person (non-practicing)
Mike Driver
Monterey Bay Aquarium
hello vonnie
RMH

titsay
we're not kids anymore.
KIROKAZE

#extradirty

Discoholic 🪩
Cosimo Galluzzi

izzy's playlists!

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
taylor price

tannertan36
todays bird
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Sade Olutola

No title available

Andulka
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
seen from Türkiye
seen from Colombia

seen from South Africa

seen from Mexico

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Ukraine
seen from Tunisia

seen from Philippines
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Latvia
seen from Morocco

seen from Türkiye
seen from Israel
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Argentina

seen from Russia
@saint-vore
person (non-practicing)
Today I went to see this exhibit at the National Library of Victoria, the description of the exhibit is this:
Love doesn’t follow the rules: it rewrites them. Rebel Heart: Love letters and other declarations is a tribute to defiant expressions of the heart, celebrating true stories of the rebels of romance from the past to the present. This stirring new exhibition explores romantic love – and its foil, heartbreak – through State Library Victoria’s extraordinary archive of soul-baring letters, intimate diaries and rare manuscripts, amplified in powerful new music commissions. Spanning centuries of connection and courage, meet the brave hearts who dared to love unapologetically – from same-sex couples in the Victorian era and a mid-century marriage at odds with the White Australia policy, to love outside marriage, across borders and online.
This was a really moving exhibit*, there were so many examples of people who were really punished by their society for loving one another, especially the indigenous and interracial couples who were treated absolutely abominably at the time.
There were also a couple of exhibits of Australian historical queer figures, the one which was most gutting to me personally was the letters of Andrew George Scott aka Captain Moonlite, who's lover/ fellow bushranger James Nesbitt was killed in the shootout where Moonlite was captured.
While in prison awaiting execution, Andrew George Scott wrote several letters, which detailed how much he loved James Nesbitt, and where he asked for several things--to be given the bloody clothes that Nesbitt died in, to tell Nesbitt's mother that her son was innocent of the worst of what he'd been accused of, and to be buried beside him:
"My dying wish is to be buried beside my beloved James Nesbitt, the man with whom I was united by every tie which could bind human friendship, we were one in hopes, in heart and soul and this unity lasted until he died in my arms."
Most of these requests were denied, and the letters were never sent by the prison authorities, but were rediscovered much later by a historian.
When he was hanged, Scott was wearing a ring made of a lock of Nesbitt's hair, and he was not buried with Nesbitt.
In January 1995 Scott's body was exhumed from Rookwood Cemetery in Sydney, and reburied alongside James Nesbitt.
Digitised versions of Andrew George Scott/ Captain Moonlite's letters can be found here: https://mhnsw.au/articles/captain-moonlite-digitised-letters-from-prison/
*Unfortunately there was one exhibit of AI generated drivel which was very disappointing and puerile beside all of the other genuinely moving and important exhibits
Headache wave © Peter Solarz
remember that pride is still a protest
Hartford Courant, Connecticut, March 9, 1906
help
this lamb keeps trying to sacrifice itself even though no one really needs or wants it to do that
source
People keep popping up in the replies on that post to insist that adults are and can be groomed and I am the world’s most exhausted whack-a-mole champ.
The thing a lot of the people who keep returning to that post to yell YUH HUH ADULTS ARE GROOMED don’t get is that I’m actually trying to advocate for children too, here. I work in Trust and Safety, which is a largely digital field devoted to all things terrible you can do online: terrorism, self-harm, and, of course, CSAM and CSA, which are my career speciality. I’m considered an expert in my field. I helped to build anti-abuse tooling that the (Biden) White House shouted out as a revolutionary step forward in combating grooming online. I was part of the team who first ousted and identified the people and behaviors behind 764, a really hideous ring of abusers whom I don’t recommend you look up unless you have a strong stomach. Some of the arrests in those cases are directly my doing.
Simultaneously, I’m an adult who, in my spare time, enjoys engaging in adult fiction spaces. As a result of that, I have, unfortunately, been shouted at a decent number of times by young adults (18-25 seems to be the common range) about children, and their well being, and how what happens in adult fiction spaces causes harm to children, and themselves by proxy. (I’ve also been yelled at by actual children, but I’m happy to ignore them, given many of them have been influenced by the previously mentioned young adults to behave that way.)
