🪽🪽 @sillylittlemind - Tumblr Blog

music can genuinely change the energy within you if it’s high enough vibrationally.

this verse is literally life changing - his own manifestation - in a way

everyone knows mike was super big on speaking things into existence but something like this can really change your life if applied correctly

a true hymn 🪄🫰🏻🪽

#michael jackson #mjinnocent #mjjforever #king of pop #music

prettyangeliczz

this will sound crazy but sometimes i genuinely feel like some michael fans view this man as white. it’s already annoying enough because a lot of people are still ignorant about his vitiligo, thinking michael could control it, which is insensitive in itself. the reason why i believe some michael fans view him as white is through some fan art, the way he’s written in some fanfic, and overall perceived in and by the media. i know what i am saying is not anything new, but it is bothering me, while having the knowledge that michael, when alive, was always proud to be a black man, and had to basically force people to see that. you’re contributing to a harmful narrative if you do view michael as a white man, in any way, shape, or form, that’s an undeniable fact. i could go on about why i feel this way and how i do think that even some of his non-black fans are a contributor to why, not just press, weirdly enough, if that makes sense, even a little. because my conversation on how some non-black fanfic writers exclude black readers when it comes to making michael x reader fics ties into this a bit. also, going back to fan art, and how some non-black artists draw michael to have skin as pale as an actual white man, which is, problematic in itself. i am not even trying to offend anyone, it’s just something that’s been on my mind for a while.

sillylittlemind

GOOD FCKN MORNING!!!

japlanta

these set of pics got me in a chokehold

sillylittlemind

the tallest 5'9 ever to exist

wahhhhh i don’t know how im going to say yes at my wedding when ill be thinking of michael jackson the whole time………

;(

#michael jackson #mjinnocent #mjjforever

visualsbyaina

this lyrics breakdown of "2000 watts" is frying me uppppp

sillylittlemind

oh yeah boy

azaablue

the best fanfiction you've ever read was written by a woman in her 40s before she made dinner for her kids. it was written by a teenager after school when they should've been studying for a history test. and a barista came up with the idea while they cleaned the espresso machine and busser fact-checked it on their break and the post-doc edited between writing grant proposals and the nurse apologized for typos in the notes after a long shift and behind every drabble and one-shot and multi-chapter fic there is a person with a wonderful and interesting and chaotic life and it is such a privilege that we get to be a part of it because they decided to do this thing we all share, for fun.

journalist x MJ: they’ve met before, there’s lots of history to unpack. i am just experimenting! 🖤

(thrillerxbad MJ)

🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽

i can’t stand to be here, but ive given absolutely everything to get where i am now in my journalistic career and i absolutely will not let HIM get in the way of that.

face to face with someone i thought had no place in my life anymore, i find comfort in directing my gaze at his now infamous black loafers, rather than his softly sketched face.

“so, at this age, you’re… 24?” i knew the answer

“30” he mumbled

“30?” no that couldn’t be. i definitely KNEW the answer

he giggles, and my stomach drops. he is charming as ever, as he was the last time i saw him, all the times before that, and especially as when i first ever laid my silly little eyes on him and cursed myself for what seems to be the rest of eternity.

i look up finally and i am unable to hide the lack of amusement on my face. he notices the almost disgust on my face and allows his teeth to sink into his bottom lip, gently forming a cheeky grin.

i feel sick.

“can we just take a second?”

silence in the room and confusion on the faces of my whole team.

gritting my teeth and forcing my eyes shut in an attempt to escape whatever hell on earth i had just landed in, “a second, please, now.”

everyone disperses and i find myself still with my eyes almost sewn shut, hoping that when i open them this will all just be a terrible nightmare and he’ll be gone and i’ll be interviewing Prince instead. at the thought of such irony i laugh to myself - “y’know i’m funny”, moment ruined.

“what?”

“you were laughing weren’t ya? or am i goin crazy after being here all day”

god i wish he’d fuck off, but he won’t. so i put on the bravest face of all.

fluttering my eyelashes at him, “oh you caught me. you have me absolutely tickled mike”

he scoffs. i roll my eyes.

