Today's Document
Sweet Seals For You, Always
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
One Nice Bug Per Day
Product Placement
No title available
if i look back, i am lost
noise dept.
Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Doug Jones
cherry valley forever
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
official daine visual archive
Cosimo Galluzzi
No title available
sheepfilms
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
๐ฉต avery cochrane ๐ฉต
romaโ
seen from Canada
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Tรผrkiye
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Germany
seen from Poland
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Spain
seen from United States
@pixiefemmeinist
Pro choice & anti porn.
Homosexuality is natural and innate.ย
Lesbians are female homosexuals.ย
Bisexuality is natural and its own unique thing.
Women are oppressed on the basis of sex.ย
Gender is an oppressive construct that should be abolished.
Single-sex spaces are important for women's safety and liberation.
The goal of feminism is women's liberation from patriarchal oppression.ย
Racism has no place in feminism and antiracism requires continued commitment to dismantling white supremacy.
A virgin birth I can believe. But finding three wise menโฆโฆ.together??๐ณ๐ญ
Why is body hair only unhygienic when its on a womanโs body?
body hair is unhygienic but long acrylic nails (scientifically proven to harbor bacteria) isnโt. body hair is unhygienic but getting lip filler at an unlicensed med spa isnโt. body hair is unhygienic but synthetic lashes (can cause eye infections) arenโt. body hair is unhygienic but lathering makeup over a pimple isnโt. itโs not about hygiene it is about performing femininity.
Listen you bricks:
female same-sex attraction is not a negative attraction, itโs not attraction to an absence. Iโm not attracted to women because they donโt have dicks. Thatโs a given. Iโm attracted to all thatโs present, to women in all their integrity. Stop defining female same-sex attraction in relation to males.
also, being female does not mean absence of dick. you getting your dick cut off means shit to me and other women. because women arenโt just โhuman beings without a penisโ we have our own anatomy that has nothing to do with maleness. you not having a dick anymore doesnโt make you a female. youโre just a man with no penis, which being honest, is probably for the best anyway.
Women arenโt men with holes where dicks used to be
The more and more I feel like complete lack of understanding of female anatomy is a big part of this current genderflake dumbasseryย
โImagination is not only the uniquely human capacity to envision that which is not, and therefore the fount of all invention and innovation. In its arguably most transformative and revelatory capacity, it is the power to that enables us to empathize with humans whose experiences we have never shared.โ -J.K. Rowling
Concept art forย Cinderella (1950),ย by Mary Blair
If itโs not because of our sex that we, women, are oppressed but by gender, why our former (and actual) monarchs were so obsessed with having a boy. If it was gender, they couldโve simply "assign" their girls as boys so there wouldโve been no problem.
We can even look at some cultures where girls are killed before (when parents can know the sex of the baby) or just after birth for the only crime to not be a boy. Why in China itโs illegal to know the sex of the baby during the pregnancy ? Why in India some villages might disappear because there is no woman ? Why in USA we can see men being so upset theyโre having a girl that they literally get violent during gender reveal ?
"Because they ASSIGN a gender only based on the genitals" And why they do not assign their girls as boys and change their body so they can be one ? This solution has already been tested in some cultures and it never changed the problem.
Stop pretending that our sex is not why, women, we were, are, and will still be oppressed.
Most people that defend prostitution today (including pornography) probably would have endorsed slavery had they been alive at the time. Just because something is normal or common doesnโt mean it is right or should continue to happen. I have a strong suspicion that the โSex work just needs to be destigmatized and legally regulated!โ folks would have been all for slavery as long as there existed some sort of welfare legislation for enslaved people. The longer the majority of us fail to question things simply because theyโre โnormalโ or โthatโs just how it isโ the longer oppression and injustice remains the status quo.
Listen you bricks:
female same-sex attraction is not a negative attraction, itโs not attraction to an absence. Iโm not attracted to women because they donโt have dicks. Thatโs a given. Iโm attracted to all thatโs present, to women in all their integrity. Stop defining female same-sex attraction in relation to males.
also, being female does not mean absence of dick. you getting your dick cut off means shit to me and other women. because women arenโt just โhuman beings without a penisโ we have our own anatomy that has nothing to do with maleness. you not having a dick anymore doesnโt make you a female. youโre just a man with no penis, which being honest, is probably for the best anyway.
Women arenโt men with holes where dicks used to be
The more and more I feel like complete lack of understanding of female anatomy is a big part of this current genderflake dumbasseryย
women with happy trail and arm hair and leg hair and armpit hair and nipple hair and those random chin and neck hairs
thoughts?
