“The Impossible III” by Maria Martins, 1946
Not today Justin
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

No title available
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
sheepfilms

pixel skylines
Cosimo Galluzzi
will byers stan first human second

if i look back, i am lost
styofa doing anything

#extradirty
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

Love Begins
No title available
Keni
AnasAbdin
Peter Solarz

★
occasionally subtle
🪼
seen from Honduras

seen from Egypt

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Honduras

seen from Norway

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
@serpent-soother
“The Impossible III” by Maria Martins, 1946
Djanet, 2025
Woven Light
Being “open to a threesome” with someone of the same sex doesn’t make you bisexual.
Finding women pretty/men handsome doesn’t make you bisexual.
If you use the split attraction model, you’re a moron, that shit is conversion therapy rhetoric
If you’re attracted to “genders” but all of those “genders” you’re into are biologically opposite sex, you’re not bisexual.
If you’re “bisexual” because you think it will attract the opposite sex, you aren’t bisexual.
You’re only bisexual if you’re attracted to both sexes. Spicy straights need to get the fuck out of the bi community so we can properly organize groups.
Angkor Wat temple - Siem Reap, 2013
I see a bird's shadow, may be? - Hverir, 2020
compiled by Sultan Murad III Albums of Murad III; Persian art 1570-90
Broch of Mousa, Shetland (1968, Historic Scotland Photographic Library)
The Heavenly Lotus tree (Gustavia superba or Gustavia augusta); native to Central and South America
Better Homes and Gardens: Stretching Living Space, 1983
John Baldessari
There isn’t Time
Goya Series, 1997
Queer theory is so funny to me as African because I'll see all these people in the western countries trying to assign meanings to clothes and to pronouns and to parts of their personalities, they'll believe that changing their clothes or their pronouns or their language or their behavior will exempt them from misogyny. And while I understand that it is a condition of the System to keep us all separated, I can't help but bristle at the racism behind this all.
If any of these liberals had bothered to read, they would know that there exists many many communities indigenous to Africa whose languages don't have gendered pronouns, where clothing rules are different. Where men and women dressed the same, where the rules of nudity are different. Where men are effeminate. And in most, if not all of these communities, misogyny will still be rampant.
My community used to allow female to female marriages but all those women were still circumcised. My language does not have "she" or "he" but that did not save any of us from misogyny. My friend's community doesn't even have gendered slurs and she still had to run away when she was 11 so that she wouldn't be circumcised. There is no solution other than uprooting the whole system. Creating more categories does nothing.
Irving Penn: Iceland Poppy (2006)
Night landscapes
Cerkiew pw. Opieki Matki Bożej w Równi w Bieszczadach