Thanks, ominous fortune cookie!
@ominous-signs
Official ominous fortune cookie
Misplaced Lens Cap
Fai_Ryy
🪼
Claire Keane
No title available
art blog(derogatory)

No title available
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

titsay
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
noise dept.
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

PR's Tumblrdome
h
almost home
taylor price

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Cosmic Funnies
Monterey Bay Aquarium
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

seen from Netherlands

seen from Canada

seen from Denmark
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Norway

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Taiwan

seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Netherlands
@stargazing-enby
Thanks, ominous fortune cookie!
@ominous-signs
Official ominous fortune cookie
Thanks, ominous fortune cookie!
@ominous-signs
Official ominous fortune cookie
Something about being next to the PULL makes this such an ominous sign @ominous-signs
Official ominous sign
*finally manages to get the gag out of my mouth* do you think im a good nice hostage or a bad stupid hostage
Elf boobs
This isn't google
all roads lead to road dude. and when in road do as the rodents do.
Before coming out I used to work at a mental health crisis line. There were so many problems with this place, that I will probably talk about some other time, but generally stemming from issues relating to social class and demographics more broadly.
90% of the volunteers were wealthy retired neurotypical cishet white women. That meant that for basically every call these people received there was a pre-existing power dynamic where the caller was well below the call-handler, and the call was consequently handled totally paternalistically, never with any sense that the volunteer might actually have something to learn from the caller. The similarity to the typical patient-GP/PCP dynamic was really striking.
Most of the callers were prisoners, homeless, or people who had recently stopped taking anti-psychotic meds. I think many of the volunteers enjoyed the feeling of the power dynamic that was obvious in these calls. If you spend most of your social time with people of the same high social class as you, I guess you might find it refreshing to encounter people who remind you that you've actually done well out of life, only from a safe distance and through a phone ofc.
We also got a lot of trans callers. Hearing how the volunteers talked to these callers was a really radicalising experience. "Why do you think you're a woman?" "Why do you think you enjoy wearing women's clothing?" "Is there a sexual component to it? Maybe something that happened in your childhood?" "What do the other girls at school think about you calling yourself a boy?", plus the obvious constant misgendering and pronoun "mix-ups", saying, "Oh sorry, miss, your voice sounds like a man's so it's confusing."
People would say this stuff during training too, and the people training us would say it was correct. It's not like they were letting their bigotry cause them to deviate from policy, bigotry was the policy. I remember there was one senior volunteer who was a retired cis lesbian police officer, and I asked her about handling trans callers and she just repeated back all the same bigoted nonsense everyone else thought (at the time I put that down to her being a cop, not being aware back then that being a cis lesbian is no guarantee at all of an absence of transphobic views.)
It didn't take long for me to start getting reprimanded for having too much empathy for the callers. I was an unusual volunteer in that I had actually been in the same position as a lot of the callers. I was trans (albeit not out yet), I was frequently suicidal, I had been on anti-depressants (incredibly I was the only volunteer out of around 150 with that experience), I had experienced CSA and domestic abuse, I had lived through times when I had a zero bank balance, I had eaten food out of a bin because I had no money, I had been heavily addicted to alcohol and nicotine.
It meant I normally had some commonality with all the callers that I could use to make sure I was talking to them in the way I would've wanted to be talked to, i.e. as an equal. I would actually let the caller direct the conversation rather than directing it myself (which was the policy), I would show genuine interest in their story, I wouldn't tell them to hurry up because there were other callers with "real problems". After a while, I couldn't handle it and I just left, not because of the stress of dealing with the callers, but the stress of dealing with the other volunteers.
And now many years later I often see queer groups near me directing people to this crisis hotline in case of emergency, and I always have to make a fuss to get them to remove it as a categorically non-safe institution. But it's so well-known and respected where I live (by people who have never used it, but they are typically the ones in positions of power ofc) that it can be really hard to get people to believe it is actually that bad.
imo it would solve a lot of fandom problems if people could hop on board with the idea that serialized media that was not fully planned from the outset can be interpreted as a unified whole AND can be interpreted as a developing trajectory.
