writing tip #4119:
the chapter isn't going to write itself, but it might unwrite itself if you don't start treating your laptop with respect
untitled

Origami Around
Show & Tell
Mike Driver
h
NASA

Kiana Khansmith
YOU ARE THE REASON
KIROKAZE
Cosimo Galluzzi
Misplaced Lens Cap
hello vonnie
š
One Nice Bug Per Day
No title available

ellievsbear

ā
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
todays bird

titsay
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Morocco
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Romania
seen from Philippines

seen from El Salvador
seen from United States

seen from Belgium
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@stargazing-enby
writing tip #4119:
the chapter isn't going to write itself, but it might unwrite itself if you don't start treating your laptop with respect
reblogging a post that says ādo it scaredā vs actually doing it scared
is it auto cannibalism to eat your clone
yes. thats you
no. its just normalstyle cannibalism
idk??? why the fuck are you asking this????
note: auto cannibalism means eating your own flesh. like if you cut off your finger and eat it thats auto cannibalism. for anyone who doesnt know what that means. now you know
okay i have another question
is it auto cannibalism if the clone isnt a full clone, and is instead lab grown meat with your genetic makeup. phm style. meburgers
yes. still you
no. still normalstyle cannibalism
hypothetical here
you are a clone. you have all the memories of the original, and think the same way as they do. you are, essentially, a perfect copy of them. now then, if you were to murder the originalā¦
would it be auto cannibalism to eat then
yes
no
another hypothetical
now, lets say you were to chop off your arm. completely severed. if you were to make a perfect copy of that arm, and then eat said perfect copyā¦
would that be auto cannibalism
yes
no
keeping in mind that your original arm is still intact. just. not exactly part of your body anymore
"All religions are cults if you think about it"
Actually they're not all cults and you're doing the work of making sure actual cults can slip under the radar when you say stuff like that
Cult leaders LOVE that trend, because they can point to it and say, "people will call anything a cult, it's basically meaningless"
I'm begging you all to stop using the word cult until you really understand what it means
Resource: https://freedomofmind.com/cult-mind-control/bite-model-pdf-download/
Rule of thumb: if you voluntarily stopped showing up a couple weeks in a row, what would happen?
If the answer is ānothing,ā or āwell, people wouldnāt like it but also wouldnāt do anything about it,ā or, āmy mom would be disappointed,ā itās not a cult.
If the answer is āpeople would come to my house to try to get me to come backā or āIād start getting shunned or actively harassed by almost everyone I knowā or āthat could never happen because youāre not allowed to,ā itās a cult!
For all that the 1800s etiquette guides are--obviously--derangedly sexist from a modern perspective? They're also mindblowing in how casually they will assert things that MODERN DAY CONSERVATIVES would scream and cry and shit their pants about.
"People back then always married young it's natural!!!" Every single 1800s guide I've ever met casually mentions that, of course, you really shouldn't get married before you're at least 20, and waiting until 25 is usually better.
Or, like. Okay here's a long segment:
Just firmly going "it is crazy sexist to blame The Wife for overspending when thirty seconds of asking questions will immediately establish that her husband was outright lying to her about how much money they had. Talk to your wife like a normal person."
Or--okay, here. A section on being honest and not writing love letters in secret, because that's usually a good sign that there's something untoward going on....
....except that he then immediately acknowledges that sometimes, the reason you're hiding this from your parents is that your parents suck. That there are parents who frankly have not earned the right to approve or disapprove of your partner.
(I realize the phrasing there sounds a lot less strong than my summary, but--trust me on this. When you're familiar with the narrative voice of these kinds of books, this passage is downright radical. The mere acknowledgement that if you treat your kids badly, it's your own damn fault when they don't talk to you? I've genuinely never seen that before in this genre. Don't freak out over "properly trained", either. It's just a linguistic shift--at the time, "training" was used the way we would say "raising" a child today. )
"Delete all the nudes and sexts after a breakup or you're a piece of shit" has been the standard expectation since EIGHT. TEEN. EIGHTY. FIVE.
"Men and women being friends with each other is literally normal. Don't be a controlling freak."
Anyway I was wrong the publishing date is actually 1882 so like.
"If you have to abuse a child to keep order in your classroom then you're a bad teacher."
So like @ the modern Republican party, are the "traditional family values" in the fucking room with us right now--
you gotta read, you gotta write, you gotta draw, you gotta watch films and shows. there is literally NO time to be employed
i think transfems should be allowed to be good at sports.
sometimes a trans woman wins against a cis woman. sometimes a cis woman wins against another cis woman too. yet only one of them is allowed to win without facing consequences.
it's not enough to support transfems in sports if your support hinges on us being bad at them.
i want to highlight this specific addition from the comments
EDIT: added image description
reblog this to place a small, rotund ceramic animal in the palm of the person you reblogged it from
What happens after we die?
Oh my god my mutual that I have a parasocial relationship with just reblogged my post, the world is good again for a moment
"crochet can't be made by machines" went from being a cool fun fact to being a call to action of "so if you see mass manufactured crochet in Target, that was made by a person and they were underpaid and you should boycott it" which is true, it was made by a person, but EVERY item of clothing you own (that you did not purchase from a company using ethical labor) was made by a person being underpaid (at *best*.)
Sewing machines are operated by *people*. Knitting machines are operated by *people*. Yes lots of the process is automated but you cannot tell a machine "make me a t-shirt" or "make me a knit cardigan".
Higher awareness of fast fashion, and the true human labor and abuse behind it, is GREAT, but let's not pretend that the crochet hat in target is THE problem. Every article of clothing in target is the problem. "All clothes are made by people" is the jumping off point here into understanding this issue it's not just crochet it's the whole thing ahhhhHHHHHHHHHH
If you've ever seen images of sweatshops in the early 20th century, in New York or the UK or other developed countries
Guess what
Your clothing is still made in a place that looks like that. The only thing that's different is the tech level of the sewing machines and the race of the workers ļæ¼
kink: deleting someoneās pointless comment by reblogging the post from the same person they did
I mean, thatās censorship but okay.
ksvskwbidbwkdbskbsjw
I feel uneasy
these pictures are so loose and lacking in detail that itās making my brain force images onto them that arenāt actually there
is that wrinkly kong
ok these are all quite certainly this exact picture of wrinkly kong. why
forget what you saw
me: if you're stuck on a scene, the problem is likely further back than you think
me after i get stuck on a scene for two days and realise the problem is further back than i thought:
Teratophiliacs were once a niche group that bonded over their sexual attraction to monsters in obscure forums. Nowāas online communities pro
Okay guys, weāve got to wrap it up now with the monsterfucking and find something new to do. Itās getting write-ups in GQ, itās so over.
Sometimes, in their obsession with monsters, humans end up finding other humans. In 2019, CachĆ©t developed a crush on Salad Fingers, the main character in a British cult web cartoon. She drew porn of Salad Fingers and sent it to David Firth, the showās creator. Firth loved it and followed her back. āHe thought I was a guy because no girl would draw porn of Salad Fingers,ā CachĆ©t says.
They started messaging. CachƩt complimented his drawing of a human-bug threesome and asked for a print. Three years later, CachƩt and David got married. The human-bug threesome drawing hangs on the wall of their home.
Okay this does kind of rule though.
logging onto tumblr like heyyy i'm thinking about the same character i've spent the past few weeks thinking about. no change here. just wanted to let yall know