I thought I'd post the guys I didn't quite like enough to put in my previous post because they have their good points in spite of being weird as hell

No title available
Misplaced Lens Cap
EXPECTATIONS

Discoholic 🪩
YOU ARE THE REASON
Fai_Ryy
noise dept.
Xuebing Du
★
Today's Document
macklin celebrini has autism
cherry valley forever

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

ellievsbear

No title available
occasionally subtle
Jules of Nature
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Cosimo Galluzzi
d e v o n
seen from Panama
seen from Panama
seen from Panama
seen from Italy
seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from India
seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Türkiye
@snepppy
I thought I'd post the guys I didn't quite like enough to put in my previous post because they have their good points in spite of being weird as hell
Julian Fałat (Polish, 1853-1929)
Sunset over the Wetlands, 1908
Watercolor on paper
50 x 90 cm
Historical Museum in Bielsko-Biała
“He is always on the brink of suicide … because he seeks salvation through the routine formulas suggested to him by the society in which he lives.” — Umberto Eco on Charlie Brown
Paul Gauguin, The Call; 1902
The fact is that David Lynch treats the subject of evil better than just about anybody else making movies today—better and also differently. His movies aren’t anti-moral, but they are definitely anti-formulaic. Evil-ridden though his filmic world is, please notice that responsibility for evil never in his films devolves easily onto greedy corporations or corrupt politicians or faceless serial kooks. Lynch is not interested in the devolution of responsibility, and he’s not interested in moral judgments of characters. Rather, he’s interested in the psychic spaces in which people are capable of evil. He is interested in Darkness. And Darkness, in David Lynch’s movies, always wears more than one face. Recall, for example, how Blue Velvet’s Frank Booth is both Frank Booth and “the Well-Dressed Man.” How Eraserhead's whole postapocalyptic world of demonic conceptions and teratoid offspring and summary decapitations is evil… yet how it’s “poor” Henry Spencer who ends up a baby-killer. How in both TV’s Twin Peaks and cinema’s Fire Walk with Me, “Bob” is also Leland Palmer, how they are, “spiritually,” both two and one. The Elephant Man’s sideshow barker is evil in his exploitation of Merrick, but so too is good old kindly Dr. Treeves—and Lynch very carefully has Treeves admit this aloud. And if Wild at Heart’s coherence suffered because its myriad villains seemed fuzzy and interchangeable, it was because they were all basically the same thing, i.e. they were all in the service of the same force or spirit. Characters are not themselves evil in Lynch movies—evil wears them. This point is worth emphasizing. Lynch’s movies are not about monsters (i.e. people whose intrinsic natures are evil) but about hauntings, about evil as environment, possibility, force. This helps explain Lynch’s constant deployment of noirish lighting and eerie sound-carpets and grotesque figurants: in his movies’ world, a kind of ambient spiritual antimatter hangs just overhead. It also explains why Lynch’s villains seem not merely wicked or sick but ecstatic, transported: they are, literally, possessed. Think here of Dennis Hopper’s exultant “I’LL FUCK ANYTHING THAT MOVES” in Blue Velvet, or of the incredible scene in Wild at Heart when Diane Ladd smears her face with lipstick until it’s devil-red and then screams at herself in the mirror, or of Bob’s look of total demonic ebullience in Fire Walk with Me when Laura discovers him at her dresser going through her diary and just about dies of fright. The bad guys in Lynch movies are always exultant, orgasmic, most fully present at their evilest moments, and this in turn is because they are not only actuated by evil but literally inspired: they have yielded themselves up to a Darkness way bigger than any one person. And if these villains are, at their worst moments, riveting for both the camera and the audience, it’s not because Lynch is “endorsing” or “romanticizing” evil but because he’s diagnosing it—diagnosing it without the comfortable carapace of disapproval and with an open acknowledgment of the fact that one reason why evil is so powerful is that it’s hideously vital and robust and usually impossible to look away from.
-David Foster Wallace, "The Theme of Evil in the Films of David Lynch"
A SILK HERALDIC RUG, POSSIBLY KASHAN, CENTRAL PERSIA, EARLY 20TH CENTURY
Full On Residence, Whistler BC by Redhouse Design
Jiuzhaigou Valley in summer, Sichuan Province, China (photos by 茄茄轻松出门)
Dirk Stewen
Born 1972 in Dortmund, Germany
To produce his works Stewen uses a wide variety of papers, inks, paints and his own photographs with elegance and precision, achieving a remarkable balance despite the most contradictory materials. After studying art history in Bochum, Stewen graduated from the Hamburg University of Fine Arts.
SANYO ROBO-NPC1 Vacuum Cleaner, 1988
Los Angeles, RA Clayton
JVC Nivico PV-4500 // portable video tape recorder (Japan, 1971)
Jlum.art
Home Office (2003)
Unknown - Ruth Stage , n/d.
British, b. 1969 -
Egg tempera on handmade gesso board , 30 x 35 cm.