I feel like I should probably put a pinned post up just so that if I’ve recently reblogged something lewd/NSFT, it’s not the first thing people see if they’d rather not.
so while this is a mixed-content personal blog, it does have a whole buncha lewd content, all tagged with #lewd.txt, #lewd.jpg, or #lewd.info, for your blacklisting needs. Pretty sure just blacklisting ‘lewd’ should cover all three, but don’t quote me on that.
Here be dragons, or whatever.
Edit: we may also be following for a sideblog we want kept separate.
Here's a reminder that Egypt would not take in Palestinian refugees from Gaza because of the risk of Hamas combatants pretending to be civilians. Egypt 100% could have evacuated civilians out of Gaza, because they didn't, because of HAMAS. When Israel won the Sinai, it returned most of that land to Egypt. Egypt gave the Gaza strip back because it was a security risk. Why? Because Hamas kept blowing shit up.
Here's a reminder that everyone living in the West Bank used to be Jordanian citizens. Jordan was fine allowing people to cross the border from the West Bank to Jordan and vice versa. And then the PLO tried to assassinate the Jordanian king because he wasn't hard enough on Israel. Now no Palestinians are Jordanian citizens and there's a hard border between Jordan and the West Bank.
You are supporting hate groups who are so reviled by other countries that countries are unwilling to take in Palestinian refugees because of them.
conservative Judaism has been a major bulwark against total assimilation and its most halachically controversial decisions were all made with this in mind. its decline signifies increasing assimilation and should be mourned; the conservative movement should be recognized for what it was able to do for 100 years, and its converts should be considered halachically Jewish
Converts from all denominations should be considered halachically Jews so long as they go through the same basic process. Someone attracted to Reform or Conservative Judaism should be able to study their teachings and practices, go before one of their batei din, and use one of their mikvot. The whole "Orthodox conversions are superior" is a consequence of the Chief Rabbinate of Israel being gatekeeping, snooty assholes sneering down at everyone who doesn't practice their very specific flavor of Judaism.
This right here. I studied for five years, changed almost everything about my life, had a beit din and the mikveh immersion, and yet because I find the Reform stream of Judaism the one that best fits who I am as a person, my conversion is “invalid”? To whom? Cause my rabbi and my community see me as fully Jewish and that’s enough for me. As my husband says “the Orthodox don’t own Judaism. As much as some of them pretend to..”
Obviously this isn’t a dig at all Orthodox Jews. But I do find it really aggravating that people see them as the “best” Jews and everyone else is Doing It Wrong.
highly dependent on cosmology(?) but I would generally advise against setting up an altar to manage a part of your life and then forgetting about it, which is the magical equivalent of putting a wild horse in a corral and forgetting to feed it.
Correct, you did not need to feed it before. And yet behold, it is now starving.
You know?
Like yes, a domesticated horse can have wildly better health, longevity, safety, etc. But you also have to feed it. And you did not have to feed it while it was roaming free.
Which in and of itself is a fine approach to altar building: "what if my [protection/prosperity/small business/relationships/etc] were a Creature that I was kidnapping and domesticating?"
Safe corral (protection for that thing)
Veterinary care (healing for that thing)
Home care (washing, polishing, and mending that thing)
Feedstock (energizing and feeding that thing)
Enrichment (drawing in new experiences that make the thing happier and healthier)
Getting rid of snakes (banishing things harmful to the thing)
Cute outfit for that thing (altar aesthetics matter and I don't mind saying it)
In such a style, any given altar should have a representation of the Creature and then protection for it, things to uplift it and help it to thrive, care and healing, very good source of nutrition for it to feed on, and depending on need some surrounding work put into the environment (getting rid of snakes) so that your thing is highly protected, as befitting such a cherished Creature.
You can indeed reach much greater heights of wellness and success with a domesticated thing, but then that requires all the care that homesteaders are already familiar with. And I think it's likely that to corral a Creature and then neglect puts you much worse off, because the Creature is of course ultimately something from your life important to you, that you are seeking to take direct control over.
So in some cases, it is much better to never try to enshrine the Creature at all. And in other cases, very powerful magic, and easy to be had.
