Petroglyphs in Kyrgyzstan, estimated to be 3000 years old.
Fond and strange memories.
occasionally subtle

bliss lane
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Game Changer & Make Some Noise

Kiana Khansmith
ojovivo
Not today Justin
hello vonnie
No title available

gracie abrams

No title available
No title available
The Bowery Presents

#extradirty
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Xuebing Du

Andulka
Monterey Bay Aquarium

izzy's playlists!

ellievsbear
seen from Venezuela

seen from Costa Rica
seen from Pakistan
seen from United States
seen from Bosnia & Herzegovina
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Lebanon

seen from Türkiye
seen from Mexico
seen from Netherlands
seen from Czechia
seen from Switzerland

seen from United States

seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from Mexico

seen from United States

seen from United States
@sgiandubh
Petroglyphs in Kyrgyzstan, estimated to be 3000 years old.
Fond and strange memories.
link to bluesky post
In addition to how to turn various things, it includes:
Other useful AI Removal/Detection links
How to spot AI Hallucinations like a Reference Librarian (originally on Substack)
Library Freedom Project has a lot of handouts about AI on their Resources page
AI is toxic. AI is surrogate. AI is despising human brains' collective hard work.
And yes, translations will still be embarrassing and they will still make you sound robotic.
Used for anything more than reference and without proper vetting and processing it is unethical, aside from being actively encouraged by an irresponsible US administration.
Thinking before posting can be useful. Let's see how it goes in one year time, statu quo and all.
PS: by the same stupid reasoning, she must have been handfasted to the girlfriend with whom she first got that matching, very grown-up tattoo.
In today's episode
PS- There was once a frenzy on Tumblr because someone dared to suggest that a certain actress's son had the same shade of blonde hair as her co-star. Anyone who agreed was judged and condemned by the Inquisition of Morality and Decency. Well, now it is considered acceptable to claim that a child—who has a living father who has always been present in her life—might actually be the child of a certain actor, simply because the child is blonde?
Hi there—apologies, as English isn't my native language. I’ve been following S and C for a few months now, and I absolutely love the Sherlock Holmes-style investigations you do! Will there be a new investigation into C and T in the future? I’m particularly curious because T always disappears and we don't know what their job is, whereas C is working so much. Thanks, and keep up the great work!
Dear Investigation Anon,
Never say never. There are still many things that can be shared and also a couple of things that cannot be shared at all, primarily because of my reluctance to cross basic red lines.
In the meanwhile, I strongly encourage you to peruse the archives, for a fairly detailed view of the current state of play. They might either help you, or raise even more questions.
Thank you for the kind words. They are much, much appreciated.
֎ AI? Only When It Sells Whisky ֎
If anyone was still wondering what the Main Character thinks about AI-generated images of himself and CMB... well, wonder no more. Apparently, the Main Character is perfectly happy to support AI 'art'.
After all, for the second day in a row, SRH has happily reposted AI-generated whisky ads from whisky.de.
Now, yes, saying he 'supports AI art' is a deliberately cheeky oversimplification. But optics are funny things, especially when you're publicly opposing the construction of data centres in Scotland.
And let's not overlook one delightful detail: on the German market, the Main Character's excellent spirits are sold under the utterly charming, and, in German, unintentionally hilarious, brand name Der 'Nach. Some marketing executive owes Germany an apology.
. . .
. . .
[30 July, 2026]
Emissions from air travel and shipping each contributed around 5 per cent of annual carbon dioxide emissions in 2025. (According to IEA, IMO and COPERNICUS Climate Change Service.)
As someone who is so concerned about the environment, I assume that Sam appropriately compensates for his own flights and those of all his staff (such as from the US to the UK) and for the shipping of his booze, and that he reports this accordingly?
⬆️ This was posted on the IG account od Sam Heughan as an IGS on 30 July 2026.
Not practicing what you preach? 🤔🧐
Please, please take time to raise your voice in support of this irreplaceable natural and historic treasure.
I am raising my voice, from afar.
First of all, many thanks to the person who sent me the screenshot from the Deuxmoi newsletter.
