I love them😭😭

No title available
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Cosimo Galluzzi
noise dept.
art blog(derogatory)

⁂
h
YOU ARE THE REASON

Product Placement
ojovivo
Show & Tell

roma★

JBB: An Artblog!

titsay
wallacepolsom

blake kathryn

No title available
Jules of Nature
Misplaced Lens Cap
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

seen from United States
seen from Thailand
seen from Argentina
seen from Argentina

seen from Malaysia
seen from Bolivia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Malaysia

seen from Panama
seen from Panama
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@smilingfroggie
I love them😭😭
[he chased me, and he wouldn’t stop]
Heyyyyy
Sorry I’ve been silent for so long! Have been studying for my uni application day and night. wish me luck, exams are almost hereee. But what is important is that during my absence I managed to get queerbaited by the mainstream show … stranger things🙄 what can I say, a have a soft spot for any slow burn friends to lovers story🙂↕️ but yeah, should have known better. naturally, to cure my tortured queer soul I turned to ao3 and now I’m obsessed with this fic called “he chased me, and he wouldn’t stop” by @michaelswilliam (go read it right now! It is sooo well written) to the level that I had to make an illustration even though exams are this week (seriously, wish me luck)
Also I have 3 unfinished arts for tcoptp and I’m planning on finishing them
As always, keep in mind, I’m not a native speaker. probably there are mistakes but I don’t have any energy to check. At least now you know I’m not using ai. peace
baby will doodle <3
something about bylers who consider themselves the most progressive part of this fandom, always prioritizing the canonically straight character, while constantly sidelining the gay character and writing tons of fics where his entire purpose is to support and comfort the guy who treated him like shit for years and was homophobic to him and never even apologized properly for it. like, okay.
This was originally going in the tags but I didn’t have enough space
☕️☕️☕️. There's this homophobic habit among fandoms of focusing on characters that are hc as gay instead of characters that are canon gay and I hate it. sometimes I get it. sometimes the gay character is not treated the same, they’re not given the same importance and depth as the other characters, the non-canon gay characters are really compelling and even better rep if seen as gay etc. like. I get it.
Many times it is fans who really develop the characters and turn them into something much better and even turn them into better rep, however feeling seen and being compelled by the fanon version of a character (and by extension—their (fanon) experience with queerness, because a lot of times the reason this happens is because people want character with actually well-written internalized homophobia, which we don't get much) shouldn’t have to come with sidelining the ACTUAL gay character/s when talking about sexuality in the story.
You can prefer Mike over Will. I don't care (I don't UNDERSTAND, but I don't care). However the problem comes when Mike's “struggles with his sexuality” (which only exist on the fans' imagination) are being given more attention and respect and forgiveness that Will's actual struggles with it.
The problem comes when Mike is held to a lower standard than Will, when Mike is seen as being on the same level as him in terms of representation and good writing (related to sexuality), because he isn't, when Mike is involved in conversations around sexuality in st, when Mike is given more attention than Will by a fandom that is supposedly really gay and progressive and Will is reduced to a side character in Mike's sexuality journey when the reality is the other way around. When Mike is not held accountable for things he did that technically aren't even rooted in his sexuality no matter how much the fandom wants them to, and when Will is supposed to take everything with a smile and be supportive and not even date anyone else just wait for Mike to catch up after Mike spent years treating him horribly.
You want epilogue byler? sure. I like the idea of it too. But not at the cost of Will's happiness and self-worth journey. Not if you're all going to hold Mike's hand through all of it while expecting Will to shake it off.
“Will cheating on epilogue bf / Will is still not over Mike” let Mike apologize first and then we'll see.
Don’t ignore his homophobia (because as much as I hate to admit it, that's what it is, homophobia) simply because YOU want to think he's gay.
I'm done talking about Mike, I'm just gonna say (as I've already said several times) that the same thing happens in this fandom with Steve and Eddie and Billy etc. A character is gay according to fans if he's hot and not ACTUALLY gay (because then he would actually have to experience being gay and the real experience is not as easy to fetishize. + he would probably talk about it and the fans would probably end up having to THINK about things and better to just not do that. better to imagine Steve as bisexual and hooking up with Eddie without thinking of what that would actually mean or how it would work or how different would Steve be if he was actually gay/bi (because growing up gay changes who you are, no matter how little straight people like to admit it) (because I’m a lesbian, not a straight woman who happens to like women. Because although I’m similar in many aspects, I’m different than them, and that’s not bad nor better, it simply is, and it shouldn’t be ignored)