Heylo! I wanted to ask about your experience post initiation if that's alright .i recently did a tarot reading and got told that to please spirits in order to begin a good working relationship, i must contemplate and be ready to be Changed. there were lots of signs that it could lead to feelings of isolation, and otherness but it will lead me deep into myself (sry if this is too long.) i want to know if u went through something similar, or something else, and is it worth it personally for you. I would also love some pointers as to what I'm supposed to contemplate about. I don't mind the isolation but maybe I'm not understanding some key aspect of it. anyway thank you and i love your blog it's an irreplaceable resource for me. :)
Hi :)
Spirit-lead initiation into witchcraft is a controversial topic, I think in part because it can be very uncomfortable to discuss.
I have been relatively open on my blog that my initiatory experience was extremely painful and required a level of sacrifice and transformation that I was too immature to comprehend at the beginning of the process. Even now it's not something I'm sure I could articulate.
For me it was a process that lasted the majority of a decade. I think this is a relatively average timeline - which I just bring up because I think it's useful to point out that if you are facing the same sort of thing that I faced, it's not just going to be over in a few weeks or months.
Was it worth it personally for me? I don't know. Right now, my answer is that I love who I am and I like my life, and I wouldn't be who I am or have this life if I didn't go through that process. I used to say I'd never do it again if I had the choice. Now, a few years after the fact, sometimes I say I'd do it again. Maybe in a decade I'll think it was worth it.
It's my belief that the sort of initiatory process I, and others, have gone through, isn't necessary for most people to form a good working relationship with the spirits.
I believe that if you have the choice, you should very, very carefully contemplate initiation and only agree to it after a prolonged period of reflection.
So, what's there to contemplate? I dunno. Otherness on the path to spirit-working was a major part of my trip, so if we are kindred, here's maybe something to contemplate:
You are a boulder. You are a very nice boulder in the wilderness. You're composed of many varieties of minerals and metals. You are a gorgeous boulder, glittering in the sunlight, hosting a unique map of inclusions and ore veins unlike any other boulder in the world.
You sit high up on a mountainside. A few meters behind you is a river. Below you is a dry valley.
The waters of the river are pressing up behind you. They rush past you, sweeping by, continuing their eternal circuit in the mountain-range, but rarely trickling into the dry valley below.
One day, you gain an interest - as some boulders do - in allowing some of the water to trickle past you into the valley below. The secrets of nature will allow you to sometimes let water to lap up over your sides, and through narrow crevices, to water the plants you find to be most beautiful, and provide drinking pools for the little animals you hold most dear.
Little by little, the valley beneath you begins to change as you apply yourself to learning the secrets of nature and letting the water flow past you.
After some time, the water begins to whisper in your ear. It appreciates your interest in its flow - it likes your focus on the river. A deal can be brokered:
The river will dissolve only some of the minerals and inclusions that run through you, creating hollow tunnels. Through these tunnels, the water can flow much more easily and rapidly.
But there are conditions.
The conditions are that whatever is washed away can never be returned. How could it? What force in the universe could restore the crystalline structure within you once the waters have carried it away?
And, the river chooses which inclusions will be removed. The river is very wise in these matters; it knows better than anyone how water can best flow through any boulder. It isn't up to you to choose what leaves, and it isn't up to you to choose the nature in which the water will flow through you.
Finally, if you use the secrets of nature to ever stop the flow of water through the new inclusions, you are at risk of crumbling away. The empty caverns within you will dry up and leave you empty in places that should be whole.
The river asks you to contemplate and return with an answer.
Of course it leads you deep into yourself. The river is going to run right through you.
Here's a really simple magical act that I have found to be ridiculously effective.
On one side of one sheet of paper, write out your boundaries with the spirit world.
Examples include:
I do not consent to any "spiritual lessons" which have not been explicitly discussed with me.
I am not "up for grabs" by random deities passing by. There is no relationship unless I consent to it. I work with the following deities...
I do not require any additional suffering, and I do not consent to it; life is hard enough, thank you very much.
If you want to "help," maybe get me more money. If you want to hurt, may I recommend one of our country's billionaires?
My spiritual goals are x, y, and z.
I came to this reality to X, and not to Y.
Add any terms you like, just stick to one page, and keep it legible.
