they call me the text ignorer for reasons I'll probably explain to you in a few days or so
almost home

Andulka
Claire Keane
YOU ARE THE REASON
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
The Bowery Presents

No title available

@theartofmadeline
we're not kids anymore.
No title available
Not today Justin

Origami Around
cherry valley forever
hello vonnie

bliss lane
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
sheepfilms

Discoholic 🪩

No title available
Sweet Seals For You, Always

seen from Malaysia
seen from India
seen from Switzerland
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Finland
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Kenya
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@sinhronicitet
they call me the text ignorer for reasons I'll probably explain to you in a few days or so
Vita Sackville-West, from her poem "In Memoriam: Virginia Woolf" published in The Observer on 6 April 1941
Carved ripples on granite. Shen Lieyi.
Being able to change the world, act effectively in the world, relies on your mental model of the world—and of yourself. Those models can be significantly affected by the works of imagination you read, watch, and listen to. Those works give you new models all the time, new ways of connecting the inner and the outer life, new explanations for why people are the way they are, and new maps for the journey you might take. Imagination is essential to our notions of identity, language, and thought. That is part of Locke’s revolution in 1690. And those ideas gave the novelists their starting point.
Henry Oliver, Will Imagination be the Key to Thriving in the Age of AI?
“I hate how summer kills me when it appears even briefly.”
— Arthur Rimbaud, from a letter to Paul Verlaine c. April 1872, featured in “I Promise to be Good: Letters,” (via violentwavesofemotion)
Hearing a book takes away the friction of visually decoding and processing. While listening, you are going at the narrative pace of the author. Some may claim they stop and take notes, but this isn’t the default behavior the medium encourages. There’s a reason the author wrote the book rather than merely narrating it and releasing it only on audio. Friction is the point of reading. There is no difficulty without friction, making the argument absurd on its face if one considers what ‘difficult’ might mean.
Anuradha Pandey, Listening isn’t reading - it’s prestige laundering
Our insistence on collapsing the distinction between the two is a tendency evident in many areas: we want the identity of being a disciplined person without the effort to cultivate it. I hosted a discussion on Brave New World a few weeks ago, and the idea of doing hard things came up because the World State is one in which people are conditioned against difficulty. The removal of friction is the point, because it makes the population easy to control. The people in the room were clearly aware that they weren’t doing hard things, and that a good life requires doing something difficult even if you’re not world-renowned at it. The good life requires working toward mastery of something, whether in your professional life or in some other craft. You need to introduce meaningful friction into the process.
Anuradha Pandey, Listening isn’t reading - it’s prestige laundering
The fact that the burden of proof is on me to prove that hearing and reading are distinct, rather than on those who are collapsing the distinction between the two, says something. We treat effort hierarchies as illegitimate unless they can be empirically proven beyond doubt (do you have a study for that?). We punish those who put in more effort by calling them elitist or ableist (two charges I am sure to receive). I have to downplay the fact that I read many difficult texts because it’s considered haughty to insist that hearing and reading aren’t the same. I’m creating a hierarchy of effort, which the professional class generally doesn’t like. They are confronted by the fact that they’re not doing the thing they claim to be doing. The social signals are all scrambled: you can signal seriousness by putting in less effort. So why would anyone put in more effort privately if the payoff is the same? And the payoff is identical because we have made it socially acceptable to collapse the distinction between listening and reading, or generally between two activities requiring differential effort.
Anuradha Pandey, Listening isn’t reading - it’s prestige laundering
I just need to take a walk (girl that is on the verge of insanity)
being the weird girl always pays off in the end
sandro botticelli, dante and beatrice in stars
the feminine urge to just fucking do it yourself
.
Hannibal 1.08 Fromage