They may have conquered America, but with their blistering new record The Heavy should finally break the mainstream in their homeland UK.
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Mike Driver

izzy's playlists!
occasionally subtle

PR's Tumblrdome
i don't do bad sauce passes

Andulka
AnasAbdin
$LAYYYTER

Love Begins
Monterey Bay Aquarium
One Nice Bug Per Day
KIROKAZE

blake kathryn

#extradirty

No title available

roma★
sheepfilms
d e v o n

No title available
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Jordan
seen from United States

seen from Croatia

seen from Switzerland
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Ireland

seen from Singapore
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from Argentina

seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Denmark

seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Luxembourg
@s-un-defined
They may have conquered America, but with their blistering new record The Heavy should finally break the mainstream in their homeland UK.
Jim Jones talks about music, but most importantly about life.
As Grimey As It Gets
Eskimo Dance, Building Six: 02 Academy. March 5th, 2016.
Having moved in London just recently, I was propelled into the world of Grime - a realm previously uncharted for my musical knowledge and taste - with no control of my direction. Being I want to be a cool kid, and I want to know stuff about where I live, I ended up pressured (no blame no shame) into buying tickets for March 5th’s Eskimo Dance at the O2 Academy; an event hosting nothing less than all the godfathers of Grime, all together, all at once. Wiley, Skepta, the Ruff Squad, and something like nine other so-called rappers with highly questionable names, like Elf Kid. Come on, Elf Kid? Really? And you want me to take you seriously? Needless say I only knew about two and a half of these artists before the event, and, after this excursus, I am even more confused with regards to who is who and why they even call themselves rappers.
So the story goes something like this.
After a prolonged tube ride, squishing like constipated penguins even though it was midnight, my six friends and I make it to the venue. We are subsequently very aproximatevely checked by security. Admitting I’m rather submissive with authorities, I wouldn’t dare argue even if they required to inspect my panties; but yesterday night I was almost indignant at how little I was searched. “I also have a bag if your want to check it”, “No, I’m cold, leave.” Yes, that was exactly the conversation I had with the security woman. Now, I understand it must be an absolutely tedious job and it probably entails arguing with way too many drunken idiots, but I could have taken anything into that arena last night, and thinking back, I probably should have.
So I paid £7.50 for a ‘large’ cloakroom locker which turned out being one of the smallest in the locker wall. However, we fortunately managed to cram in the entirety of four puffy, fluffy winter jackets, because, I mean, after having paid £7.50, we would have even squished our aunts and uncles in there if we could have. Shortly after, we huddle at the bar and chug down as many ice cold jeger shots as our wallets permit, and once again, that being not very many given that those saddest shots we had ever seen, cost the moderate price of £4. I’m sorry, I do not want to make this all about money, but we must acknowledge that not only London is crazy expensive, clubs are also apparently run by uptight shylocks feasting on teenagers’ allowances.
Having soaked up our livers and emptied our pockets, we take to the dance floor and show off some horrifyingly, off-beat dance moves. As several short, chubby gangster wanna-bes casually touch my ass addressing me as a White Girl to my unamused disgust, the dancefloor fills up, very much, too much, with too many of them. We wait, and wait, and awkwardly dance some more, not that there’s much space left to dance in anyways. We wait again, it is 2am and there is still no sign of any of these grandiose Grime fairies we should be bowing down to. So we keep on pretending we’re having fun, and chat about Donald Trump with random men boasting ridiculous snapbacks, and steal cigarettes off blondes too drunk to be stingy, and laugh at ratchet ladies slipping on poured beer and off their preposterous high-heals.
So it’s packed, it’s hot, and it is as grimey as it gets. Excuse the pun. A bunch of stiff, buff black boys sway side to side facing the stage and blankly staring at the screens. Nobody seems to actually be having fun. Not even the wide eyed blokes proudly waving their 500ml crumpled water bottles, or those sniffling their pointy noses. As a consequence, the hotspot of the venue is the smoking terrace, a rustic resembling patio area with sofas, picnic table, a burger stand and a grandiose view. In fact, we spend most of our evening out there, in the freezing cold, shivering and nodding our heads to the tunes filtering through the doors, ‘far from the madding crowd’.