Then just stick it into your wallet and forget about it. I have a wallet phone case, and some people believe that the phone is a magical object. When off, it's a black mirror. When on, it is full of electricity (bottled lightning). And it is definitely a portal of a kind. But I think just having it on your person all the time is sufficient. When spirits approach, point to the paper. If need be, take it out and read it (doing this before entering a magical gathering is also helpful).
jewish history basically is a cycle of arriving in the land of israel, leaving it, arriving again, leaving again, etc. i’ll call each of these a loop. there are, essentially, four loops (for simplicity’s sake). the thing about the promise is that it was already fulfilled at the end of the second loop. zionism is concerned with the fourth loop.
the jewish story (a mix of biblical narrative and history), told in loops of exile:
loop 1 - really half a loop, because it starts outside the land of israel. abraham is in ur (a city-state in mesopotamia) and god tells him to go to canaan.
after he arrives, god promises the land to his descendants.
loop 2 - abraham’s grandson jacob brings the whole family to egypt. they get enslaved, then they escape, eventually they arrive back in canaan. joshua conquers it. the promise is fulfilled.
loop 3 - the babylonians destroy the first temple in jerusalem and jews are exiled to babylonia. then the persians beat the babylonians and the jews are allowed to come back.
loop 4 - the romans destroy the second temple in jerusalem. many jews are taken as slaves, expelled, or leave due to poor conditions. some come back but not in large numbers until zionism in the 19th century. then the holocaust happens, the state is established, holocaust refugees pour in, and the jews of swana are expelled and pour in too.
the zionist narrative is about loop 4. especially the religious zionist narrative. “the romans expelled us and now we’ve returned.”
while zionism is obviously informed by the torah and the concept of the promised land, the ideology of zionism is not primarily “we should go to israel because it’s the promised land.” that’s an anachronism. you’re looking at the wrong loop.
If science is about the world that is, and religion is about the world that ought to be, then religion needs science because we cannot apply God’s will to the world if we do not understand the world. If we try to, the result will be magic or misplaced supernaturalism. We will rely on miracles – and the rabbis ruled, ‘Don’t rely on miracles.’ By the same token, science needs religion, or at the very least, some philosophical understanding of the human condition and our place within the universe, for each fresh item of knowledge and each new accession of power raises the question of how it should be used, and for that we need another way of thinking.
Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks zt"l, The Great Partnership: God, Science, and the Search for Meaning p.214
singing is such a great grounding exercise tbh bc doing it well requires a lot of attention to your entire body and active listening. if your posture is restricting your airflow or you're holding tension in your body it affects the way your voice sounds. you need to take deep breaths otherwise you won't have enough air to move through your vocal folds. and being able to hear and correct your own pitch requires you to be present and paying attention to what you hear. plus it's fun and comforting
Just wanna reply / add stuff due to your lovely tags!
>#also anybody can learn vocal technique!! #not that like. you need to if you're not interested in that #but so many people are like 'oh no you dont want me in your choir i cant sing' YES YOU CAN WE WILL TEACH YOU #if you want to sing well but you think you just dont Have It #sing anyway. find youtube tutorials. take lessons if you can swing it #you can sing! you can sing! you can sing!
We took lessons a few years ago, starting from scratch! Scratch, as in, all the "beginner" and "learn to sing" guides online that we could find were too advanced for us!
For whatever reason, all the advice was "record yourself singing and see if you're sharp or flat in places" and i'm like. What part of "beginner" did youse not understand? i don't know how to tell if i'm sharp or flat because i don't know how to know what note i'm supposed to sing, or what note i am singing.
Anyway. If there's anyone reading who feels like i did, here's a process - note that i'm assuming here you can already read notation, but the first few steps will be doable even if you can't.
Get a tuner. There are free apps. I like this one for android (you'll need to manually install it, or install through f-droid) because it shows wobbles in pitch quite well, but any works. https://f-droid.org/packages/de.moekadu.tuner/
At your comfortable speaking voice, say "laa". Try to hold this for 3+ seconds without it pitching up or down.
Use the tuning app to check what pitch it is. If you're sharper flat, raise/lower the pitch ever so slightly so you're on a whole note.
Tuner on phone + virtual piano on computer + headphones with one (1) speaker in/over your ear, the other off your ear (so you can hear both yourself and the piano, but the tuner can't hear the piano).
Play the piano note that matched your voice from before, then try to copy that note with your voice. Try to focus on matching the sound, and only using the tuner to help confirm you had it right.
Pick a line of 3 notes that includes your starting note (so, if your starting note was E, pick something like CDE, DEF, or EFG).
Play your starting note and match it with your voice for 3 seconds. Play the next note in your sequence and match it. Keep just playing these three notes and matching them for a while.
