leone @strangeangel22 - Tumblr Blog

leo ✮ he/him ✮ 19 ✮ audhd+phys disabled ✮ writing/art/music/fandom/disability n queer convos

ok this originally wasn’t an intro post but it’s lowkey turning into one. atleast an info post… photos and art r under #photography #art if u wanna see my stuff. @oldpoet22 is my sims account and @cosmichero22 holds all my creative post reblogs for easy access and maybe ill drop some writing there eventually… also unlimited art access over on my ig!! @/pyreflyforest22 i just kind of yap on there yk. #me #mine #text #writing? r other pictures or things i have to say if you are ever interested. i tag my fandoms but also rb from random stuff if its untagged i haven’t seen it sorry if its secretly the worst piece of media ever… i also rb random ship art so sorry if it was accidentally the worst ship in the world… feel free to tag me in stuff of ask me stuff i only bite a little but in the fun way!!! im horrifically socially stunted and shy tho so sorry if im freaky in response… but i’m open to chatting nonetheless!! thank you for reading ill make something fr soon enough

csh song for your troubles ty and goodnight!!!

#photography #art #me #mine #text #writing?

fag-made-of-stardust

Tori fanart!!! Actually so proud of how this one turned out I hope yall like it

#ros

sinkies

whatever I'm out of here.

bobdylanyaoi

“Subverting” Catholic art? Oh, okay. I see, you think this has nothing to do with you. You log onto the internet and you post about how “Wound of Christ” from Psalter and Prayer Book of Bonne de Luxembourg, attributed to Jean le Noir, c.1349, for instance, looks like a vulva because you're trying to tell the world that you enjoy Catholic art and imagery in an alternative, queer, risqué way that challenges Christian beliefs. But what you don't know is that that stigma isn’t just a vulva. It's not just a mandorla. It's not just yonic. It's actually intentionally erotic. And you're also blithely unaware of the fact that around 1297, Saint Angela of Foligno experienced a vision of Christ himself, who called her to put her mouth to the wound in his side and lick the freshly flowing blood. And then I think it was Saint Catherine of Siena who drank blood and a clear liquid from the wound before receiving a ring made from Christ’s foreskin? And then graphically erotic encounters with the side wound of Christ quickly showed up in the writings of eight different mystics. And then the yonic interpretation of the stigmata filtered down through the illuminated manuscripts and then trickled on down into some pseudo-intellectual corner of the internet…where you, no doubt, fished it out of some Pinterest board. However, that interpretation represents hundreds of years and countless visions of religious ecstasy. And it's sort of comical how you think that you've come up with an idea that exempts you from Christian theology when, in fact…you're posting an image that was sexualized for you by the very Medieval saints you think you’re so different than…from “subverted” Catholic art.