So Hank Green got caught using AI and it’s a whole huge blow up, and I really don’t have much interest in adding to the pile on.
However, I do think this case is great example of what happens when smart people decide they can use these systems “responsibly.”
Let’s put aside the plagiarism and the energy use for a second (not that these don’t matter, but they’re not relevant to my point at the moment) and pretend these systems were made with entirely properly obtained info and ran on only solar, but otherwise were entirely the same. If you’re a person, you might think “okay, I’m going to only use this to come up with ideas for my next paper: I’m going to do all the research myself and the writing, I’m just gonna brainstorm topics.”
The thing is, even if you’re trying to limit use to just “brainstorming” the chatbot isn’t going to limit itself to just brainstorming. You might ask it “what should I write about involving Greek history” and it may suggest “the plague of Athens” but it’s also going to suggest some “basic info” on the plague of Athens that you might end up picking up and deciding your topic is. It’s going to provide you with “research.” And even if you decide to check that research yourself, that’s still setting you down a specific path you might not have picked organically.
And speaking of double checking its “research”, fact checking is a time heavy process. Not only now do you have to read the original text the bot provided, but you also have to compare it line by line with the summary the bot provided. That’s more time than it would have taken to just read the article by itself. And with any time heavy task, people are going to get lazy. And in original research being lazy might mean skimming a paper or an abstract, chatbots allow you to be lazy without looking at the article at all.
And soon enough, despite telling yourself you were only going to use it for brainstorming, you have offloaded topic generation, research and eventually even drafting because that’s what these bots are intended to do. They are not meant to serve as research tools or help brainstorm or serve as a bouncing off board: they are built to encourage maximum engagement. And that means if you go at them with the best of ethical intentions, they are built to tempt you to use them as much as possible, regardless of whatever line you drew in the sand for yourself.
Anyway, my main thought here is you are not smart enough to outwit the dopamine machine. It wants your attention and nothing more. Do not assume you can resist just because you know what’s under the hood.
i loved the opening in ithaca, unabashedly (and i love THAT the film opens in ithaca, being who i am). travis scott as the bard is captivating. penelope's entrance was literally showstopping, as she also does in the poem.
anne hathaway was the strongest performance by far. don't think there was a penelope scene that didn't hit for me. the use of the screen in the great hall and the loom as shields showed her isolation and opacity while letting her also be present for the action.
eumaeus & eurylochus are the standouts of the supporting cast.
the scenery looked a lot better than i feared from the trailers; circe's island was my favorite set/location.
i liked the pacing, broadly speaking. i saw it with two people with no background knowledge and neither were bored or thought it dragged, for the length. any feature film even at 3 hours was always going to be a brutal struggle for adapting epic poetry; it's not the medium i think is best suited. but for what it was, the choices of what to cut, abridge, and include largely feel correct to me.
i got jumpscared once by clytemnestra and once by scylla and that was crazy
my personal favorite moment(s) of the film: stringing and plucking the bow to make it sing. the sound design on that alone was worth the imax ticket, but man, to find a way to call back to that... from the first scene i knew how they were gonna do the climax and it hurt my fucking feelings!!!!
the bad and the ugly:
whether by natural inclination or direction, matt damon plays odysseus as an everyman, and the thing about everymen is they can't have strong personalities. the range goes from "kind of despondent" to "even more despondent," in the words of one of my companions my (who, again, went in blind). he's bland as hell. the most fun i had with him was in the palace as a beggar and his face was covered. the lead is the film's most significant problem, and that's not something i can forgive.
like it's to the point that when he wants to hear the sirens, it feels out of character
the costume design is exactly as bad as it looked in the trailers. mostly i can ignore this because it's really not my bag, but in some cases (the trojan armor, notably) it inhibits the messaging
and, to a lesser extent, the monster character design. the laistrygonian giants truly should have been cut for time anyway. goofy ass
i will join the popular stance against a cyclops encounter with no "nobody," but for me it's not so much about that exchange, iconic as it is, as the loss of all humanizing traits of polyphemus. it doesn't sit right with me to treat him as a mindless monster encounter instead of a chance to probe odysseus' xenophobia.
i have long noted that no one is interested in portraying agamemnon as a human being, but never before to THIS extent, oh my god. he kept making me laugh which was not the intended effect
helen and clytemnestra not actually having much screentime was a letdown for me, since that was what i was looking forward to most.
since they bothered to cast mia goth you might think melantho would have anything to do, but you would be wrong.