A lot of the character that this happens to (Steve, Billy, MIKE) are not held accountable on anything because people think they're gay so that immediately means that any scene where they were homophobic/racist is forgivable when that's just not true. This always happens with characters that are kind of homophobic. Have you noticed? Maybe because fans are looking for internalized homophobia rep that is more complex, but let me be woke for a second:
Straight people tend to act like homophobes are just gay and it pisses me off so bad, because they're just denying responsibility and refusing to think on why homophobia could be so prevalent on society.
A quote from one of my favorite books (Red, White & Royal Blue) goes like this: "straight people always want the homophobic bastards to be closet cases so they can wash their hands of it. As if ninety-nine out of a hundred aren't just regular old hateful bigots.” Yeah.
And I know a big part of the fandom is gay themselves, but that doesn’t mean their behavior isn’t influenced by internalized homophobia, because a lot of times I think it is. There’s a reason why many prefer the idea of a character being gay above a character actually being gay
Straight people are coddled (even straight people who the fans see as gay, because in-show, technically, they’re straight, no matter if it doesn’t make sense. Mike doesn’t speak about behaving badly with Will because of internalized homophobia. You can think that if you want, but it hasn’t been confirmed anywhere, no matter how much I believe it too. Mike is straight. You can believe as you wish. But, it hasn’t been confirmed otherwise, and there’s no defense for his behavior). Mike is coddled. Mike is straight. Mike is seen as gay, but since he technically isn’t, we get no insight about this in the show. No talking about his experience being gay etc. Mike is straight. Straight people are coddled. It’s okay if you say a slur, you didn’t really mean it and it’s not that serious. You’re such a good friend for not stopping being friends with you bsf after he came out. What did YOU think of his coming out? How did it affect YOU?
Straight people are coddled (even more so straight white men), meanwhile gay people are supposed to suck it up. You being gay is a big change for her, she didn’t expect it! Be more understanding, your father is grieving the idea he had of you! Don’t talk so much about being gay, we’re not really comfortable with that. Don’t take what he says seriously, he doesn’t really mean it, it’s just the way boys talk. He didn’t know anyone gay growing up, he’s from another time.
It reminds me of how straight people focus on other straight people in situations where gay people are central. It must be so hard for you for your son to be gay. It’s a lot to process for you that she’s a lesbian, right? You’re such a good friend for not hating your bsf for being gay!
and actually while i’m at it, why was will wanting to stay connected with his childhood through d&d after being repeatedly brutalized by the upside down framed so strangely? will was repeatedly mistreated by his friends for being “stuck in childhood” so much so that his BEST FRIEND threw his sexuality in his face and didn’t even apologize for it. a full season of basically just making fun of will (expect of course the one scene where he literally and figuratively tears down his childhood) only for it to end with absolutely no one other than lucas bothering to say something about how they treated them. and will had to reassure mike at the end of the season on top of that.
but s4 and 5 mike is allowed to keep his love for d&d alive, and everybody is accepting (or at least sympathetic) towards him for it. he repeatedly made references to it throughout both seasons and it’s treated by the narrative as something endearing rather than something to be mocked. el even physically comforts him after trying to tell him this wouldn’t be like one of his campaigns (all while will is being actively tortured by vecna but whatever “narrative”). they even had WILL at the end ask if mike would be okay after learning to let go of this childhood, despite not being given the same kindness in s3.
why is 14-year-old will forced to grow up and let go of his childhood interests after being kidnapped, assaulted, impregnated, and possessed by the supernatural for two years but 18-year-old mike is allowed to exist in perpetual man-child dreamland while everyone else sacrifices themselves for his needs?
i was listening to phantom of the opera while working on this and now it's permanently stuck in my head
If you need to be mean, be mean to me.
I Don’t Smoke by Mitski - Will Byers and Henry Creel
i miss what i thought season 5 was going to be
Men writing women 101