in a show, each individual episode is (hopefully) a unified whole, in that events from the beginning function as deliberate foreshadowing for events at the end. the end is in conversation with the beginning because everybody involved knew what both beginning and end were going to be at all stages of development. if you choose to stop watching an episode part way through, your interpretation of the beginning of the episode will be objectively less correct than the interpretation of someone who saw the whole episode, because the beginning was created intentionally to be in conversation with the per-determined end.
within seasons of a show this is typically the case, such that episode 1 is foreshadowing what will happen in episode 15 (or whatever). the writers probably hope that, if you watch the full season and then rewatch it from the beginning, you will catch stuff they were doing to hint at where the story was going.
some shows' earlier seasons are also intentionally in conversation with later seasons that have already been planned. shows that have a sketched out 3- or 5-season arc are generally doing this. but a lot of shows don't function this way season to season — and especially a lot of them don't function this way across every season, even if they have some seasons that are written as pre-determined arcs.
in shows that do not have a full pre-planned narrative arc from beginning to end, the later seasons are in conversation with the earlier seasons, but the earlier seasons aren't necessarily in conversation with the later seasons because the people who wrote the earlier seasons didn't know where the story was going yet. they put information down that might get retrofitted to work as foreshadowing for what happens in later seasons (especially if the writing is good), but that information wasn't foreshadowing when it was originally written, because the end wasn't set yet.
so if you want to look back from the end of a show like that and read everything as foreshadowing that winds up working as foreshadowing, what you're doing is essentially noticing what the writers of the later seasons did: how they hooked the story they wanted to tell into the information that was already there. you can interpret it that way explicitly, or you can approach it by interpreting it as if everything had been planned from the beginning. these are interesting and often very rewarding ways to approach analysis.
also an interesting and often very rewarding way of approaching analysis is chunking the stuff that is known to have been pre-planned and interpreting that one way, and interpreting stuff that got built off of that stuff a different way. often this looks like cutting shows into sections; e.g., looking back from the end of season 1 to see how the beginning was in conversation with the end, then watching season 2 (if it was not planned when s1 was written) and seeing how season 2 puts itself in conversation with the beginning of s1, but not interpreting anything that happened at the beginning of s1 as being intentionally in conversation with events in s2.
using this latter framework, it is also fair game to analyze an earlier season without considering events from a later season at all, because the earlier season was not created to build to what happened in the later season. in a way this is ignoring canon, but it is not ignoring canon in the same way that ignoring the second half of an episode or a season is ignoring canon. you're not splitting something up that was written as a coherent whole from the start; you're splitting earlier parts of an evolving timeline off from things that the people who created that part of the timeline had no knowledge of yet — sort of like how with history you can analyze how events from the past built to the present, AND you can analyze events from the perspective of that past moment before the present had happened yet.
anyway yeah thanks for coming to my ted talk
all of this to say when i talk about events from early spn as if events from late spn never happened, i'm not denying the late seasons events; i'm (usually) ignoring them. sometimes i am not ignoring them and am instead looking at them as things that grew out of foundations. i am basically never reading the full 15-season arc as a unified whole because that frame of analysis just doesn't really do it for me. but i'm not denying.
god made me aromantic because she knew dropping me into the dating pool would do some category 9 shit to the meta. i've been benched for balance reasons. if they let me free it would cause millions of divorces world wide. you're welcome.
god made me aromantic because she knew dropping me into the dating pool would do some category 9 shit to the meta. i've been benched for balance reasons. if they let me free it would cause millions of divorces world wide. you're welcome.
crossposting from bsky - glad I stopped using spotify when I did and that I unlinked it from my discord, but still
[ reddit thread | bsky post ]
Everything after (and including!) the question mark is the identifier. Destroy it!
crossposting from bsky - glad I stopped using spotify when I did and that I unlinked it from my discord, but still
[ reddit thread | bsky post ]
Everything after (and including!) the question mark is the identifier. Destroy it!
crossposting from bsky - glad I stopped using spotify when I did and that I unlinked it from my discord, but still
[ reddit thread | bsky post ]
Everything after (and including!) the question mark is the identifier. Destroy it!
THE GOOD PLACE (2016—2020) cr. Michael Schur
Show so good even just the Tumblr gifsets make you tear up
when a mutual posts a poll you know nothing about, but they say "orangutan johnson my beloved, orangutan johnson sweep!!!!" you vote for orangutan johhnson. it's called loyalty.
“Egg [x2]”