these three emojis are brothers 🤔🤨🧐
art blog(derogatory)

No title available
official daine visual archive
Not today Justin
No title available

No title available

if i look back, i am lost
Claire Keane

Janaina Medeiros

oozey mess
Misplaced Lens Cap
ojovivo
almost home
🪼
Stranger Things
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Origami Around
Sweet Seals For You, Always
NASA
YOU ARE THE REASON
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Italy

seen from Singapore
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Uzbekistan
seen from United States

seen from Albania

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Venezuela
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from United States
@serasgf
these three emojis are brothers 🤔🤨🧐
not any ordinary sera but CONCEPT ART SERA
reaver wife for the world’s cutest blood mage!!!
*enters a tavern in DA:I*
“Sera was never an agreeable girl-“
bees!! bees!! bees!!
I hope DA4 is about your character being penniless in Tevinter and helping slaves and other people in poverty and accidentally becoming the leader of a huge and very bloody revolution.
am i doing this right
LI at end of DA game: run away with me. you are the love of my life.
PC at end of DA game: we will be together forever. i will never leave you.
NPC at beginning of next DA game: they parted ways later that day
so what's your opinion on bioware screwing up by not making fenris and anders at least tolerate each other at the end of da2? i always found it a shame because i feel like they too strongly clung to the opposites thing with them, while their trauma is .. in a way, similar, and bioware really messed their writing up. both of them have points (fenris more about tevinter than anything else), but i really hate that they never showed any progress between them
oh! thank you so much for this question, because i have Many Feelings about this topic.
Anders and Fenris both had their agency destroyed, they were reduced to less than people. Anders spent an entire year in solitary confinement, the horrors of which are reflected in the book Asunder. Fenris was abused, forced into servitude by a master who only allowed Fenris to exist according to his judgment.
so, I can see where Bioware attempted to go with the Anders-Fenris rivalry. Their anger comes from different places - Anders is mad at power abuse, Fenris is mad at magic abuse. But, what is the most inconsistent piece of writing in DA2, to me, is the fact that these two spend nearly ten years communicating, and they are not allowed a reconciliation.
one of the most idiotic pieces of writing in DA2, for me, is when Anders approves of giving Fenris back to Danarius. alright - maybe Anders would be that petty (arguments about his character). but if you seriously think that Justice, for one second, would allow someone to be sold into slavery, you have to be stupid.
which, I have reduced to the writers of DA2 not really understanding their characters. they wanted conflict, but they didn’t give a shit about handling it. which led us to DAI, which was basically meaningless.
tag yourself im grandma
A Grey Warden took away one of our hunters to fight the darkspawn. I heard she fought the Archdemon. I wonder what’s become of her.
…I suppose the great Hero of Ferelden doesn’t need my help now.
take a fucking sip babes…
Who would win in a fight between your Warden, Hawke & Inquisitor?
The biggest problem with Cullen’s writing in DA:I is not that its inconsistent. It’s the fact that it IS consistent but its presented in a way that’s meant to be endearing.
For example, in DA2 we hear Cullen revel in the power he wields as a Templar when he tells Hawke that the Templars have “control over mages by Divine right”. This is similar to how he will gleefully tell the Inquisitor “let’s see them try to dismantle us now” in Trespasser. Both situations tells us that this is a guy who enjoys being in a position in power.
The key difference here is that in DA2, we’re allowed to react to this in a negative way. Hawke can argue with him. But in Trespasser we’re meant to agree with him because fck the nobles, right?
Another example is how, in DA2, he will state that Templars are fighting a losing battle because more mages are born everyday. Which implies that mages are something akin to rats carrying the plague. The brave Templars are trying to contain it, but more carriers appear everyday.
If you think his mindset is different in DA:I, you’d be wrong.
“First the Templars, now the Grey Wardens. They dedicate their lives to fighting evil, now they serve it"
This is Cullen basically comparing mages to darkspawn. But, again, in DA2 Hawke could argue, disagree or just react in any way. The Inquisitor? Not so much. Its glossed over by the dialogue.
In DA:I, you can barely disagree with Cullen. Much less argue with him. Every other character talks about how great he is even though it makes no fcking sense for that character to do so.
I could bring up other examples but that would make this ridiculously long. Cullen IS written consistently, but its presented in a way that’s meant to be seen as endearing. And in a disturbing way, it makes sense. When Cullen was introduced in Origins, his writer never intended for him to be popular or seen as cute. She saw him as a character that would potentially r*pe the Warden should he decide that he needed to get her out of his system. This is kinda touched on in Witch Hunt with the two mages who expresses relief that Cullen is gone because he was creeping them out with his staring. But for some reason, the people playing this game decided to overlook all the bad because…..he was cute? The VA made him seem endearing? Like the very first dialogue has Cullen essentially say “I would’ve killed you, but its not personal and I might’ve felt bad” and fans actually thought it was cute? That his awkwardness was endearing even though what he is saying is fcked up?
No matter the argument, you get some fan going “well, he meant this…” or “clearly, he was referring to this” as if he is this mystical being that only they understand. And they’ll deny even the most basic things. He was a Templar, he was second-in-command, overseeing Harrowing’s and mages being made Tranquil would be part of his job. If nothing else, he would’ve signed the papers that authorized it. But, nope, according to the fans he did nothing like that.
So its not surprising that Bioware basically wrote the same character all over again, but forced the narrative to kiss Cullen’s ass. Because that’s what his fans have been doing since day one.
Took a break from work for a quick smooch doodle!
Merrill’s background shows that the Dalish are not perfect, without Merrill hating the Dalish and hating herself for being Dalish.
Vetra’s background shows that Turians are not perfect, without Vetra hating Turians and hating herself for being Turian.
Merrill does not exist to enforce a game’s message to the player that “See? The Dalish isolated me and so they deserve to be hated.”
Vetra does not exist to enforce a game’s message to the player that “See? Turians are too militaristic and deserve to be hated.”
It is entirely possible to use characters of a group to point out new sides of that group, without trying to validate racism.
And honestly, if it was just one or two characters I’d let it go, but my whole point is that at this rate it is becoming a BioWare trope.