I think the Duffers wanted to do the BSY trope but in an edgy 'we're in on the joke too' way except their own fascination with the subject matter exposes them for who they are.
So let's unpack.
This is also why I hated Poor Things no matter how many people told me I just didn't understand it. It's indulgence, not subversion.
The Duffers are obsessed with two female archetypes. The blond Madonna and the innocent blond girl.
A lot of fans thought it was leading up to some big plot twist but I guess the plot twist was just the most base level Pygmalion and Oedipal shit. Once you see it, you can't unsee it. Why do these women have no speaking parts?
This whole thing is bookended with El emerging from the woods unable to speak, and Karen getting slashed across the throat this season as well. They can't talk about the bad men.
I've seen people say Mike and El can't fit the BSY trope because they're both little kids and I would have agreed with you around season 4 because I thought El was just as mature as her peers. But the show has gone out of its way to draw comparisons between El's relationship with Mike and her relationship with both Hopper and Brenner, and even this season with Holly getting dressed up as Henry's sister while wearing a figurine of herself that Mike made for her.
A real life Matryoshka doll.
I'm going to bet good money the Duffers thought they were subverting things by turning Mike's fantasy will you be like my brother girlfriend into a doll and a story he sort of leaves behind, while Holly breaks away from Holly the Heroic and becomes a DM herself but. This is what happens when men write women and see them all as interchangeable girlfriends, mothers, sisters, and daughters.
Her not a real people. Her a doll.
Why does the mage look like Karen in her nightgown? To be continued below.
Born Sexy Yesterday is sort of Pygmalion in nature; you have a naive, childlike female character who depends on the male protagonist to guide her and teach her, and win by default as her first and only love interest.
But it's also rooted in an inability for men to find fulfillment with 'real' women. They want this pure fantasy idealized saintly angel, except they put her so high on a pedestal they cannot desire her. It's the Madonna/Whore complex.
El swings across both ends, depicted as both monstrous and pure, blond and brunette. And as a contrast to Karen and Holly and all the other blond female characters, Nancy and Joyce are depicted as ballsy and sex-positive, though the tail end of season 5 again boils them down to gun-totting/axe-wielding girlfriend and mother whose main relationships are still with Steve and Jonathan and Hopper and Will.
And if Holly is trapped in Camazotz with Henry, then the Upside Down is ruled by sci-fi mother extraordinaire herself Linda Hamilton. The pregnant women, Kali the Dark Mother, they're all there to push the Madonna narrative on El herself without any deep thought about how all that symbolism works together.
Season 1, El's a little girl like Holly and Sara. Season 2, she's a monster who needs to be sent back to the lab. Season 3, she's a preteen girl who likes kissing and comics and shopping. Season 4, she's a superhero who frees herself. Season 5, her future is basically...mother.
The men blowing all of this up as some kind of coming of age arc? I don't even want to try and understand.
The three female characters who break the mould and make their own rules are Max and Robin and Kali, who sort of play the serpent in the Garden of Eden this season with Holly and Will and El. Knowledge is power. But Max has no female friends even though 'there's more to life than stupid boys' and Robin has no girlfriend and a bucketload of dick jokes and Kali is dead so. Well.
Feminism!!!!!!!
Even if you want to argue that some male characters are also shown as part of a 'cycle' in the epilogue, their stagnancy comes from a lack of personal growth, mutual understanding, or incentive (I chose to join it, we are one) compared to the female characters who are crushed by the system they try to fight so hard.
Another case in point.
Men rarely fight the system when there is no incentive for them.
I knew this season would focus on mothers and female characters but I guess women are fun sci-fi concepts. Bonus points if you're not white.
A last note on this and how the writers treated Will's sexuality. I've always thought they were more interested in gender and these tropes than sexuality, which is why they tied Will's arc to him growing up slower, and extended his arc with Joyce, and contrasted him with so many female characters.
Kali's blood isn't working and it was killing the pregnant women along with their unborn children, unlike El who is the only one who is 'truly' like Henry. Will infected the world, while the other kids are going to bring it into the light which will expel the darkness.
Young Henry's blood being used to power up unborn children in a church. The Duffers love taking their symbolism absolutely no where.
These were horrific metaphors to use with non-white and gay characters when there was no intention to subvert them, especially in this political climate.
The biggest question mark for me is the insistence that Will's powers are 'innate'.
