i’m DYING
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

Kiana Khansmith

blake kathryn
Sade Olutola
dirt enthusiast
todays bird
No title available

@theartofmadeline

oozey mess
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
DEAR READER
Peter Solarz
cherry valley forever

tannertan36
h

shark vs the universe
NASA
YOU ARE THE REASON

titsay
styofa doing anything
seen from Russia

seen from France

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Belgium

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Taiwan
seen from Netherlands

seen from Australia
seen from Germany
@revolian
i’m DYING
The fact that it’s mostly women and men who don’t conform to traditional gender stereotypes that get asked for their pronouns (or automatically get referred to with gender neutral pronouns) is not “by chance” and it sends a message to everyone.
It sends the message that only stereotypically feminine women and stereotypically masculine men are real women and men, and that’s why they always get referred to with their correct pronouns and their gender is correctly assumed, as opposed to people who don’t conform to these stereotypes. People then use neutral pronouns to assert that they are uncertain about said person’s gender because of their clothes, hair, style and it certainly doesn’t help breaking down then barriers.
How is singling out women and men who don’t conform to traditional femininity or masculinity out of large groups of people and only asking them for their pronouns not reinforcing gender stereotypes and gender expectations of men and women?
People have internalized gender stereotypes so much that they think that not conforming to them is somehow making somebody less male or female or neither or both. We’ll never manage to abolish gender inequality and gender stereotypes. We’re embracing them now. We’ve gone backwards.
The fact that it’s mostly women and men who don’t conform to traditional gender stereotypes that get asked for their pronouns (or automatically get referred to with gender neutral pronouns) is not by chance and it sends a message to everyone.
It sends the message that only stereotypically feminine women and stereotypically masculine men are seen as real women and men, and that’s why they always get referred to with their correct pronouns and their gender is correctly assumed, as opposed to people who don’t conform to these stereotypes.
People then use neutral pronouns to assert that they are uncertain about said person’s gender because of their clothes, hair, style and it certainly doesn’t help breaking down the barriers.
How is singling out women and men who don’t conform to traditional femininity or masculinity, setting them aside from large groups of people and only asking them for their pronouns not reinforcing gender stereotypes and gender expectations of men and women?
Women are so beautiful with their soft skin and their bright eyes and their lovely voices
And men are wonderful with their tough spirits and great muscles and their sweet laughs
Men are so beautiful with their soft skin and bright eyes and their lovely voices
Women are wonderful with their though spirits and great muscles and their sweet laughs
I like it better like this 💜
For my revolian girls and boys who feel like they’ll never find anyone who loves them and accepts them the way they are because of how they present themselves- we will all be loved one day.
Even if our first kisses or relationships are delayed in comparisons to others our age. Even if we feel like we are doomed to being lonely because we don’t “look like straight people are supposed to look” to attract the opposite sex.
Please don’t despair. Please don’t change. Please don’t hurt yourself. You’re not less worthy of love 💜❤️🤍💙💜
Guys: uhh why do women only like tall men?? Why does height matter so much?
Also guys: tall girls are so unattractive I would never want to date a girl taller than me that’d be embarrassing 🤮🤮
Ana Badea- this is what a revolian looks like
Music videos of male artists: women get objectified.
Music videos of female artists: women get objectified part 2.
Some tumblr user which I’m not going to name because I genuinely feel sorry for her, recently stained the name of Revolianism by calling us terfs, and then she said we have a “pride flag”, even though that is impossible because we are not LGBT in any way shape or form and don’t want to intrude either, we just have a flag to show positivity for us, which she decided to hate on, and on top of that, she said that only girls are revolians 😂 (just so you have an idea about how informed she really is). Thoughts and prayers 😔🙏🏻
P.S if you can’t see her post it’s because she blocked pretty much anyone who ever posted in “revolian” or “revolianism” hashtags because she didn’t want us to be able to defend ourselves. A real brave legend.
Dear straight cis men:
-you are allowed to wear makeup
-you can have long hair and pretty colors in it
-you can do your eyebrows or have a skincare routine
-you can have a flamboyant fashion sense
And you can do all of the above and still be masculine and your sexuality is valid. Please don’t feel compelled to conform to social norms- break the chains.
Teddy girls started gaining attention in the 1950s, having their style characterized as “rebellious”, they broke all the dress codes which were much stricter in their days. This is revolian culture.
They had no problem having short hair, even though that was seen as even more outrageous back then. Absolute legends.
Teddy girls are the early revolian girls. Guys we literally have a historical ancestry!!!
Hello, here’s your daily friendly reminder that:
Women don’t have to look good for men
Looks (hair length, clothes, makeup or the lack of makeup) don’t indicate somebody’s sexuality; revolians exist.
Sexual objectification of both men and women in the media affects people’s self esteem and mental health
Liking “masculine” women is not the same thing as liking men, and liking “feminine” men is not the same thing as liking women.
You don’t have to force yourself to be someone you’re not just because you would fit in better with the rest.
Current gender stereotypes and gender roles are at the basis of the inequality between men and women, and have been so since they were established.
Biology and social constructs are two separate things.
“ Women don’t have to look good for men “ Equally, men don’t have to be appealing to women. If men want to MGTOW, tht’s up to them. However, if you want to be successful in business, looks matter. If you want to maximise your attractiveness, looks matter.
That applies regardless of your sexual preference. “ Looks ..don’t indicate somebody’s sexuality” They are signifiers. That means, people choose to communicate to others what their preferences are, to stop wasting time.
