Discourse Sideblog

|| 22 y/o || || He/It/Xe (collectively) || || Autistic DID system mobility aid user || || Anti Misinformation ||

[squidcourse]

This is a blog for which I will reblog discourse on the rare occasion I decide to interact with it.

[c-yns-deactivated20260406]

I keep seeing endos in the alterhuman community saying that being alterhuman and anti endo at the same time is absurd and this seriously pisses me off.

"How can you believe that someone can be a wolf, but can't believe that multiple people can exist in the same body without trauma?"

First of all, although some systems do see their alters as different people (us included), this is not what a system is. It's dissociated states of identity, not multiple people. Please, do your research.

Secondly, how is an actual disorder comparable to an identity in any way????

It's so frustrating to have to check every alterhuman blog I come across to make sure they're not ableist.

The more I see about the endo community, the angrier I get

— 🌟 (They/xe/it)

[squidcourse]

Went in some of the system tags for the first time in a while (traumagenic system, cdd system, etc) and its like nothing but "this post contains filtered tags" (endo safe, pro endo, etc). And I've been clicking on them, because why not and its all endo shit.

I thought the old discourse about endos trying to take over the tags was kind of stupid/pointless, but damn they really are just doing that. Fuck off. There's no reason to post your endo shit in those tags. Fucking hell

[pro-willo-miku]

are they truly endogenic or are they just pro endos that you consider endogenic?

[squidcourse]

That is an idiotic opinion. Please don't project that on me. Annoying.

[squidcourse]

Went in some of the system tags for the first time in a while (traumagenic system, cdd system, etc) and its like nothing but "this post contains filtered tags" (endo safe, pro endo, etc). And I've been clicking on them, because why not and its all endo shit.

I thought the old discourse about endos trying to take over the tags was kind of stupid/pointless, but damn they really are just doing that. Fuck off. There's no reason to post your endo shit in those tags. Fucking hell

[epicsause-official]

the summoning

[diogenes-2-electric-boogaloo]

for me, infinitely more painful

[system-of-a-feather]

I was talking to a friend about drama vs important topics and I decided to kind of make a little graph of how I tend to weigh and understand whether a topic is one I want to engage with or if it is a topic that probably is not worth my time.

One Axis: Highly Productive / Insightful / Intriguing Topic vs Minimally Productive / Insightful / Intriguing Topic

Second Axis: Largely Localized Impact to Community / People and / or Impacting only Those that Choose to Engage VS Largely Impactful to Community / People

Green Quadrant - Highly Productive and Largely Impactful = Critical / Important Topics

Example: The US Election and US Politics, Human rights on a global scale

Yellow Quadrant - Highly Productive but Largely Localized = Interesting or Fun Food for thought / Learning Opportunities

Example: Sysconversation tag, Some parts of Tulpacourse

Blue Quadrant - Minimally Productive but Largely Impactful = Unproductive Discourse / Topic that has Lost the Plot

Example: Most infighting online

Red Quadrant - Minimally Productive and Largely Localized = Drama

Example: Most person centered heated discussions

Typically I try to not spend emotional energy, mental energy, or time on topics that are not in the Green / Yellow Quadrants as Blue and Red tend to be both a time and energy sink. Blue Quadrant I might focus on a more meta "lets try to improve how we handle this topic" effort to move it from Blue -> Green, but the topic itself is not something I'd humor in the environment / way it is currently being talked about

Additionally, for topics in the Green Category, I tend to approach them with A LOT more mindfulness and caution both to how I engage and contribute to the discussion as well as how the topic is weighing on my mental health / wellbeing.

[system-of-a-feather]

Rebloggung this cause Real

[karas-demon-blog]

some spaces aren’t for you

I know a lot of “endogenics” are kids so they don’t really understand the complexities of the issue. The system community is a trauma community. It is for people who have been through intense trauma. “But Endos have been through trauma” you have osdd or did. You have to accept that you formed through trauma. Sorry not sorry. Some spaces aren’t for you and that’s ok. I’m not going to invade the amputee community because I think I should have a cut off arm. That’s not how this works. Find spaces that belong to you. Trauma spaces exist and your trauma is enough. No you can’t create headmates, and even if you could, it would be different than being a system. It would be plural. Stop calling yourself a system when you aren’t and stop invading the did and osdd community. Get out of my space. It’s not gatekeeping. You can’t invade the cancer community because you don’t have cancer. Don’t claim labels that don’t belong to you. These disorders are serious and they aren’t fun.

[burningnails]

Me saying ‘endos do not interact’ does in fact mean endos do not interact.

It doesnt mean to send asks or comments arguing with me for being anti endo.

It doesn’t mean trying to justify being pro endo to me or trying to get me to support the belief that you’re endogenic.

It means do not interact.

[lambbchopped]

endos feel like invasive species

[daywasteful]

BY THE WAY . i don’t care how anti—endo you are , you should NEVER make someone “ prove “ they are a system by making them share their trauma .

[squidcourse]

I think that abusive people with BPD are prone to targeting gullible people with Autism. Autism and BPD are like magnets for the most toxic possible relationships.

Disclaimer: This statement does not apply to every possible relationship where one party has BPD and the other has autism. Not all people with BPD are abusive and acting as though they all are only encourages certain people with BPD to act abusive because they feel as though they have no other choice and can just blame bad behavior on that stereotype. Also, not everyone who is autistic is gullible or vulnerable to being abused by others.

[squidcourse]

some but not most is not. better? the post is still viciously mean and demeaning to any trans or disabled person the op doesn’t like. there is no reason to platform that kind of bullying and invalidation. it’s literally nobody’s place to say ‘well you seem too weird for me to think you really need that cane’ and the idea that it is is beyond invasive and paternalistic in a really derogatory way.

I don't know how to word my response to this, so I'm doing bullet points.

You cannot determine if anyone is faking anything based on what you see of them online.

Bullying and invalidating people because you think that they are weird or cringe or whatever is not ok.

Sometimes, people do fake things for attention.

Most people are not faking things for attention.

Of the people who do fake things for attention, there is not always ill-intent, and there usually is usually an unrelated issue that the person faking may or may not be aware of.

Online communities often mislead people (not always deliberately) into thinking that symptoms are automatically one thing when they may be something else, resulting in people doing things they maybe shouldn't.

[c4ss1an-deactivated20260110]

Actually the most pissed off I've been in months over syscourse I am about to go block all of those tags.

If you're a syscourse focused blog RB or like this or something so I can block. I'm so fucking livid.

[squidcourse]

I'm not a liar. It rarely even occurs to me that people lie. Sometimes though there's alters that say the dumbest possible fucking things.

[squidcourse]

Are there any official terms for "illiterate child alter that throws tantrums" and "preteen barely illiterate alter that starts arguments with people."

Because they're annoying. Also who deleted like 20 of the sideblogs?

[squidcourse]

like the end point of the whole post is bemoaning how they can’t effectively convey to others that these people aren’t Real trans and disabled people without harming All trans and disabled people and isn’t it sad that bigots are making it harder for them to be a more specific bigot only to the people they don’t like. agreeing with that at all is… yikes. like come on they specifically list DID as one of the things causing these people to be ‘fakers’.

I don't think you read the whole post.

[squidcourse]

the post is the one saying that all the disabled and trans people the op doesn’t like are really mentally ill and exaggerating for attention and validation and to infantilize themselves.

Oh, ok. I edited my reblog.