“you sound like my dad, john” @rudelymetaldream - Tumblr Blog

a character being a perpetrator does not negate their victimhood and neither does their victimhood negate being a perpetrator. u can accept and reckon w both dimensions in ur analysis

ilynpilled

there is nothing morally purifying about suffering or victimhood, it is not something that inculcates “goodness.”

one’s character has no impact on whether they were/are a victim or not, victim status is not something that is only afforded to the palatable.

it also does not = absolution.

ilynpilled

ppl cant handle this in cartoons made for teenagers lets not get ahead of ourselves

#have come across this issue irl #very frustrating

stereobone

masters of the air // slaughterhouse-five, kurt vonnegut

#oh okay 😭#clegan

dailyflicks

Callum Turner & Austin Butler in Masters of The Air (2024—)

#prev!#bucky loves being on gale's leash #clegan

#how your email finds me

eclipxium

are they gay? not sure. are they hopelessly and entirely devoted to each other? i think we have enough evidence to say yes

dogmetaphors

episode 1 // i have to tell you, dorothea grossman // episode 9

justasnappin

CALLUM TURNER as JOHN "BUCKY" EGAN Masters of the Air | Part Three

#john egan

blackheartbiohazards

➡️ Content warnings on fiction are a courtesy.

➡️ Not every medium of fiction and storytelling has or is expected to have content warnings or extensive tagging.

➡️ Print novels do not traditionally warn for content in any way.

➡️ Until AO3 came along, fanfiction did not traditionally warn for content in any significant way.

➡️ An author is only obligated to warn for content to the degree mandated by the format they publish their fiction on.

➡️ Content warnings beyond the minimum are a courtesy, not an obligation.

➡️ 'Creator chose not to warn' is a valid tag that authors are allowed to use on AO3. It means there could be anything in there and you have accepted the risk. 'May contain peanuts!'

➡️ Writers are allowed to use 'Creator chose not to warn' for any reason, including to maintain surprise and avoid spoilers.

➡️ 'Creator chose not to warn' is not the same thing as 'no archive warnings apply'.

➡️ It is your responsibility to protect yourself and close a book, or hit the back button if you find something in fiction that you're reading that upsets you.

➡️ You are responsible for protecting yourself from fiction that causes you discomfort.

valtsv

this is going to sound like such a little sibling ass take but i genuinely believe that being a little bit annoying is actually a greater sign of maturity and self awareness than being universally likeable and on good terms with everyone

valtsv

if some people find me annoying and can't stand me because of how i think and act then that means i'm a fully realized human being with my own personality and opinions and free will and not just a reflective surface for other people's desires, which is in fact a good thing despite what people who want you to just be a reflection of their own opinions and desires will tell you, and why being considered "cringe" or whatever doesn't bother me at all

valtsv

also it's really funny when you're confident enough in yourself to know that people not liking you isn't always a sign that you're the problem. like there's something undeniably hilarious about being aware your mere existence has the power to piss someone off and ruin their day and i recommend embracing it.

spice-ghouls

teaboot

Oh fucking thissss

fuckyeahmarxismleninism

The first photo is from 1956. It shows a Black woman watching members of the Ku Klux Klan (a terrorist, racist, far-right organization focused on white supremacy) walking along a sidewalk in Montgomery, Alabama (USA). I couldn't find the photo's author, but most sources state that it was taken in 1956.

The second photo shows members of the Patriot Front group (a white supremacist and nationalist group, formed in 2017, that openly advocates what they call "American Fascism") traveling on the subway during the 250th anniversary of the U.S. independence in Washington D.C., while a Black woman watches them. The photo is by photographer Cheney Orr, taken on July 4, 2026, 70 years after the first photo.

Via Jurunense

aust-een

Callum Turner | man about town photoshoot

likeafieldmouse-deactivated2015

Gustave Caillebotte - The Floor Scrapers (1875-6)

Original on top, later version below

“Despite the effort Caillebotte put into the painting, it was rejected by France’s most prestigious art exhibition, The Salon, in 1875. The depiction of working-class people in their trade, not fully clothed, shocked the jurors and was deemed a ‘vulgar subject matter.’

The images of the floor scrapers came to be associated with Degas’s paintings of washerwomen, also presented at the same exhibition and similarly scorned as ‘vulgar’”.

lolitanora

pleasuretrade

freckles. moles. beauty marks. whatever. just thinking about them

libraford

At this point, I truly think that MAGA are just like... anti-fun.

They don't like our rainbows, they don't like cosplay or costumes, they don't like cultural festivals.

Like... fun for them has very strict rules. Like it can't be too outlandish, it has to be about the country or have religion attached to it somehow, there's an itinerary. Like... the Freedom 250 thing has a baptism pool. The fun has to be a specific way or its out of line.

I'm in a picture with my friends, having fun at a parade in our dance costumes (which no one seems to complain about when they're on a stage) and they're like... "freak show," "lunatics," etc... and its like... yes? And?

Its a parade, youre supposed to provide a spectacle or you end up like the Christmas parade we were too queer to be in. (It was a requirement by the organizers to have the float themed around the birth of christ somehow. It was the saddest parade ever and I dont know why i wanted to be in it so bad.)

I bring my colorful flow props to everything. People spit on me, tell me im going to hell, preach at me while im just vibing. Like they see all the fun im having and have a visceral reaction to it. Like... how dare I make my lifestyle look fun and carefree in front of the impressionable youths? (My lifestyle is fun and carefree! I have a life that I love outside of my sexuality, but I also love being out and queer.)

A comment thats going to stick with me for awhile was 'i don't care if they're gay, but why do they have to be weird?'

And like... i am weird, yeah. For sure! But children's media for most of my young years was about embracing weirdness, so i figured it was okay. Plus, performers are often weird.

Im having fun in a way that doesn't fall into the three acceptable categories of fun: faith, country, or family.

And its like... I wonder if there's a correlation between MAGA and certain rules-based symptoms, you know?

lizardlicks

The thing you need to understand about MAGA is it's deep ties to Christian fundimentalism, and the thing you need to understand about THAT is:

Fun is very literally the Devil Tempting You Away From Christ. Everything from books, to music, to movies and television, to playing games (both the physical and digital, though usually there's an exception for American Football to an extent) to just hanging out with friends or being intimate with your monogamous partner. This is not even limited to specific properties, either. Though some are more suspect than others- anything that has a whiff of the otherworldly and isn't specifically attributing it's supernatural elements as coming from the MC's Faith In God is promoting the practice of witchcraft (yes even if it's explicitly stated to be entirely made up fiction)- but even with pastimes that are completely mundane, a lot of churches hold that if you're having too much fun at an event or doing an activity, you're actually being distracted from God by the forces of darkness.

How much fun is too much fun? Don't worry about it. Your guilty conscience is God Taking To You. Or a church elder will inform you if you aren't hearing God's voice directly.

And if you're a person who is publicly having fun? Especially if it's outside the tightly policed acceptable amounts and means of fun? You are in fact an agent of Lucifer sent to lead young and impressionable Christians astray, and you must be shunned, or driven off! That's part of the basis for the loud hatred of dyed hair or GNC bodies, or anything even a little bit queer; if the young people see you happy and content with your life and with a good relationship with your body and the people around you, they might start to seek fulfillment outside of the church. And they can't have that. So they work extra hard to enforce the message that weird and fun is ACTUALLY Evil.