romance and role reversal

all about genderbending gender roles, relationship role reversal/role removal, and cute stuff. male, he/him, 28,

[rolereversalrdr]

Hi I’m Ruru, a while back I wrote the Role Reversal Reader which was a rough aggregate of all my thoughts and feelings regarding Relationship Role Reversal!

All my role reversal related stuff can be found under #role reversal

Role Reversal Details below the cut

Role Reversal means a lot of things to a lot of people! But I’m a  simple boi who simply thinks of it in terms of being the boy, in a  girlfriend kind of way.

However it is important to remember that using the term role reversal implies that there are in fact roles to reverse which isn’t universally held to be true necessarily.

Everything  is made up! Gender isn’t real! We live in a heteronormative society and  we’re all victims of a patriarchal capitalist system that profits off assigning unwanted roles and keeping people in little boxes!

[carrionthird]

me, continuing to look at a screen despite having a headache: OUCH my brain… OUCH my brain… OUCH my brain… OUCH my brain… OUCH my brain… OUCH my brain… OUCH my brain… OUCH my brain…

[unalivejournal]

Just casted a powerful curse on you.

[creature-unlimited]

a pleasant evening to all girls getting a little sloppy on a monday night

[pale-grunge-dark]

[hurlanachronism]

i think it's awesome that there's weed for cats and we just give it to them

[jaubaius]

Source

[not-your-pussikat]

Madam, you are looking very posh in your fancy dress, if I may say so.

[random-chaos-thoughts]

Those earrings are a delight, darling and I love what you did with your hair.

[micro-usb-deactivated20230625]

[happy-little-elf]

A capybara running along the bottom of a river  

(source)

[joshpeck]

what is she doing down there

[great-and-small]

The scientific name for the Capybara is Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris which in Greek means “water pig water hog”. I honestly think they nailed it on that one lol

[ordr]

can we do this ^ again please. what the fuck happened? who was this hurting? why did we stop?

[relelvance]

King

[formlessdemi]

Update: Elon is now trying to hide his jet activity

[formlessdemi]

Here's some fun links:

Elon Musk Jet

Jeff Bezos Jets

Bill Gates Jets

Donald Trump Jets

Rick Astley's "Never Gonna Give You Up"

[magiclamd]

Reblogging for the last one because that is next gen

[hearty-an0n]

she was the first victim of cancel culture

[hearty-an0n]

[galahadwilder]

If Batman and Spider-Man switched rogues galleries none of their villains would last more than ten minutes against the new enemy

[galahadwilder]

Batman takes down all of Spider-Man’s villains with ruthless efficiency and preparation

Batman’s villains are all like “TAKE ME SERIOUSLY DAMMIT” and Spider-Man is like “No 😜”

[azuzulira]

The Joker would have an intense hatred for Spider-Man because Spider-Man is actually funny

[galahadwilder]

That was the exact thought process behind this post

[sexycraisinthanos]

In Gotham:

“Riddle me this-”

“I like knock knock jokes better.”

In New York: 

Green Goblin is getting his ass beat by 12 orphans in spandex

[no-mere-mortals]

[aristotles-denial]

[ID: an instagram comment by pun_intended24 that reads: “Batman’s villains are all theatre majors, Spider-Man’s villains are all STEM majors. Only by being matched up against their kryptonites- a STEM major that’s funnier than them and a theatre major with better critical thinking than them, respectively, can they truly be defeated.” end ID]

[mousemilf-deactivated20250508]

the most important thing is to be snuggly in bed

[plaid-flannel]

Where I wanna be.

[dirty]

you know what’s really fun and in style right now? being kind and making others feel loved and valued

[hope-for-the-planet]

The World Spent $14.4 Billion on Conservation, and It Actually Worked

Between 1992-2003, that investment led to a 29 percent decrease in the rate of biodiversity decline.

“Between 1992–2003, $14.4 billion was spent in total in the 109 countries studied…That investment resulted in a 29 percent-per-country average decrease in the rate of biodiversity decline…”

This is one of the first large-scale studies to show that investment in conservation really does work. The study also examined how conservation dollars could be spent most effectively in different locations to slow biodiversity loss. 

[gayngel-posting-deactivated2024]

Sounds like we need to spend more.

[tractor-inside-joke-fucker]

This was over the course of 11 years. That 14.4 billion was spent over the gradual course of over a decade. This amounts to about 1.3 billion per year for what it accomplished, a pittance to most nations and truly a tiny amount if there’s multiple nations (like the 109 countries) covering it together. Never let anyone tell you dying ecosystems and climate disasters are inevitable or “too expensive” to prevent.

[the-awkward-turt]

But there’s a significant silver lining here: If spending a “pittance” can buy us a 29% decrease in biodiversity loss, think how much loss could be prevented if countries seriously invested in this kind of thing!

This is one of the first big studies to show that investing in conservation translates to real, measurable, tangible improvements over the long term and in multiple countries. We aren’t just throwing money at something that isn’t working. That’s still really excellent news! And a big reason to invest more in conservation efforts!

[jennyholzerwannabe]

“An accompanying commentary in Nature notes that halting the decline in global biodiversity would be “remarkably cheap,” amounting to less than 0.01 percent of global gross domestic product.”