Because when juxtaposed with Kali and El's arcs, it leaves some super disturbing questions. Will is still white and male compared to Kali. Trying to portray his powers as more 'pure' is not it.
On the other hand, Will's sexuality is innate and conflating that with his powers leaves other issues. Will starts the season expressing interest in kissing and dating, but that gets squashed towards the end. The fact that it happens after he's told he infected the world, while the show indexes hard on El's future as a 'healthy' mother is pretty whack. Or rather it is because it's never questioned.
Especially because Will is the only character who gets his powers directly from Henry/Vecna compared to Kali and El and the other numbers who get it through their mothers, and the kids and the flayed who are hooked up via those vagina dentata coded monsters.
But if Will is only connected if the UD and everything in it exists, then he's 'free' once it's gone. Unlike Kali and El. Because...he's pure.
Anyway. Yeah. Am I doing more thinking than the Duffers did? 100%. But this is what happens when you write without any understanding of intersectionality or how all these different stories overlap and inform each other.
Also if you're gross to begin with.
Here is my one and only take on #conformitygate: I have no goodwill left to believe any of this was intentional, but as far as theories about being imprisoned in false realities go, I think The Matrix is a more appropriate movie to compare Stranger Things to than The Truman Show.
Because The Matrix is a story for queers that accidentally resonated with cishet men, while Stranger Things is a story for cishet men that accidentally resonated with queers.
The Matrix is commonly understood today as a trans allegory, but it's important to note that the Wachowski sisters were still in the closet when they made it -- which doesn't mean it isn't a trans allegory or anything, but according to Lilly Wachowski it wasn't consciously written to be about the trans experience -- she and her sister were just vibing with escapist fantasy at a time in their lives when (I presume) they still felt like their only option was to live as unhappy men.
So I don't think it's a coincidence that the movie's red pill -- a symbol of being willing to question oppressive social systems and start seeing them for what they really are--
--has been appropriated by incels: a particularly unhappy group of men who can sense that something is deeply wrong with the suffocating gender expectations they're held to, but are so damn close to meeting those expectations -- and thus reaping the reward of social and sexual dominance they've been promised is their birthright -- that they just double down on them instead of rejecting them the way queers do.
I don't think the Duffer brothers are incels, but the ending they wrote for Stranger Things is definitely giving miserable cishet men who don't want to acknowledge the real reason they're so miserable.
I strongly suspect that the movie which most fundamentally inspired the end of Stranger Things is the same movie which inspired its first season: Stand By Me.
This movie has a satisfyingly bittersweet ending about looking back fondly on childhood and knowing that its magic is gone forever. As Gordie, the narrator of Stand By Me who grows up to be a writer, says at the end:
"I never had any friends later on like the ones I had when I was twelve. Jesus, does anyone?"
This explains a lot about Mike "The Storyteller" Wheeler's closest relationships: on one side he has El, who represents the magic of childhood and who deep down he always knew he was doomed to lose; on the other side he has Will, his best friend whose ability to stay true to himself helped Mike figure out how to grow up without completely letting go of the whimsy of childhood.
(And they're all wrapped up in a double-doomed love triangle to stress the importance of accepting yourself over thinking romance will solve all your problems.)
At least, that's the most charitable interpretation I can come up with for the story I think the Duffers were trying to write.
What they actually wrote was the bleakest, most bafflingly unsatisfying ending I've ever seen, because instead of letting their characters organically reach the endings they'd grown towards over the course of four and a half seasons, they forced them to act out a predetermined ending that doesn't at all fit who they really are.
I'd call it a silly, terrible play if I had any faith left in the Duffers' capacity for self-awareness.
Making Jane a metaphor for the magic of childhood while also making her a real human girl who was robbed of her own childhood by institutional abuse is an utterly unhinged choice.
It makes sense if the point is to criticize privileged boys like Mike who are at risk of growing up into pricks who take the women in their lives for granted, but ST doesn't do that: the story places the onus on Jane to sacrifice herself yet again instead of on Mike to become part of the solution.
Giving Will a four-season unrequited crush arc (disguised as a reciprocated slowburn romance to trick the audience into experiencing Will's self-delusion and heartbreak along with him, don't even get me fucking started on that) while also making him a CSA-coded gay kid is equally unhinged.