Kind of hate how utterly nuanceless progressive types are when it comes to trans ppl. The classic "conservatives hate it, we should support it!" The complete disregard for any issue that affects only women. The way that women and children and neurodivergent ppl are acceptable collateral damage when it comes to owning terfs. The way that owning conservatives is more important than actually being right or good, to the point that they can't even they can't even do that properly and just end up being homophobic too. And this weird slippery slope fear that criticising anyone in your in-group in even the tiniest of ways will instantly destroy solidarity (while they actively force gay ppl, lesbians, and feminists out of the community because they they want to stop prejudice by allowing ppl on "our side" to be prejudiced bc they are marginalized and that cancels it out) The complete inability to focus on 2 issues at once (except for when ppl in the in-group are transphobic, suddenly we understand how activism works again and being marginalized doesn't make you except from criticism) They way everything is just now US vs Conservative instead of Us vs Immorality and nobody questions that
A customer contacted our team with questions, and then finished their email with: "I am daunted by the complexities and unknowns." I haven't been able to stop thinking about it since.
Reblog if you are daunted by the complexities and unknowns
Accidentally went wraith form in public and frighteneda load of people Im so fucking sorry
My hot take for modern progressives is that this "do whatever you want forever" approach to everything is wrong, and everybody already knows this. The most basic example is that nobody thinks that you should be allowed to murder someone for no reason. The thing is, they keep saying "let people do what they want, it's none of your business" as if it's a good argument.
A feminist criticizes how misogynistic bdsm is and they say she's a puritan censoring freedom expression, while simultaneously asserting that anyone they disagree with on the issue shouldn't be allowed to have a negative opinion about it.
They think the concept of morality and rules is inherently conservative and religious, so they informed the rule that you can't enforce rules. They should just admit that they believe some behaviors are wrong and some are right, but then they wouldn't have an automatic defense against criticism
One of my favorite research projects I ever did for school was the effect of single-sex education on children. Iโll tell you why.
My initial research (mostly news articles) all said that thereโs no benefit to sex-segregated education. They acknowledged outliers like that school for young black men with such incredible graduation statistics, but said that, generally, thereโs no benefit.
But then I kept looking. And it turns out that yeah, if you look at all children overall, thereโs no benefit - because sex-segregated education is great for girls, and terrible for boys.
Girls in all-girl schools get better grades, have closer and healthier social lives, and have better mental health.
Boys in all-boy schools get worse grades and get in trouble more.
When attempting to make sense of this, journalists and researchers usually fall back on โgirls do better because theyโre not distracted by boys/boy drama, and boys do worse because thereโs no girls to impress.โ
Which is ridiculous, of course, because these effects are seen even grade school - 8 year old boys are not doing well in school to impress girls. Itโs also ridiculous because teenage boys are also not doing well in school to impress girls. Thatโs not how teenagers work.
The answer is obvious to women. Girls learn better away from boys because they are not being assaulted, harassed, belittled, or compared to their male peers at every turn. Boys do worse away from girls because, without a socially acceptable target, they turn their antisocial urges on each other. Even adult men do this when separated from women - see hazing scandals at fraternities, or the constant man-on-man sexual harassment that is just โpart of military culture.โ
But because it doesnโt benefit men, sex-segregated education is considered pointless. Send your daughters to girls-only schools.
Ngl americans trying to pose as the morally superior figure about european immigration annoy me so much. We're successfully killing religion in our countries and are basically having an influx of new religious fundies. This is like if they lived in a near atheist country and their current crazed christians were foreigners who are suddenly immigrating there. Maybe they'd have empathy if they saw it that way. The way they talk about islam like they know it better than us annoys me too. Their muslim population is 1% of the country and they are generally progressive from all I've heard.
I do not agree with all the positions you have but I also don't think the argument of our colonialist past/present matters here, because why should women be the victims? Why are we the sacrificial lambs? There are ways to recognize we have a huge racism issue and a part to play in the very very unstable state of those countries without having to give up women's safety. Religious fundamentalism will always hurt women.
๐ฏ agreed anon, well said!
no offense intended regarding my fellow american radfems, I don't mean to generalize here, but it is true that some really act like they know better than the female immigrants and european local women who are directly affected by male immigration. I have seen a vast amount of ignorance from them since starting to speak about it and from what I have observed, most radfems taking an issue with the points I raised were in fact american.
especially the last part about what you said is incredibly important. we can acknowledge the past & history while at the same time acknowledging that this is not a reason to compromise women's safety.
me after i get home from school