It is finally 3am when it starts getting exciting, or at least sort of. We hear muffled sounds that resemble the chorus of the only Skepta song we actually know, so we race to the dancefloor to finally admire the 33 year-old Nigerian-born British rapper as he waves his hands to the rhythms of 2015 hit track Shutdown. Everybody is jumping, yelling and nodding along. The self-proclaimed King of Grime shows the audience what he’s made of. Having performed in America the night before, he proves that what The Guardian critics have established is probably true: “ the world, and the hip-hop establishment, seems ready to meet Skepta on his own terms, rather than the other way around.”
I’m buzzed, and I’m singing along with the few words I know, which are basically a list of Skepta’s accomplishments and then the word “shutdown”, which means, in case you don’t know, “a very hyped atmosphere”.
“That's not me and it's shutdown, Ring ring pussy, it's shutdown, Fashion week and it's shutdown, Went to the show sitting in the front row, In the black tracksuit and it's shutdown” but all I basically did was yell “shutdown” when everybody else was doing so too. I sing, but still understand very little of what they are saying. Actually, almost nothing of what they are saying. The speakers also suck.
Everything seems to pick up, we’re thrilled and look at each other in agreement, silently telling each other this is what the night was all about. All the rappers are together on the stage and chanting in unison, clashing each other and spitting rhymes like there’s no tomorrow. Hands up, faces towards the sky, rolling their shoulders.
And then they leave. Just like that. 10 minutes, and they leave. Gone. As if they had never been there. Wasn’t the night supposed to be about them? What kind of King shows face with his disciples for no more than a few words? It very much seemed like an evening full of people that, hypocritically enough just like me, had shown up because Skepta’s fame just recently exploded, even though he’s been on the frontlines of the newborn genre for a decade now. People that, once again, apologetically just like me, wanted to see what it was all about. A concert where the main acts are too full of themselves to actually carry out a full gig, right because they’re fame just exploded anyways. Those people had already paid their tickets. Those people had been waiting three and a half hours, minimum, for them.
Unimpressed, we try to make our way home. We fight amongst ourselves on the quickest route home. We fight with a bunch of violent commuters trying to get on a bus. We fight amongst ourselves some more. We do not get on. We, shortly after, who knows how, manage to get on another bus. A rather random one. It is more packed than the 8am Central Line and, instead of hosting poised suited-up business men and women, carries way too many drunk, dazed, grumpy and sweaty troglodytes.
When now resigned and desperate, we experience an unexpected musical highlight of the night. Some roudy, talkative passenger sitting on the floor next to us launches a rap clash against a guy sitting behind me, a questionably skinny twenty year-old dressed somewhat like a malicious Dementor. They battle, and it is amusingly entertaining and incredibly funny. Refreshing. We’re all probably too tired and too cold but we explode in unison as ‘Dementor’ disses talkative-boy’s grandmother.
It’s 6am and we’re finally home. Sober, and hungry, we make ourselves pasta in my kitchen, we’re Italian after all. As my eyelids fall, the sun’s rising, and I baptize that moment as the best moment of the night.
A diagnosis of Chronic Lyme Disease led Aurianna Joy on a hallucinogen-fuelled, voyage of discovery deep in the Amazon.
Our most embarassing and unflattering moments have been deliberately left out of this video diary. Watch us conquer a new city while mom crooning at gigs...
Babe’s amazing video of our lives here in London!!
Why are there fewer women than men in the House of Commons?
191 women MPs were elected as a result of the 2015 General Election. This is 29% of all MPs: a historical record high. Nearly a third of Commons is now female. However, unfortunately even a twig looks like a flower when in the desert. Infact, this is progress but it is nowehere close to eliminating the gender gap. Summing the total number of women in the House of Commons ever since 1918 - the year in which women were first allowed to run for office - the total reached, 450, is still smaller than the number of men just currently in Parliament, 459! (Keen, 2015).
