don't even know how to title this...
Again, invalidating trans women rights
Comparing trans women to spiders... for some unknown reason... I guess...
Slipping this in just to show how poorly acculturated she is
Oh! And guess what she did not even a month after? She took a picture under a trans woman's skirt!!!😆 - you can check THIS article
Uhm??? Wtf???
Whatever this means....
So... uhm... should I go on? I have to take more proof to you to show that she is dangerous or you just want to go on ad invalidate my point of view just by saying I'm a Nazi and by invalidating my identity, Miss psychologist?🤨
Btw, seriously... I'm not gonna argue any longer with a middle aged millennial that still lives in the fantasy world XX
Ps. I really hope you don't approach your patients in the same way you relate to other people on the internet (assuming things about them, inventing other things, paraphrasing things that are said so that you're right, manipulating the conversation with false information, etc.)
No, what I am telling you is that you're mentally unstable. Also that you lack reading comprehension, are inept, bit of a cretin, and rather amazingly stupid. You lack empathy, have narcissistic traits and a slight psychopath trait up there. But that's not my official diagnosis you've got to pay for those.
How, defending the rights of trans women, makes me homophobic and "anti-women"? You're homophobe and misogynist if you support a woman taking pictures under other people's skirts, if you support a woman who deliberately spreads hate. Admit it, and avoid posing as a paladin of justice on your blog. You're not progressive, you're homophobic and you're misogynistic.
And if, speaking against a person who spreads hatred against our trans sisters, makes me in some strange way homophobic and misogynistic, then I'm happy to be.
And yes, I'm "obsessed," I'm obsessed with doing the right kind of propaganda, pointing the finger at anyone who says or does something wrong, not giving a damn who they are. That means being progressive and feminist. The fact that R*wling is a woman does not allow her to say and do whatever she wants. She is the first to not be truly feminist and her being a woman does not bind me in any way to her and to having to defend her.
Just to be clear: a misogynist comment could have been "she became famous because she opened the legs for someone important," too bad that we poor "obsessed" are calling her out because she's literally a shitty person. Let's wake up and start dot the i's and cross the t's, and making ourselves respected. As women, as true activists and as supporters (and part) of the LGBTQ+ community, we are not angry enough.
I'll explain and firstly I will say that both me and my partner are LGBTQ+ so careful with yourself.
"How, defending the rights of trans women, makes me homophobic and "anti-women"?" you defend an ideology that believes that same-sex attraction is transphobic, that is homophobic by default, and that pays no attention to threats against women, and is perfectly happy to harass and attack women, threaten women (and I was there in the flesh when the transgender mob marched into Trafalgar Square asking through a speaker for women to be raped and killed if they disagreed with them), and occupy all spaces and concepts previously reserved to women until women are even more invisible.
"You're homophobe and misogynist if you support a woman taking pictures under other people's skirts, if you support a woman who deliberately spreads hate" JK Rowling doesn't spread hate, JK Rowling didn't take an underskirt photo, one cannot be misogynist against a MALE, and calling me homophobic and misogynistic is rich, absurd, ridiculous, funny and entirely expected of your mob.
"Admit it, and avoid posing as a paladin of justice on your blog. You're not progressive, you're homophobic and you're misogynistic." I will not take any lessons of morality from people who happily support and make excuses in favour of a criminal mob that enjoys fantasizing with raping anyone who rejects them, with murdering, who enjoys making women feel unsafe, who is hugely composed by pedophiles and people with a criminal record of sexual offences and domestic violence (like Stacie-Marie Laughton, Isla Bryson, Stephen Ireland, Karen White, Ciara Watkin, or Lea Rose Cheng), and who supports the sexual sterilisation and castration of children, which, as I would know given I'm one of the psychologists who does research and writes scientific reports for institutions in the UK, does not actually improve their mental health but leads to a significant long-term decline, increase of suicidal thoughts and increase of numerous health problems they lacked prior to these treatments. Even my partner, a female trans man, is heavily opposed to gender ideologists and those mobs and those people, and has suffered hatred from within the same mob you belong to for that, and for being a huge fan of JK Rowling. And he works for the NHS so again, both of us are quite aware of the actual effects of the treatments gender ideologists are happy to push without concern.
