The Bee Sting, Climate Change, Artificial Intelligence
This summer I was stung by two honey bees. I was in Patna, and had gone for my morning run at the Botanical Garden/Zoo, my favourite place to run, till I got stung. I felt something touch the back of my head, just above the neck. I thought some twig from the low tree on the side must have brushed past. I casually swept over the head to feel if there is anything still stuck. I felt a sharp sting, and then one more. In less than a few seconds, I had bees buzzing around me. I have had no prior experience with bee sting, so naturally, survival instinct kicked in that told me to run waving my arms frantically. Unfortunately, in the process of shaking the bees off, my headphones had gotten stuck in the nearby bushes. But at that moment, I had to run away. I tried to sweep them away by taking off my t-shirt because they were clinging onto it. I had to stomp my feet, make weird noises to hush them away. I was flailing my limbs and running away, then ran back to take my headphones, and then run away again. When I thought I had put some distance from them, I stopped at a water filter to quench at my panic induced thirst, but I saw a bee fly close to me, and I ran again. Ran out of the Zoo, almost a kilometre away. When I took my t-shirt off, there were seven stingers lodged in it. I couldn’t imagine what it would have been like if all those stings had gone in my skin, but the two I had at the back of my head gave a piercing pain when I pulled them out. A bad move, I know! I checked Google later.
Since then my immunity has been super alert, giving me days full of sneezing and even a throat pain, but it has slowly come back to normal. I must have spoken and searched plenty about Bee stings because my Kindle suggested this novel called The Bee Sting by Paul Murray. I guess this has been the most favourable outcome of the summer sting because this book turned out to be a fantastic read. I love stories cooked on a slow burn, and Paul Murray has done that to perfection in this novel. There are layers to the stories that speak of larger crisis and the personal ones ongoing at home. The last time I felt this much for the characters in a novel was when I read Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go. A story told well needs patience and time to season the characters and show their turbulence.
What the book did additionally well was to throw light on how to look at the daunting fact of climate change. Surprisingly, the penultimate episode of Season 2 of Twin Peaks has a compelling speech from Annie Blackburn on Climate Change too, and I came across it the same time I was reading The Bee Sting. The larger issue of Climate Change can perhaps be tackled first as how we look at ourselves. What self-image do we hold for us? Is it covered under pretences that masks what we truly are? That raises the other question, who are we? Are we born selfish or selfless? I don’t have the answers, but once you begin to come to terms with yourself is when you can perhaps come to terms with the uncertainty that lies ahead in the future. I am writing this after a day at a Design Conference where the buzzing hot topic of Artificial Intelligence and what lies ahead is the burning question. Lauren Celenza, one of the speakers at the conference, threw light on it by questioning if the intent behind using AI is to get there faster and quicker. If that’s the idea then that model will only be our downfall in the long run. She recommended care, depth and meaning as the new benchmarks for using AI. I did wonder that if we ever question as to what values do we seek in the way we live. Is faster growth a critical requirement for us or is it only there because it suits the corporate structure? How do we feel about using AI in our work as individual practitioners? Do you see yourself as a problem solver and derive joy out of it, or your craft is only limited to do the template task. If it’s the latter then the templatised work will be swept away by AI, but if we you pride yourself to come up with iterations that chip away at finding the right solutions, then AI is not a threat. You have to ask yourself what do you get out of your work. What does it do for you? I had seen a quote on the Internet saying, ‘Why should I be bothered to read something that you are not even bothered to write it yourself’. It was about novels being written by AI. I agree with it. Unless you don’t see value in what you create, it’s difficult to make others see the value in it. I love spending time on coming up with abstractions when working on a logo, why would I outsource it to AI to generate a generic looking slop. Maybe this is my privilege, but I choose a slow, quiet life than a rushed one. I am not denying efficiency. A doctor needs an efficient solution in critical situations, but even then, a careful diagnosis has its place and it can be supported by AI, but it cannot be AI first, at least not yet. You can’t rush things. A quiet life is worth living if that’s what you want. Choose for yourself.
Excerpt from The Bee Sting by Paul Murray
You couldn’t protect the people you loved–that was the lesson of history, and it struck him therefore that to love someone meant to be opened up to a radically heightened level of suffering.
I’m going to propose tonight that one path towards a solution lies in a radical rethinking of what we mean by ‘us’. By really looking hard at these things we think make us ourselves. Those two words, in fact, give you the gist of the argument. ‘Things’ and ‘selves’. What do ‘things’ have to do with ‘selves’? How can a thing make you a self? Before people had things, were they not selves? When you were born, when you first came into the world, with no iPhone, no car, no Nikes or Adidas or in fact running shoes of any sort – did your parents think you were incomplete? We have a faulty baby here? No. They thought you were perfect. You were stark naked without even the power of speech, and they thought you were the acme of beauty and perfection. But that’s not how we think of ourselves, is it? That’s not how we’re encouraged to see ourselves. Instead, we’re taught to think of ourselves as flawed, inadequate, incomplete. Different in some way that is repugnant, that is unacceptable. We’re taught that if we don’t hide that difference away, we’re going to be alone. Unloved. And so we learn to cover ourselves up, with products, labels, masks of one kind or another. Clothes, goods, sports teams, belief systems, politics, nationalism – things from outside that we use to represent who we are. I’m the guy who’s a Marxist, I’m the guy with the fancy watch, I’m the guy from this place not that. When you look at me, that’s what I want you to see. Still different to you, but in an understandable, categorizable way.