Why are there fewer women than men in the House of Commons? The problem is based within both sides of the story: women and the government, supply and demand. These account for there being few women in Parliament as a whole, and in the House of Commons specifically.
The problems which result from women themselves are mainly reasons for there being fewer women than there should be in the Parliament as a whole. These are primarily issues based on social and cultural norm or mere biological discrepancies betwen gender. Therefore, all such factors can easily be tackled throughout steps as simple as specific training or education and awarness of the issue.
Researchers of the Fawcett Society have proved that women seem less psychologically incline towards politics as a whole; polls suggest they are less trustful of politicians and cynically believe that “politics is all talk and no action and people go into politics only for themselves.” (Russel & Stephenson, 2014 pg.36). Also, Director of the Goldsmiths MediaResearch Centre demonstrates that women acquire political knowledge much later in their lives than men and are less likely to be encouraged by their families to engage in a political carreer.
Likewise, male bias within the media still today perjudicates women’s involvement in politics as, for example, “within the content of the news story, 79% of women were referred to as 'victims' while three-quarters of men held the role of 'expert'” (Pollack, 2013).
Regardless of surrounding intrinsicate societal norms of politics itself, women seem biologically less wired for politics. Possessing less testosterone than men, therefore higher levels of risk aversion, women are afraid of being wrong: this isn’t a feature fit for politics (Ollen, 2012). Plus, when leadership opportunities arise women feel they would ‘be less capable’; among adults who wouldn’t be confident running for election after solidly establishing their careers, “23% of young men vs. 15% of young women still mulled over the idea of putting their name on the ballot anyway” (Henderson, 2013).
Overall, women often wait to be asked therefore parties need to “actively recruit” women as candidates but “political gatekeepers tend to recruit from their own networks” and political gatekeepers are often men whom surround themselves with men. (Harris, 2014). Some parties have attempted to tackle this issue; in 2015 the Labour party instituted an all-women shortlist, allowing only women to stand in particular constituencies: this is not only the reason for the boost in percentage for women in the House, but also results in several more women friendly policies and greater attention upon issues such as healthcare (Kenny, 2015).
Last but no least comes the factor which is too often blamed for gender inequality in politics: women’s role within a family. This isn’t as prominent as usually assumed, but these responsabilities surely still weigh upon political decision-making. Women, in most cases, still cover the role of carer for both younger and older family members."It's not precluding them from being politically ambitious, but it is to say they probably still have three jobs to juggle instead of two when they throw their hats into the ring" says Lawless, director of Women and Politics Institute at American University (Fang, 2014).
“In Britain, however, research overwhelmingly demonstrates that the central issue is one of demand rather than supply” (Kenny, 2015). In other words, the problem, specifically with the lack of women within the House of Commons, lies within the parties rather than the women. Radical change within political party ethics and thourough mentoring will hopefully shepherd women's candidacies.
Differing cases show there is evidence of well-entrenched gender bias within the House of Commons: forms of both direct and indirect discrimination. From nasty comments alluding to an incapability in working in the sector to explicit sexual comments, words and actions undermine the political atmosphere for women on a daily basis, singeling them out for their gender. The Labour shadow minister for public health Luciana Berger comments: “I’ve been in all sorts of workplaces where I haven’t felt in a minority, and here it feels as if we’re a minority and a novelty,” As MPs are technically self-employed, men have less fear of paying the consequences of their unprofessionality, and women have greater difficulty in making a difference (Harris, 2014). “You can be sure that in most other workplaces, anyone making such claims would have them dealt with quickly and straightforwardly” (Bland, 2014).