"And if, speaking against a person who spreads hatred against our trans sisters, makes me in some strange way homophobic and misogynistic, then I'm happy to be." JK Rowling has been one of the greatest protectors and defenders of women, children and LGBTQ+ people, including trans people. It's only ignorants like you who have consistently tried to prove otherwise (and largely failed, as seen by how the tide is slowly but surely turning).
"And yes, I'm "obsessed," I'm obsessed with doing the right kind of propaganda, pointing the finger at anyone who says or does something wrong, not giving a damn who they are." Look at yourself in the mirror.
"That means being progressive and feminist." Dude you follow Nazi propaganda techniques don't make me laugh.
"The fact that R*wling is a woman does not allow her to say and do whatever she wants. She is the first to not be truly feminist and her being a woman does not bind me in any way to her and to having to defend her." Things you don't know: what feminism is, what misogyny is, what homophobia is, what sexism is, what JK Rowling does...
"Let's wake up and start dot the i's and cross the t's, and making ourselves respected. As women, as true activists and as supporters (and part) of the LGBTQ+ community, we are not angry enough." Again start with yourself. I'm angry enough. I'm fighting. My partner is fighting. Is shits like you who know shit, think you know it all, and are doing all harm and no good. And we're the ones who then have to treat the victims of your negligence.
Again you prove the kind of shit you are. You're arguing with a person with two careers, a PhD and who works as a psychologist with trans people, and loves trans people and is in a relationship with them. Your ignorance, your far-right behaviour, your refusal to learn, your embracing of Nazi like ideology and your sheer stupidity are going to cost you massively. You're the one who will end up shutting up, I guarantee. Not me. Women won't wheesht. You're not on my side, you're not on the side of gay people and you're not on the side of trans people. You're on the side of a mob and you'll pay enormously for it. And worst of all? you don't want to do any better and you don't give a fuck. My dear, you're just revealing your true colours and thank god for that.
And if Terf means: person who defends, protects and takes care of women, children, gays, lesbians, bisexuals and normal trans people, then yes I am. Because someone has to protect them against monsters like you, who do everything to ruin their lives. I might be a terf, but you're a monster who hates and preys on women, kids, and vulnerable LGBTQ+ people.
So you, a psychologist, are telling me, a cisgender bisexual woman, that my fears are unmotivated?
You are telling me that what R*wilg posts on her socials is completely normal and not, in any way, dangerous fort trans people and for women?
Take a look yourself then and try to defend these statements too:
Promoting detransition
Invalidating trans women experiences
Don't even know how to title this...
Again, invalidating trans women rights
Comparing trans women to spiders... for some unknown reason... I guess...
Slipping this in just to show how poorly acculturated she is
Oh! And guess what she did not even a month after? She took a picture under a trans woman's skirt!!!😆 - you can check THIS article
Uhm??? Wtf???
Whatever this means....
So... uhm... should I go on? I have to take more proof to you to show that she is dangerous or you just want to go on ad invalidate my point of view just by saying I'm a Nazi and by invalidating my identity, Miss psychologist?🤨
Btw, seriously... I'm not gonna argue any longer with a middle aged millennial that still lives in the fantasy world XX
Ps. I really hope you don't approach your patients in the same way you relate to other people on the internet (assuming things about them, inventing other things, paraphrasing things that are said so that you're right, manipulating the conversation with false information, etc.)
No, what I am telling you is that you're mentally unstable. Also that you lack reading comprehension, are inept, bit of a cretin, and rather amazingly stupid. You lack empathy, have narcissistic traits and a slight psychopath trait up there. But that's not my official diagnosis you've got to pay for those.
