Why I no longer claim the label of 'radical intersectional super cool feminist' and am now a self-described 'hippy-dippy liberal' instead (in which I say shit a lot):
I’m writing this down with pen and paper. Actually I’m not. I’m typing it on the ‘notes’ section of my phone. I imagined that I wrote it down on pen and paper but then I realised I needed to be with friends so I left the house, and I am journeying my way towards my friends house.
Transient. In transition. In between and on a journey. I am young. So of course that perfectly describes where I am at. I even know older people who are in this same space. There is something humbling about it. I’m not quite ‘there’ yet but I will be some day, or maybe I won’t be. That’s life. Life is the journey. Here is the thing: I need to be ‘there’ now. I’m so done with in between spaces and I’m emotionally exhausted.
I am not a perfect human being. I can be: sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic, femmephobic, ableist, and other things I’m forgetting that some may get mad that I’ve forgotten. It seems that these are the yard sticks by which we measure people. I used to be right there with you. I used to judge people like that too. I judged my parents by those yard sticks and forgot to remember how privileged I am to have my parents. My parents who have clothed and fed me and financially supported me since before I can remember. My parents who have always and will always love me. I forgot about *that* love.
What can be so toxic that it makes you forget about that sort of love? Something powerfully toxic. As I pen this (or type if you’re into pedantry) I know some may read it and rage, and really rage against it. ‘WHAT ABOUT THEIR RACISM, SEXISM, TRANSPHOBIA??!! WHAT ABOUT HOW PROBLEMATIC THEY ARE??’
Let me tell you, I have heard this so often that I now equate it to ‘WHAT ABOUT THE MENZ??!!’ which by the way, I’ve seen to critique all sorts of things, and have not agreed with every criticism I’ve seen. So that when people sarcastically write ‘WHAT ABOUT THE MENZ???!!!’ this reads as being as ridiculous as men derailing conversations about women.
To clarify I will give you a number of examples, on Facebook a feminist page posted an article about men’s underwear models and a fantastic campaign set up to show how unrealistic images of men in magazines are. They took ‘average’ men and had them pose as underwear models striking similar poses to a number of underwear model adverts. The responses in the comments? Horrendous. ‘Why is this on this page?’ ‘OH NOES THE MEN’ ‘I don’t give a shit’. Really? The details in which patriarchy also oppresses men is not important to feminists? Feminists ‘don’t give a shit’ about men? See, I’d always been told different. If you don’t think there is anything particularly bad about that then listen to my next example.
A man posted a photo showing his self-harm scars with a sign about how his girlfriend abused him, and now he has to hide his self-harm scars from the mental illness triggered by this abuse. This was one of many pictures of men holding signs with comments about how they’d been abused. That particular example was picked on as being ‘pathetic’ and he should ‘man up’. Many comments were made that abuse is primarily instigated by men towards women; they took this to another level. Therefore, they don’t give a shit about this. It is a minority of abuse cases and so it doesn’t matter. Blimey, all this on a feminist page. Not to mention the inherently patriarchal messages in the phrase ‘man up’ but I thought intersectional feminists were ardent about defending minorities, so using ‘but this is a minority’ argument wouldn’t work on them because that is completely faulty reasoning (which it is). Regardless of which on an individual basis I can tell you that people won’t give a fuck. If your case to case response to abuse against men is ‘I don’t give a shit’, then I don’t want to listen to your reasoning about ‘bigger picture’ and ‘majority of cases’ because basically it is clear to me that you are just not a very nice person. Hmmm, indeed, what about the men? Who gives a fuck about the men?
And that is the problem here, there is no emotional connect. There is a lot of discussion about ‘bigger picture’ and a lot of political theory, and explanation of people’s privilege, but really if the kool aid you are drinking is so toxic that when a *male* survivor posts an incredibly strong and brave photo of himself on to a public platform to say to other abused men ‘I have survived. I am surviving.’ all you can say is ‘WHAT ABOUT THE WOMENZ??!’ and quote statistics at someone who has been abused instead of love them, and hold him, and cry with them, then that is some toxic shit.
'But Rhys, you're fighting a straw man! [sic]' (I think if we're being massive pedants that ought to say woman or at the very least person).