Based on the content, which was accompanied by a single photobooth picture still bearing traces of Purv’s watermark and the Luke Combs concert photo from Steph’s Instagram Story, I’m assuming the source was Purv. That assumption is reinforced by the fact that the entire premise falls apart, since the hand they identified as Steph’s is actually Sammie’s, Richard’s wife.
The text:
Sam Heughan Sparks Engagement Speculation With New Photo
“Outlander” star Sam Heughan is fueling fresh speculation about his relationship after sharing a new photo featuring rumored girlfriend Steph French.
The black-and-white snap, posted to Sam’s Instagram Story, shows the pair smiling together at what appears to be a concert or stadium event alongside friends.
Fans were quick to notice what appears to be a ring on Steph’s left ring finger, prompting questions about whether the couple could be engaged. However, because of the angle, lighting, and quality of the image, it’s not possible to confirm whether it’s an engagement ring.
Sam has never publicly confirmed a relationship with Steph and has long kept his personal life out of the spotlight, so for now, any engagement speculation remains just that: speculation.
I absolutely love it when this happens, even if I offered - for fairness - to take my own reblog down and was gently turned off 😘.
The shitshow seems so desperate, that it now takes anyone with at least one working neuron about thirty seconds to get the gist of the entire arrangement.
@lallybroch-pr-watch is, however, not just 'anyone' - she is one of the voices of reason and fairness. Thanking and giving her due precedence.
The reels and BTS pics from that same concert tell, one more time, a totally different story. I still wonder if I should post or not, simply because I do not want to give that person more air.
deuxmoi talked about sam, do you (or anyone) know what is it about?
No. But my understanding is that items published in a newsletter are a step above a generic submission that anyone could send in.
Considering they had just begun promoting Embassy, my assumption is that this is a PR planted item. If that’s the case, then regardless of what it says, I’d take it with a grain of salt.
This is what it is all about:
[Screenshot by courtesy, with many thanks and all credit due to the discreet friend who took and shared it.]
The use of the photobooth montage/collage/whatever and the red arrow point to *urv, who regularly does this to emphasize convenient details.
Way to go, Deux Moi. You did nothing else than point out the very profitable collab between Madam Mao and PR's pet fandom troll. I know credibility and ethics has never been their forte, but still...
This has been debunked three days ago, reason why I suppose *urv never posted it - 🚫SQUEE, heh. I suppose the Anon pls tip was submitted by the troll almost in real time, as it was posted by who? Madam Mao, of course:
[Source, LOL: https://www.tumblr.com/sgiandubh/823215158396649472/reblogging-to-rebuke-ready4newyears-biased?source=share - posted July 26, 2026]
The information/feeding circuit is suddenly quite apparent.
I predict more ocular problems in sight - pun absolutely intended. An excuse older than Egypt's pyramids. The real ones:
I just have to ask, after another week of odd behaviors, what is the point of the new beard?
I am not talking about the facial hair. I mean the performances of amazing girlfriend for the past year (or more!) and amazing boyfriend, or uncertain boyfriend, or unbothered boyfriend? Or smitten lovebirds, or match made in heaven.... yes, lets think about that. OK. Done. Listen. He isn’t being forced to look like he loves her and wants to be near her. He is forced to exist in same general area, and to be next to her at times. He is an actor. He can make strangers feel seen and listened to, or liked, in a 4 minute interaction. And then make the next fan also experience interest, happiness or appreciation in another 3 minute encounter. He may also genuinely feel happy or interested in a person he meets and exchanges some words with, and could be tight with frustration up inside and wishing he could run from the situation, when smiling and side hugging another fan. I don’t know, can’t really tell if he’s acting hard or hardly acting. But seriously, people, taking the various film or single pic evidence of his encounters with this little wannabe girlfriend lady, and then making the observation that he definitely has genuine affection for her, that his thoughts frequently turn to her, is simply a leap of imagination. It just is. It’s filling in blanks with fluffy gooey ideas, but there are real actual blank holes there. Sitting in close proximity to strangers or friends or whatever, there are still subtle body movements or positions a trained actor can use to demonstrate all kinds of slight messages of attitude, interest, comfort, wariness, respect. The list is infinite. What is happening with the times when Sam is being observed in public is -- when Sam is in public. No person knows this better than Sam. So it seems he is spending energy AVOIDING a person (I’m just ignoring the absolute wrong addition of a child) He is not trying to sell this as a close romantic infatuation or love story. And yet, he is being credited by a group of people for exactly that accomplishment. And all I can come up with after a year is still the same response. Whyyyyyy? That’s it. Why literally act like he does not care about someone, in this well documented way? What is the point of acting like you aren’t acting, while acting, as if not acting.But he is acting.