How, defending the rights of trans women, makes me homophobic and "anti-women"? You're homophobe and misogynist if you support a woman taking pictures under other people's skirts, if you support a woman who deliberately spreads hate. Admit it, and avoid posing as a paladin of justice on your blog. You're not progressive, you're homophobic and you're misogynistic.
And if, speaking against a person who spreads hatred against our trans sisters, makes me in some strange way homophobic and misogynistic, then I'm happy to be.
And yes, I'm "obsessed," I'm obsessed with doing the right kind of propaganda, pointing the finger at anyone who says or does something wrong, not giving a damn who they are. That means being progressive and feminist. The fact that R*wling is a woman does not allow her to say and do whatever she wants. She is the first to not be truly feminist and her being a woman does not bind me in any way to her and to having to defend her.
Just to be clear: a misogynist comment could have been "she became famous because she opened the legs for someone important," too bad that we poor "obsessed" are calling her out because she's literally a shitty person. Let's wake up and start dot the i's and cross the t's, and making ourselves respected. As women, as true activists and as supporters (and part) of the LGBTQ+ community, we are not angry enough.
I'll explain and firstly I will say that both me and my partner are LGBTQ+ so careful with yourself.
"How, defending the rights of trans women, makes me homophobic and "anti-women"?" you defend an ideology that believes that same-sex attraction is transphobic, that is homophobic by default, and that pays no attention to threats against women, and is perfectly happy to harass and attack women, threaten women (and I was there in the flesh when the transgender mob marched into Trafalgar Square asking through a speaker for women to be raped and killed if they disagreed with them), and occupy all spaces and concepts previously reserved to women until women are even more invisible.
"You're homophobe and misogynist if you support a woman taking pictures under other people's skirts, if you support a woman who deliberately spreads hate" JK Rowling doesn't spread hate, JK Rowling didn't take an underskirt photo, one cannot be misogynist against a MALE, and calling me homophobic and misogynistic is rich, absurd, ridiculous, funny and entirely expected of your mob.
"Admit it, and avoid posing as a paladin of justice on your blog. You're not progressive, you're homophobic and you're misogynistic." I will not take any lessons of morality from people who happily support and make excuses in favour of a criminal mob that enjoys fantasizing with raping anyone who rejects them, with murdering, who enjoys making women feel unsafe, who is hugely composed by pedophiles and people with a criminal record of sexual offences and domestic violence (like Stacie-Marie Laughton, Isla Bryson, Stephen Ireland, Karen White, Ciara Watkin, or Lea Rose Cheng), and who supports the sexual sterilisation and castration of children, which, as I would know given I'm one of the psychologists who does research and writes scientific reports for institutions in the UK, does not actually improve their mental health but leads to a significant long-term decline, increase of suicidal thoughts and increase of numerous health problems they lacked prior to these treatments. Even my partner, a female trans man, is heavily opposed to gender ideologists and those mobs and those people, and has suffered hatred from within the same mob you belong to for that, and for being a huge fan of JK Rowling. And he works for the NHS so again, both of us are quite aware of the actual effects of the treatments gender ideologists are happy to push without concern.
"And if, speaking against a person who spreads hatred against our trans sisters, makes me in some strange way homophobic and misogynistic, then I'm happy to be." JK Rowling has been one of the greatest protectors and defenders of women, children and LGBTQ+ people, including trans people. It's only ignorants like you who have consistently tried to prove otherwise (and largely failed, as seen by how the tide is slowly but surely turning).
"And yes, I'm "obsessed," I'm obsessed with doing the right kind of propaganda, pointing the finger at anyone who says or does something wrong, not giving a damn who they are." Look at yourself in the mirror.
"That means being progressive and feminist." Dude you follow Nazi propaganda techniques don't make me laugh.
"The fact that R*wling is a woman does not allow her to say and do whatever she wants. She is the first to not be truly feminist and her being a woman does not bind me in any way to her and to having to defend her." Things you don't know: what feminism is, what misogyny is, what homophobia is, what sexism is, what JK Rowling does...