“Grooming” isn’t truly a technical term, though my industry uses it as one often. It doesn’t have a precise definition or pattern of behavior beyond “inappropriate conduct with a child.” It’s had other uses, of course, like saying someone was “groomed to inherit a title” or similar. But generally what we mean online is “this has to do with child abuse.”
Children are, no joke, one of the most uniquely oppressed classes of human being in the world. Most of the time, they simply have no recourse, no legal right to self-advocate, no ability to retain counsel, choose their own living environment, what they do, how they dress, what they eat. To even report their own abuse — which I assure you, most children are perfectly aware is abuse — they must first be believed by an adult, who may then choose to do something on the child’s behalf, or not. Any option a child has for safety or freedom of choice is entirely dependent on an adult deigning to humor them in the first place.
When you turn the age of majority in your country, you are automatically given a new set of legal and social rights. Even a severely disabled adult, in most places, may advocate for their rights on the basis of their legal adulthood. (There are constant failures here by the legal system, of course, but the point is that you are allowed to advocate in the first place.) You become a different class of person, who can do and ask for things that children are simply not allowed to.
When you try to say that “adults can be groomed,” by bringing up all kinds of random possibilities like “well what about cults” “what about age gaps and different levels of life experience” “what about this or that,” you’re still ignoring the idea that the exploited adult has recourse, in those situations (again, leaving out that there are many failings with the system that allows that recourse does not eliminate the fact that recourse is an option.) Restraining orders. Moving away. Going no contact, with no parent to force you to continue to see that person on holidays. Even if you are young, you are not helpless. You have an agency allowed to you that children simply are not given.
Of course, an 18 year old can be abused and exploited. And I absolutely am wary of a 19 year old dating a 40 year old — personally, I question the shit out of that. I’d even suspect that that 19 year old was previously groomed in some way. But the distinction is important to me, here, not to diminish the abuse that young adults can face, but to ensure that the plight of children is properly understood.
Children matter to me. Their harms and their rights matter to me. And just as I find it reprehensible to compare the fictional behaviors of fictional characters to real world harm, I am frustrated with the constant need to insist that young adults are on the same harm level as children are. It is the very opposite of “who gives a shit about kids and young people suffering.”
Once in a while I still see people going on about young adults being “groomed,” so here again is my take on why that’s wrong and unhelpful.
I think mostly what young fandom types (and I guess younger people in general) who are very very invested in the idea that “20 is still basically a minor” need to understand is that the feeling of “I’m just a child pretending to be an adult, and everyone else around me is a REAL adult” is DEEPLY universal (and won’t stop, ever, by the way, sorry!) and also is not, like, praxis.
Believe me, I get it, but the self-infantilization needs to stop, especially when you’re trying to engage in conversations about actual children and the harms they can face. Yes, it is scary to wake up and realize you’re 22 and you still feel like you’re 15, but it happens to all of us. You’re an adult. You have to deal with it.
Intersex people who are not trans can experience wrong puberty.
Intersex people who are not trans can experience daily misgendering or degendering.
Intersex people who are not trans and have presentations that make them visibly ambiguous have to choose between working to alter our bodies in ways that might make us ill or might be difficult with comorbid disabilities just to pass OR be all but entirely outcast from normal society. Jobs, friends, etc.
Intersex people who are not trans can have gender dysphoria in relation to not passing as their gender - even their assigned gender. Some intersex people who are trans will be afab trans women or amab trans men for reasons perisex people will never understand.
Intersex people who are not trans experience the same kinds of social violence as trans folks - often with added medical violence unique to intersex people. (Being denied access to a gender affirming endocrinologist by a nonbinary doctor bc I'm not trans and being sent to an endo who abused me for being intersex instead lol!!!! and forced hormones and medical rape as a young teen etc)