Various cases regarding sexual assault and including Liberal Democrat MPs have recently soiled the House of Commons. However, often these incidents caused greater trouble for the victims rather than the assaulters. The Channel 4 News journalist who broke the story accusing Lord Rennard, Cathy Newman, explains that even though she initially thought that “the exposure of the allegations would be a helpful step for the status of women in Parliament”, things aren’t that straightforward: “If you were a woman in Westminster who had been harassed in the way these women allege they were, you would now think, do I really want to report it? Is it worth my while?” She continues, "I blame the macho, antediluvian culture that lingers long after its expiry date” commenting that certain behaviours were allowed “by a chorus line of male cronies, to portray himself as a victim of the women who reported his behaviour" (Bland, 2014).
The House of Commons was an istitution designed and built for men one hundred years ago, “women were not thought of and often it shows” underlines Helen Grant, minister for equalities, sport and tourism (Sanghani, 2014). “The atmosphere can be aggressive at times.. it is often about point-scoring rather than debate” she contines, highlighting that politics is not like all walks of life. Furthermore, it must be taken into consideration that the media is never particularly generous with women in politics, often giving greater importance to their attire and look rather than their words and beliefs. This too adds to the negative atmopshere within the House of Commons, which, drop by drop, hinders women’s serenity within Parliament.
Finally, being an MP with family caring responsabilities is challegning due to the structure of the actual job. Working in the House comprises extenuatingly long work days and an exceptionally busy schedule.Women in other senior positions work very long hours and hard shifts but have greater control: it would be impressive to “look at ways that all MPs can have more control over their working lives” explains Mary Macleod, Conservative MP for Brentford and Isleworth (Sanghani, 2014). However, several MPs simply do not grasp the eminence and imminence of the issue: when it was voted to adjust evening schedules, measures to reduce evening working hours passed for few votes: “Some of the arguments were bizarre… You hear people saying, well, what am I going to do in my evenings?” explained Luciana Berger (Bland, 2014).
To conclude, both men and women, both the government and society are to blame for gender discrepancies within the House of Commons. There are factors that are innate to human nature and will have to be overcome and others that are faults in social norms and will take time to heal. Both sides of this story come together to create one final picture: a portrait of the 21st century society still plagued by gender inequality. If the House of Commons, like the government as a whole, cannot combact sexism and gender bias, how is the surrounding society supposed to?
Surely big steps have been made in the right direction, hopefully 2016 will bring several more. Great Britain, after all, can boast having had Margaret Thatcher as Prime Minister; concrete political proof that there is nothing denying women’s political affirmation. Likewise, Mhairi Black, 20-year-old MP for SNP is political proof that young women can succeed in the political scene.
It is statistically proven that women in office increase government transparency atop of tending to work in more a bipartisan manner and bring new issues to the policy agenda (Harris, 2015). Mary Robinson, former Irish president, explains that, because of that lack of testosterone, "women are actually more inclined towards that more modern leadership, which is collaborative problem-solving, enabling, consultative, not just trying to assert a kind of hierarchical power" (Cookson, 2010). In addition, it is a positive virtuous cycle: women in power create a better environment for other women to come to power, and slowly gender equality will be at everybody’s door steps.
No Christmas without a Christmas-cracking panto!
Exploring the pantomime tradition: Pleasance Theatre presents a modern rendition of the impeccable holiday classic The Nutcracker.
Christmas spills over London in sprinkles and sparkles. However, this Christmas is not like past Christmases, as recurring terrorism has disseminated fear amongst Europeans. Thankfully, most of us have continued our quest for joy throughout community celebrations and cultural entertainment. London, specifically, has demonstrated the ability to continue telling fabulous tales to keep people dreaming of worlds of make-believe, through the art of theatre.
From A Christmas Carol in Covent Garden to Peter Pan Goes Wrong in Soho, the metropoly swells with yuletide themed pantos. Similarly, Islington-based Pleasance Theatre presents a modern musical rendition of Tchaikovsky’s magical The Nutcracker presenting the whimsical Nutcracker! The Musical.