Well, at this point all I can say is ‘I AM NOT!’ and sound all defensive. Some people reading this will just get it. Others won’t. People who won’t may shout this in response. There really isn’t much I can say in response to this except from I want to care about people based on their humanity not any specific socially constructed category. I’ve literally had people say things like ‘I don’t give a shit about men and their men tears or cisgender tears or straight tears, or white tears?’ Really, you don’t give a shit about cis-het white men’s pain? You don’t give a shit about them because of things they didn’t ask for or choose. You may even deride them. Their experiences mean jack shit. This sounds far too familiar for comfort. Except that the difference is people who do this openly admit it and act on it. Because we live in a cis-het white world and now you want to create a trans-queer BME/PoC world to claim as your own and that is fine (for now). But I think someone put something in the kool aid, and this shit is toxic. At some point, we want to create a world free of any dominating groups. I mean, personally I thought that was the point of this left-wing politics thing. I thought that was the goal. What has been said has been said, and what has been done has been done. So to create an equal balance, to create a world with no dominating oppressive groups one of two things could happen. We create a power balance in the opposite direction and then swing back around again OR at some point someone is going to have to *forgive* someone for an awful lot of shit. I mean A LOT of shit. Do not get me wrong, I get that there is A LOT of shit. And you can’t demand forgiveness and you can’t expect it. You have to apologise and wait. Personally I would just like to forgive, right now, the wrongs committed against me, the wrongs currently happening and the wrongs yet to be committed against me. All the wrongs that are ‘problematic’ and politically incorrect. Other wrongs do not exist and/or obviously don’t matter. Here is the thing. I am so done with confrontation and quarrel and argument. I have no pride left. I don’t need pride. All I know is that people are hurting in this world, all people. And there probably are some seriously fucked up people who just are malicious. But I’ve not once had someone sit me down and explain their story, to have me say ‘yes, you’re just a dick’. People have shit, all people.
Maybe this explains my hippy tendencies. When I got asked to choose my saint in primary school I chose Veronica. Jesus revealed himself to Veronica, a pagan woman. He revealed his face on the cloth she wiped his face with on his walk towards being crucified. The message I took from this was that there is a little of Jesus in everyone, and I want to recognise the humanity in everyone. I don’t want to have a long mental list of how x,y,z person is politically problematic to use against them in online Facebook debates or to guard myself against them to not get hurt. I’m done guarding myself. I’m ready to be vulnerable. I’m ready to live and work in communion with people who profoundly disagree with me and who people with leftist political tendencies might label as ‘problematic’. I’m willing to get hurt, over and over. I’m wiling to listen to cisgender people and hear their story and really listen to them. I want to engage with the nitty-gritty of their thinking because I am so tired of building brick walls between myself and ‘the problematic people’. I thought it would break me to engage with such people. I was wrong, it is breaking me to view the world in black and white instead of shades of grey. Heck, I might even learn something from ‘the problematic people’. Wouldn’t that be horrendous?
So how does this relate to how I’d like you all to relate to me? Well, some of you might be so pissed off at this point that you just stopped reading. Some of you might have found that this post was too long (I wanted to read another treatise on everything that is wrong with left politics so I wrote one).
Well to be honest, it all relates back to journeying. I’m nearly there now. I’m nearly at my friend’s house I mean. It is pissing down with rain and miserable. I’m not sure if I’m ‘there’ though and if I’m being honest I probably never will be ‘there’ if being there is about being a perfect human being. Not perfect in the sense of making no mistakes generally, but politically perfect in every way. I’m learning and on a journey and in a sort of transition. I probably always will be about one issue or another.
Please be gentle. If at this point your response is ‘I don’t give a shit if you want me to be gentle’ then your response is what I’m criticising. That right there. What is that? That’s some toxic shit.
We all have shit that means we respond to other human beings in messed up sort of ways. So many emotions and experiences are the undercurrent of what we say on a day to day basis. I try and remember that with everyone I talk to and sometimes I forget, because my own shit seems more prevalent, because I’m pissed off, because of a whole list of reasons. The problem is right now this sacrificial exchange seems rather one-sided in a lot of my interactions. It seems like whilst I am willing to try my best to sacrifice my personal thoughts and emotions in these situations in which I’m found to have made a ‘political mistake’, if you aren’t able to do the same in your interaction with me at some point I will have to say ‘enough is enough’. I value myself more highly than that. I’m done sacrificing my emotions so that you can explain ‘the truth’ to me.
And on another note, there may be times when we just don’t agree. When I think that what you think is ‘politically correct’ is actually just bullshit. Can we still be friends? Are you willing to stand side by side with me and live and work in communion with me, someone who disagrees with you. If not, then I’m done.
I’m over surrounding myself with people who are ‘politically sound’. This is code for ‘people who agree with me’ and I’m over it. I’d like my world to be a lot less black and white, because if there is a single truth it is this: life is messy.
I’m happy to engage with that messiness. Are you?
I’ve often thought that political mistakes are comparable to Christian sins. There are definite cross-overs. The portion of the Church I participate in and with do a good job of recognising:
1) sin is very serious and harms people
2) not everyone will agree on what sin is and we have to learn to live in communion with people who have different ideas about sin
3) compassion cures more sins than condemnation
If the radical left could mimic what my Church tries its best to do (and does it well), I’d be more than happy to identify as a radical. As of yet, this is not the case. So, this is me, self-declaring myself a hippy-dippy liberal.
I quite like that last stanza as an ending to this manifesto but I thought I would enact a thought experiment, so this has to be at the end of this. How many of you assumed that I had certain privileges? How many of you made assumptions about my life and my life experiences? What do you think I am based on this treatise? Well, here is what I am: a transgender pansexual white man with mental health difficulties (depending on how you categorise mental health I am either able-bodied or not, I’ll leave that to you).