“did ya get prettier since the last time i saw you?” he inches closer, taking his aviators off forcing me to be face to face with him but without anything separating us this time.

there are a few moments in my life where i’ve ever felt out of body entirely, and this might just be one of them.

to my blank stare at him and lack of a response to his ridiculous question, “so, did ya?”

im getting tired of him. tired of his baseless questions, his attitude, his constant and extremely unnecessary lip-biting, and the fact that even after all this time, after the endless girls he’s had after me, im still deeply obsessed with him and he knows it. so he plays to his advantage. he can read me like no one else can, and he knows exactly what to say to get me tripping all over him again.

but i want to leave him tripping this time.

“why don’t you ask your girlfriend? i ran into her last weekend. god i wonder if she thinks ive gotten prettier since the last time i saw her. when was that again? oh i know, when i walked in on you two whilst we were together.”

my heart is beating so fast it might just fall right out my chest and ill have to humiliate myself and pick it up off the floor and stuff it back inside of me. he can’t know that though, so i lean against the interviewers seat and smile politely at him; unwavering.

michael on the other hand is in utter shock. for someone so laid back, the look in his eyes made it easy to see his whole facade was coming crashing down on him by whatever i just spat out at him.

#michael jackson #mjinnocent #mjjforever #mj fanfic #michael x reader

sillylittlemind

posted my first piece of mj writing feel like throwing up and crying x

sillylittlemind

fyi it is on the mj community thing i really am scared to post any writing on my main blog lol

#michael jackson #mjinnocent #mjjforever

posted my first piece of mj writing feel like throwing up and crying x

#michael jackson #mjinnocent #mjjforever #king of pop

dukeofdelirium

Exposing Nexflix’s Michael Jackson: The Verdict Pt 2

As I have done in my first extensive post covering the first episode in a 3 part “documentary series” released by Netflix, I will now go over the second ep.

You can read the first post here

I want to start this post off by saying that the only thing that has managed to draw out actual emotion from me viewing this documentary is the real footage of Michael’s fans all over the world showing up to this trial to support him in the public eye. Michael at this time in his life had been essentially blacklisted by the music industry, ostracized by the media, and turned into a caricature. I’m sure seeing all of his fans there to support him meant a lot to him, and was why he continued to let them approach him despite the death threats and allegations from people stabbing him in the back.

Kerry Anderson states that Michael made a point to let fans approach, and that what mattered to him throughout the trial was the fans. He goes on to state that Michael loved his fans, which we all know, and to that I’ll state that we love you too Michael, though you’re no longer with us. And that is why we will never stop defending you, and that is why I am compiling these posts.

They begin after Kenny Anderson speaks by introducing two jury members who were part of the 12 that reached a unanimous Not Guilty verdict. Not shown are the 8 alternates who also maintained they saw no evidence of guilt from the prosecution in the televised live interview of the entire Jury following this verdict in 2005. Though the 8 alternates did not deliberate, they too sat in for the entire trial.

Now, for the sake of transparency, I will link a post I made prior answering an ask that discusses the two jurors that famously flipped after the verdict, despite BOTH of them stating to anti-Jackson media outlets that there was no evidence proving guilt.

💬 0 🔁 3 ❤️ 13 · hi i have one question. is it true that 3 / 5 of jurors in mj's trial believed he was a predator? i see often that guilter

Let’s continue.

Ron Zonen, one of the prosecutors in Jackson’s trial, claims that they felt that Jackson was so famous he was “getting away” with his crimes. Obviously, Jackson’s fame did not stop him from being unrightfully prosecuted (as if it had been anyone else, such a bogus case would have never went to trial to begin with), and yet the jury themselves state in their televised interviews in 2005 that they did NOT CARE about Jackson’s celebrity and that they decided as a unit to judge him as they would anyone.

Diane Dimond later states that supposedly Gavin said Michael requested he and Star sleep in his bedroom, and for them to ask for permission from their parents. Again, this is not true, as Jackson himself stated in the Bashir doc that they asked to sleep in the room with him and that he said they could if they asked their parents first (which he did with every child), and Frank Cascio on video corroborated Michael’s story, long before the Cascio family flipped to make allegations of their own for some cash!

It should be noted here that the Cascio family knew Michael for decades (and he met and befriended the parents before most of their children were born), and that this family defended Michael Jackson for over 25 years. Both on live tv and in private.

Frank Cascio was Michael’s assistant. Frank was in the room along with Michael’s two oldest children Prince and Paris Jackson. All the children slept in the bed, and Michael and Frank slept on the floor. Even Gavin, the accuser, took the stand and stated he wasn’t sleeping in the damn bed with Michael.