It is absolute tradition for Londoners to join their family to watch humorous pantomimes for some light-hearted holiday fun. As complex as it is to pinpoint why this specific theatre genre became so crucial to the festive season, experienced panto-actor John Savournin underlines how pantos used to suit several different Christian holidays, but shifted to being characteristic of the most exuberantly celebrated one, due to progressive development of traditions.
Tchaikovsky’s The Nutcracker is the ultimate traditional Christmas ballet, historically characteristic to the season just as much as the pantomime genre is, being one of the most performed ballets of all times. Multiple Emmy Award-winning writer Nancy Holson decided to combine the two great festive traditions, modernising the story into a musical-panto and adding several contemporary elements into Hoffman’s original narrative. Starting on December 9th 2015 and concluding on January 3rd 2016, this suitable-for-all-ages show is on at the Pleasance Main House (Carpenters Mews, North Road, London N7 9EF), 7.30 pm and 4pm.
Eclectic director and playwright Ollie Fielding, also founder of Peaceful Lion Productions, is the man behind it all. He’s always demonstrated a keen interest towards the fantasy world and the importance of imagination. In fact, he has thorough experience with producing and directing adaptations of children’s stories also including Alice Through the Looking Glass and The Enchanted Castle, in the same Pleasance theatre. Rather contented, Ollie lets out a sigh of relief after the press night and first run of the show. He candidly explains how frustrating it can be to observe your own work as an outsider: “You sit there in the audience and your stomach is churning, you’re just panicking all the way through” he confesses. When asked if he had spotted anything go wrong, he admitted to having an infinite list of adjustments to make, but overall he concluded being “pretty satisfied” underlining the fantasy Christmas vibe was the one he was looking for.
Actors descend from the stage to meet up with the audience in the cozy bar, munching on mince pie and mulled wine - the perfect Christmas combination. Glowing in serenity, the performing couple Ben Stacey and Meg Matthews explain how it all came about and how it felt to be in front of the audience with this peculiar show for the first time.
Ben Stacey, Arts Educational School London graduate starring as Drosselmeyer’s quirky assistant ‘Huff’, charms the listeners within the bar with funny anecdotes. He underlines that “The show has been thought about for a few years now but it was only written early this year, even though it had definitely been on the pipeline for a while.” While explaining the auditioning process, affable Ben Stacey comments: “I didn’t audition for any specific part, it was all kind of just thrown in together, they asked me to do a little dancing and a little singing and so on.”
Meg Matthews, a graduate from the same institution, playing various differing characters within the play, respectively discusses the importance of versatility. With piercing eyes and smile she adds: “We personally didn’t think it would go this well! The rehearsals were just two weeks long!” highlighting how grateful she was for the audience’s appreciation and enthusiasm.
Some other experienced actors were amongst the audience for this premiere, enjoying the progress and success of their colleagues from past productions.
Scottish professional soprano and actress Wendy Carr, 27, notes that it was a “good” show “but it will be amazing”. Having considerable experience in the field, she allows herself to shyly comment on some minor issues that occurred throughout the night: “It has huge potential to be brilliant but it’s still got a lot of teething progress to do.” In her characteristic accent, she points out that the show was still very atmospheric, dreamlike and made her laugh.
Colleague Helena Northcote, 35, graduated from Drama Studio London in July 2014, was similarly positively impressed: “There’s definitely some really strong characters in there. If it was on a bigger scale, set, lighting, I think it would be amazing.” She concludes, in tune with the surrounding climate and while twirling her dark locks between her fingers: “But I’m a child. I liked it. I love the Christmas show season.”
The Flight; Our Flight.
An upside-down turquoise dinghy hangs from the vaults of St. James Church on Piccadilly Street, London. This is the same dinghy that attempted taking sixty-two desperate, homeless Syrian, Afghan and Iraqi refugees to the Greek coast of Lesvos: one of the countless flights for salvation through the tempestuous and merciless waves of the ocean.