If I see a woman with a haircut like that, I know there’s a fair chance she’s not interested in men, and men are better off steering clear. It’s obviously not absolute, but...
I think women are going to be wasting their time with those to, don’t you? “ Sexual objectification “ Doesn’t exist. “ You don’t have to force yourself to be someone you’re not just because you would fit in better with the rest. “ Depends, sometimes fitting in is necessary for survival. I’ve talked to a lot of gay men who hated living in the country. When they moved to the city, they could relax and be themselves. I certainly feel that way about my political beliefs; I’d expect to be bashed for wearing a MAGA hat, for example. I’m hardly alone in that - Twitter is full of blue checkmarks promising violence to the next person they see wearing anything that supports Trump. “ Current gender stereotypes and gender roles are at the basis of the inequality between men and women “ Nope, biology created the gender roles, which is why Tumblr went apeshit about a lioness with a hormonal imbalance. Men and women have different brains, which means we think differently, gosh, who’da guessed? The inequality is created in the West by Feminism, who privilege women above men. In the Islamic countries, you could say the reverse happens, but it is argued that they are protecting women - and males are still expected to die protecting women. I’ve argued with feminists who say that men laying down their lives for their girlfriends is just men defending their property. Seriously, I don’t think there are men around willing to take a bullet for their car.
Ok, maybe for that car. “ Biology and social constructs are two separate things. “ One’s science, one pretends to be science. Almost nothing feminists say is a social construct is a science. Saying that humans have an infinite number of sexes - or no sexes at all - is insane, but it is what comes out of feminism, and the danger is that the retooling of universities to become feminist propaganda outlets may result in “Feminist Science” becoming the new Lysenkoism. “Brain imaging shows that testosterone therapy given as part of sex reassignment changes the brain structures and the pathway associated with speech and verbal fluency. This result supports research that women in general may deal with speech and interaction differently than men.” (source) “ Long-standing studies have indeed shown that males do tend to score higher on tests of mathematical ability and spatial processing (particularly geometric thinking) than females, who score higher than males on test of verbal fluency, perceptual speed and manual dexterity (Casy, Nutall & Pezaris, 1997; Maccoby & Jacklin, 1974). In a study of students under age 13 with exceptional mathematical ability, boys outnumbered girls 13 to 1 (Benbow & Stanley).” (source)
Sorry, but we don’t do “signifiers” in 2019. Short hair doesn’t make a woman a lesbian. A woman cutting her hair short doesn’t suddenly turn into a lesbian, just like a man growing his out or wearing makeup doesn’t suddenly turn him gay.
You seem like you believe straight people aren’t capable of doing anything they want, and that’s a toxic way of thinking. Clothes, also, are a fashion matter, not a sexuality matter.
Thinking that way only shows being close minded and thinking in patterns, thus encouraging stereotypes. If you don’t personally like short haired women, you should stay away from us, instead of claiming that our hair somehow makes us gay.
(Also, there are a bunch of long haired feminine lesbian women, but somehow you don’t feel the need to steer clear from those? Sounds like you just have a problem with short haired gals.)
Sexual objectification does exist. If you ever opened a tv or just a magazine, or walked down the street you’d eventually see someone almost naked, because sex sells, and everybody knows it.
I don’t know why the last part of the response was needed because literally what I said was that biology is different from social constructs, which means that men and women ARE biologically different, but long hair does not belong to women, just like short hair does not belong to men. Those are social constructs. They are related to appearance. Unless of course you believe that having long hair turns somebody into a woman or vice versa.
Hello, here’s your daily friendly reminder that:
Looks (hair length, clothes, makeup or the lack of makeup) don’t indicate somebody’s sexual orientation; revolians exist and so do gay people who conform to gender stereotypes.
Sexual objectification of both men and women in the media affects people’s self esteem and mental health
Liking “masculine” women is not the same thing as liking men, and liking “feminine” men is not the same thing as liking women.
You shouldn’t have to force yourself to be someone you’re not just because you would fit in better with the rest.
Some gender stereotypes and gender roles are products of older inequalities between men and women, and have been so since they were established.
Biology and social constructs are two separate things. If a man is more “feminine”, that does not make him “look like a woman” or that does not mean he wants to be a woman. Same goes for women who are more “masculine”.
Straight cis people who don’t conform to gender stereotypes and roles are a minority and can be discriminated against by more powerful groups, but we are not LGBT and don’t want to invade or claim we have a place in LGBT spaces.
If a little girl wants to play with dolls, let her.
If a little girl doesn’t want to play with dolls, don’t force her. If she wants to play with a truck instead, let her.
If a little boy wants to play with trucks, let him. If he doesn’t want to play with trucks, don’t force him. And, if he’d rather play with dolls, let him.
It’s that simple.
If you’re a woman, you’re womanly.
If you’re a man, you’re manly.
There is no right way to “look like woman” or “look like a man”.
Biology wins over social constructs.
If I see one more situation in which an older person looks at a young revolian girl and then looks at her parents with pity in their eyes and says “don’t worry, they will settle down later, all girls have a rebellious phase when they’re young!”, I’m gonna lose my mind.
They’re basically implying that they are free and “rebellious” now but when they’ll realize they have to be “girly girls” for boys to like them, they will drop it. No- you don’t have to be like that, you shouldn’t have to force yourself to be someone you’re not in order to get approval.
I want every young revolian girl to know that who you are is valid and it’s not “a phase”, it’s a beautiful identity, and clearly, it’s not for everybody to understand.
Revolians are valid! They exist! And they are the proof that somebody’s looks don’t dictate their sexuality.
Everybody is free to look however they want, and it won’t invalidate their sexuality.