"Let's wake up and start dot the i's and cross the t's, and making ourselves respected. As women, as true activists and as supporters (and part) of the LGBTQ+ community, we are not angry enough." Again start with yourself. I'm angry enough. I'm fighting. My partner is fighting. Is shits like you who know shit, think you know it all, and are doing all harm and no good. And we're the ones who then have to treat the victims of your negligence.
Again you prove the kind of shit you are. You're arguing with a person with two careers, a PhD and who works as a psychologist with trans people, and loves trans people and is in a relationship with them. Your ignorance, your far-right behaviour, your refusal to learn, your embracing of Nazi like ideology and your sheer stupidity are going to cost you massively. You're the one who will end up shutting up, I guarantee. Not me. Women won't wheesht. You're not on my side, you're not on the side of gay people and you're not on the side of trans people. You're on the side of a mob and you'll pay enormously for it. And worst of all? you don't want to do any better and you don't give a fuck. My dear, you're just revealing your true colours and thank god for that.
And if Terf means: person who defends, protects and takes care of women, children, gays, lesbians, bisexuals and normal trans people, then yes I am. Because someone has to protect them against monsters like you, who do everything to ruin their lives. I might be a terf, but you're a monster who hates and preys on women, kids, and vulnerable LGBTQ+ people.
So you, a psychologist, are telling me, a cisgender bisexual woman, that my fears are unmotivated?
You are telling me that what R*wilg posts on her socials is completely normal and not, in any way, dangerous fort trans people and for women?
Take a look yourself then and try to defend these statements too:
Promoting detransition
Invalidating trans women experiences
Don't even know how to title this...
Again, invalidating trans women rights
Comparing trans women to spiders... for some unknown reason... I guess...
Slipping this in just to show how poorly acculturated she is
Oh! And guess what she did not even a month after? She took a picture under a trans woman's skirt!!!😆 - you can check THIS article
Uhm??? Wtf???
Whatever this means....
So... uhm... should I go on? I have to take more proof to you to show that she is dangerous or you just want to go on ad invalidate my point of view just by saying I'm a Nazi and by invalidating my identity, Miss psychologist?🤨
Btw, seriously... I'm not gonna argue any longer with a middle aged millennial that still lives in the fantasy world XX
Ps. I really hope you don't approach your patients in the same way you relate to other people on the internet (assuming things about them, inventing other things, paraphrasing things that are said so that you're right, manipulating the conversation with false information, etc.)
How, defending the rights of trans women, makes me homophobic and "anti-women"? You're homophobe and misogynist if you support a woman taking pictures under other people's skirts, if you support a woman who deliberately spreads hate. Admit it, and avoid posing as a paladin of justice on your blog. You're not progressive, you're homophobic and you're misogynistic.
And if, speaking against a person who spreads hatred against our trans sisters, makes me in some strange way homophobic and misogynistic, then I'm happy to be.
And yes, I'm "obsessed," I'm obsessed with doing the right kind of propaganda, pointing the finger at anyone who says or does something wrong, not giving a damn who they are. That means being progressive and feminist. The fact that R*wling is a woman does not allow her to say and do whatever she wants. She is the first to not be truly feminist and her being a woman does not bind me in any way to her and to having to defend her.
Just to be clear: a misogynist comment could have been "she became famous because she opened the legs for someone important," too bad that we poor "obsessed" are calling her out because she's literally a shitty person. Let's wake up and start dot the i's and cross the t's, and making ourselves respected. As women, as true activists and as supporters (and part) of the LGBTQ+ community, we are not angry enough.
I'll explain and firstly I will say that both me and my partner are LGBTQ+ so careful with yourself.
