SERVICE DESIGN TOUR IN BERLIN
It was a lot of fun to participate in the 4th edition of Service Design Tour, this time in Berlin together with students / alumni from Politecnico di Milano. During 2 days, we opened the doors of 7 design / innovation agencies, the kind that service designers could dream of:Â
IXDS, Fuxblau, Futurice, Fjord, Mandalah, Service Innovation Labs, Boana
Overall all of these agencies share 3 things:
The same mission: to help service based businesses to innovate and to be / stay ahead in the market.Â
The same process: despite their different ways of wording their design process, they all go from research, ideation to design, prototype and testing. They use [service] design thinking, try to involve users, do workshops and come up with innovative proposals.Â
The same clients: in majority big players from the private sector. The co-founder of Boana even said they don’t see each other so much as competitors but happily do business together.Â
So what makes them different from one another? Below are some of the characteristics that seem to me to position them differently on the spectrum.
Local VS GlobalÂ
The scale of the agency can varie from few people who transformed an apartment into an office [Fuxblau] to hundreds of employees in many offices around the world [Fjord counts 23 offices]. There is also the case where the agency has a lot of employees but only a couple of offices located in the same country [IXDS]. Or on the opposite, small amount of employees in a couple of offices in different countries [Boana]. This can have an impact on the kind of role and work you will get.Â
Prototyping VS Strategic DesignÂ
Some will want you [designer] to be great at coding [Futurice] when others will want you to nail business modeling [Fjord]. This reflects where do they put most focus on and the kind of outputs the agency will produce. There is also the diffenciation: All digital [Futurice] VS Back to hardware [IXDS].
Consumer VS People
This could be seen as just a question of vocabulary but it actually says a lot about the approach of the agency. Either For profit / Commercial or more Humanistic / Social. People from Mandalah were the ones putting the most emphasize on the purpose and impact of their work.Â
Client VS Partner
Consultancy work has limits. All these design agencies struggle with the implementation phase. Several told us about their frustrations of working a lot on a project which ended up in a drawer. There are multiple reasons for that but some understood that building long term partnership with their clients could increase the chances to see their designed solutions coming to life.Â
Playful small dog VS White fluffy dog
It was very interesting to see how much effort they all put into developing their working culture. It almost felt like there is a battle going on on who has the best office dog and the coolest work package to offer [designed space, comfy couches, personal desk you can move around, flexible working hours, time for personal project, credit card...]. Service Innovation Labs even chose to focus their presentation only on this aspect. They welcomed us with refreshments, then taught us one of their typical team building exercise and continued with a deep explanation of their way of governing / managing the agency [principles of Holacracy].Â
To conclude, this tour showed me again that it is extremely important to see what’s behind the flashy friendly websites before applying straight to a design agency. Meeting the people and feeling the vibe in the working space can really help defining wether this is a place made for you or not.
If you want to see pics of the tour or feel like reading more about the learnings, see the article written by Kevin Fox, service designer and co-organiser of this edition.Â