CB instagram...
caitrionabalfe
It may be Hungarian Granprix this weekend .. but two weekends ago I was lucky to get to join @mclarenf1 at Silverstone thanks to @velo.global #LiveYourFandom #VeloxMcLaren #NeverStopRacing .. What an experience 🤍 26m
While everyone was focusing on the ring, its size and its more or less deliberate placement, we were focusing on a much humbler detail, my friend and I:
[Source: C's IG account, posted July 25, 2026]
This was posted last week-end, so 'two weekends ago' was 10-11 July.
Except the 2026 British Grand Prix at Silverstone happened three week-ends before her post, on July 5, 2026:
[Source: https://www.silverstone.co.uk/news/your-2026-british-grand-prix-questions-answered]
And naturally, S's young relative's documented departure for Spain that same week-end is just a coincidence.
Inconvenient facts? Maybe. But the puzzle is slowly, but surely beginning to fit.
I am very surprised nobody noticed it. And yes, believe what you want.
With many thanks, as always, to my friend who wishes to remain in the shadows. One more time, the entire credit is due to her, not me.
https://www.instagram.com/p/DbUntbeKEjE/
Ask yourselves this: why is it always so difficult to find a single genuinely affectionate photo of the two of them after entire days of heavily photographed public events?
I'm willing to bet that no matter which event featuring Sam and Caitriona I bring up, there will be at least one photo, and usually several, where they genuinely look like a couple, whether it's through their body language or the way they're looking at each other.
So why, after an entire year filled with public appearances, does every "proof" end up being some ambiguous photo that Purv and her army of minions drool over?
And no, I don't think she's resting her hand on his arm. I think she's holding her drink.
It's exhausting.
"Give me truths; For I am weary of the surfaces…" – Ralph Waldo Emerson
I am “Narcissistic Anon” and she point I was trying to make (and apparently I did not do very well, so I apologize for that), was that if you knew nothing about MM and Steph, but just took a few minutes to browse their social media, they look markedly different. From that perspective, MM appears to have a very normal life, has friends, is close to her family, etc. and that Steph’s looks very different. That’s all. i was not trying to defend MM. I know that MM did some squirrelly things during her relationship with Sam, I was just observing how, on the surface (that is the key), Steph looks very strange and there are a lot of very clear red flags, that Steph is not smart enough to try to hide. Or perhaps she is too arrogant to hide. I hope that makes a little more sense?
Dear (returning) Narcissist Anon,
I never said you defended Flukenzie Floozy and I do not know why you seem to put this on my account. All I did was simply adding my two cents into what I honestly thought was an open conversation, that is all.
I remember very well reading many things about that particular moment in time. The thing you fail to grasp is that the woman you mentioned suddenly started behaving normally, including on her socials, the minute her showmance was over and done with. For the duration, she was a more tamed version of You-Know- Who, William Shatner's 'adorbs' comment on top.
Who is real Sam ?
https://www.instagram.com/p/DbO7ihbsEo8/
Hey, Anon. Just so you know, I’ve been wrestling with your question for the past two days. And unfortunately, I have to admit that I simply don’t know.
The truth is, none of us really know celebrities. We all catch glimpses of them through interviews or whatever they choose to share on social media, but over time we usually form some sense of who they are. We get a feel for their personality, sometimes their values, their family and friends, or the kind of life they lead.
With Sam, that feels impossible.
He shares almost nothing about his private life, and ever since he turned himself into a walking storefront, he has become a caricature of a middle aged party boy.
Gone is the humble, slightly awkward Sam who used to blush when a woman looked at him. Gone is the nerd who built Lego sets and loved Scully and Back to the Future.