slavery is generally glossed over. antinous makes one reference to slaves having no choice but to be loyal to who's in power; that's truly it. as usual (with the return 2024, for instance, which has much stronger theming) i thought the message would have hit harder if the hanged women were included
if i had a nickel for every time someone cut all the sex from my beloved sex object i would have 2 nickels
inconsistent diction. every time telemachus said "mom" or "dad" it broke my immersion
the interesting, [some of] what's missing, and whether it worked for me:
the ambiguity of the gods, particularly athena (and her various disguises in the poem): i would not characterize it as a "fakeout" as some people have. there are still undeniable supernatural elements in the film; whether you read athena as odysseus' hallucination, how he perceives her, or how she chooses to present to him is left up to you. worked for me, but would have worked even better if he had killed that trojan girl himself
replacing the phaeacians and the lotus-eaters with calypso: poor nausikaa, i miss her. but i thought pairing calypso and the lotus, odysseus piecing together the story while literally picking up the pieces of his broken wreckage, was a strong choice to streamline the narrative
along with that, the way his departure from calypso is framed as a surrender of control felt powerful in that moment, after all the useless striving against fate. people made fun of the "defy the gods" tagline but once again, if one cares to actually see the movie, the point being made is that odysseus can't.
circe: loved the setup, enjoyed swapping out a palace for a more folklorish witch's hut, absolutely ate up the body horror. but i think the thumbprint of madeline miller's circe is there in how she's portrayed as vulnerable rather than a woman in a position of power, as i would argue she is in the odyssey, and i think that's a weird choice to make when you're stripping the sexual violence that is in the narrative out (the hanged women).
i could take or leave crow pasiphae but it doesn't actively offend me
the underworld, sinon, and antinous: rolling together elpenor and achilles into sinon, and using him as a representative of common soldiers who died at troy, was not a move i predicted. it works to tie the story of the horse back into the narrative, while also giving antinous more depth and history. i also loved the visuals of tiresias, the muck, and the tide of dead soldiers almost dragging odysseus down with them. however: i think his mother's ghost could have been included here without losing anything.
i'm not sure why both odysseus' parents were cut, actually. it doesn't streamline all that much.
odysseus' return being interrupted with an action sequence where he rescues telemachus at pylos: mixed feelings. my first feeling was that it would undercut the impact of the violence odysseus does in the hall not much later, but i'm not sure that it did. mentor's death was an interesting note and callback to the body odysseus had to leave behind in the cyclops' cave. did enjoy it as father-son shenanigans, but missed opportunity for odysseus' first interaction with telemachus to be witnessing another man greeting him as a father, which is, you know, more thematic and impactful.
totally copied the return's homework by having odysseus recognized because he does pet argos before the dog dies. not sure how i feel about it as the moment of recognition between him and telemachus but i think i liked it? neither actor was really Giving but it was like. serviceable
i will say again that i loved anne hathaway as penelope. my only complaint is that they sanded down her ambiguity (i suspect to make her more sympathetic, which i object to on principle). having her, for instance, vocally state (in private) that she hates the suitors, or odysseus flat-out saying he doesn't have to test penelope's loyalty, he just has to prove his identity to her, is the coward's way out of the mind games. in the poem it's very much both. nolan's penelope is way more ready to believe it's odysseus. and yes maybe i did tear up when he plucked the bow and she realized, but is that and the athena brooch (the brooch being based on something in the odyssey) as clever, iconic, or indicative of her character as the tree bed? i submit to you that it is not
spinning odysseus' foretold quest and departure from ithaca as going into exile after violating xenia: less ambiguous than the poem's ending in many ways. but i am kind of a sucker for it, especially after my stomach plummeting when they played it like he was going to die. and idk. penelope goes with him. am i supposed to say i don't allow that. me. ME?
trying to tie in the bronze age collapse: maybe i'm just too used to reading the odyssey as mythical rather than historical, but this was not successful with me. i did like the emphasis on xenia, including that odysseus' ability to "come home" has been shattered by his own violations of hospitality laws. i just don't think that really worked as "the reason civilization is collapsing and what if the real sea peoples were the pirates we created along the way"
i also don't think you can entirely successfully bring home (haha) the theme of odysseus' displacement while also reveling in the violence, as a film. in a way i think nolan tries to lure the audience in with spectacle, then to deconstruct it by returning, at last, to the horror of the sack of troy. but we dive right into the violence again with the suitors, and i don't know that we're any less invested in odysseus' coolness. i think it will be interesting (for more people than just me) to compare this to the return, which wants more or less the same arc for odysseus, but executes it more consistently and with more economical storytelling. so did this work for me? i... i don't know. at some point i'm going to write a substack essay about it, probably.
there's enough in this film that i believe it will inspire people to read the poem, and if they have the tenacity to stick with it, i think they won't have a wrong idea of what it is and be put off. (i use the word tenacity because i think people make too much out of how hard it is to read the odyssey; i think it is and should be accessible, but it is still a story removed from us by time and culture and style, so it does ask you to put in some work.)
