Three Legged Crow - Larry Venneau

izzy's playlists!

shark vs the universe

Origami Around
Sweet Seals For You, Always
tumblr dot com
ojovivo

blake kathryn
Show & Tell

oozey mess
we're not kids anymore.

No title available
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

tannertan36
trying on a metaphor

roma★

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Today's Document
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

if i look back, i am lost

★
seen from United States

seen from France

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from Australia
seen from Türkiye
seen from Japan

seen from Australia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from India

seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from Philippines

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Philippines
@ravensclutch
Three Legged Crow - Larry Venneau
misty and moody in the fanal forest
Art History Meme [1/6] Themes or Series or Subjects ↳ Rose Windows
the silence in the fog
by Denny Bitte
thechillpsycho photography
I see green, icy blue - Andrea Dautelle
I see green, icy blue - Andrea Dautelle
/ Fred Lyon, San Francisco, 1940 - 1960
J R R Tolkien’s dislike of Disney was not casual, and it did not come from jealousy or trend resistance.
It began in 1937. That year, Tolkien published The Hobbit, a carefully constructed myth shaped by language, history, and moral weight. Just months later, Disney released Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, the first animated feature film of its kind. The timing unsettled him.
Tolkien watched the film with his close friend C S Lewis. Neither was impressed.
What Tolkien saw was not technical failure. He recognized Disney’s talent immediately. What disturbed him was intent. Fairy tales, in Tolkien’s view, were not decorative entertainment. They were ancient tools meant to confront fear, loss, danger, and moral consequence. Disney’s approach transformed those elements into sentiment, humor, and spectacle designed for universal consumption.
That transformation felt like corruption to him.
In a letter written in 1964, Tolkien stated plainly that Disney’s talent seemed hopelessly corrupted. He believed that any story Disney touched risked being flattened into something moral but shallow, visually rich but spiritually thin. Clear villains replaced moral ambiguity. Dark edges became soft conclusions. Myth was reduced to amusement.
This was not personal hatred. It was philosophical opposition.
Disney believed stories reached their highest purpose when simplified for mass audiences. Tolkien believed stories gained power only when they retained shadows, complexity, and danger. One tried to modernize myth. The other tried to protect it from modernity.
This belief shaped Tolkien’s resistance to film adaptation throughout his life. He feared that cinematic convenience would erase the depth he had built word by word.
For Tolkien, mythology was not meant to be improved. It was meant to be preserved.
When stories lose their darkness, do they still deserve to be called myth.
See Joseph Campbell
jennifer cantwell, 2011
“the recording is of a blackbird in my garden in the north of scotland. the idea of the piece is that it's a letter home from a migrated bird, telling the family of its new life and making the connection between the migrant and the homeland.” - jennifer cantwell
Roundtop Mountain, Virginia, in winter. Photography by Reynier Squillace.