The reason the Cascio family did not testify in the 2005 trial was because Frank Cascio was named an un-indicted co-conspirator, for Jackson’s conspiracy charge. Other individuals were also named. The entire Cascio family was implied to be co-conspirators as a result, which discouraged valuable witness testimony due to fear of being prosecuted themselves. In other words, it was a way for the prosecution to effectively gag pro-Jackson people.

This did not stop the Cascio’s from defending Michael in interviews publicly, however.

It should also be noted that Frank Cascio was named by the accuser and brother of the accuser who alleged he showed them porn on a laptop. Their stories change between who was operating the laptop by one saying Michael and the other saying Frank, but Frank was literally accused of CSA alongside Michael in the criminal trial. Which makes the Cascio families recent allegations absurd even more so than they already are, because if Michael is guilty, SO ARE THEY! They would be guilty of not only CSA but of conspiracy!

Now color me fucking SHOCKED! They actually brought up a major inconsistency in Star Arvizo’s testimony!

Yes, it is true that Star Arvizo claimed he walked up the stairs in Michael’s bedroom and caught Gavin being molested while unconscious. Not only does his description of this scene continuously change throughout police interviews, grand jury interviews, and his actual sworn testimony in the trial, but there was a MAJOR issue with his story: the alarm!

If you have read my Arvizo thread which deeply and thoroughly discusses the allegations, you will have seen a video I uploaded of this alarm test provided by the defense. If you haven’t read my thread, please do so and come back.

💬 1 🔁 0 ❤️ 10 · The Arvizo Allegations · Here we will be breaking down the timeline, inconsistencies, provable lies, and evidence of the A

Arvizo allegations thread ^

As I was saying, the alarm completely dismantled this child’s story, because it could be heard from any part of the 2 story bedroom, as shown on video. How could Michael Jackson not have heard such an alarm? Obviously the rational answer is that it doesn’t make sense, because it never happened.

Star contradicted himself many other times in his testimony. His cross examination was absolutely devastating to the prosecution’s case, as was his brother Gavin’s. He claimed the alarm couldn’t be heard if the door was closed, which again, was disproven on video.

He also claimed that Michael had shown him and Gavin a specific magazine. Tom Mesereau got him to repeatedly state it was that exact magazine, which had Gavin’s finger prints on them. Only to reveal to the child and the jury that this magazine was not published until well after the Arvizo’s left Neverland Ranch, meaning MJ showing them such a thing was impossible. 👇

pieces of Star Arvizo’s cross examination March 8th, 2005 ^

And now, some of you might be wondering. Fingerprints?! Let me link you more posts where I have discussed this matter.

💬 1 🔁 1 ❤️ 20 · I would like to thank you for giving all the sources, evidence and clocking haters who claim wrong things about Michael. I

It should also be noted that one of the staff members testified to Star Arvizo’s BRANDISHING a KNIFE at her in the kitchen while she was washing dishes. She also testified to the fact the staff complained about the Arvizo children, stating they vandalized the property, that they threw stuff at them, etc. And not only that, another child that was there at the time and that hung out with Star and Gavin privately accused the two boys of sexual assault. They were also accused of harassing young girls on the prophet and defacing furniture and personal items. They stole alcohol from the kitchen and the wine cellar, and were caught by staff members.

And by the way, Star Arvizo years after this trial was accused of bashing his girlfriend’s face into the dashboard of a car. He lied repeatedly under oath in that trial in 2016, as well. He and his brother also falsely accused their biological father of molesting their sister while he and the mother were divorcing. The Arvizo family had also falsely accused a JCPenny store of sexual abuse to get settlement money, and had committed welfare fraud against the United States Government.

But ah, that’s not all: Gavin Arvizo also danced with his wife at their wedding to none other than Michael Jackson’s songs. Would you dance to your abusers music at your wedding? Yeah, I didn’t think so.

But wait! There’s more! See the name attached? It was Diane Dimond who reported it. Diane Dimond, who attended Ron Zonen’s wedding with the Arvizo’s and Louise Palanker who also appeared in this Netflix documentary as a “family friend” lmao! She is MARRIED TO THE PROSECUTOR! They married while was still a prosecutor and were dating during the trial. How a State prosecutor can be allowed to date a State witness is fucking beyond me! And Palanker testified in the trial, and she was the only person that even somewhat corroborated this “MJ held the Arvizo’s captive” story, though her whole testimony was essentially hearsay.