Will did not need to learn a lesson in accepting that romantic prospects don't always work out: that lesson is for cishet kids who expect romance as their birthright, not for traumatized queer kids who think their desires are shameful and forbidden. Once again, the onus is on the abused minority character to learn Mike's lesson for him.
As for Mike himself? That clever, loving, heroic boy was slaughtered like a pig some time after S2 and replaced with a mannequin wearing his skin like a suit.
(No offense to Finn Wolfhard; he did the best he could with what he was given.)
In the end, Mike still couldn't say "I love you" to Jane or do anything to help her. In the end, he still couldn't have a genuinely vulnerable conversation with Will about how his ignorance and cowardice ruined their friendship. In the end, he still couldn't follow Will's lead to keep being his most authentic self.
Will and Jane suffered horribly for the sake of Mike's coming-of-age and it was all for naught, because Mike Wheeler is a coward who chose the blue pill: he gave in to the suffocating expectation that men should be emotionally repressed and accept the loss of their dearest friendships, and he thinks that the closest he can ever get to escaping this fate is to make up stories about the women and queers he envies for their freedom.
(Or, well, the freedom he likes to imagine they have -- much like his creators, Mike doesn't appear to be interested in their perspective on their own experiences.)
And the Duffers apparently want us to believe that this is an "inevitable" and "bittersweet" ending to the Saving Kids From the Horrors of Conformity With the Power of Love and Friendship show...?
I dunno, maybe I'm just too gay to understand why three character arcs lying pointlessly shattered in the aftermath of a fumbled allegory and 20 minutes of self-indulgent manchild ennui is supposed to read as bittersweet closure on Mike's coming-of-age, because all I see is a desperately tragic warning of how far-right sociopolitical climates turn sweet, caring boys into pathetic, self-absorbed men who can't lift a finger to help themselves or their friends.
I'm not surprised #conformitygate went viral. You don't need to think Mike is secretly gay to sense that something is deeply wrong with this picture.
messy will byers and laura palmer sketch cause it wouldnt leave my head🚬
we are one person.
Laying awake thinking about how cruel the duffers were to Will Byers and then had the audacity to say that he’s the center of the show.
Will isn’t the center of the show, his trauma is. And not even his expression of his trauma, but the raw pain that springs from it, the emotion that the duffers made Noah show for hours and hours and hours. Later in season four and three his queer pain.
They don’t care to explore how his trauma affects him the way they do with max because they see him as a sad gay boy not a queer person who deserved just as much exploration that they put into Hopper. They have explored hopper’s trauma repeatedly for five seasons to the point where they have to regress his character to keep rehashing it because he has little material. Will has so many lingering aches outside of his love for Mike: his survivor’s guilt over Bob and the soldiers and barb, his lack of bodily autonomy from season one and the mindflayer and everything after, his self sacrificial tendencies evidenced in season one, his self blame (which they briefly touch on in season five but don’t lead to any narrative actions taken by Will in the finale).
They care about the trauma porn because Noah has “expressive eyes” and love depicting the struggles of queerness without exploring any possibility of true, genuine queer joy beyond the bare minimum.
After making him a character that yearns for romance and yearns to be loved, depriving him of a true love interest was straight up homophobia and carelessness. When Will is happy, he’s irrelevant. Apparently even his pain is irrelevant because his vecna vision happens off screen. He can’t express his pain to any of the characters because he’s stuck being a therapist to Mike Wheeler’s problems in his bullshit relationship with Jane, and he’s only relevant to be possessed by Vecna apparently because rhe sorcerer arc doesn’t explore his autonomy to any depth after episode 5.
And while they deprive Will of the love interest he deserves, they further reinforce Mike and jane’s unhealthy, bullshit relationship, which actively regresses both Mike and especially Jane by making her say that Mike understood her over anyone else (an audacious statement). How do you fail the supposed hearts of your show this terribly?
The double edged sword of misogyny and homophobia. They’re incels. My willel don’t belong in this show.
i can’t believe they made vecna’s entire persona revolve around clocks, the whole creepy ticking sound, they made his birthday the same as wills, nov6 having significance as the day will was taken and the final battle , and zooming into the plays date(nov 6) and they even made the entire upside down a wormhole, and then the finale had absolutely nothing time related in it.
missing gothic heroine will byers like a mf tonight 😔 🚬