Intersex people who ARE trans have to deal with the duality of these experiences, with dysphoria towards traits that align with their desired gender bc of how their bodies were treated starting young, with every bit of social fallout and abuse and violence that comes with both being intersex and being trans, with perisex trans people refusing to try to begin to understand intersex experiences or how transition can look wildly different for an intersex person.
If youre a closeted person somewhere out there thinking "I want to transition but it would be less progressive/unique/countercultural for me to be that gender instead of this one" please know that you are a real person not a character in a narrative and cant live your life based on what is good media representation. You are real you can only be yourself and theres no moral weight to any identity over another
Liberal transphobes enjoy positioning trans identities as regressive compared to cis queerness or like non-transitioning transness or anything else they can leverage to make transphobia look progressive and I think its easy to absorb that message subconciously. But in real life we just are what we are and no ranking of validity can change the fact that you have an identity that is NOT chosen and is just your unchangeable truth. Not only should you not have to live a life dictated by what is most countercultural to identify as or whatever but also: being trans is extremely countercultural and feminist and leftist to begin with and theyre only trying to convince you otherwise bc theyre bigots
"Why cant you be a feminine man society hates feminine men 🥺" and "all the butch lesbians are becoming men we need u 🥺" = stay in the closet for the noble purpose of being an abstract representation point in my new york times opinion column. You wont actually be a gnc cis person youll be a closeted trans person who uses the wrong words but I need you to do that because i hate you
Pablo Fernandez par Laurent Humber pour Têtu magazine, 2021
i was training a young person at work, and she referred to sexual assault as "SA" out loud, and i immediately was like, "no, it's sexual assault, call it what it is," bc idgaf if the algorithm overlords have taught y'all that you should fear direct language, how tf do any of you expect to ever address real issues with any amount of seriousness if you can't even say the words? imagine an advocate looking a sexual assault survivor in the eyes and asking "did he grape you?" it's absolutely fucking absurd, but these young interns and new hires are coming into an environment where we deal with survivors of all different kinds of abuse, and they're coming with the mindset that the words are as bad as the actions, and that makes them shitty at the job and look juvenile af
i HATE self-censorship for a lot of reasons, but being in crisis work makes it even more frustrating. who are you censoring for? like i am being so fr, WHO are you censoring for? have you even thought it through? people who have been raped know that they have been raped. if someone attempts suicide or is grieving someone who did, saying "sewer slide" isn't going to protect them from any of the feelings. a murder victim's family isn't going to feel better bc you said "unalived" instead of murdered. if anything, it's just extremely invalidating and othering. it's saying "what happened to you is so bad that i won't even say the word," which is NOT trauma-informed care. you are not protecting survivors/victims when you self-censor. the ONLY things you protect when you self-censor are the puritanical ideologies that are being encouraged by rich fascists who want your money and obedience
say the fucking words, guys. just say the goddamn words before i go insane!!!
i had a dream last night that the entire world used a currency (?) called angrypennies which as the name implies are obtained by experiencing anger. the stronger and more intense your anger was, the more angrypennies you'd gain. an all-consuming rage would earn you more than a slight irritation, etc. so people were always searching for ways to fuel their anger and purposefully keeping themselves angry all the time because they wanted to earn angrypennies. unclear if angrypennies could be exchanged for goods and services, or if they were just a collectible.
anyway, as if this wasn't heavy-handed enough, at one point british comedian greg davies appeared and explained that angrypennies couldn't be worth feeling angry all the time. this was a real revelation to dream-me and i was finally able to break free of the angrypenny grind and allow myself to experience emotions other than anger.
it goes without saying that i will be using the word angrypenny as if it was part of the common vernacular instead of a term that my dreaming brain conjured up i.e. "he's all about the angrypennies" (derogatory way to refer to a guy who searches for reasons to be angry and possibly lacks introspection)