Yes, you do. Use critical thinking. You would not shave your legs or wear lipstick if these options were not socially sanctioned and punishing for women who refuse to comply.
almost home
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Discoholic 🪩
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
Fai_Ryy
macklin celebrini has autism
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

Origami Around
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
The Bright Sessions

#extradirty
Today's Document

No title available
YOU ARE THE REASON
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

@theartofmadeline
The Bowery Presents
todays bird
occasionally subtle
NASA

seen from Türkiye
seen from Eswatini

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from India
seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from Russia

seen from Russia
seen from Brazil

seen from Russia

seen from Canada
seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Thailand
seen from India
@rad-strawberry-blog
Yes, you do. Use critical thinking. You would not shave your legs or wear lipstick if these options were not socially sanctioned and punishing for women who refuse to comply.
i’m screaming
I don’t think this woman is straight anymore.
Yall are missing the best fucking part
TODAY’S THE BIG DAY
it makes me sad because my rat died this week, I GUESS IT'S HER IN HEAVEN?
wow i love girls so much ❤ you're all great ❤❤
seems perfectly logical to me
I didn't like the way your anon about lesbians not being able to get their gfs pregnant said that, made it sound like NO lesbians can, and some of us do have "the parts for the job." Not being able to procreate isn't an inherently lesbian thing.
that anon was literally them mourning that they can’t… this is incredibly callous lmao… congrats on being able impregnate someone… jesus christ
congrats on your dick anon sry lesbians dont have those
Not Everything Is About You ™
*record scratch* *freeze frame* Yup, that’s me. You’re probably wondering how I ended up in this situation.
“So basically twenty years ago I was a douchey brogrammer who thought it would be a great idea to create a website specifically dedicated to objectify women. Obviously this led to me becoming one of the richest people on the planet”
JUST LETTING Y'ALL KNOW WHERE THIS BLOG STANDS.
Reblog every time it hits my Dash
a riot is the language of the unheard
quick question, not accusing you of anything just curious of your stance. do you think gay men can be sexually attracted to transsexual men? like duh not everyone is gonna be comfortable with a trans person, but isn't there more to homosexuality than just genital preference? like secondary sex characteristics, romantic attractions, etc
No they can’t next question.
“Genital preference” pretty much tells me where you stand on this issue. Homosexuality isn’t a preference to imply it is a preference implies it can change. The sole basis of our attraction isn’t dick, but we’re attracted to men - and men have dicks.
Homosexual males are attracted exclusively to other males, not females who imitate male characteristics.
It’s exhausting to keep having to explain this.
Anyways, gay men can be attracted to trans guys and that’s that! In fact, trans guys can be gay men so jot that down.
I’m not tryna say all gay men will date trans men cus that’s obviously not true and natal men shouldn’t feel obligated to date trans men if they can’t look past their genitalia, but gay men who date trans men are still gay and trans men who are exclusively attracted to men are gay and that’s that. “Men have dicks so a gay man wouldn’t date a trans man bc they don’t have dicks” is very broad. Would you not date an intersex man if they for instance had a dick but ovaries instead of testes? What about gay men who date men who have had their penis partially removed during an accident or because of cancer?
dude stop using intersex people as gotcha cards
I’m not, my sister is intersex so I know full well the struggles intersex people go through. It’s a valid argument though. If one where to say “men are people with completely male reproductive systems” you automatically deny the existence of intersex dudes.
gay men dont have to date intersex ppl either, nor do they have to date a man who lost his penis. what you all dont seem to get is that just bc someone is homosexual it doesnt mean they have to be attracted to or date or have sex with literally everyone of the same sex or who resembles the same sex.
people are trying to find loopholes in homosexual attraction. can’t you see how fucked up that is?
You seem to have forgotten the whole “Natal men should not feel obligated to date trans men if they can’t look past their genetalia” part of my post. I am not saying that natal gay men have to date anyone they are not attracted to, I’m saying that gay men who date trans men are still gay, just as gay men who date anyone else with reproductive “abnormalities” are still gay.
being biologically female isn’t a reproductive abnormality stop being gross and don’t expect gay men to stop being exclusively attracted to the same sex to validate your identity. does your intersex sister know you use her condition as a gotcha to guilt trip gay men to consider the opposite sex part of their dating pool just like conversion therapists want?
men attracted to both sexes are bisexual. don’t be biphobic to excuse your homophobia. gay men don’t like females. bi men like males and females. a man who loses his dick in an accident doesn’t become a woman. a biological female who uses he/him pronouns isn’t biologically a man.
there are lots of ways to be bisexual but only one to be gay. fuck you.
Women who are socially selective and empowered shouldn't be made objects of sexist scorn
Maybe Resting Bitch Life should be a thing.
As you recall, women are told both explicitly and implicitly from a young age that they should smile, sit pretty, people-please, ensure the boys find them attractive, stay small… the list goes on.
These ingrained sexist messages account for that guy on the street or that guy in the bar telling a woman to fix her RBF and smile, as if she owes it to him.
Then, it also accounts for the verbal lashing a woman gets if she rejects that man’s wishes. In fact, even women feed the patriarchy unknowingly when they turn to a girlfriend sporting a RBF and ask, “are you mad at me?” or, “why are you so cold?”
If you look closely, you’ll find an extension of the RBF problem as women
navigate social situations and find their tribe.
A variation of the aforementioned messages and interactions is embedded in response to choices we make when it comes to our social life and friendships.
And that’s shaming women for being socially selective, which is when a person mindfully chooses who they spend their time with.
As if yet another choice of ours is governed by society. As if we need another situation in which our “no” is not accepted and respected as a full sentence.
Because the biological reality oppresses :^)
It’s funny how troons are all for respecting and validating people’s “identities” except when a woman tells them she doesn’t want to be called “cis”🤔🤔🤔🤔
Folks are already reporting that the airstrikes have killed at least four Syrian civilians. That number will only increase. And no number will be great enough to quench the West’s thirst for greater power.
If it’s not about taking resources that aren’t ours, it’s about power. It always has. There’s certainly no moral argument for attacking Syria. Assad has done nothing that the US and its allies haven’t done over the past century. This isn’t meant to defend Assad; I want him and his government to be overthrown, just as much as any other government. But that’s for the people of Syria to do, on their own terms.
American authorities — political and capitalist alike — have kept us at war pretty much all my life (and if you’re a millennial, probably yours too). We have spent almost two decades turning the whole Middle East into a bomb crater. We have done so in the service of powerful people, who do none of the fighting and suffer none of the consequences.
This is just part of life now. Peace doesn’t exist. It will never exist as long as we allow people to dominate others.
But while the lion’s share of blame belongs to the authorities, some of it has to fall on regular people who tolerate or support this shit, intentionally or not.
Liberals who supported or ignored Obama as he did the same thing.
Liberals who would’ve supported or ignored Clinton once she did the same thing.
Conservatives and nationalists who actually thought an aggressive, predatory billionaire would somehow keep us out of war.
I don’t know if World War 3 is in our future. If it is, those responsible will be brought to justice someday. And I hope the consciences of the people who put them in power are haunted by what they did.
If I didn’t make it clear, the US isn’t the only guilty party. France and the UK are joining in, Canada put out a statement recently in support, and I’m certain plenty of other European countries will at least be complicit. Including your precious social democracies in Scandinavia.
None of your governments are pure. Don’t pretend otherwise.
it’s weird how france and the UK love middle eastern people and muslims, but still bomb the shit out of them in the blink of an eye
sadly, many people in France hate muslims, maybe Macron act like they're welcome here, but trust me, they're not.