This is probably the most you want to do for day 1. Don't hurt your throat! Tomorrow you start by doing these again, from step 2/3 - your voice will do different things day by day, so your starting note might change!
Start expanding that range. See how high & low you can (comfortably!) go. Make sure you're practicing both up and down!
Hopefully by this stage, you'll have started at least sometimes hearing when the note you sung and the note on the piano matched, or didn't match. If you haven't, try listening carefully to a match, and playing a mismatch on purpose to hear how it sounds "off".
The challenging bit (and another part where a teacher might help!) - find a song you like that has these traits:
you can find the notation online somewhere (probably musescore)
Is within your range (someone who knows what they're doing (teacher!) can help you with changing the key to match your range).
is mostly or only whole notes
Has a few of the same note in a row
Has most of its notes step up or down by one note at a time
("Snuff" by Slipknot is a good example of a song that meets the last two points).
From here it's basically, practice the first line or two of the song using the technique above (play note on piano, match note with voice, check tuner for confirmation.)
Later you can start practicing skipping notes (so go A C E G E C A and B D F D B (or whatever is within your range)) and start practicing all the notes including sharps/flats. Practicing sliding up and now the notes smoothly (like laaaaaaa vs laaa laaa) Start singing more lines of the song you picked.
You'll also want to be hydrated (i recommend having hot honey water with you!) and stop by the time your throat gets a little sore. You'll also want to look up guides online (there's plenty of 'em!) for how to breathe properly / use your belly / abdominal / diaphragm muscles to help with singing, as this is a good habit to get into early. My teacher was performing before he learned this, and his throat would hurt a lot after every performance! Not good.
sometimes I think about how people make their little TikToks insisting that the British somehow unlawfully “gave” Israel to the Jews and “supported” the Jews because they’re “white Europeans,” and then I read things like this and it reminds me painfully of the revisionism we’re having to navigate :
The Exodus was an American Holocaust rescue ship. She was American funded. She was crewed by American World War II veterans with Haganah leadership. Her mission was to rescue 4,515 desperate Survivors of the Holocaust, unwanted by the world for surviving, trapped in European Displaced Persons Camps. In some cases, the DP camps were adjacent to the Concentration Camps where the Nazis had tried to murder the Survivors just two years before.
Though promised a home in British Mandate Palestine through the Balfour Declaration of 1917, the British denied the Survivors permission to enter because of Arab resistance. It was the same before the outbreak of WWII. The British closed Mandate Palestine to desperate Jews and 6,000,000 were slaughtered.
Sam Schulman was a teenager in 1947. He was 18. He wanted to go to Palestine. He, like the other American volunteers onboard the old, worn out WWII surplus ship Exodus, wanted to do what they could to help the Survivors of the Holocaust. All the volunteers understood that if captured, the British could throw them in prison for ten years. They went anyway.
One of the volunteers on board was Bill Bernstein, a Navy Veteran, one of the very few crew members on the Exodus with any previous naval experience. He was the second officer. Bill wrote home about what he saw and felt as the Exodus awaited the arrival of the refugees in open, secret, convoys to Sete, France for boarding. This time, he wrote to his family back home in San Francisco: “Our people have only one burning desire – – – the second deliverance to Eretz Israel. The first migration was supposedly the handiwork of God; the second one, we fight for!!”
Bill did fight. He was murdered by a British truncheon crushing his skull. 22 miles at sea the British ordered the unarmed Exodus to stop and surrender. The Exodus continued running hard for the shallows of the coastal waters where the British could not go with their deep V hulled destroyers. Two destroyers rammed the Exodus trying to crush her hull, possibly sinking her and killing 4,500 Survivors, of whom 1,300 were children.
Boarding parties were sent on board with guns blazing and truncheons flaring. The Jews resisted with everything they had, tin cans of kosher beef, water hoses….
In the uneven fight, three Jews, including Bill had been killed. 147 wounded. It became very clear to the Exodus’ commanders; unless she surrendered the British would kill them all.
The British took control of the Exodus and brought her into Haifa’s Harbor. As the Exodus came into view of the Promised Land, ashore, the sounds of singing could clearly be heard coming from the ship. The refugees were singing the Hatikvah with all their hearts.
The British had prison ships waiting for the brutalized refugees. The prison ships, some complete with cages, took the refugee prisoners back to the land of death – Germany. The British were intent on teaching the Jews a lesson.
