#NoCaption
Interview Vampire Daily
macklin celebrini has autism

ellievsbear
KIROKAZE
Cosimo Galluzzi

No title available
Color Me Curious
Game of Thrones Daily
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Sweet Seals For You, Always
RMH

bliss lane

Product Placement
Xuebing Du
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Monterey Bay Aquarium
h

Andulka
art blog(derogatory)

seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Brazil
seen from Canada

seen from Singapore

seen from Australia

seen from Brunei

seen from Mauritius
seen from United States
seen from Kenya

seen from United States

seen from Lithuania
seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from Chile
seen from Brazil
@shikongo-andreas777
#NoCaption
Look up
#backFromtraining Am apparently #tooTallForSoccer
#cowboy
#UFO SIGHTED 2 MINS AGO IN WINDHOEK (at Grysblock)
#lateAfternoonSnack #enjoying snapchat (at Grysblock)
Mr........ Earlier... (at Unam Maın Campus)
😎 (at Grysblock)
#focused (at Grysblock)
Tried all the #filters but no luck (at Grysblock)
#Pals_on_fleek
#watLie about to kick off #UpFoxesUp (at Grysblock)
....... (at Grysblock)
Pal's for #lifelong (at Unam Maın Campus)
On campus #testcomingup #focused (at Unam Maın Campus)
😉😉😉😉😉😉😉 (at Grysblock)
South Dakota Gov. Dennis Daugaard has vetoed a bill that would have banned transgender students from using the bathrooms that match their gender identity.
It would have been the first bill of its kind to actually pass, but after major outcry, Gov. Daugaard vetoed it hours before the deadline.
From the Washington Post:
“In a message to state lawmakers announcing his veto, Daugaard said that the bill would replace local control with a statewide mandate and ‘does not address any pressing issue concerning the school districts of South Dakota.’
‘Instead of encouraging local solutions, this bill broadly regulates in a manner that invites conflict and litigation, diverting energy and resources from the education of the children of this state,’ Daugaard wrote.
If it had become law, the South Dakota law would have been in direct conflict with federal civil rights policy, and schools could have faced the possibility of losing millions of dollars in federal funding.”
PHEW. Y'ALL THAT WAS CLOSE.