Her testimony backfired on her gravely, because she didn’t realize her initial interview with sheriff’s had been recorded. In this initial interview, she stated Gavin and Star had been coached.

pieces of Lousie Palanker’s cross examination testimony March 22nd, 2005 ^

Her attending Gavin’s wedding along with Zonen and Dimond ^ And do I spy with my little eye Stacy Brown sitting at that table? 😂 wow it’s almost like all of these people that appeared in this Netflix documentary to slander and smear Michael Jackson are all friends or something???? Huh, that’s not extremely fucking weird!

I swear this woman is fucking insane and obsessed with this man! Why does she have pictures of him on her wall in her house?! Diane Dimond, get a fucking job, leave him alone you freak!

Diane and Stacy Brown make a whole spectacle of Michael having shown up to court in pajamas like it’s some humiliation ritual they must carry out on a dead man, as if the first time wasn’t enough. Because he fell and re-injured his back, which he had already sustained extensive injury to in the 90’s during a concert production accident where he fell over 20ft off a bridge that collapsed during a show. Jackson showed up to the court house late, and was helped to walk by the people with him. I personally remember watching this footage live as a child. It is burned into my memory forever. I was incredibly disturbed by the media’s portrayal of this, as if was obvious to me even as a child that Michael Jackson was in a lot of physical pain. I remember crying watching this footage with my mother. I will never, ever, EVER forget what the media did to this man. Not for the rest of my life, and I hope to fucking GOD I never see anything the likes of it again.

Stacy Brown, for those of you who may not know, was a former friend of the Jackson family and a defender of Michael Jackson. That was, until the media dollars rolled in, where he then made a complete 180 and began guilting him. He’s told many lies over the decades to the media, he’s lied plenty about the allegations, and he tried to encourage a trial witness for the defense who was eventually not called (she was there to testify against Jordan Chandler) to “fluff up” her testimony. The witness stated that she felt he was trying to get her to embellish her story of Jordan telling her Michael didn’t abuse him so she could be discredited, to which she never did “fluff up” anything. You can watch her testimony on Square One, a documentary that actually goes over the first allegation and talks to witnesses for the defense that were ultimately not called upon, some due to Jordan Chandler not showing up to trial.

Stacy Brown testified in the trial for the prosecution. He was found to have been plotting a book, wherein lies are told about the Chandler allegations. You can read more about this in my Chandler allegation thread and Arvizo thread which are linked at the bottom of the first post, linked at the very top of this post.

Diane Dimond then goes on to read alleged notes she took during the trial, talking about things Gavin said on the stand. She talks about alleged acts of molestation, yet doesn’t mention that Gavin Arvizo was caught in lie after lie by Tom Mesereau during his cross examination. One example being that Gavin claimed Michael told him “boys have to masturbate or else they’ll go out and rape women”, something disproven by the fact that in his police interview, Gavin stated his GRANDMOTHER told him this. When confronted about the obvious lie, Gavin stated that his grandmother and Michael Jackson just so happened to say the exact same thing word for word.

Other contradictions in the alleged acts of molestation are that Gavin originally claimed he was molested 7 times. This later changed to 5 times during interviews, and then on the witness stand during the trial, it changed to 2 TIMES! To go even further, Star Arvizo told a story about Michael Jackson coming up to the second level of the bedroom fully naked, sitting down on the bed with an erection and talking to him and Gavin for minutes. Gavin also told a story about this, but in his version? Michael comes up the stairs, grabs something quickly and runs back down. Where did the bed sitting and conversation go? What about the supposed erection? There it goes, up up and away in the wind 🍃🍃🍃 along with their credibility lmao

Oh, and btw, when asked about Michael’s skin disease vitiligo? Gavin said he didn’t realize it caused blotching on the body, and stated and I quote: “I thought he was all white.” Yet he claims to have seen Michael completely nude? That doesn’t make sense. If he had, he would have known about the blotching.

This isn’t me mentioning every contradiction. If you want to uncover it all, you have to read the transcripts from the trial yourself. But these are some that come to mind.