Journalists present in Haifa saw the pathos differently. They shared the horrific scenes with the world. World opinion began shifting in favor of the Holocaust Survivors.
Aboard the Exodus was a Methodist Minister, Rev. John Stanley Grauel. He was an eyewitness to what had happened during the British attack. Rev. Grauel was smuggled by the Haganah to Jerusalem to tell the story of the Exodus to the United Nations Special Committee on Palestine sent to investigate the Mandate. Before Rev. Grauel told the story of the Exodus, the Committee had refused to consider Holocaust Survivor testimony. After Rev. Grauel, the Committee agreed to go to Germany and take Survivor Testimony.
That testimony proved crucial. The Committee changed their position and recommended to the United Nations to partition the Mandate into two States, one Jewish and one Arab. November 29, 1947, four months after the Exodus arrived in Haifa; the State of Israel was born. 2,000 years of exile and homelessness ended, a Jewish state was reborn on its ancient land.
Pat Boone and the story of ‘Exodus’ – San Diego Jewish World
yeah gotta be honest every time i think about how the dome of the rock was literally built on top of the holiest site to judaism and that jews are actually literally banned from going there i wonder how the jewish people haven’t set the world on fire with justifiable rage
and not only that but the people whose religious structure now sits on top of the temple mount have historically fear mongered about jews supposedly plotting to take over the site and used these misinformation campaigns to justify violence against jews — the hebron massacre for example — and yet the jewish community is expected to not be pissed about any of this
also i should be used to this by now but i think it’s wild how every fucking time i make a post like this validating jewish pain i IMMEDIATELY lose followers. some of y’all just plain disgust me.
Blogging about Israel and the Arab world since, oh, forever.
Also, what prompted the Second Intifada (on paper), was that a Jewish politician went to visit the Temple Mount after the Jerusalem Islamic Waqf illegally excavated and dumped over 10 dump-trucks' worth of priceless artifacts within the Temple Mount.
And they slaughtered thousands of our civilians for it.
“A new sense may actually be dawning that only a mass movement against Israeli apartheid (similar to South Africa’s) will work.”
Fuck this article, but the headline spot on.
A Jewish man merely visiting the holiest place in the entire Jewish religion, that Jews aren't allowed to go near to "respect" the religion that built over it, and that alone prompted slaughtering thousands of our civilians.
20 years after the fact, what attacks did Israel face?
And people try to, "Well... both sides" it.
"Wellllll, a Jewish politician visiting the Al-Aqsa Mosque made Muslims scared that they'd make changes to it, so you can understand why--"
a) Like when they "made changes" to our holiest site in the world by destroying and dumping tens of tonnes of our holiest artifacts??
b) A Jew visiting a Mosque shouldn't prompt slaughtering thousands of Jews.
I shouldn't have to say that.
And don't, "Well, apartheid--" me:
This was just after the Camp David Summit.
Just after the Israeli government agreed to all of Yassir Araf's demands for Palestinian statehood and then some: All of Gaza, 96% of the West Bank, East Jerusalem as the capitol, plus full monetary reparations for those displaced in 1948 War that they started.
And Arafat responded by not just rejecting statehood, but his Waqf by vandalizing and destroying ten dump-trucks worth of the holiest Jewish artifacts from the holiest Jewish place in the world.
And Jews were (and are) expected to be completely fine with it.
"They destroyed literally tonnes of our holiest artifacts, but we visited their mosque, so it's really all the same."
"They stabbed, shot, and blew up thousands of our civilians across a bloody summer, but one of our guys visited their mosque, so tit-for-tat."
Fuck that.
-
If you disagree with me about any of this, that's fine.
I don't care.
I just wanted to draw attention to that one extra detail.
It's also important to point out that this act of vandalism destroyed historical evidence of our history in Israel.
See, the Waqf's illegal excavation of the Temple Mount has a part two: The Temple Mount Sifting Project. We know where all the rubble was dumped, and this organization, with the help of hundreds of thousands of volunteers, has spent decades sifting through it for all the priceless archeological treasures.
But one of the most important elements of an archeological find, perhaps the most important element, is the context. Not only where it was found, but how deep. What was above it? What was it above?
And all of that context was permanently, irrevocably destroyed. If a 3000 year old shard is found, we have to ask: has it been there for three thousand years? Or could it have spent two thousand years elsewhere before being moved?