This dinghy, tipped in mid air in the solemn darkness of a church and pointing towards the altar, now holds only three of those bright orange life jackets from the journey; one for a man, one for a woman and one for a minute, helpless infant. These life jackets hang in the oblivious echoes of the empty space above the benches, just like world wide, too many shivering escapees drift slowly into the darkness of the waters, unheard.
This touching installation is The Flight, it was installed December 20th 2015 and will be up till February 8th, 2016. It is work of Arabella Dorman, war artist who spent several months since September on the Greek islands, witnessing first hand the outrageous plight of these poor individuals. Arabella is particularly interested in depicting “the consequences of conflict” after having personally attempted to lend a hand to such disastrous situations, collaborating with two refugee/medical charities, Starfish Foundation and Doctors of the World UK.
“I want to represent the light within all the darkness, I wanted to give a human face to the stories that often feel too far away, hidden behind headlines. It is both a cry of anguish and an act of solidarity”, the artist explains while describing the inspiration behind her art work. “Being there, seeing these people wash up on a shore, knowing that they do not have a home, witnessing their courage.. it is incredibly humbling” she continues, recounting how she attempted to produce a piece which could work on several metaphorical levels.
In fact, these solitary yet familiar life jackets hanging from the ceiling seek to remind us of the individuality of every single man, woman and child that audaciously take on a journey risking their lives rather than remaining where they are definite they will not have one anymore. The life jacket trinity reminds the onlookers of a voyage towards faith, just like Jesus and his family were refugees, locked outside the impenetrable walls of Egypt.
“I wanted it to be up during Christmas because it is a period in time when everybody returns home to their families, but the refugees have fled theirs, they don’t have one anymore” Arabella continues, adding that she feels the highly spiritual venue adds sentiment and passion to the piece, nonetheless still attracting the emphatic attention of non believers too. This situations also purposefully picks up the tradition of hanging boats from church ceilings and “links the Latin word NAVIS (‘ship’) to ‘nave’, symbolising the Church as the collective boat in which we find refuge” explains” formally explains the official description of the piece.
“It was very emotional to, on Christmas eve, in the dark, each holding candles, sing silent night.. remembering their night is not silent” she underlines, “it wouldn’t have felt right to open with champagne and celebration, I wanted something very heartfelt”. The impassioned artist also confesses that “in a dream-world” she would have appreciated the installation hanging above the heads of the thousand of commuters at St. Pancras, “reminding them that even though it is now so easy for us to travel to France, to Italy.. it isn’t exactly so for the multitude of souls departing from their homes to run away from war”.
The dioceses was exceptionally excited about the project and collaborated in all ways possible, explains Reverend Lucy Winkett, rector of the Saint James Church. Londoners seem to have responded overwhelmingly well, personally sending music, poetry and letters to the artist herself; several pieces of which are read during appreciation gatherings. Simon Callow, prominent London actor and musician, even decided to celebrate his wedding under the stirring installation, explaining how Arabella has reminded him that “art cannot change the world, we do not have the answers and there is no easy way out, but art can remind us to not constantly avoid the questions.” Atop of this, both the press and the internet have been moved by Arabella’s work, even though local MPs and politicians show passive resistance, being quiet and acting indifferent towards the several attempts undertaken by the community to involve them.
As continuation to her work and ongoing response to the humanitarian crisis, alongside continuing to paint portraits, Arabella is also working on another installation by the name of The Wave, 5,000 lifejackets discarded by refugees washed up on the shores of Lesvos, constructed to the shape of a great tidal wave. Arabella is part of a much larger movement of artists currently producing artwork in response to the refugee tragedies of forced displacement across the world, the controversial Banksy amongst such group.
The Flight is not just representative of a flight, it is this flight that is currently taking place all over the world. It is real, it is cruel. It is the flight for life through unpredictable waters as consequence of the escape from death of hostile lands. It is not something we can turn our heads from anymore. It might not have an answer, but there are plenty of questions still out there to listen to. The flight; our flight.