Ah, they end this second episode by trying to create intrigue over the 1108 evidence. As discussed in the first post, CA law allows a prosecution to bring in evidence of a prior alleged sex crime even if a defendant was never charged. They brought in tabloid whores like Adrian McManus and Blanca Francia (and many more), people even the tabloids didn’t trust. Blanca Francia’s son alleged MJ tickled him and touched his balls and that he needed therapy, which DA Sneddon sat in on. Jason Francia originally denied that Jackson ever hurt him, and only cracked after the cops told him other people had been molested by Jackson and that he could save them if he admitted to something happening.

💬 0 🔁 0 ❤️ 3 · dukeofdelirium · I have a question if you don’t mind, what was the deal about MJ supposedly having a nude image of a kid? I

Here is a post I made answering an ask, where I discuss this in more depth. I’m sure I will discuss it again in part 3 of this docu series posts.

Blanca Francia never sued MJ, she got ahold of Larry Feldman, the civil attorney that extorted Jackson during the Chandler allegations and was plotting to once more during the Arvizo allegations, to privately threaten him saying she would accuse him if she didn’t get money. She, like the rest of the prosecution witnesses, splattered under cross examination and recanted stories she sold to tabloids. As for Jason Francia himself, when he was asked why he said Jackson touched him by Tom Mesereau, Jason responded with “I was trying to figure out how to get out of there”, referring to the police interrogations he experienced as a child.

For now, I will leave you all with this. I still have one more part to watch through and debunk accordingly, but until then, chew on these facts. And don’t forget to keep stunting on these lying bitches 🤣

dukeofdelirium

Exposing Netflix’s Michael Jackson: The Verdict

Wow, what a way to start things off with footage of the Neverland Ranch raid from 2003, which was an obvious PR stunt carried out by the prosecution, who aimed to make a media spectacle of it for the world to see. Mind you, they found absolutely nothing in said raid, or in any other raid carried out against Jackson from 1993 onward.

The first person they bring in is J. Randy Taraborrelli, a known liar and tabloid whore—and don’t any of you worry, there’s plenty more where that came from that I’ll cook as well in other posts.

Randy Taraborrelli has written two books about Michael Jackson over the decades, none of which Michael himself ever endorsed. And in these books, he embellishes many stories about Michael, and throughout the editions of these books, his stories continuously change. He claims to be close friends with Michael (and has for decades), and yet he only met Michael one time because Taraborrelli was head of a Diana Ross fan club and got the opportunity to meet and interview Michael when they were both teenagers. There is exactly one photograph of them together, from the 70’s, pictured below.

In Randy’s book Michael Jackson: The Magic, The Madness he tells a lie that Emmanuel Lewis’ mother did not want Michael to be around the child star and put an end to their friendship. In reality, this did not happen and Emmanuel Lewis himself has stated such. He also tells a tale of the 1993 strip search Jackson was forced to submit to by police, a specific version of a story told in Victor Gutierrez’s book Michael Jackson Was My Lover, a book that he was sued for (along with a slanderous interview in which he told Hard Copy he had a video of Michael Jackson sexually abusing his own child family member),which effectively bankrupted him. He also borrows heavily from Ray Chandler’s (Evan Chandler’s brother) book All That Glitters, which ALSO borrows from the above mentioned Gutierrez pedo fantasy novel. In fact, most of MJWML and ATG are nearly identical, aside from the alleged sexual acts. This is because Ray Chandler and the rest of the Chandler family worked with Gutierrez to create this CSA hoax in the first place. Remember, Gutierrez managed to somehow tell these stories first (in 1997), while Ray didn’t until 2004. That’s Gutierrez telling the exact same version of events from the Chandler camp 7 full years before they did themselves.

Now, let’s move on, seeing as I’ve already displayed all the ways in which Randy Taraborrelli is not a credible source for anything pertaining to MJ.

Martin Bashir is a highly unethical “journalist”, yet no outright mention of the criminal behavior he and BBC took part in regarding Princess Diana to be found in this hit piece!

Martin Bashir tells a lie claiming that Michael brought Gavin in to be a part of Bashir’s slanderous documentary LWMJ, yet in the 2005 criminal trial, Gavin Arvizo himself testified stating that Michael planned to have Dave Dave (Davin Rothenberg) in the documentary, and that Bashir then completely omitted Dave Dave from the documentary.

Gavin Arvizo testimony March 14th, 2005. ^

Dave Dave was a close friend of Michael and was an adult at the time, though he’d known Jackson from childhood. Bashir insisted on having Gavin in the movie instead, as Gavin was still a child.