If the Temple Mount hadn't been desecrated, we'd find that shard in a layer of debris that would prove how long it had been there. But as is, we can't be totally certain. We can't prove it.
I've volunteered with the sifting project twice. The first time, I found a piece of Herodian tile--that is, the specific type of tile that he used in all his major building projects, which we also see at Masada.
I held in my hands corroboration of the contemporary account of Herod renovating the Temple and adding the retaining walls and plaza that are still standing today, the structure the Dome of the Rock was built on.
But that evidence, and every other piece of evidence the project finds, has, and always will have, an asterisk.
A bit of room for doubt that will always be there, because the religious authority descended from the conquerors of the land deliberately destroyed the evidence of the cultural history that predated their presence.
And yet, somehow, we are the real imperialist colonizers, and our presence is the real desecration.
Also, who wants to take bets on whether Yumemiya here sees someone online say they're German and immediately goes to ask them if they're a Nazi?
Actually, hang on, 'If you let a Nazi into a bar, it becomes a Nazi bar, same deal with ethnic groups'? Does anyone else get a weird feeling about this guy's thoughts on segregation?
Yeah, that’s really the thing, isn’t it: the point of “if you let a Nazi into your bar, it becomes a Nazi bar” was never about how you should grill random German people about whether or not they’re Nazis before you let them enter your space – on the contrary, if your only focus was on German people, you’d miss a lot of neo-Nazis who are, not to put to fine a point on it, actually majority not ethnically German. The original story was about noticing that the patrons in question were displaying an explicitly Nazi symbol. It had nothing to do with who they were and everything to do with what they were openly supporting.
How the actual fuck did we get from “learn to recognize fascist dog whistles and have a zero tolerance policy about them” to “selectively interrogate members of minority groups you think are suspicious about whether they’re one of the good ones?”
Bruh let’s imagine for a moment that two people walk into your bar:
Person A is not German, but is wearing a literal iron cross. You ask him if the literal iron cross is a Nazi thing. He says that sure, that’s maybe the origin of the iron cross, but obviously he’s not a Nazi, and you need to stop jumping at shadows. The iron cross is really just a symbol of resistance against modernity, and embracing tradition. He wears it because he believes it’s important to preserve ethnic divisions and maintain cultural purity. He thinks stopping modern degeneracy is critically important – in the politics, and also in the arts. There are a lot of sick, evil people out there who are trying to destroy communities, but groups like his are trying to resist that. “We’re stronger together,” he says. “That’s why we need to protect our own.”
Person B is dressed completely normally but he speaks with a German accent. You ask him to clarify whether or not he’s a Nazi right this instant because “all Germans are Nazis until proven otherwise,” and he tells you “fuck off, you racist piece of shit.”
If you kick out Person B and let Person A stay, congratulations, you’re speed-running your way into having a Nazi bar.
This person is a Nazi. If it wasn't clear before that the tactic of labeling Zionists as undeserving of life and then asserting that any Jew should be assumed to be a Zionist is bent towards Jewish extermination it should be now
Kaifeng Jews in China were, for many years, cut off from other Jews AMD thought they were the only Jews left. Imagine their surprise when European Jews, fleeing the Holocaust, arrived in their town, speaking a language they already knew: Hebrew.
Similar things happened in Uganda and Ethiopia.
Even when Jews are removed from each other, we maintain our identities. We recognize Jews from other countries and we will share a history, language, songs, and culture.
okay, so, I know it's an annoying question but I trust you far more than I trust myself when it comes to research on Israel and Palestine. Mostly because I'm incredibly ADHD and because I have the tendency to go into utterly unrelated rabbit holes.
I was wondering if you know where I can find an exhaustive list of events before 1948, that prove peace was never truly a thing? I know of the Arab revolt and Hebron massacre, but I'm almost certain there were others, but idk how to even look these up. (I'm quite bad with that stuff).
I can later look these up and find sources about them, but idk where to start is my problem.
Thanks in advance!!
I also want to thank you, from the depths of my heart, for helping me learn more about this history!! You're so well-versed and you carry yourself in arguments/debates and express yourself with such elegance and eloquence. Thank you!!
Attacks by Arabs against Jews in Israel pre-dates Israeli settlements, pre-dates Israel's so-called 'occupation,' and pre-dates the establis
On October 7, 2023, a pogrom took place in Israel for the first time since the creation of the Jewish state.
