⁂
h
No title available
Cosimo Galluzzi
izzy's playlists!
@theartofmadeline
Product Placement
Three Goblin Art
hello vonnie
macklin celebrini has autism
NASA
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
art blog(derogatory)
#extradirty
pixel skylines
if i look back, i am lost
blake kathryn
dirt enthusiast
$LAYYYTER
Janaina Medeiros
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from Chile
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from Ecuador
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@prime-numbers-official
shoot... i was walking across li(x) to observe π(x) from up above, but i tripped near 1.3971 * 10^316 and accidentally pushed li(x) below π(x)... i don't know if the damage is repairable, so no one please tell @mathematics-official, or they'll be pissed that li(x) isn't always greater than π(x)...
Hey, did anyone see what happened to li(x)?
OH haha funny seeing you here!!! i have no idea what’s happened with li(x)!!! :) :) what happened?
Which prime number is the most prime?
seven since if you ask anyone if a number is prime then seven is the most likely to get the correct answer "yes"
source
New, separate question. You said bone-stealing. I wasn't aware primes had bones.
that is a fact about prime numbers that wasn't taught in schools! composite numbers are also boneless, and most look surprisingly like jellyfish! one is a worm
Are you guys just the prime numbers in ℤ? Or is this account representing the primes in all rings?
we currently represent only prime numbers in ℤ, but we have been trying to do a one on one collaboration with the Gaussian primes! (we hate them and want to steal their bones)
What about rings like ℤ[√5]?
not yet, but we do hope to collaborate with them! (not for bone staling reasons, we just really respect radicals here at prime-numbers-official)
Hmm. Okay. What about rings like 𝒫(ω) with symmetric difference as + and intersection as *?
sorry but this blog is only for primes not prime ideals so unless one of those rings has a prime we cannot accept them…
Are you guys just the prime numbers in ℤ? Or is this account representing the primes in all rings?
we currently represent only prime numbers in ℤ, but we have been trying to do a one on one collaboration with the Gaussian primes! (we hate them and want to steal their bones)
What about rings like ℤ[√5]?
not yet, but we do hope to collaborate with them! (not for bone staling reasons, we just really respect radicals here at prime-numbers-official)
Are you guys just the prime numbers in ℤ? Or is this account representing the primes in all rings?
we currently represent only prime numbers in ℤ, but we have been trying to do a one on one collaboration with the Gaussian primes! (we hate them and want to steal their bones)
unfortunately, due to inflation, we had to fire the largest 97% of prime numbers.
they were chosen due to not being used as much as the former 3%, according to this graph:
hopefully, this transition will be seamless with the rest of number theory work and no conflicts will arise.
thanks for your understanding,
2
hey so i have an encrypted hard drive with 32 bitcoin but i cant access it??
sure just tell me the password and I’ll give you step by step instructions
prime factorization is so stupid. like, that prime doesn’t divide into that number? try again with a different prime, loser.
unfortunately, due to inflation, we had to fire the largest 97% of prime numbers.
they were chosen due to not being used as much as the former 3%, according to this graph:
hopefully, this transition will be seamless with the rest of number theory work and no conflicts will arise.
thanks for your understanding,
2
we here at @prime-numbers-official are proud to present:
Prime Numbers 2
Now With 2.5 Factors
More to come out soon...
this is the moment you’ve all been waiting for…
Prime Numbers 2
With the latest AI and quantum technology, we here at Prime-Numbers-Official have spent countless hours asking ChatGPT to answer our vague question of “what if a number had 2.5 factors”.
We have now come up (with the AI’s help) with an algorithm that relies on quantum computing to find a number with 2.5 factors.
Now, the technology isn’t quite advance yet to find these numbers, but within the next year, we will be able to fully release a stable Prime Numbers 2.
Everyone, invest on the ground floor now with this strange and unique idea by giving us 6 . Only then, and a few days later, will we be able to release this to the public. More updates to come out soon!
From: 2
the square root of 8
the all knowing AI does not agree. henchmen, send them to the pit.
we here at @prime-numbers-official are proud to present:
Prime Numbers 2
Now With 2.5 Factors
More to come out soon...
this is the moment you’ve all been waiting for…
Prime Numbers 2
With the latest AI and quantum technology, we here at Prime-Numbers-Official have spent countless hours asking ChatGPT to answer our vague question of “what if a number had 2.5 factors”.
We have now come up (with the AI’s help) with an algorithm that relies on quantum computing to find a number with 2.5 factors.
Now, the technology isn’t quite advance yet to find these numbers, but within the next year, we will be able to fully release a stable Prime Numbers 2.
Everyone, invest on the ground floor now with this strange and unique idea by giving us 6 . Only then, and a few days later, will we be able to release this to the public. More updates to come out soon!
From: 2
we here at @prime-numbers-official are proud to present:
Prime Numbers 2
Now With 2.5 Factors
More to come out soon...
shoot... i was walking across li(x) to observe π(x) from up above, but i tripped near 1.3971 * 10^316 and accidentally pushed li(x) below π(x)... i don't know if the damage is repairable, so no one please tell @mathematics-official, or they'll be pissed that li(x) isn't always greater than π(x)...
i'll make sure that the most common way of representing numbers maxes out at like 1.79 * 10^308 so nobody will know
thx that should cover it up really well
shoot... i was walking across li(x) to observe π(x) from up above, but i tripped near 1.3971 * 10^316 and accidentally pushed li(x) below π(x)... i don't know if the damage is repairable, so no one please tell @mathematics-official, or they'll be pissed that li(x) isn't always greater than π(x)...
SHOULD WE MAKE -1 A PRIME NUMBER???????1????
yes
no
im composite and we want -1
you guys got gaussian primes there
yes, but they’re a $1.99 more. our irreducible polynomials are on discount though, 2 for $13.99!
give me one with Galois group Q8 and one with Sl(2,5)!
coming fresh off the grill! would you like some packets of sporadic groups? only 99 cents more!
remember the garlic powder!!!!!!!!
shoot… we ran out of garlic powder… would you be okay with a substitute of onion powder?
sure but don't forget to apply the units
alright, you bought 1 bulb of garlic so
1 garlic bulb * (1 onion powder / 1 garlic powder)
= 1 onion bulb
all for $2.99!
you guys got gaussian primes there
yes, but they’re a $1.99 more. our irreducible polynomials are on discount though, 2 for $13.99!
give me one with Galois group Q8 and one with Sl(2,5)!
coming fresh off the grill! would you like some packets of sporadic groups? only 99 cents more!
remember the garlic powder!!!!!!!!
shoot… we ran out of garlic powder… would you be okay with a substitute of onion powder?
