imagine breaking someone's dni just to not know what you're talking about and say being genderfluid and roleplaying means you have a disorder 😭 (not directed at you op) so this entire thing is misinformation and you didn't even bother to do research
everyone has multiple personalities, but if you mean distinct that's just not what polymind is. it can also be caused by disorders as the flag represents. you're making up a new definition to be more similar to DID to get mad at it for "comparing itself to DID"
this literally just is never said, you're describing willogenic stuff and applying it to polyminds when that's not what the term actually means then complaining about polyminds "conflating themselves with systems", stop rewriting the definition of something to get mad at it, you likely don't know what it actually means because it's a new term so it's easier to spread misinformation on it. nothing in polymindence states what causes it nor is it about "willing personalities into existence" (like i said that's not what polymind even means and everyone has subpersonalities, they're always apart of you, not brought into existence, you cannot be saying someone's problematic for having subpersonalities 💀) it's just an entirely different thing from systems. the carrd openly states polymind is a label for people who were already like this, not about becoming polymind. it's insanely disrespectful to trauma survivors to imply they're an endogenic term (im pretty sure you're conflating polyminds with willogenic systems).
i don't know what to say to this one because it doesn't even make a point and you're coming from a standpoint of not knowing what polymind actually means. just because someone's brain functions in a way that's different doesn't mean they're a bad person (why are you making someone feel bad for functioning differently because of trauma), and it might be a different experience but it's still normal in the sense they're not disordered. not every single quirky personality trait has to be a disorder. you are acting like people can't have any sort of different experience or something that would be disordered if extreme otherwise they have a disorder, which is a fallacy, specifically false dichotomy or more so completely misunderstanding what a disorder is and watering it down. polymindence is also similar to ifs which is not a disorder. people can have fragmented identities without having a disorder and acting like its good to call them invalid for having a fragmented or compartmentalized identity from trauma and functioning differently is borderline saneist. you're acting like people aren't allowed to have any remotely different experience and have to compartmentalize the exact same amount as the average person with no trauma at all times and never do IFS therapy or see their subpersonalities as unique individuals if they don't have DID (fuck any other disorder) which is insanely unhealthy. there's also multiple other disorders that cause identity confusion, stop acting like everything has to be DID. saying people are invalid for having disorders that aren't DID is ableism, i can't believe this and anything else i said is something that needs to be explained. also you can't armchair diagnose people with disorders or speak on what is and isn't a disorder, you can't just make up disorders on a whim because they "feel like one to you", you're not a licensed psychologist you're a random person on the internet and what you're doing waters down disorders. if you were genuinely concerned and not just being saneist and bringing down other people who show signs of DID to feel better about yourself, if you think someone has undiscovered DID you would give them support not insult them and make them feel bad about themselves for "mocking it" and "trying to give themselves their dissociative symptoms" (which isn't possible). if you think they have DID why are you saying they're faking their experiences or "mocking" you (saying someone's "mocking" you for having the same disorder is extremely stupid)
so if someone roleplays they're using a different identity so they're disordered and they have alters because alters have their own identities lmfao?? if someones genderfluid they have alters?? most obvious fallacy. saying you can't use different names or pretend to be a different person because it makes you disordered (as if people are supposed to never act different or remotely compartmentalize in any capacity) not only waters down disorders and makes no sense but is also extremely unhealthy (you are forcing people to break their normal brain functioning and hurt themselves tf, don't say this shit)
"swap is bad" everyone has facets and people can have more seperate facets without having DID so it makes sense for the terms to be similar literally how else are they supposed to describe a different mind activating (just to prove my point, code switching literally has the word switching in it), "mind is bad" people who aren't systems can have a fragmented identity (my childhood trauma is not "mocking your disorder" it has similar aspects because everyone has a brain?? like do you think if someone has OSDD they're invalid because it's "mocking you" as if no one else is allowed to have the same disorder?? people can dissociate without DID you are not the only human in the world you are not the only person with a brain you are not the only person who is capable of dissociating and has ego states that's how it exists in DID in the first place. this is like saying if you have the ability to see you're invalid for mocking people with schizophrenia. stop acting like people having trauma is mocking you bro thinks if people have OSDD or just have DID they're mocking them 💀) giving identities to and categorizing parts of yourself can help with identity confusion "fictling is bad" the term fictive isn't a CDD term. plus you conflated polyminds with systems and intentionally tried to make them more similar to systems the entire post you directly implied they're supposed to think they're disordered (as if DID and OSDD-1b are the only disorders) multiple times. saying polyminds are invalid because they're mocking DID is also a fallacy (i forgot the name) where you use one definition of a word to apply it to something then use a seperate definition that isn't being used for the conclusion, or tbh i dont think people with DID should even be told theyre mocking it even if you're using the "imitating" definition that just makes no sense because multiple people can have a disorder. stop acting like having characteristics of a disorder makes you a bad person you have to use like 500 fallacies to come to that conclusion
this entire ask is just invalidating people's dissociative experiences and trauma by saying they're "trying to mock you and will their seperate identities into existence (saying someone's mocking you is implying they're faking their experiences and they're not a real person so yes you are invalidating them)" this is no better than telling someone with OSDD they're just making it up, claiming to "will it into existence without trauma" when you're both aware that's not possible, or "mocking" you, you just want a socially acceptable way to invalidate peoples dissociation/trauma to feel better about yourself and get away with it and im not arguing on this. subpersonalities does not mean someone is a bad person for "mocking DID because DID has subpersonalities with extreme barriers and DID has multiple alters and people have multiple subpersonalities" that is insanely unhealthy and you are advocating for people to be dysfunctional. and for the last part you implied they're plural and should identify as such the entire time so i don't wanna hear anything about "well they claim they can identify as plural and i actually don't think that's valid anymore" you are a hypocrite
"people are invalid for having subpersonalities because people with DID have distinct subpersonalities" brother what 😭