"How, defending the rights of trans women, makes me homophobic and "anti-women"?" you defend an ideology that believes that same-sex attraction is transphobic, that is homophobic by default, and that pays no attention to threats against women, and is perfectly happy to harass and attack women, threaten women (and I was there in the flesh when the transgender mob marched into Trafalgar Square asking through a speaker for women to be raped and killed if they disagreed with them), and occupy all spaces and concepts previously reserved to women until women are even more invisible.
"You're homophobe and misogynist if you support a woman taking pictures under other people's skirts, if you support a woman who deliberately spreads hate" JK Rowling doesn't spread hate, JK Rowling didn't take an underskirt photo, one cannot be misogynist against a MALE, and calling me homophobic and misogynistic is rich, absurd, ridiculous, funny and entirely expected of your mob.
"Admit it, and avoid posing as a paladin of justice on your blog. You're not progressive, you're homophobic and you're misogynistic." I will not take any lessons of morality from people who happily support and make excuses in favour of a criminal mob that enjoys fantasizing with raping anyone who rejects them, with murdering, who enjoys making women feel unsafe, who is hugely composed by pedophiles and people with a criminal record of sexual offences and domestic violence (like Stacie-Marie Laughton, Isla Bryson, Stephen Ireland, Karen White, Ciara Watkin, or Lea Rose Cheng), and who supports the sexual sterilisation and castration of children, which, as I would know given I'm one of the psychologists who does research and writes scientific reports for institutions in the UK, does not actually improve their mental health but leads to a significant long-term decline, increase of suicidal thoughts and increase of numerous health problems they lacked prior to these treatments. Even my partner, a female trans man, is heavily opposed to gender ideologists and those mobs and those people, and has suffered hatred from within the same mob you belong to for that, and for being a huge fan of JK Rowling. And he works for the NHS so again, both of us are quite aware of the actual effects of the treatments gender ideologists are happy to push without concern.
"And if, speaking against a person who spreads hatred against our trans sisters, makes me in some strange way homophobic and misogynistic, then I'm happy to be." JK Rowling has been one of the greatest protectors and defenders of women, children and LGBTQ+ people, including trans people. It's only ignorants like you who have consistently tried to prove otherwise (and largely failed, as seen by how the tide is slowly but surely turning).
"And yes, I'm "obsessed," I'm obsessed with doing the right kind of propaganda, pointing the finger at anyone who says or does something wrong, not giving a damn who they are." Look at yourself in the mirror.
"That means being progressive and feminist." Dude you follow Nazi propaganda techniques don't make me laugh.
"The fact that R*wling is a woman does not allow her to say and do whatever she wants. She is the first to not be truly feminist and her being a woman does not bind me in any way to her and to having to defend her." Things you don't know: what feminism is, what misogyny is, what homophobia is, what sexism is, what JK Rowling does...
"Let's wake up and start dot the i's and cross the t's, and making ourselves respected. As women, as true activists and as supporters (and part) of the LGBTQ+ community, we are not angry enough." Again start with yourself. I'm angry enough. I'm fighting. My partner is fighting. Is shits like you who know shit, think you know it all, and are doing all harm and no good. And we're the ones who then have to treat the victims of your negligence.
How, defending the rights of trans women, makes me homophobic and "anti-women"? You're homophobe and misogynist if you support a woman taking pictures under other people's skirts, if you support a woman who deliberately spreads hate. Admit it, and avoid posing as a paladin of justice on your blog. You're not progressive, you're homophobic and you're misogynistic.
And if, speaking against a person who spreads hatred against our trans sisters, makes me in some strange way homophobic and misogynistic, then I'm happy to be.
And yes, I'm "obsessed," I'm obsessed with doing the right kind of propaganda, pointing the finger at anyone who says or does something wrong, not giving a damn who they are. That means being progressive and feminist. The fact that R*wling is a woman does not allow her to say and do whatever she wants. She is the first to not be truly feminist and her being a woman does not bind me in any way to her and to having to defend her.