“O’ hear us when we cry to thee for those in peril on the sea…”
The Lobster
Watch trailer here.
This is not a review. This is just what I think.
Greek writer and director Yorgos Lanthimos makes his English debut with the dystopian love story The Lobster. It’s some sort of 1984 about the modern conception of love. A near future where people are forbidden to be single, therefore as soon as they somehow become so - death of a partner or divorce for example - they are taken captive in a hotel where they are forced to fall in love and find a partner in 45 days, or will be turned into animals.
Like all dystopian realities, not only is the story-line commentary to society, but every small detail becomes a symbol alluding to a glitch in the modern world of the spectators.
Descriptive scenes underline small facts about this surreal reality.
No bisexuals, either you are heterosexual or you are homosexual. No shoe size 44.5, either it is a 44 or a 45. A critique to the black and white world created by a technological reality where users resort to ‘like’ or ‘unlike’ and no in-between.. or a critique of the exact opposite, the grey world constituted by the infinite half way connotations of modern society; “we love each other but we’re not together”, “I would want to leave but I don’t have the courage”..?
The story-line is centered on the lack, or presence, of love.. in a society of couples. Singles are looked down upon. Is that what happens now? “Why don’t you ever bring a girl home? At 35 you still don’t have a partner? Time’s cracking: get your life together..” seems like the exact father-son conversation of the twenty-first century, doesn’t it? Or, yet again, is it the other way round? Is modern society not concerned with “love” enough anymore? Has it become too normal for individuals to resort to the ease of having to just deal with themselves rather than putting up with someone else’s life every once in awhile?
Those that are lonely aren’t happy and aren’t accepted, but those that are loved don’t truly love each other. Their selfish reality comes afloat as soon as there’s the slightest possibility of danger, once again, very 1984ish of the Greek writer. The protagonist’s lover is blinded and yells, “why didn’t you blind him?!”. A famous scene replete with rats comes to mind.
Those that love each other and truly believe to love each other, are really just staging their own love, for commodity, for warmth: looking for a similar trait amongst themselves. For example, the protagonist blinds himself for his lover. You’d say; this is true love - he wanted to understand her and share her reality. However, it is made more than clear that it is just a matter of finding a similarity between themselves, something in common, something to connect them. Why is that, weren’t they supposed to be in love?
“I just have this limp, which is also my defining characteristic. My wife died six days ago. She was very beautiful and I loved her very much. She had a limp too.” - The Limping Man
Touching upon very heavy thematic, this movie definitely touches every base, making it to home-run. Being alone, being together, being in between. “Dating rituals and the often brutal search for love”, a society where relationships aren’t based on sentiment and feeling rather than the respect of having to go through defined stages of a relationship: situations take place because there is an underlying sense of obligation. “You will be given children because they seem to help solve problems such as discussions and misunderstandings”. What?! Isn’t this what surrounds us on a daily basis? Why is it absolutely terrifying just when it’s acted out by somebody else?
In my opinion, an absolutely delicious piece of work. When you finish a story and you have no idea what you just saw, that means it did what it was supposed to do. Symmetric, smooth, precise.. but constantly and completely off-beat. Humorous, funny and characterized by very cunningly delivered deadpan.. but awfully grim, dark, gloomy and intense. It’s completely awkward, it’s completely surreal; but it is full of details that are too real to be true, and for us to admit they are.
It definitely does lose momentum on the second half, it seems to slow down as it leaves the eerie setting of the slick couple-inducing hotel, but it is still absolutely vivid. It leaves you baffled, cold and confused but full of something you yourself have trouble defining.
Heartwarmingly violent and off-putting.
That sense of absolutely mouth-watering bitter sweet.