Martin Bashir, in this netflix hit piece, goes on to tell a complete lie about Michael supposedly sleeping in bed with Gavin, and then playing a clip from his movie, despite this longsince being proven edited.

What was not originally aired, and what continues to be perpetuated by the media and these hit pieces is Michael supposedly saying he slept in a bed with Gavin. What he went on to say was “always give the beds to the company”.

Oh and by the way, Bashir told Gavin to put his head on Michael’s shoulder and instructed them to hold hands behind the camera. Because while Bashir was filming Michael, Michael had his team secretly film him without him knowing. This documentary was proven to be maliciously edited in court, Bashir took the stand and refused to answer questions saying he had protections as a journalist under shield law, and even Gavin said that the portrayal of Michael in Bashir’s film was not truthful.

Let’s move on to the next person interviewed: Diane Dimond.

Diane Dimond has had a 3+ decade career built upon slandering Michael Jackson. She has lied and claimed he possessed CP, she allowed tabloid liars onto her show Hard Copy (a 90’s tabloid TV show), most notable being Victor Gutierrez.

This is the interview Michael Jackson sued him for and won, being awarded 2.7 million dollars, which bankrupted that bitch. Victor then fled the country and was later convicted of the same shit in Chile. Michael sued Diane Dimond too, but she was let off the hook, claiming journalistic privilege. Same thing Bashir did. Noticing a pattern yet?

💬 0 🔁 4 ❤️ 19 · The origin of the “nude photos of boys being found at MJ’s properties” allegation came from a tabloid TV show called Hard

additional post I’ve made with sources about another lie in these allegations Diane Dimond allowed on her show ^

and yet another source to show the ways in which Diane Dimond allows lies to run rampant. this video shows proof of a boy being coached to lie on MJ. it aired on her tv show Hard Copy. ^

She smiles here with glee at seeing footage of Gavin with Michael, recalling the Chandler allegations. Why the apparent happiness if she believes it to be true? It is not shocking Dimond finds glee in guilting Michael Jackson; she clearly holds a deep contempt toward him. Look no further than how she speaks of him here in this video I posted.

💬 1 🔁 3 ❤️ 20 · I can't believe Maureen Orth is allowed to be able to write at all after that racist bullshit from 2003. Like seriously? V

Not only did Diane Dimond state of Victoria Gutierrez (a self admitted pedophile and NAMBLA member) “I’ve never had a doubt about this person, ever!”, but she was in bed with the prosecution and DA Tom Sneddon during the trial and the media swarm leading up to it. They regularly leaked biased info to her which she reported.

Diane, in Netflix’s doc, lies and states that the 1994 Chandler civil settlement is what caused the Chandler allegations to never go to trial. However, what no one makes mentions of is that the Chandler allegations and evidence from 1993-1994 were tried alongside the Arvizo case in 2005’s criminal trial.

This was due to CA Evidence Code 1108, otherwise known as “prior bad acts” evidence, which allows a prosecution in the state of California to bring in evidence of an alleged similar sex crime against a defendant even if they were never previously charged, such as in Jackson’s case. This means that the Jury did in fact hear and see evidence of BOTH allegations, and still met a unanimous not guilty.

What she also fails to mention is this: IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR A CIVIL SETTLEMENT TO PREVENT A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OR CRIMINAL TRIAL IN THE UNITED STATES!

Nothing can stop the government from charging someone with a crime. Jackson was forced into a settlement with the Chandler family due to his rights being violated by the judge, and being deposed for the civil trial while the criminal investigation was pending. Had he given deposition, it would have revealed his entire defense to a prosecutor actively hunting him down, which the DA could then take and use to tailor his criminal case against Jackson.

The criminal investigation continued for half a year following this civil settlement. The reason the Chandler’s never went to trial in 1994 was because they stopped cooperating with the police, and the accuser Jordan Chandler refused to testify. Despite his refusal, DA Sneddon brought 2 grand juries (one in LA and another in Santa Barbara) to review evidence for the case. They convened, reviewed the evidence and heard witness testimony from 400+ people, and then said they wouldn’t indict Jackson.