Just to be clear: a misogynist comment could have been "she became famous because she opened the legs for someone important," too bad that we poor "obsessed" are calling her out because she's literally a shitty person. Let's wake up and start dot the i's and cross the t's, and making ourselves respected. As women, as true activists and as supporters (and part) of the LGBTQ+ community, we are not angry enough.
“if you love this character then you must make him happy in your fics, right?” wrong. the horror. suffering. internal hemorrhage. hospital. immediately
I just want to say thank you for talking about the Calum snap incident. I had no idea the context or when it happened. I made a single surface level joke about it but now I feel disgusted and ashamed. I’m still fairly new and don’t know them in-depth,just that he and the others are hilarious and talented and none of them deserve the disrespect.
So once again thank you and I hope I made some sense.
Don't feel guilty, babe. It clearly wasn't your fault.
I'm the one to thank you because you decided to inform yourself about what happened 🩷
I am aware that many of the people who joke about it, as in your case, do so because they do not know the context behind that video, and that is why I made that post. Thank you for reading my post and understanding it 🩷
Grown ass adult scared to ask a question without the anonymous?🙏🏻😔
No btw, I was saying that we (you) should stop taking pictures of what's in between Calum legs just cause he has a skirt, we (you) should stop saying things like "I'm so sorry that Luke/Michael is married, I want fuck him". I've also read of people that was ironizing about the pictures that Ash posted saying his niples bleed through the performance, saying things like "breastfeed me", disgusting.
I'm a writer, I've always read and wrote ff and probably I'll always will, that doesn't mean we should be disrespectful to the real people we wrote/read about. I mean: if x singer/actor/etc don't want to read people fantasizing about them, then they won't open x app where there are spaces dedicated to ff about them. If we (you) write this kind of comments under their posts, the concept is different: they're forced to read those things and MAYBE that would make them uncomfortable.
So... yes... that's what I was obviously referring to. If you DIDN'T want to understand that's not my problem babe xx
Today, let's talk about Calum's 2014 snapchat "incident."
Not because I'm crazy, but because I have to make a point.
First of all: I was 10 years old at the time, and before you even start talking, I know: I was too young to have access to social media, but my parents gave me a phone so they could contact me in case of emergency and left me completely unsupervised with it. We can't help it, c'est la vie.
Secondly: Why am I bringing this up again in the big 2026? I have a friend who's a new 5SOS fan; she read something online and asked me about it, and it brought back these beautiful memories of my childhood.
My friend literally asked me, "Why are there 15-year-olds on TikTok asking where they can find Calum's Snapchat video? Which video?"
What I wanted to say:
What the fuck? Literally.
Why the hell are there people, in the great year of our Lord 2026, who still don't understand that leaking the video was SA? And WHY is it still possible to find it online?
What disgusts me most is that it's GIRLS who are asking to see it. Girls who should understand the concepts of "invasion of privacy" and "revenge porn" on a deeper level. Girls who, presumably, live in daily fear that someone will post their nude photos online just to show who (or rather, what) they're "fucking."
It's truly inconceivable that, in the big 2026, there's still a need to discuss such topics; it's truly absurd.
That said, I don't think I have anything else to add, I just needed to vent.
It's absurd because that video literally represented an act of SA against Calum, first and foremost, but also against all of us other fans who, MAYBE, and I mean maybe, didn't want to know certain information about him. It wasn't a "pleasurely gesture" by a girl trying to feel important. It was the reflection of a culture that, still stuck in the ways of a few years earlier (see the leaked photos of Vanessa Hudgens just a few years earlier), couldn't understand the fact that it couldn't do whatever the fuck it wanted with other people's bodies. And it's disgusting that in 2026 there are still people who aren't capable of developing such basic human rights thinking. And don't tell me "they're young girls." I WAS A YOUNG GIRL TOO, and maybe I would have liked to preserve my innocence for a few more years.
"He shouldn't have sent that video, it's Calum's fault." Victim blaming in the big 2026, congratulations.
ps. english it's not my first lenguage, sorry if what I wrote doesn't make sense