Instead, we have this persona, and I sincerely hope it is just that, a persona. One that comes wrapped in jewelry, tattoos, and whatever new accessory he’s selling that week. No matter how hard I’ve tried to find the PR logic behind it, I just can’t.
It feels like a strange mash up of several completely contradictory branding strategies.
On one hand, he’s the businessman behind a premium spirits brand, the owner of a distillery, someone who gives speeches to members of Parliament and represents Scotland both at home and abroad.
On the other, he’s playing the frat boy in tank tops and chunky jewelry, pouring alcohol down strangers’ mouths.
On one hand, he’s soft launching an instant family at every public event. On the other, he refuses to define that relationship, lets the fandom chase breadcrumbs, and behaves around that supposed new family as though they’re an obligation rather than people he wants to be with.
I can understand building a polished, distinguished image. That’s good for the brand.
I can understand leaning into a younger, college boy persona if the goal is to separate himself from Jamie Fraser and perhaps open doors to different audiences.
I can even understand introducing a family, whether for image purposes or as cover for something else.
What I can’t understand is trying to be all of those people at the same time.
How do you narrate smut one week and a children’s book for visually impaired kids the next? How do you sell a $180 bottle of whisky while deliberately cultivating an image that feels cheap and trashy? How do you present yourself as a family man while treating your supposed partner and her daughter like an inconvenience?
I actually found myself wondering this week whether I’ve been wrong all along. Maybe I’ve been holding on to the version of Sam I thought I knew and struggling to let him go.
It’s not an easy thing to admit that you may have completely misjudged someone you spent years believing was a gentleman. A bit of a mama’s boy. Nerdy, charming, funny. Only to wonder whether he’s actually none of those things, but instead a player, a terrible boyfriend, someone who makes questionable decisions and surrounds himself with questionable people.
And then, in the middle of all these videos showing me someone I genuinely dislike, another clip appears. One of him helping Luke Combs’ mother down the stairs, quietly making sure she was okay.
And I catch myself thinking all over again…
Maybe that’s the real Sam.
Pope Francis’ last wish
A lot of people compare Steph to MM, which, especially in the beginning, I understand. Now, however, comparing the two only serves to highlight how (in my opinion), mentally disturbed (narcissist, sociopath…I’m not making a formal diagnosis), Steph is.
MM social media is full of what I would consider “normal life” pictures. Obviously curated to some extent, but years of pictures of her with her family, friends, vacations, work, and now with her husband and daughter. She appears to have a close relationship with her family and a very full, normal life.
When you look at Steph’s social media in comparison, the contrast is glaring. No holiday pictures with her family, no pictures of her out to brunch with friends, birthday parties, etc. Does she spend time with her family? Does she have any friends? Go to normal activities with her daughter? Then there is the fact that she completely erased her second husband from her life like he was just a speedbump on her way to better things.
And that’s just looking at what was/is available on social media. The red flags were everywhere. Sam just chose to ignore them.
Dear Narcissist Anon,
I would have to take your honest word, as far as Flukenzie Floozy's socials go, as I have never followed, nor engaged with anyone related to these people. I know their overall bankability also relies on social media engagement, but this is not how I operate.
Anyways, throwing my two cents into the conversation, I was talking with a friend who is a shrink - a real one - a couple of days ago and I was curious to see how they defined a narcissist.
Here is the gist of it, quoting from memory:
'A narcissist is somebody who does not have a past, nor do they care about their own past. Because they think they are the best thing ever since sliced bread, they take self reliance to a pathological level. And so history, including their own, is ahead, not behind them. These people are unable to perceive the idea of continuity, they only see discontinuity, because of their own self-proclaimed exceptionalism. Basically, everything starts with them. The world starts with them. Now, that is a mistake and so intellectually infantile.'
My question was general, because I read enough psychology stuff in my own life to know on the spot diagnosis is unethical and irresponsible. But I found A's answer so, so rewarding and more than I would have asked for, anyways.