‘Poseidon left a party in Ethiopia because the sea vibes went rancid after Odysseus set sail’ feels like a bit I would make up, but no. That actually happened.
Toto je má petice (not really) za překlad termínu GENDER slovem ROD.
Je to naprosto jednoduchý, elegantní a český překlad, který snadno řeší hned několik problémů.
Je jednodušší zavést ho do jazyka, jelikož už v něm to slovo fakticky existuje, jenom se přidá definice (společenská role z hlediska femininity a maskulinity).
Konzervativní Češi nebudou mít pocit, že jsme indoktrinováni nějakými americkými výstřelky jako tomu bývá s anglickým gender.
Nebinární lidičkové u nás neřeší především zájmena. Sociální tranzice (tedy změna rodu, ve kterém nás vnímá okolí) se sestává hlavně ze změny jména a gramatického rodu.
Místy se to už takhle používá, já jsem na to narazila u Slováků a přijde mi to naprosto bezchybné.
Prosím prosím, pojďte místo genderu používat rod. Zatím je nebinární čeština celkem divočina, čeká se, co se u lidí uchytne. A právě mi na tom můžeme mít svůj podíl.
(Ano, vycházím z předpokladu, že vennův diagram lidí, kteří mají ve svém slovníku termín gender a umí ho správně používat, a lidí, kteří jsou na čumblru, je takřka kruh.)
Zkrátka obrozenci! Toto je naše šance. Tohle je slovo, které máme ve své moci, pojďme ho obrodit!
Dne 18. 6. 2026 nám vedení FF UK oznámilo, že zamýšlí k 1. lednu 2027 zrušit &Uac
niche věc, ale na #čumblr rozhodně patří. podepište, pokud vám to bude dávat smysl - mně to smysl dává, podobně jako dávalo smysl držet mezioborový věci pod úřadem vlády a ne pod jednotlivýma ministerstvama, tak je blbost rozpouštět translatologii mezi jednotlivý obory, katedry a ústavy
To rušení translatologie z "ÚsPORnýCh DůVOdů" je mega mem taky proto, že ten Ústav je na fildě jeden z mála, co mají extrémně viditelný praktický uplatnění. Jelikož v týhle zemi furt společensky ani institučně neuznáváme vzdělání jako abstraktní hodnotu bez ohledu na jeho využití na trhu práce, spíš jako něco, co má pomáhat efektivněji mačkat čudlík v montovně, člověk by si myslel, že ten institut bude opečovávanej jako vlajková loď, ale holt asi ne, lol.
Trvalo mi to staletí, ale jakmile jsem vytvořila koláž (šedesáti prvních českých žen, co mě napadly bez nápovědy; omlouvám se všem sportovkyním, že vás neznám), věděla jsem, že to půjde.
Ve formuláři o trochu níže můžete do 5. 7. nominovat své oblíbené Češky, a to podle následujících pravidel:
vaše Češka je živá či mrtvá, ale není fiktivní nebo mytologická (př. ne Teta, Kazi, Libuše; ne Fifinka)
vaše Češka většinu svého života nebo alespoň jeho významnou část strávila v Česku (české rodačky, co se prosadily jinde, nebereme) (př. Madeleine Albright, Ivana Trump); bereme osobnosti zahraniční, které ale splňují předchozí bod (př. Chantal Poulain, Agnieszka Holland)
That's it, to jsou všechna pravidla. Případné sporné případy si dovolím rozhodnout sama. Nominovat můžete, kolik žen chcete, přikládat můžete psanou propagandu.
Samotný turnaj se rozjede pravděpodobně 10.–12. 7., uvidíme, jak mě sejme návrat z FFka do pracovního procesu.
Tož. Tu máte formulář, go wild. (A reblogujte, ať se nám těch Češek shromáždí co nejvíc!)
Milé obrozenkyně, milí obrozenci, milá obrození!
V létě nás česká velký turnaj o nejlepší, největší, nejskvělejší a vůbec nej českou ženu.
he's my spirit animal your honour! @straw-hat-moro - Tumblr Blog | Tumgag