She goes on later in this doc to tell a tale of complete fabrication with ZERO evidence to substantiate it, a story she made up and put in her book where she tells plenty of other lies. She claims Michael was “entertaining a group of teenage boys who all spoke German”, where they were all, Michael included, heavily drinking liquor and smoking cigars. Yeah, likely story there, Dimond.

Honestly, I would need an entire thread to go through Diane alone, but let’s move on to Vincent Amen.

Vincent Amen alleges that Michael Jackson gave Star Arvizo the nickname “blowhole”, showing off Polaroid photos that were evidence in the 2005 trial. But this is a lie—Star Arvizo testified and stated numerous times that HE chose that nickname for himself and stated he made it up himself.

Star Arvizo cross examination testimony March 8th, 2005 ^

Now, to address Vinnie’s lie about nudist magazines with kids being circled in a magazine for order:

Which he has been telling for decades and selling to tabloids mind you…

There is ZERO evidence to prove Michael ever owned such a thing, let alone circled things like this. Vinnie even went to the prosecution and they deemed him inconsistent and non credible, refusing to call him as a witness. The prosecution, who called upon some of the least credible people I’ve ever seen in any court case, chose not to call this guy who claims he had proof that MJ was trying to get ahold of CP? Yeah, again like Dimond, likely fucking story bud.

Amen owns this magazine, and has for decades, sold stories about it for decades, but supposedly it’s MJ’s? What the hell, sure!

DA Tom Sneddon who was spearheading the prosecution never notated anything about Helios any such related DVDs that Amen claims were circled throughout any court filing or within any search warrant and seizure from 2003-2005. And none of the items supposedly circled were ever found in Michael Jackson’s possession.

Michael did own nudist magazines from the 1930’s which were not pornographic, as confirmed in actual documentation. None of these materials had DNA evidence on them, either, as confirmed in forensic examiner testimony.

Michael owned thousands of books of all sorts of things, and collected all sorts of stuff. The man was borderline a hoarder. Said “nude children” were not the focus of these magazines. They were part of a nudist community of families.

And I should also mention: Vinnie Amen’s wife, Rina Oh, was literally a pimp for Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein victim’s have accused her of this. 🤔🤔🤔 Me thinks this circled CP is his idkkkkkkk guys lol

Now, let’s talk about Dr. Stanley Katz

Dr. Katz came into contact with the Arvizo family through Larry Feldman. Larry Feldman was referred to the Arvizo family by their at the time attorney Dickerman, who admitted to referring them in his testimony. It was stated that Feldman was the “go-to” guy on anything Michael Jackson, which is quite peculiar, seeing as Feldman only ever worked on ONE case involving Michael Jackson: the Chandler allegation of 1993. Similarly, Dr. Katz admitted that Larry Feldman was plotting to file a civil lawsuit on behalf of the Arvizo family, which Dickerman corroborates in his testimony, stating he has a fee-sharing arrangement with Feldman.

Of course, DA Sneddon lied to the media and claimed the Arvizo’s didn’t want money, yet both attorneys they had stated otherwise and the psychologist they queried did as well.

After being referred to Larry Feldman, Feldman then referred the Arvizo family to Dr. Stanley Katz, a psychologist who specializes in the field of child sexual abuse. More importantly, this is the same exact psychologist that interviewed Jordan Chandler in 1993. Dr. Katz was formerly also involved in the highly controversial McMartin preschool trial. He was the Director of Training and Professional Education at the Children’s Institute International (CII). Kee McFarlane, who initially interviewed the McMartin children, worked under him. During his cross examination at Jackson’s 2005 trial, Dr. Katz testified that he did the assessments of the McMartin children. The CII’s role in the McMartin case has been widely criticized in professional circles. Their interviewing techniques are considered coercive and manipulative which may lead children to make false allegations of sexual abuse.

Dr. Stanley Katz, who operated his organization CII in the 1980’s, and one which resulted in HUNDREDS of falsely coerced child sex abuse allegations and mass hysteria, was the prosecution’s star witness.

Credibility? Nada 👎🏻

Remember, if you don’t fact check, that means you don’t care. So don’t eat garbage from Netflix and take it as truth. I still have 2 more parts to power through, and I intend to, but for tonight I’m clocking out and enjoying the rest of my evening free from glue sniffer delusions 🤣

I’ll leave you with these two comprehensive threads discussing both the Chandler allegations from 1993 as well as the Arvizo allegations from 2003-2005 for your reading pleasure 📖