“A movie that seems kind and inoffensive... but that will destroy and change your life.” - Suso Aira
Seasonal
Christmas spills over London in sprinkles and sparkles. As fairy-lights flood the city in golden and silver, the metropoly swells with tourists carrying baskets replete of glossy paper and tinsel. Whole families, cocooned in their warm woolen sweaters, make their way in and out of perfume shops, chocolate shops, book shops. The toddlers press their runny noses and minute mittens against shop windows, trying to take in the colorfully decorated expositions: mice dress their miniature Christmas tree, figurines dance under polystyrene snow, real-size porcelain ballerinas enchant the onlookers.
“Tis the season to be jolly”; and nobody ever wonders why, in the atheist 21st century megalopolis which London happens to be, this season should be the season to be jolly. But doubts aside, everybody relentlessly makes an effort to be happier, sweeter, kinder.. more of something or the other.
Nero
Think bleach blonde siren of death wearing a black mesh body suit and a dark see-through cape. Bedeviled angel of evil. Poisonous goddess of thunder slipping on beam of light and throwing a tantrum on every drop. Ethereal, disappearing in an explosion of lasers and fog.
29.11.15
Londra è bellissima dal finestrino di questa macchina. E’ nera e argento, i miei due colori preferiti. E’ asfalto, vetro e acciao. e parole della gente. I viaggi in uber sono molto meno ansia dei viaggii in taxi; mi ero già dimenticata che ogni mio sguardo mi costa denaro. Finestre simmetriche, segnali stradali rotti, lampioni sfocati, macchine opache, vecchie in stampelle, oroloi enormi, strisce al contrario. Mille piccole vite dentro ad edifici come lucciole rinchiuse in piccoli barattoli. Per queste luci è quasi Natale. Pere queste luci sarà uno dei tanti, tantissimi Natali. Queste luci ora sono luci di Natale. E festeggeranno capodanno, esprimendo desideri di cui ci si dimentica il giorno dopo - ormai sobri - e balleranno con sconosciuti, perchè tanto chi si conosce veramente?
Voglio essere una canzone che spacca i timpani ai passanti, fa tremare le casse ecrollare i soffitti.
+
Ci togliamo il respiro a vicenda.
Giovani illusi dei nostri dolori.
Sognamo luoghi lontani
e non respiriamo mai la stessa aria.
Camminiamo scalzi sulle delusioni dei nostri antenati.
Rimaniamo stupiti.
Tremiamo nel freddo.
Corriamo al contrario.
Piangiamo la mattina.
Desideriamo tutto -
e abbiamo già tutto -
e desideriamo ancora di più.
ò.
Il corri mano è la spina dorsale di una creatura marina. Le pareti sono ricoperte di squame. Tutte le sfumature di blue, azzurro, turchese. Piastrelle, piastrelline, piastrelluzze. Uno svarione epico in duecento gradi di pastelli e legno color miele. Le finestre a forma di tartaruga, le porte rimandano a conchiglie. I vetri fanno giochi di colori e luci che sembra di essere in un sogno sfocato. I soffitti sin una curva unica, modellate in gesso. La facciata variopinta, mosaici di fiori e giardini. Pietre preziose chiare ed affilate. Questa casa è una grandissima lucertola scheletrico che respira e sbadiglia in aria di mare. Questa casa è una festa di un oscuro carnevale subacqueo. Bolle di vetro, e di pensieri. Un lago di ninfee che si scioglie in vetrini di bottiglie. L'audio guida poi è fatta benissimo.
After a career as vocalist for the post-hardcore band Million Dead, Frank Turner now celebrates his tenth year as an accomplished acoustic-based solo artist. On the last date of his sixth studio album tour, Positive Songs for Negative People, the songwriter and his four-piece backing band The Sleeping Souls, amuse an approximate 1,800 fans at […]
Kacey Musgrave, Texan Grammy-winning country star, inundated the Royal Albert Hall in pink and golden sparkles. The prestigious venue, completely sold-out, hosted 5,000 passionate fans of all ages who eagerly enjoyed Musgrave’s refreshing soulful vibes. Sparkles, sprinkles and lasers filled the hall. Lights depicted intricate patterns, changing every song. Kacey, wearing three different glittery, country […]