Telephone booth surrounded by snow in Hokkaido, Japan (2021)
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Not today Justin
Three Goblin Art
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Today's Document
$LAYYYTER

Andulka

tannertan36
sheepfilms

Origami Around
ojovivo

izzy's playlists!
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Peter Solarz
i don't do bad sauce passes
AnasAbdin
DEAR READER

JBB: An Artblog!

blake kathryn
No title available
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from France
seen from Netherlands
seen from Switzerland
seen from Malaysia

seen from Romania
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from China

seen from United States
seen from China
@rabbivole
Telephone booth surrounded by snow in Hokkaido, Japan (2021)
PC Mag - November 1999 Throw Out Your Software
Hmmm
Olan Ventura — Still Life with Parrot Tulip, Poppies, Roses, Snowballs (acrylic on canvas, 2019)
You have been brought before the ORC BOYAR.
The ORC BOYAR seeks entertainment; perhaps this will be your chance to impress the ORC BOYAR?
Perform a dance for the ORC BOYAR by selecting two DESCRIPTORS of the ORC BOYAR’s liking.
You perform a BONE MUSHROOM dance.
The ORC BOYAR was not impressed.
You perform a CHEESE SPIKE dance.
The ORC BOYAR was not impressed.
You perform a FAST BROTH dance.
The ORC BOYAR was not impressed.
You perform a HOT CRUMB dance.
The ORC BOYAR was not impressed.
You perform a DESSERT STONE dance,
The ORC BOYAR was not impressed.
You perform a LAKE MUD dance.
You feel TIRED.
The ORC BOYAR was not impressed.
You perform a ROYAL PIG dance.
The ORC BOYAR was not impressed.
You perform a CAVE TROUT dance.
The ORC BOYAR was not impressed.
You perform a ANVIL BREAD dance.
Your POINTED JINGLE SHOES begins to show wear from use! Bring the item the TOWN SMITH to repair it.
The ORC BOYAR was not impressed.
You perform a DOG MOSS dance.
The ORC BOYAR seemed slightly interested.
You perform a DOG DOG dance.
The ORC BOYAR was not impressed.
You perform a MOSS MOSS dance.
The ORC BOYAR was not impressed.
You perform a MOSS DOG dance.
The ORC BOYAR was not impressed.
You perform a DOG MOSS dance.
The ORC BOYAR was sent into a rage.
ORC BOYAR: I have already seen DOG MOSS dance. Away with you!
A FERAL HOG appears to your LEFT.
A FERAL HOG appears to your RIGHT.
A FERAL HOG appears to your FRONT.
The FERAL HOG attacks you!
The FERAL HOG attacks you!
The FERAL HOG attacks you!
You have DIED. The world has been thrown into chaos.
Tip: The ORC BOYAR was once heard to have inscribed his favorite dance on a HIDDEN STONE in the DARK DWELLING.
grim is Long so he has to slowly rotate like a docking yacht to present all the various limbs he wants me to pat for him. man are you ok why do German shepherds always look like they're about to burst into tears. boy this image stabilization makes the walls look like a PS1 render engine
calm down it cannot possibly be that serious
i was coming in from outside with my hands full just now and needed to pick up a plastic plant pot and said "pick up the plant pot please" and it took him a couple guesses what "plant pot" meant and he guessed ball, then stick, but has learned my negative/affirmative indicators well enough to have eventually tried the pot and then followed through when i said "yes" and carried it inside for me. good dog
You have been blessed by the Sisko of everything’s going to be all right. Reblog to let your followers know everything’s going to be all right.
Everything’s going to be alright!
I’m not sure I believe you, miles-obriens-endless-torment
For more stories like this, like Slate on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
The Washington Post published a story so horrifying this weekend that it would stop your breath: “The Justice Department and FBI have formally acknowledged that nearly every examiner in an elite FBI forensic unit gave flawed testimony in almost all trials in which they offered evidence against criminal defendants over more than a two-decade period before 2000.”
What went wrong? The Post continues: “Of 28 examiners with the FBI Laboratory’s microscopic hair comparison unit, 26 overstated forensic matches in ways that favored prosecutors in more than 95 percent of the 268 trials reviewed so far.” The shameful, horrifying errors were uncovered in a massive, three-year review by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the Innocence Project. Following revelations published in recent years, the two groups are helping the government with the country’s largest ever post-conviction review of questioned forensic evidence.
Chillingly, as the Post continues, “the cases include those of 32 defendants sentenced to death.” Of these defendants, 14 have already been executed or died in prison.
The massive review raises questions about the veracity of not just expert hair testimony, but also the bite-mark and other forensic testimony offered as objective, scientific evidence to jurors who, not unreasonably, believed that scientists in white coats knew what they were talking about. As Peter Neufeld, co-founder of the Innocence Project, put it, “The FBI’s three-decade use of microscopic hair analysis to incriminate defendants was a complete disaster.”
This study was launched after the Post reported that flawed forensic hair matches might have led to possibly hundreds of wrongful convictions for rape, murder, and other violent crimes, dating back at least to the 1970s. In 90 percent of the cases reviewed so far, forensic examiners evidently made statements beyond the bounds of proper science. There were no scientifically accepted standards for forensic testing, yet FBI experts routinely and almost unvaryingly testified, according to the Post, “to the near-certainty of ‘matches’ of crime-scene hairs to defendants, backing their claims by citing incomplete or misleading statistics drawn from their case work.”
NACDL executive director Norman Reimer said in an interview with Associations Now that the flaws in the system had been known for years now. “What we were finding was that the examiners … wouldn’t just simply say that there was a microscopic similarity [between the two hairs], but they would go beyond that and say it was a 100 percent match, essentially misleading the jury into concluding that the evidence had a certain value that it didn’t actually have,” Reimer said.
adios